logo
College football transfer portal all-impact team: John Mateer headlines offense

College football transfer portal all-impact team: John Mateer headlines offense

Fox Sports2 days ago

Thanks to the creation and proliferation of the transfer portal, player acquisition in college football now takes on a life of its own every winter and every spring. Coaches across the country — including those whose seasons haven't yet ended — begin remaking their rosters during the initial December transfer window and tweak them once more during a subsequent flurry of movement each April.
Though equal parts maddening, exciting and unrelenting, the transfer portal has shown just how quickly programs can now change the trajectory of their seasons with a couple fistfuls of shrewd additions. Michigan received key contributions from all nine transfers the Wolverines added before winning the national championship in 2023. Indiana flipped the guts of its roster in one offseason and then reached the College Football Playoff for the first time in school history under new coach Curt Cignetti. Identifying which transfers might make the largest contributions in 2025 is, of course, a subjective exercise — but a fun one nonetheless. It's a task rooted in the amalgamation of past production, future opportunity and the projection of how certain individuals might mesh with new coaches, teammates and schemes to influence the landscape of college football.
With that in mind, here's a look at our transfer portal all-impact team on the offensive side of the ball:
*Transfer Portal rankings courtesy of 247Sports.com Quarterback John Mateer, Oklahoma via Washington State (No. 6 transfer, No. 3 QB)
Mateer faced the two-prong challenge of simultaneously replacing superstar Cam Ward, who transferred to Miami ahead of the 2024 campaign, and guiding Washington State into the unknown following the collapse of the Pac-12 conference. The former three-star recruit handled both situations with aplomb by blossoming into arguably the top dual-threat quarterback in the country amid an eight-win season. Mateer completed 224 of 347 passes (64.6%) for 3,139 yards, 29 touchdowns and only seven interceptions while also rushing for 826 yards — including two 100-yard games — and 15 additional scores. He is listed as a redshirt junior for the Sooners and will be joined at Oklahoma by former Washington State offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle, whom head coach Brent Venables hired to fill the same role. The continuity between Mateer and Arbuckle is a big reason why Oklahoma's offense is expected to make a significant leap forward in 2025 after uneven quarterback play from Jackson Arnold and Michael Hawkins Jr. last season, with the former ultimately leaving for Auburn. Fernando Mendoza, Indiana via Cal (No. 22 transfer, No. 4 QB)
Mendoza arrived at Cal as a two-star prospect ranked outside the top 2,000 players in the 2022 recruiting cycle, devoid of additional power-conference scholarship offers. He redshirted later that fall before moving into the starting role partway through the 2023 campaign, playing well enough in nine appearances to earn honorable mention Offensive Freshman of the Year recognition from the Pac-12 coaches. He took another step forward in 2024 during Cal's debut season as a member of the ACC, propelling the Bears to consecutive bowl games for just the second time in the last 15 years. Mendoza completed 265 of 386 passes (68.7%) for 3,004 yards, 16 touchdowns and six interceptions to become one of the most sought-after quarterbacks in the portal. He'll attempt to follow in the footsteps of former Ohio transfer Kurtis Rourke, who turned in the best season of his career under first-year Indiana head coach Curt Cignetti and helped guide the Hoosiers to the College Football Playoff. Both of Indiana's leading receivers — Elijah Sarratt (957 yards, 8 TDs) and Omar Cooper Jr. (594 yards, 7 TDs) — are back for another year. Running back Justice Haynes, Michigan via Alabama (No. 42 transfer, No. 1 RB)
At Michigan, the first season of life after All-American tailback Blake Corum, who was drafted by the Los Angeles Rams in 2024, resulted in a timeshare between bruising runner Kalel Mullings (948 yards, 12 TDs) and enigmatic speedster Donovan Edwards (589 yards, 4 TDs). The result was a rushing offense that finished 73rd nationally after ranking 55th in 2023, fifth in 2022 and 15th in 2021 as former coach Jim Harbaugh elevated his alma mater to three consecutive College Football Playoff appearances. With both Mullings and Edwards moving on to the NFL, there was a significant vacancy in the run-heavy system preferred by head coach Sherrone Moore. The Wolverines are hoping that Haynes, a former five-star recruit in the 2023 cycle, can shine in the kind of leading role he never occupied at Alabama. Now a junior, Haynes finished third on the Crimson Tide in rushing last season (448 yards, seven TDs) behind quarterback Jalen Milroe (726 yards, 20 TDs) and fellow tailback Jam Miller (668 yards, seven TDs) after playing a small role his freshman year. Makhi Hughes, Oregon via Tulane (No. 117 transfer, No. 7 RB)
