UK aid cuts: More than 90 activists and advocates call on UK Government to back women with UK Aid as polling shows public support
By Editor_wr On Mar 9, 2025
Club de Madrid supports CARE's campaign ahead of International Women's Day, joining activists, advocates, and global leaders in urging the UK Government to allocate at least 20% of its aid budget to gender equality. Following newly announced aid cuts, the UK Government is at risk of backtracking on its promise to put women and girls at the heart of its foreign policy, a group of activists, advocates, and celebrities warn today.
In an open letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy ahead of International Women's Day (March 8th), the group calls on the government to allocate at least 20% of UK aid directly to achieving gender equality. The signatories include the CEOs of CARE International UK and Oxfam, as well as several members of Club de Madrid: Eighth Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon, former President of Mongolia (2009-2017) Tsakhia Elbegdorj, former President of Mexico (2000-2006) Vicente Fox, former Prime Minister of the Republic of Korea (2008-2009) and Vice President of Club de Madrid Seung-soo Han, former President of Croatia (2010-2015) Ivo Josipovi?, former President of Sri Lanka (1994-2005) Chandrika Kumaratunga, former President of Albania (1997-2002) Rexhep Meidani, former President of Nigeria (1976-1979; 1999-2007) Olusegun Obasanjo, former Prime Minister of Senegal (2013-2014) Aminata Touré, and former President of Switzerland (2010; 2017) Doris Leuthard.
This warning and call to action come after the Prime Minister announced that the UK's already-reduced aid budget would be cut further to support an increase in defense spending. Research from CARE International UK shows that previous aid cuts failed to consider the impact on women and girls, who were disproportionately affected.
'Women are already leading efforts to tackle today's greatest challenges – from humanitarian crises to grassroots movements and international negotiations. Yet their vital work is held back by attacks on their rights and a lack of investment in their leadership,' the letter states. 'We cannot wait generations for equality, prosperity, or peace.'
A survey commissioned by CARE International UK reveals that: 65% of the British public believes it is either very or quite important that the UK government uses its aid budget to protect women's and girls' rights around the world. This includes more than half of 2024 Conservative (64%), Labour (77%), and Reform (50%) voters. Only 8% of Britons believe it is unimportant.
67% of the British public believes that supporting women's and girls' rights worldwide does not come at the expense of economic growth. Only 11% think such efforts slow economic growth.
The letter follows data analysis released by CARE in February, which found that the previous UK Government significantly reduced funding for women and girls worldwide, jeopardizing decades of global progress on gender equality.
The research shows that UK aid spending on gender equality has declined every year since 2019, nearly halving from £6.3bn in 2019 to £3.4bn in 2022. This makes 2022 the joint lowest year on record since the UK began tracking gender equality spending in 2014, with cuts disproportionately affecting programs for women and girls.
Explaining why the group coordinated the letter, Helen McEachern, CEO of CARE International UK, said:
'The Prime Minister has followed the path of other leaders in making the short-sighted and reactionary decision to slash the UK's aid budget – undermining both the progress made and Britain's standing in the world.
'Women around the world are facing a rollback of their rights and are paying the price for decisions made primarily by men. Meanwhile, aid is being slashed on the global stage – and evidence shows that those who need it most will be hit the hardest. Ignoring the vital role of women and international aid in making the UK and the world safer, healthier, and more sustainable is a self-inflicted setback for the Government.
'We stand at a crossroads: what the Government decides to do now with its aid budget could shape the future for women and entire societies for decades to come.'
