‘He has told me he will kill me and I believe he will do so,' wife tells domestic violence court
'He has told me he will kill me and I believe he will do so,' the woman told the emergency domestic violence court in
Dublin
's Dolphin House.
Her husband grabbed her by the back of the head when she confronted him about having an affair, punched her in the back of the head and dragged her out of their house, she said.
On other occasions, he threw candle holders and glass food jars at her, one of which cut her foot open when it smashed, she claimed. He smashed her watch and phones, threw her clothes and other possessions out of the house and damaged her car, the court heard.
READ MORE
Judge Gerard Furlong told the woman on Friday he would grant her ex parte – one side only represented – application for an interim barring order and returned the matter to next week.
In another of about 20 ex-parte applications, a man got a protection order against his wife, whom he alleged is physically and verbally abusive to him, including hitting him with a mop while he was in the bath and scratching his neck with her nails.
She has thrown food and cups of hot tea over him while he was lying down in bed, threatened to make him homeless and put down his dogs, threatened to get three men to kill him, and has sent abusive videos and phone messages, he said.
She had said she would stab him to death when he is asleep, he claimed. He sleeps with his medication in his underwear because she tries to take it, he added.
In another application, a father who said he is 'in fear for my life' from his adult son was granted an interim barring order against him.
His son, aged in his 30s, is very violent, has psychosis and is constantly on drugs, he said. His son forced his way into his home after his recent release from prison, refused to leave, was constantly abusive and threatened to beat him.
He immediately called gardaí but his son said they would not come 'for ages' and had told him, if he pursued a barring order, he would smash all his windows.
The man said he has several health issues, the situation is causing him anxiety and fear but gardaí have been 'fantastic' in their response.
'They have inundated me with welfare checks. If I was younger, I'd love to be a guard.'
In a different application, a woman said she and her husband had been advised by gardaí to leave their rented council home due to safety concerns. Her adult daughters have changed the locks and are facilitating a gang who want to store stolen material in the house, she said.
She and her husband have been in bed-and-breakfast accommodation for some weeks now and do not want to go back to the family home due to fear, she said. She wanted to get her belongings from the house but was concerned to ensure her safety while doing so.
Her daughters are not paying the rent – she pays it, but she cannot afford to continue as well as paying the B&B costs, she said. She wanted her daughters out of the house, which would facilitate her getting alternative emergency accommodation for which she has been approved.
The judge said he would grant protection orders so the woman could retrieve her belongings, but he could not grant an interim barring order as the woman sought. This was not a domestic violence situation, he said, and gardaí would have to deal with the gang. As tenancy issues also arose, the woman could seek an injunction to get her daughters out of the house. He urged her to seek legal advice.
Another woman who said she had lived in an abusive marriage for years, including being subject to bullying, financial abuse and body shaming, sought an interim barring order against her husband. She found out earlier this year he had a 'double life' with another wife and child, and since then he had been 'acting crazy', shouting and screaming at her and saying he was going to make her life 'unbearable', she said.
She does not feel safe and is in constant fear due to her husband's deceit, the woman said. 'I don't want to die in this marriage.'
The judge said the man's secret life was not a ground for an ex parte interim barring order, but he would grant a protection order and the woman could renew her barring application when both sides were represented. She could seek a divorce, he told the woman.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
French police investigate ‘electrocution' death of Irish cyclist at Paris metro station
French police have opened an investigation into the death of an Irish cyclist following an incident at a metro station in Paris. Tomás Walsh, from Waterford, died in the early hours of Monday in circumstances that remain unclear, but it is believed the 25-year-old may have been electrocuted after falling on to the underground railway's tracks. The Paris prosecutor's office has confirmed it has opened an investigation into his death. It said there was no evidence at this stage to suggest foul play. Police said the body of Mr Walsh was discovered lying on the tracks inside the Grands Boulevards metro station in the northeast of the city. READ MORE He had travelled from Ireland to watch the 16th stage of the Tour de France cycling competition. Online tributes to the cyclist described him as a 'pleasant young man with the world in front of him', a 'credit to his parents' and a 'really great lad'. In a statement, Comeragh Cycling Club said it had learned of his death with 'great sadness' and said Mr Walsh had been the 'life and soul' of the club. Altitude, a bike shop in Waterford city, described him as 'one of a golden group of talented cyclists'. The Department of Foreign Affairs said it was aware of the case and was providing consular assistance.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Man who repeatedly raped foster daughter must pay her €328,000 in damages, court rules