Hughes was a three-star prospect and the No. 1,149 overall player in the 2022 recruiting cycle when he committed to Tulane over a list of suitors that only included two power-conference programs: Florida State and Kansas. Though an injury sidelined Hughes for the entirety of his freshman season, he quickly established himself as one of the most productive tailbacks in the country over the last two years. Hughes was named AAC Rookie of the Year after carrying 258 times for 1,378 yards and seven touchdowns amid an 11-3 campaign in 2023, at which point head coach Willie Fritz left for Houston, and Hughes bettered those numbers last fall when he carried 265 times for 1,401 yards and 15 touchdowns to earn first-team All-AAC recognition. So while his new team, the Ducks, lost leading rusher Jordan James (1,267 yards, 15 TDs) to the NFL, the one-two punch of Hughes and returning veteran Noah Whittington (540 yards, six TDs) should be among the strongest tandems in the Big Ten this season. Wide receiver Eric Singleton Jr., Auburn via Georgia Tech (No. 5 transfer, No. 1 WR)
A former high school state champion in the 100-, 200- and 400-meter dashes, Singleton enjoyed two highly productive seasons at Georgia Tech despite playing in an offense predicated on running the football under head coach Brent Key. He earned freshman All-American honors in 2023 after catching 48 passes for 714 yards and six touchdowns, numbers that were good enough for him to finish second in ACC Offensive Rookie of the Year voting. His production was nearly identical during a 7-6 campaign last fall — resulting in the Yellow Jackets' first trip to a bowl game since 2018 — when he snagged 56 passes for 754 yards and three scores to become the highest-ranked wideout in the portal. A noteworthy end to the season included a two-game stretch with 13 catches for 192 yards and a score against NC State on Nov. 21 and then-No. 7 Georgia on Nov. 29. Singleton will now form an electric tandem with former five-star receiver Cam Coleman, who would have garnered far more attention last fall when he caught 37 passes for 598 yards and eight scores as a true freshman were it not for the exploits of Jeremiah Smith at Ohio State and Ryan Williams at Alabama. Nic Anderson, LSU via Oklahoma (No. 9 overall, No. 3 WR)
Rated the No. 243 overall prospect in 2022, Anderson was a four-star recruit from the suburbs of Houston who chose the Sooners over additional scholarship offers from nearly every blue-blood program: Notre Dame, Penn State, Oregon, USC, Auburn, Miami, Michigan, Tennessee and Texas, among others. He did not catch a pass in three appearances as a true freshman but exploded onto the scene as a redshirt freshman in 2023 during quarterback Dillon Gabriel's final season at Oklahoma. Anderson established himself as a dynamic, field-tilting threat with an average of 21 yards per reception — fifth-best in the nation — on 38 catches. He finished second on the team in receiving yards with 798 and was tied for the team lead with 10 touchdowns, which also tied for the most in the country among freshmen. A significant quadriceps injury sidelined Anderson for most of the 2024 season and prompted him to enter the transfer portal, ultimately landing at LSU. He should become an important target for an offense that ranked seventh in the country in passing last season (315.2 yards per game) and returns quarterback Garrett Nussmeier for a second season as the Tigers' starter. Trebor Pena, Penn State via Syracuse (No. 129 overall, No. 26 WR)