Comments are closed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Francesca Albanese: David Cameron could be criminally liable for threatening ICC
On Monday, Middle East Eye revealed that former British Foreign Secretary David Cameron privately threatened to defund and withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat in April 2024 in a heated phone call with Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor of the court. Since then, 10 British MPs have commented on the revelation. Some have called for a parliamentary investigation, while others have urged the Labour government to distance itself from Cameron's actions. On Tuesday afternoon, Humza Yousaf, who was Scotland's first minister when Cameron made the threat, said that it was "shameful that Lord Cameron allegedly threatened the ICC for having the audacity to do their job". Now, legal experts say there is a serious risk that Cameron, who sits as a Tory peer in the House of Lords, could be criminally liable. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Francesca Albanese, the prominent legal scholar and UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, weighed in on Tuesday evening in an exclusive interview with MEE. Albanese, an expert in international law, was careful to note that she is not conversant with all the details of the Cameron story. She caveated her comments by saying, "if this occurred and there is evidence". The UN rapporteur explained that if Cameron acted as MEE's sources said he did, the former foreign secretary and prime minister has committed a "criminal offence under the Rome Statute". The Rome Statute criminalises those who attempt to prevent war crimes from being prosecuted. Article 70 awards the ICC jurisdiction over those responsible for "impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties". According to MEE's sources in The Hague, Cameron told the ICC prosecutor that if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders, the UK would "defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute". Cameron did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 'The court can take action' "A threat against the ICC, direct or indirect, is an obstruction of justice," Albanese told MEE. "It's an action aimed at preventing the court from carrying out an investigation. So it's a violation of the principle of judicial independence. "It's incredibly serious that someone in a position of power might have had the audacity to do that." Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » Albanese pointed out that "any form of intimidation, retaliation, or interference with court officials is an offence in itself". Significantly, she said that the "court can take action against a person who misbehaves or obstructs proceedings." Cameron could also face potential repercussions under British domestic law. Section 54 (1) of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 notes: "A person intentionally committing any of the acts mentioned in article 70.1 (offences against the administration of justice in relation to the ICC) may be dealt with as for the corresponding domestic offence committed in relation to a superior court in England and Wales." Albanese said that if Cameron was still in politics, "there would be condemnations from other states, probably diplomatic or retaliatory measures. "Now, I don't know the UK system enough, but in normal systems, had he still been in office, there could have been an investigation, legal challenges by civil society - surely something that will happen. "And again, I don't know. One needs to see the UK legislation, but surely there could be something that is along these general principles." 'Cameron must be investigated' In the call on 23 April, Cameron told Khan that applying for warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant would be "like dropping a hydrogen bomb". He said Khan was "on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". According to MEE's sources, the foreign secretary spoke aggressively and repeatedly shouted over Khan, who had to ask to be able to complete his points. 'Any form of intimidation, retaliation, or interference with court officials is an offence' - Francesca Albanese Labour MP Naz Shah called the news "shocking" and said she would be "raising this matter directly" with the Foreign Office. Labour MP Zarah Sultana said on social media platform X that "David Cameron - and every UK minister complicit in arming and enabling Israel's genocide in Gaza - must be investigated for war crimes." Independent MP Ayoub Khan told MEE: "I urge the relevant parliamentary standards committees to investigate this matter with the seriousness it deserves." Emily Thornberry, a senior Labour MP and the chair of parliament's foreign affairs select committee, said: "I've always believed that when making difficult decisions, international law must always be our guide." Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said on Monday: "I have no comment to make at this time."
Arabian Post
13 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Bangladesh Is Finally Going For National Elections By April 2026
By Nitya Chakraborty The interim Chief Adviser of Bangladesh Government Dr. Muhammad Yunus has finally announced the holding of national elections in the country in the first half of April next year defying the demand of the main opposition party BNP to hold it in December this year. The final dates will be notified by the Election Commission. The EC will also be notifying the norms as also the criteria for the eligibility of the candidates for contesting the polls Chief Adviser Dr. Yunus is currently in London on a four day official visit to United Kingdom. He will be meeting the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as also other leading ministers of the Labour government. He is expected to have a meeting with Tarique Rahman, the working chairman of the BNP and the son of the BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia. Tarique is the main strategist of the Bangladesh's main opposition party. His discussions with Dr. Yunus have special importance in view of the impending elections. As regards the stand of the opposition parties in Bangladesh, all the parties are preparing for the elections though the BNP still maintains that December is the best time since the months of February and March are not convenient in view of annual school examinations, Ramzan as also the possibility of sudden storms and incessant rains during those months. The Election Commission will take the final view on dates after looking at the representations. For all parties, now one thing is certain that the national elections are taking place anytime between December and April and they would have to be fully ready for that. The EC will notify the lists of the parties eligible for taking part in the elections, but already, the trend is clear. Excepting the Awami League which has been barred by the law, all other parties including Jamaat El Islami are eligible to participate in the elections. There may be more than thirty political parties but the main parties presently are the frontrunner BNP, the newly set up the National Citizens Party (NCP) and Jamaat-El-Islami. Other smaller parties and loose fringe left combinations are there but they have not much influence in electoral terms in the present volatile Bangladesh. To take the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) first. The BNP has been functioning in the