A man who admitted to repeatedly raping his foster daughter over a seven-year period must pay more than €300,000 in damages to her, a High Court judge has ruled. Stephen Murray, formerly of Humphreystown, Valleymount, Co Wicklow, was jailed for 11 years in 2022 after pleading guilty to multiple counts of rape, oral rape and sexual assault of Kelly Kemmy. The offending occurred between February 2009 and December 2015, when Ms Kemmy was aged between 11 and 18 years old. Ms Kemmy (27), who waived her right to anonymity following Murray's sentencing, subsequently issued civil proceedings against Murray and Tusla. Ms Kemmy's claim against Tusla, which sought damages for negligence for placing her in the care of Murray, was later settled for €250,000. READ MORE In February, 2024, Mr Justice Paul Coffey ruled in favour of Ms Kemmy in her claim against Murray, which sought damages for personal injuries as well as rape, sexual assault, assault, battery, false imprisonment and trespass to the person. Murray did not participate in the proceedings and judgment was made against him in default of appearance. In a judgment on Wednesday, Ms Justice Emily Egan ruled Ms Kemmy should receive damages of €328,000 from Murray. Ms Justice Egan, who characterised the nature and severity of abuse suffered by Ms Kemmy as a 'worst case scenario', said Ms Kemmy should be awarded €578,000 arising from her action against Murray. This would comprise €450,000 in general damages and €128,000 in special damages. However, the judge ruled that Tusla and Murray were 'concurrent wrongdoers' in the case and as such, the €250,000 settlement with Tusla should be deducted from the total award. '[Ms Kemmy] suffered damage as a result of the tortious and criminal actions of Murray and that damage was not prevented, interrupted or ameliorated by Tusla, as it ought to have been,' the judge said. An award of €450,000 in general damages reflects 'the nature, severity, timing and duration of abuse and the severity of the injury' to Ms Kemmy, Ms Justice Egan said. This award is greater than damage previously awarded for other child sexual abuse cases, the judge said. The judge noted the current upper limit for awards of general damages in personal injuries cases is €550,000. The €128,000 in special damages arises primarily from Ms Kemmy's claims of loss of earnings. Referring to Ms Kemmy's evidence in the civil case, Ms Justice Egan noted that it is estimated she suffered hundreds of separate incidents of rape, occurring three to four times a week. Murray's abuse of Ms Kemmy began when she was 11 years old, some seven years after she and two of her siblings were fostered by Murray and his wife. 'For years, [Ms Kemmy's] dignity and autonomy were taken from her, causing her to suffer humiliation, frustration, helplessness, loneliness and despair,' the judge said. It was Ms Kemmy's evidence that Murray told her the abuse was normal but secret, and if she told anyone, 'it would ruin the family', the judge noted. Ms Kemmy said she felt trapped, helpless and frightened, and that her shame was so overwhelming she felt she had no one to turn to for help, the judge said. Ms Kemmy reported Murray's abuse to An Garda Síochána in July 2019. After this, she was rendered effectively homeless and her relationship with her two siblings was 'devastated', the judge noted. Murray would later plead guilty to 14 counts of rape, two counts of oral rape and one count of sexual assault. Ms Kemmy continues to suffer with post-traumatic stress disorder, the judge noted. The judge also said Ms Kemmy is a resourceful and intelligent woman, keen to gain security for herself and her young child, and who has ambitions of becoming a social worker.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account
A solicitor is facing three allegations of professional misconduct linked to his handling of a €100,000 deposit placed into his practice's client account. Michael A O'Brien, solicitor and principal of a firm of the same name based in Carrick on Suir, Co Tipperary , denies any wrongdoing. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority 's case against Mr O'Brien, being heard by the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal , follows a complaint by Dolores Barrett Burke who sought to invest €100,000 in a scheme to purchase the Heritage Hotel and Spa in 2018. She told the tribunal she was 'shocked' to read in a newspaper that the Co Laois hotel had instead been purchased by FBD Hotels & Resorts, yet Mr O'Brien made no attempt to return her money to her. READ MORE Ms Barrett Burke, who is retired and lives in Castlebar, Co Mayo , said she transferred the money after receiving a letter from Mr O'Brien in June 2018 that she believed provided the required assurances. The investment opportunity had been suggested to her by her brother-in-law Cyril Burke. The proposed purchase was being led by Mary Parton, a woman she never met, she said. However, she said she later learned FBD had purchased the hotel. She believed she would receive her money back 'in the same way I had sent it', but did not immediately worry about why it was not returned. More than a year later, she consulted her solicitor, Thomas J Walsh, who sent the first of a number of letters to Mr O'Brien seeking the return of the funds. After no reply to initial correspondence, the tribunal heard, Mr O'Brien responded to explain that the terms of his undertaking had been adhered to and the money had been dispensed in accordance with the instructions of his client, Ms Parton. Barrister Mark Finan, for Mr O'Brien, put it to Ms Barrett Burke that the letter his client sent to her clearly stated his understanding was that she would be paying the money into the client account 'for and on behalf of Mary Parton'. It was also put to her that, while she had indicated when making a complaint about Mr O'Brien to the Legal Services Regulatory Authority that she had engaged Mr O'Brien, she had never actually done so and was not, in fact, his client. 'I figured because I sent him the money and it was a client account, I was now a client,' she said. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on October 29th. In the interim, it is to be clarified whether the tribunal's chair, Tom Coughlan, is acquainted with Ms Barrett Burke's brother-in-law Cyril Burke. He told the hearing he became aware of a possible connection after seeing the list of witnesses and hearing the evidence but was not sure if it is the same Cyril Burke who he knows but not well.