Arguably the most prominent storyline surrounding Penn State's offseason has been the incredible retention efforts by head coach James Franklin and his staff to preserve the nucleus of a 2022 recruiting class that ranked sixth in the nation. The Nittany Lions convinced quarterback Drew Allar, tailbacks Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen, edge rusher Dani Dennis-Sutton and defensive tackle Zane Durant all to come back for what many expect to be a national championship-level roster this fall. But the one position where such efforts fell short is wide receiver, where leading wideouts Harrison Wallace III (720 yards, four TDs) and Omari Evans (415 yards, five TDs) both entered the portal. Penn State began addressing that glaring need — which has become a perennial thorn in Franklin's side — in the December transfer window by adding Kyron Hudson from USC (No. 261 transfer, No. 36 WR) and Devonte Ross from Troy (No. 524 transfer, No. 99 WR). But the room lacked any sort of legitimate pop until Pena, who caught 84 passes for 941 yards and nine touchdowns last season, committed to the Nittany Lions in late April. He has the potential to be a difference maker on the perimeter. Tight end Max Klare, Ohio State via Purdue (No. 17 overall, No. 1 TE)
The assembly line of high-end receivers that has pumped through Ohio State for the better part of a decade almost always usurps the involvement of Buckeye tight ends. In 2019, during Ryan Day's first season as head coach, no tight end caught more than 14 passes, while wideouts Chris Olave (first-round pick), Garrett Wilson (first-round pick) and KJ Hill Jr. (seventh-round pick) all snagged at least 30 passes. In 2020, during a pandemic-shortened campaign with Olave and Wilson again headlining the show, no tight end caught more than 13 passes. The pattern changed slightly when rugged tight end Cade Stover put together back-to-back 400-yard seasons in 2022 and 2023, working his way into a fourth-round pick. But even last year's national championship-winning team hardly utilized the position as starter Gee Scott Jr. caught two or fewer passes in nine of 16 games. The arrival of Klare, however, gives Ohio State the kind of bonafide receiving threat it hasn't had at tight end in quite some time, perhaps since John Frank in the early 1980s. Klare caught 51 passes for 685 yards and four touchdowns last season to lead Purdue in all three categories despite a passing offense that ranked 113th nationally. Jack Endries, Texas via Cal (No. 131 overall, No. 4 TE)
When Endries entered the spring transfer portal on April 16, he needed only two days before committing to Texas, a program that has reached the College Football Playoff in consecutive seasons. And it's not difficult to understand why. Two years ago, in 2023, Longhorns' tight end Ja'Tavion Sanders caught 45 passes for 682 yards and two touchdowns before the Carolina Panthers selected him in the fourth round of the NFL Draft. Last year, in 2024, tight end Gunnar Helm caught 60 passes for 786 yards and seven touchdowns before the Tennessee Titans drafted him in the fourth round earlier this spring. Endries has similar potential considering what he's already accomplished at Cal the last two seasons. He logged more snaps than any tight end in the country as a redshirt freshman in 2023 while catching 35 passes for 408 yards and two touchdowns, garnering freshman All-America honors from three news outlets. He played even better last fall by leading the Bears with 56 receptions for 623 yards and two scores, including back-to-back 100-yard games against Pittsburgh and NC State. Offensive line Isaiah World, Oregon via Nevada (No. 2 overall, No. 1 OT)
Long before Oregon's season ended in a Rose Bowl loss to Ohio State, head coach Dan Lanning knew he was going to be in the market for at least one starting-caliber offensive tackle given what the Ducks stood to lose in the NFL Draft. Left tackle Josh Conerly, who finished as a first-team All-American, would become a first-round pick by the Washington Commanders. While right tackle Ajani Cornelius, who earned second-team All-America honors, would be taken in the sixth round by the Dallas Cowboys. In landing World last December, Lanning secured a player considered the top offensive lineman regardless of position. World, who is listed as a redshirt senior, logged more than 1,600 snaps at left tackle over the last two seasons and spent one year as Nevada's starting right tackle in 2022. He slashed his number of quarterback pressures allowed from 34 in 2023 to just 15 last season, according to Pro Football Focus, and reduced his penalty count from 11 to eight during that same span. The Ducks also added former Texas State offensive tackle Alex Harkey (No. 125 transfer, No. 17 OT). Elijah Pritchett, Nebraska via Alabama (No. 45 overall, No. 6 OT)