parliamentary domain just few years after the founding of Bangladesh in 1971. The BNP's present chairperson Khaleda Zia was three times Prime Minister. She was out of the country for medical treatment. She came back last month and is now presiding over the strategy meetings though she has been asked by the doctors not to take strain of campaigning. So she is not campaigning much but guiding the local leadership in consultations with her son Tarique who is based in London. Tarique will be back to Dhaka as soon as the pending cases against him are disposed of in courts in Bangladesh. BNP has governing experience for a long period. The party has contacts with the bureaucrats as also a major section of the Bangladesh army. BNP can be called a centre-right party in Bangladesh. The party is flexible and the top leadership understands the importance of having friendly relations with such a powerful neighbour like India. BNP took a vehement anti-India position during Sheikh Hasina's tenure as the BNP thought that India was making use of Hasina to serve its interests and Hasina was sacrificing national interests to Indian government so that all her excesses are ignored by New Delhi. BNP leaders now express the view that they will like to have normal relations with India if they come back to power after the national elections. The second visible political party is the NCP. The NCP was founded in the last week of February this year. Only more than three months have passed. The party has still to set up all its units in districts at village levels. The party as a whole has no governing experience. Most of their top leaders were the vanguard of the anti-discrimination movement which toppled Sheikh Hasina from power on August 5 last year. The NCP is an unwieldy combination of diverse forces from the secularist to fundamentalists, from pro-Chinese to libertarians. They have some experienced trade union workers as also peasant leaders. But basically, the NCP is led by young radicals who are dreamers and talk of a new Golden Bangladesh to be built on the basis equity. The NCP is totally anti-India. The leadership feels that Indian government was fully responsible for all excesses of Awami League and along with Sheikh Hasina, Indian government led by Narendra Modi is also guilty. In fact NCP was most vocal in mentioning Indian role in Hasina's tenure to the international delegations which studied the anti-Hasina students movement. The NCP has now speeded up formation of its core committees for election purposes. The NCP is very much with Dr. Yunus in most of the programmes. The NCP looks at BNP as its main rival. NCP is also suspicious of Army role. As regards Jamaat El Islami, the party has lot of dedicated workers. The party has lot of funds now after the Yunus regime withdrew earlier ban on foreign donations to it. The Jamaat on its own remains an insignificant force in elections. Earlier, it aligned with BNP and got some recognition, but right now, BNP and Jamaat are at loggerheads. Jamaat is supporting Dr. Yunus just like NCP. A section of Jamaat wants an understanding with the NCP but that may not fructify as the top leadership of NCP is against any dealing with Jamaat. What is the political ambition of Dr. Yunus? This is also important. Dr. Yunus is 85 years old now. Despite giving threat of submitting resignation twice during his tenure, the Nobel Laureate is enjoying his time, say the sources. He will not mind being nominated President after the elections. But that depends on which combination comes to power after elections and what type of dealings take place. NCP and Jamaat will like Dr. Yunus to remain in political limelight, but will BNP agree? Dr. Yunus had connections earlier with Biden administration as he was known as a good friend of Clintons. But after the coming of Trump in the White House, Dr, Yunus lost that weight. He is now trying to establish fresh contacts with Trump advisers taking advantage of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's latest embarrassing position vis a vis US administration over May 10 ceasefire. How does India stand in this scenario? With Awami League not in the race for national elections, India has hardly any party among the contestants in which it can take interest. As regards Awami League, the leaders say that they will challenge the ban decision, but that may not make any impact as the law has been amended. AL leadership can draw global attention for holding fair elections with its participation with India's help, but the possibility of success is remote. Two international teams including members from the EU submitted reports accusing Sheikh Hasina regime of election frauds and excesses during July movement including unwarranted killings. For the time being, Awami League leadership has very few options. Among the big nations, the U.S. is right now not interested in Bangladesh since it is too involved with other pressing issues. China is positioned against Awami League and it is presently doing very good business with the present Bangladesh regime. China has friends in both BNP and NCP. China's ambassador in Dhaka receives maximum visitors from the political parties now. China has its ambitions far more than the business in Bangladesh. The plan involves reactivating abandoned airports as also naval base in Chittagong. But China is not in a hurry. Beijing wants to win people's hearts through setting up a cluster of factories creating jobs and then working for its geo-political goals in Bangladesh which affect India. How will Narendra Modi government plan to meet the challenge in Bangladesh? That is the big question. (IPA Service)
Dubai Eye
21 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
UK, allies sanction Israeli far-right ministers over Gaza comments
Britain and other allies imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, on Tuesday over "their repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities", the UK's foreign ministry said. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway joined Britain in freezing the assets and imposing travel bans on Israel's national security minister Ben-Gvir - a West Bank settler - and finance minister Smotrich. "Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable," British foreign minister David Lammy, along with the foreign ministers of Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway said in a joint statement. "This is why we have taken action now to hold those responsible to account." Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Saar, said the move was "outrageous" and the government would hold a special meeting early next week to decide how to respond to the "unacceptable decision". Smotrich, speaking at the inauguration of a new settlement in the Hebron Hills, spoke of "contempt" for Britain's move. "Britain has already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland, and we cannot do it again. We are determined God willing to continue building." Britain, like other European countries, has been increasing pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to end the blockade on aid into Gaza, where international experts have said famine is imminent. In Tuesday's joint statement, allies tried to soften the blow by saying Britain reiterated its commitment to continuing "a strong friendship with the people of Israel based on shared ties, values and commitment to [its] security and future". "We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution," the statement said.
