The Atlantic Expands Reporting on Defense, Military Intelligence, and Global Conflict: National Security Section and Newsletter Launch Today
The Atlantic is launching a new section that marks a dramatic expansion of reporting at the intersection of national defense, technology, and global conflict. New reporting will appear in a just-launched National Security section and newsletter. The Atlantic's August issue is also devoted to the topic: the cover package, 'Eighty Years on the Edge,' examines the past eight decades of life in the Atomic Age.
The Atlantic—already known for its leading coverage of foreign policy and defense—has been scaling its newsroom to add more reporting in this space, led by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg and staff writers Anne Applebaum, Shane Harris, Tom Nichols, Missy Ryan, Isaac Stanley-Becker, Nancy Youssef, and many others. Today it announces the newest member of this team: Vivian Salama, who has most recently covered the White House and national security for The Wall Street Journal, and was previously a reporter for the AP, CNN, and NBC. Her reporting has taken her across America and to more than 85 countries.
In a note to readers about this reporting expansion, Goldberg writes: 'Today, as the post–World War II international order constructed and maintained by the United States is under unprecedented pressure (from within and without), issues of national defense and America's role in the world are among the most urgent we face. Which is why The Atlantic is committed to rapidly and dramatically expanding the scope and scale of our coverage.'
New reporting for today's launch:
– '': Contributing writer and Black Hawk Down author Mark Bowden profiles the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan 'Razin'' Caine, with extensive access to those who know him best. Trump picked Caine for this role at least in part because he loved his nickname; the president has also repeatedly and incorrectly said that it was Caine who donned a MAGA hat with Trump and vowed to 'kill' for him. But this person wasn't Caine. Bowden writes that Caine 'is known to be apolitical, and is genuinely liked. Where Trump is boisterous and self-aggrandizing, Caine is retiring and reflexively self-deprecating. The chairman is openly religious and prays over important decisions.' Bowden writes that it would be hard to list all the points of potential friction in store for Caine; Trump is given to flashy displays and fancy and expensive new armaments at a time when the military's industrial base is incapable of meeting basic demand for munitions. He writes: 'Caine's hasty elevation may also put him in the awkward position of having to deal with service chiefs and combatant commanders whom he now outranks. There is a danger, from both the Pentagon and the White House, that he will find himself sidelined. And if Trump doesn't like what he hears from his top military adviser, he can always just stop listening—or send Caine to join Brown, Milley, Mattis, and Kelly in private life.'
– '': Staff writer Ross Andersen reports from South Korea and Japan that as American power recedes, these countries may pursue nuclear programs. His article explores the idea that with all the recent focus on Iran, East Asia is where the world's fastest buildups of nuclear warfare are unfolding, in China and North Korea. He writes that 'a dangerous proliferation cascade may be about to break out, right in the shadow of Hiroshima. It would likely start in South Korea, and spread first to Japan. It might not stop there. The decades-long effort to keep nuclear weapons from spreading across the planet may be about to collapse.'
– '': Retired Army Special Forces Officer Mike Nelson writes that Hegseth risks creating a false dichotomy: that one must choose between lethality and professionalism. This view comes at a cost to operational effectiveness as well as moral clarity. For all the complaints about weakness and wokeness, Nelson writes, America's military remains at its most effective when inspired to maintain both its professionalism and its warrior culture.
Last week, we published editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg on how the only way to win at nuclear roulette is to stop playing; Tom Nichols on why the power to launch nuclear weapons rests with a single American and the danger that involves; and the writer Noah Hawley on Kurt Vonnegut and the bomb. And later this week, deputy managing editor Andrew Aoyama writes about Joseph Kurihara, a Japanese American activist who was interned during WWII, after fighting for the U.S. during WWI.