One of the most pressing items on a lengthy to-do list for Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule, who continues barreling forward in his attempted resurrection of the Cornhuskers, is to surround former five-star quarterback Dylan Raiola with enough talent so that the program can realistically compete for the College Football Playoff. Rhule swung big in his efforts to accomplish that goal by adding big-name, big-money transfers like former Kentucky wideout Dane Key (No. 34 transfer, No. 10 WR), former Notre Dame right guard Rocco Spindler (No. 139 transfer, No. 10 IOL) and former Cal wideout Nyziah Hunter (No. 198 transfer, No. 34 WR) to an offense that finished 103rd in scoring (23.5 points per game) last season. But the most important addition might have been Pritchett, who played 555 snaps at right tackle for Alabama in 2024 and logged 64 additional snaps at left tackle. Though Pritchett struggled in pass protection as a first-year starter — he was charged with allowing 30 quarterback pressures and six sacks — he has the pedigree of a former top-40 national recruit and at least two years of eligibility remaining. Josh Thompson, LSU via Northwestern (No. 16 overall, No. 3 IOL)
By the time December rolled around and the first transfer portal window opened, LSU head coach Brian Kelly and his staff were keenly aware of how significant the team's offensive line overhaul might be. They knew that left tackle Will Campbell, a consensus All-American, was a surefire first-round pick. They also knew that right tackle Emery Jones, right guard Miles Frazier and left guard Garrett Dellinger were all receiving interest from NFL scouts. Center DJ Chester, an underclassman not yet eligible for the draft, was the only starter likely to return for another year. So the Tigers wasted little time in pursuing Thompson, the second high-profile Northwestern lineman to hit the portal in as many years after guard Josh Priebe transferred to Michigan last offseason. Kelly secured a commitment from Thompson shortly after Christmas to anchor a transfer portal class that now ranks No. 1 in the nation. Listed as a fifth-year senior, Thompson was a two-year starter for the Wildcats who spent 2024 playing right guard (646 snaps, eight pressures, three penalties) and 2023 playing right tackle (731 snaps, 27 pressures, three penalties). Early reports from LSU suggest he will compete at both positions during fall camp. Pat Coogan, Indiana via Notre Dame (No. 138 overall, No. 9 IOL)
In an otherwise magical season for Indiana, which won 11 games for the first time in school history, losses to Ohio State on Nov. 23 and to Notre Dame on Dec. 20 in the College Football Playoff exposed one of the team's only weaknesses: a deficiency in talent along the offensive line. The Buckeyes rattled Indiana for five sacks, eight quarterback pressures and eight tackles for loss in a game that was over midway through the third quarter. The Fighting Irish damaged Indiana for three sacks, eight quarterback pressures and 10 tackles for loss that rendered the Hoosiers' offense one-dimensional. Moving forward, Cignetti knew his team needed better players in the trenches to hold up against elite defenses. Adding Coogan, a two-year starter for Notre Dame, was a heady move. Now a redshirt senior, Coogan logged more than 800 snaps at center last season (eight pressures allowed) for a team that reached the national championship game. He also spent the entire 2023 campaign as Notre Dame's starting left guard in his only other year as a primary contributor. He is expected to anchor the interior for Indiana this fall. Howard Sampson, Texas Tech via North Carolina (No. 14 overall, No. 3 OT)
Texas Tech made headline after headline this offseason by compiling the No. 2 transfer portal class in the country behind LSU — and reportedly spending more than $10 million in NIL to do so. Any number of players from the Red Raiders' 21-man haul could have made this list, like former Louisiana tight end Terrance Carter (No. 169 transfer, No. 7 TE) or former USC running back Quinten Joyner (No. 145 transfer, No. 9 RB), but the most important addition might just be Sampson, the mammoth 6-foot-8, 340-pound tackle. Sampson was a lightly regarded three-star recruit in the 2022 cycle, originally committing to North Texas over additional scholarship offers from Grambling, Texas Southern and Texas State, among others. He entered the transfer portal following his sophomore season despite having just 87 career snaps to his name, though 83 of them came at left tackle. That was enough of a sample size for North Carolina to take a chance on Sampson and turn him into their starting left tackle last fall. He was charged with allowing 19 pressures and five sacks in 824 snaps before entering the portal a second time last December. Listed as a junior, Sampson will start at left tackle for Texas Tech in 2025.
