US Slams UN Conference on Israel-Palestinian Issue, Warns of Consequences
Reuters
A military vehicle manoeuvres in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the border, June 10, 2025. REUTERS
PARIS/WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is discouraging governments around the world from attending a U.N. conference next week on a possible two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, according to a U.S. cable seen by Reuters.
The diplomatic demarche, sent on Tuesday, says countries that take 'anti-Israel actions' following the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to U.S. foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from Washington.
The demarche, which was not previously reported, runs squarely against the diplomacy of two close allies France and Saudi Arabia, who are co-hosting the gathering next week in New York that aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security.
'We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages,' read the cable.
President Emmanuel Macron has suggested France could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territories at the conference. French officials say they have been working to avoid a clash with the U.S., Israel's staunchest major ally.
'The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' the cable read.
The United States for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel.
Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of U.S. Middle East policy. The Republican president has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term.
But on Tuesday, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a long-time vocal supporter of Israel, said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a U.S. foreign policy goal.
GAZA WAR
'Unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day,' the cable read, referring to when Palestinian Hamas militants carried out a cross-border attack from Gaza on Israel in 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages.
Hamas' attack triggered Israel's air and ground war in Gaza in which almost 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of the 2.3 million population displaced and the enclave widely reduced to rubble.
If Macron went ahead, France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, would become the first Western heavyweight to recognise a Palestinian state.
This could lend greater momentum to a movement hitherto dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel.
Macron's stance has shifted amid Israel's intensified Gaza offensive and escalating violence against Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, and there is a growing sense of urgency in Paris to act now before the idea of a two-state solution vanishes forever.
The U.S. cable said Washington had worked tirelessly with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, free the hostages and end the conflict.
'This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted.'
This week Britain and Canada, also G7 allies of the United States, were joined by other countries in placing sanctions on two Israeli far-right government ministers to pressure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to bring the Gaza war to an end.
'The United States opposes the implied support of the conference for potential actions including boycotts and sanctions on Israel as well as other punitive measures,' the cable read.
Israel has repeatedly criticised the conference, saying it rewards Hamas for the attack on Israel, and it has lobbied France against recognising a Palestinian state.
'Nothing surprises me anymore, but I don't see how many countries could step back on their participation,' said a European diplomat, who asked for anonymity due to the subject's sensitivity. 'This is bullying, and of a stupid type.'
The U.S. State Department and the French Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
41 minutes ago
- Japan Times
'Golden share' to help U.S. Steel keep name and prevent relocation
The so-called golden share to be held by the U.S. government in United States Steel will prevent the company from relocating its headquarters from Pittsburgh or changing its name without the consent of the U.S. president, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Saturday. Tokyo-based Nippon Steel plans to acquire all common shares in U.S. Steel while issuing a golden share in the U.S. company to the American government. Lutnick said that the golden share will also prevent Nippon Steel from reducing, waiving or delaying its $14 billion investment into U.S. Steel, transferring production or jobs outside the United States and closing or idling plants before certain time frames without the consent of the U.S. president, Lutnick said. The golden share "has powerful terms that directly benefit and protect America, Pennsylvania, the great steelworkers of U.S. Steel, and U.S. manufacturers that will have massively expanded access to domestically produced steel," Lutnick said in a post on X. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Friday that says Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel will be approved on the condition that risks to national security are mitigated. Based on the order, the two steelmakers concluded a national security agreement with the U.S. government that calls for it to receive a golden share.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Approval of Acquisition by Nippon Steel: Deal Opens New Doors for Japan-U.S. Cooperation