Press Contact: Anna Bross, The Atlantic | press@theatlantic.com
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
From Washington: The Congressional Clash Over DC Crime, Redistricting
This week, President Trump invoked a section of the Home Rule Act, enabling a federal takeover of the D.C. police department. He stated that the move was necessary to restore safety and combat violence in our nation's capital. FOX News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram explains the authority the Act grants to both the President and Congress, and how Republican lawmakers might take further action to support this effort. Later, he looks ahead to the midterms and discusses how the ongoing redistricting battle could impact election outcomes. Later, Congressman Troy Downing (R-MT) explains why he's pushing legislation to overturn limitations on coal, and why it's a necessary power source for America to win the race on artificial intelligence. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets With Millennials
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has plummeted with millennials, hitting its lowest level of the year in August, according to new polling. According to YouGov/Economist polling, in June, 40 percent of millennials approved of Trump's job performance while 53 percent disapproved—a net rating of -13 points. That slid to 41-57 (-16) in July before plunging to 33-56 (-23) in August. The figures show a 10-point drop in net approval in just two months, underscoring growing dissatisfaction among millennials as the 2025 political season intensifies. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Why It Matters Trump, who has long highlighted strong polling at rallies and press events, now faces slipping approval ratings that could weaken his influence and hurt Republican prospects in the 2026 midterms. After returning to the White House in January with solid numbers, his support has eroded amid economic concerns, tariff backlash and political discontent. Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris have turned to podcasts and digital outreach to court millennials, a generation wary of legacy media and traditional messaging. Millennials are defined generally as people born from 1981 to 1996. The generation has overtaken baby boomers as the largest age demographic, according to the Pew Research Center. What To Know The poll shows that Trump's declining popularity among millennials is being driven by worsening views on the economy and inflation. "Millennials have yet to see the sweeping national renewal Trump promised," Thomas Gift, an associate professor of political science and director of the Centre on US Politics at University College London, told Newsweek. On the economy, Trump's approval among millennials slipped from 36 percent approval and 52 percent disapproval in June to 38 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval in August, showing that approval and disapproval has edged up the same. Inflation also appears to be a particular weak spot. Approval in this area dropped from 33 percent in June to 27 percent in August, while disapproval rose from 58 percent to 60 percent. The shift suggests heightened concern among younger voters about persistent price pressures. That comes as inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June despite Trump's previous promise to end inflation on day one of his second term. "Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods," he said during a rally in Bozeman, Montana, in August 2024. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP Meanwhile, job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. After last month's jobs report was published, Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. In a post, Trump accused McEntarfer—without offering evidence—of rigging the numbers to harm his administration. But that move by Trump was not popular among millennial voters, with only 16 percent saying the decision was justified. There are also concerns about Trump's tariff program. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick predicted $50 billion in monthly revenue from the new import taxes, which came into effect this month. But JPMorgan warned that 60 percent of the increased costs are expected to be passed on to American consumers through higher prices. "On the consumer side, many remain burdened by rising prices under his tariffs, while housing in particular continues to be out of reach for a generation still struggling to get a foothold on the economic ladder," said Gift. According to Federal Reserve data, millennials own less than two-thirds of the real estate that baby boomers owned at the same age. But it's not all bad news for Trump. His handling of immigration remains a relative bright spot with this age group. Approval rose from 33 percent to 41 percent over the same period, while disapproval fell from 58 percent to 50 percent, marking an 8-point net improvement. Throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively expanded immigration enforcement—launching mass deportation operations, increasing raids in sanctuary cities and reviving thousands of old deportation cases. His administration has also dramatically scaled up detention capacity, allocating $45 billion to expand ICE facilities and construct large-scale temporary camps, including a facility in Florida nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz." But while Trump has continued to push the hardline immigration agenda that helped him win support in 2024, polls indicate that backing for those policies is fading across other demographic groups. Gallup polling from last month showed that 30 percent of Americans now say immigration levels should be reduced, down from 55 percent in 2024. Support for maintaining or increasing immigration has risen across the board, including among Republicans. More broadly, the number of Americans who view immigration as a "good thing" has reached an all-time high of 79 percent, the same poll shows, reversing a steady decline during Joe Biden's presidency and surpassing levels from Trump's first term. What Happens Next Trump's new nominee to run the BLS, E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, hinted at suspending the monthly release of jobs data. August's numbers are due to be published the first week of September.


NBC News
43 minutes ago
- NBC News
Ukraine left scrambling as Trump shifts toward Putin after Alaska summit
LONDON — Ukraine and its allies were scrambling Sunday to respond to President Donald Trump's apparent shift toward Vladimir Putin's hardline position after their summit in Alaska. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy, set to visit Washington on Monday, warned that the Russian leader was complicating efforts to end the war by refusing to halt the brutal fighting before holding further talks. "Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. This complicates the situation," Zelenskyy said in a post on X late Saturday. He added that he would have calls with allies in the day ahead as he prepares for his meeting with Trump. His remarks came as Trump signaled he was reversing his insistence on a ceasefire and instead pursuing a permanent peace deal — aligning the United States with the Kremlin rather than Kyiv and its European backers. Zelenskyy's message was accompanied by a joint statement from the leaders of eight Nordic and Baltic countries, stressing that a lasting peace 'requires a ceasefire,' while calling for 'credible security guarantees for Ukraine.' That is one area where Trump appears to have taken a step toward a position more aligned with the wishes of Ukraine and Europe. Trump directly engaged with Zelenskyy and European leaders by phone early Saturday morning about the U.S. taking part in a potential NATO-like security guarantee for Ukraine as part of a deal with Russia, two senior administration officials and three sources familiar with the discussions told NBC News. 'European and American security guarantees were discussed,' one source familiar with the discussions said. 'U.S. troops on the ground was not discussed or entertained by [Trump].' The security guarantees would be made in the scenario that Russia were to invade Ukraine, again, after a would-be peace deal, the sources said. The sources said that those protections, as discussed by the White House, would not include NATO membership — despite European leaders saying in a joint statement Saturday that Ukraine should be given the right to seek NATO membership. As Ukraine and Europe work out how to navigate these dramatic shifts from Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will Sunday jointly chair a virtual meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing,' which includes more than 30 countries working together to support Ukraine. For civilians on the ground, still under Russian attack even as the diplomatic maneuvering played out, it was not just the substance but the optics of the Alaska summit that caused frustration. 'I was hoping that the U.S. wouldn't roll out the red carpet to the enemy,' Kyiv resident Natalya Lypei said Saturday. 'How can you welcome a tyrant like this?'