Planned Parenthood Medicaid funding restored, as Dems seek BBB rollback
Talwani found the law retaliated against Planned Parenthood in violation of its First Amendment rights.
'Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,' Talwani wrote in the Monday ruling. 'In particular, restricting Members' ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.'
Separately, Democrats, spearheaded by Reps. Laura Friedman (Calif.), Nikema Williams (Ga.), Chris Pappas (N.H.) in the House and Sens. Tina Smith (Minn.) and Patty Murray (Wash.) in the Senate, plan to introduce legislation that would repeal that provision of the law.
The measure won't advance in the GOP-controlled Congress, but it highlights how Democrats are continuing to mobilize and message around reproductive rights.
'We're fighting to ensure people can continue getting the essential care they count on, no matter who they are or where they live,' Friedman said in a statement shared with The Hill.
Trump's tax and spending package includes a provision that bars health care providers from being able to reimburse Medicaid for a year if they provide abortions and received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023.
The lawsuit challenges that provision, because there's almost no other organization that meets the $800,000 threshold.
Talwani ruled it is 'easily ascertainable' that Planned Parenthood was specifically targeted, despite the law not mentioning the organization by name.
The Trump administration already appealed a temporary restraining order that Talwani imposed just after the lawsuit was filed. But pending any action from the appeals court, Monday's ruling will stand while the case plays out.
Taxpayer money is already prohibited from covering most abortions.
Instead, the new law cuts reimbursement for other health services provided by Planned Parenthood and other health centers, such as cancer screenings and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.
For more legal coverage, sign-up for The Hill's courts newsletter The Gavel, written by Ella Lee and Zach Schonfeld. It publishes every Wednesday. Click here to sign up & get it in your inbox.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Standing just behind the president, MAGA Rep. Derrick Van Orden appeared to awkwardly mouth, 'I'm here.'
President Donald Trump briefly lost track of the room Wednesday, searching for a GOP lawmaker whose bill he was signing while the congressman stood inches behind him. Reps. Derrick Van Orden and Mike Bost were already flanking the podium when the 79-year-old president strolled up without so much as a glance at either of them. He spoke for roughly two minutes on Van Orden's veterans bill before pausing mid-sentence.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis says a census redo could be in works amid state redistricting wars
TALLAHASSEE, Florida — Gov. Ron DeSantis, maintaining that the last U.S. Census was 'flawed,' said Wednesday that the Trump administration was considering whether to approve a new census before the end of the decade — a move that that the Republican governor predicted could help Florida gain extra congressional seats. DeSantis said he is already 'seriously' looking at asking the Florida Legislature to redraw the state's existing congressional map. Republicans already hold a 20-8 edge over Democrats. Florida, like other states, normally redraws its congressional and legislative maps once a decade following the decennial U.S. Census. But with the House narrowly under GOP control, a plethora of both red and blue states are considering redrawing seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, the nation's second largest state, is already embarking on a mid-decade redistricting that could result in Republicans picking up five additional seats. Florida picked up an extra congressional seat after the last U.S. Census. DeSantis, however, has maintained that the census — which was largely conducted during the first Trump term with the results announced by President Joe Biden's administration — under-counted Florida, which he contends cost the state an additional House seat. During remarks made at a Tampa roundtable on education, the governor said he was he 'told at the tail end of the [first] Trump administration that we were going to get at least two seats and so we were shocked when it came out.' DeSantis said he considered suing but ultimately decided against it. He said, however, he has had discussions with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and 'they agree that Florida did not get the population that it should have gotten.' In his remarks he said 'I know they've considered doing another census,' and that if it's done that it would not include anyone who had entered the country illegally. The first Trump administration tried multiple times to find ways to exclude some immigrants from the 2020 apportionment count, but ultimately abandoned the idea after a U.S. Supreme Court loss and pandemic-related delays pushed the data release until after his term ended. 'I hope that they do redo the census, I think Florida would benefit if they redid the census. But even short of that I do think we are going to be looking at the pathways to be able do the redistricting here in Florida,' DeSantis said. A completely new U.S. Census would be unprecedented and legally and logistically questionable; the Constitution mandates a census every ten years and non-citizens have never been excluded. But a theoretical mid-decade rerun of the census would likely benefit Florida, as the state has seen rapid growth since the Covid-19 pandemic, with people relocating from other states including New York, Illinois and even California. The last census began in 2020 under Trump and the next is scheduled for 2030. The White House and the Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to questions about DeSantis' comments. DeSantis acknowledged that he has yet to personally discuss redistricting ideas with leaders of the Florida Legislature. He once had tremendous sway over lawmakers, but after his failed run for president has repeatedly clashed with top legislators, especially those in the Florida House. Legislative leaders have so far been reticent to comment on DeSantis' suggestions to mount a redistricting effort. During the last go-round, DeSantis muscled through a map that helped Republicans pick up four seats that year. That map was challenged in both federal and state courts with the Florida Supreme Court — which is dominated by DeSantis appointees — earlier just this month upholding the map. That ruling concluded that legislators could sidestep protections for minority voters first adopted by voters in 2010 as part of the 'Fair Districts' constitutional amendment. DeSantis asserted on Wednesday that those protections were unconstitutional under federal law and likely 'unenforceable.' Last week the governor suggested that ruling could be used to reexamine other districts, including some in South Florida. Democrats in Florida, however, have said they will fight back against any efforts to 'rig the system.' The state's Fair Districts amendment also prohibits drawing districts in a way that protects incumbents for partisan gain. 'Any mid-cycle redistricting would still need to comply with the rest of Fair Districts and would open us up to all new rounds of expensive state and federal litigation,' predicted state Rep. Fentrice Driskell, the House Democratic leader from Tampa. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Brown University inks deal with Trump admin to restore funding: What's in the agreement?
Brown will not pay a fine to the federal government. Instead, the Rhode Island university said it would donate $50 million to workforce development organizations in the state. Brown University has reached a deal with the Trump administration to restore more than $500 million in federal funding to the school and close three government investigations into its campus. The compact, which Brown's president announced July 30, came exactly one week after the White House entered into a separate unprecedented agreement with Columbia University and levied fines against that school, Brown's peer in the Ivy League, totaling more than $220 million. Unlike the contract with Columbia, Brown won't pay money directly to the government. Instead, the university in Providence, Rhode Island, committed to providing $50 million in grants to workforce development organizations across the state over the next 10 years. There were other stipulations, however: The university said it would commission a survey on campus life to its Jewish students. It also said it would hand over admissions data, broken down by various factors including race, in an annual report to the federal government (a provision included in the Columbia agreement as well). Read more: The details of Columbia's extraordinary $220 million deal with Trump Brown also promised to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at benning transgender athletes in women's sports. And the university said its medical facilities would not facilitate gender-affirming care for minors. In exchange, the Trump administration promised to reinstate payments for active research grants at the university and restore its ability to compete for new federal grants and contracts. In a statement announcing the deal Brown President Christina Paxson emphasized that the agreement does not give the government any authority to "dictate Brown's curriculum or the content of academic speech." Read more: Ivy League colleges face a reckoning after Columbia's Trump deal "The University's foremost priority throughout discussions with the government was remaining true to our academic mission, our core values and who we are as a community at Brown,' she said. Linda McMahon, the secretary of the Department of Education, said in a statement, "the Trump Administration is successfully reversing the decades-long woke-capture of our nation's higher education institutions." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