A major industry restructuring, which had been buffeted by U.S. politics, is finally set to happen. This deal is likely to make a mark on industrial history and become a new symbol of cooperation between Japan and the United States. The constructive decision by the U.S. government is laudable. In connection with Nippon Steel Corp.'s plan to purchase U.S. steel giant United States Steel Corp., Nippon Steel announced that U.S. President Donald Trump has 'approved' the companies' partnership. With that approval, Nippon Steel said it is set to complete the buyout by acquiring 100% of the common stock in U.S. Steel for $14.1 billion (about ¥2 trillion) and realize a deal that will make the U.S. company a wholly owned subsidiary. The companies have signed a National Security Agreement, which is intended to dispel security concerns, with the U.S. government. Under that pact, U.S. Steel will issue to the U.S. government a 'golden share' that allows Washington to veto key decisions even though it holds a minority stake. Steel is the foundation of manufacturing, used in a wide range of products such as automobiles, infrastructure and military equipment. China, which has become a 'factory for the world,' has overproduced products, including steel, and launched an export offensive with lower prices. Under such circumstances, it is important for Japan and the United States to deepen their cooperation from the standpoint of economic security. This deal can be said to have resulted in the best possible combination of steelmakers to cooperate on policy toward China. U.S. Steel is struggling with aging facilities, and its crude steel production has fallen to below 20th in the world. In contrast, Nippon Steel, the world's fourth-largest steelmaker, boasts advanced technology in high-strength steel sheets for automobiles and thick steel plates for shipbuilding, among other products. If Nippon Steel provides U.S. Steel with technology and funding, doing so could help the U.S. company regain its competitiveness. It is also highly significant for Nippon Steel to establish a foothold in the United States, which is a massive market. U.S. Steel was once the world's largest steel company and a prestigious firm that represented the United States' prosperity. In some ways, it is understandable that there was resistance among U.S. citizens to the acquisition of such a firm by a Japanese company. Under these political circumstances, Trump initially called for blocking the planned acquisition, and former U.S. President Joe Biden also issued an order to halt the deal. Trump has consistently emphasized that U.S. Steel is an American company. It is groundbreaking that he has shown understanding for overcoming this matter by acquiring the golden share. Nippon Steel has promised to invest $11 billion by 2028. If U.S. Steel continues to grow, there may be no need for the U.S. government to exercise the rights of the golden share. Trump has imposed high tariffs indiscriminately with an aim of bringing manufacturing back to the United States. However, attracting investment and securing jobs in this way is the best possible approach that should be pursued. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 15, 2025)
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
50 Years of Summits: Can G7 Countries Play Role in Ensuring Global Stability?
The Group of Seven advanced countries, which share values such as democracy and the rule of law, have taken the lead in shaping the international order. Disarray among the G7 countries could destabilize the world further. It is important to end the aggression and fighting that is spreading around the world. To that end, the G7 members must first unite. A G7 summit is scheduled to be held in Kananaskis, western Canada, from Sunday to Tuesday. This year, the group will mark 50 years since its first summit, at which the leaders of six countries — Japan, the United States and European nations — met in 1975. Canada was not included at that time. Initially, the agenda was how to deal with economic crises, such as the oil shock and currency issues. At Japan's suggestion, the G7 countries decided to hold a summit every year, and topics have widened from economic issues to also include politics and security. Fifty years ago, the member countries collectively accounted for 60% of the global gross domestic product, but with the rise of China and other countries, the figure currently stands at 40%. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the Group of 20 major economies began to play an active role. Many people have noted the decline in the G7's presence. However, the G20, which includes China, Russia and India as members, often faces conflicting national interests, so it is an insufficient framework for resolving issues. With the U.N. Security Council also falling into disarray, the G7 must play a role in restoring world peace and stability. A source of concern is the presence of U.S. President Donald Trump, who will be returning to the G7 summits. At one point, Trump leaned toward Russia, which has continued its aggression against Ukraine. He was involved in ceasefire talks, but his attempt did not go as intended. Recently, he has begun to distance the United States from Russia. European and other countries have condemned Israel's attacks that have caused many casualties in the Palestinian territory of the Gaza Strip, but the United States has continued to provide military support to Israel. In addition, Israel would not have been able to conduct airstrikes on Iran if the Trump administration had opposed them. Although a rift has widened between the United States and European and other countries, it is unlikely to be possible to resolve various conflicts without the involvement of the United States, which has overwhelming military power. Washington's high tariff policy is also causing discord within the G7. Canada, which currently holds the G7 presidency, reportedly intends to forgo issuing a leaders' joint statement, which typically summarizes the outcomes of the summit, and instead plans to compile separate documents of agreement on individual issues such as the economy and security. This approach appears to be aimed at allowing the G7 countries to reach agreements as much as possible by seeking common ground with the United States on individual issues. It is difficult to say that the administration of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has been actively engaged with providing support to Ukraine and resolving conflicts in the Middle East. At the G7 summit, Ishiba should make clear Japan's stance to contribute to restoring peace. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 15, 2025)