Check back later in the week for Part 2 of FOX Sports' college football transfer portal all-impact team, which will feature the top additions on the defensive side of the ball.
Michael Cohen covers college football and college basketball for FOX Sports. Follow him at @Michael_Cohen13.
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily !
recommended
Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

6 big questions for the 2025 NBA Finals and why Thunder will beat Pacers
6 big questions for the 2025 NBA Finals and why Thunder will beat Pacers

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

6 big questions for the 2025 NBA Finals and why Thunder will beat Pacers

So … are we really in a new era of NBA playoff outcomes? These next two weeks may tell us emphatically. For the last couple of postseason cycles, I've noted that postseason results have diverged from those of the regular season to a much greater degree. Chalky postseasons of yore have given way to teams seeded eighth, fifth and fourth making the last three NBA Finals. A team seeded sixth or lower has made it to the conference finals in each of the last three years (Minnesota Timberwolves, Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Heat); a team seeded fifth or lower has done it six times in five years. Advertisement Overall, this postseason is tracking to be another outlier in terms of lower seeds advancing. The team without home-court advantage has already won five series this year (Indiana Pacers twice, Timberwolves, Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks), and the Pacers upsetting the Oklahoma City Thunder in the NBA Finals would make it six. Historically, that number of upsets has been between three and four per year, but not lately. In the six post-pandemic postseasons, we've had five, five, three, seven, six and now five again with a potential for six — an average of over six a year, or nearly double the historic upset rate. Remember, there are only 15 playoff series a year; underdogs are winning more than 40 percent of them! What is this, the NHL? However, even with all those upsets, one piece of the equation has held: The champions were a regular-season monster, at least to some extent. Every champion but one since 1980 — including the last 29 in a row — has been a top-three seed that won at least 52 games (prorated to an 82-game season). Lately, though, we've had several close calls. Four straight finalists and five of the last six have violated that condition, but so far, none have prevailed in the finals: Miami in 2020 (a 49-prorated-wins fifth seed), Boston in 2022 (51 wins), Miami in 2023 (a 44-win eighth seed), Dallas in 2024 (a 50-win fifth seed) and now Indiana (a 50-win fourth seed). Thus, an Indiana win over Oklahoma City would be icing on the cake for the idea that regular-season records just don't matter as much as they used to in predicting playoff performance. The Thunder had one of the greatest regular seasons of all time, winning 68 games with a historic scoring margin. Indiana … did not. The Pacers were 9-14 at one point. Of course, we could be headed for the opposite narrative: a third straight season in which upsets in other series allow a favorite to steamroll through a broken bracket of crooked-number seeds. Following Denver in 2023 and Boston in 2024, the Thunder could make it a three-peat for No. 1 seeds coasting to a title against remarkably soft opposition — not facing a single team that was either seeded in the top three or won more than 50 games. Advertisement It's not just a disparity in wins and scoring margin in these finals, though. There's also the element of the JV conference playing the varsity. Oklahoma City went 29-1 against the Eastern Conference this year (the Thunder's loss to Milwaukee in the NBA Cup final didn't count in the standings), dropping a January game in Cleveland. The Pacers, meanwhile, were the only one of the East's playoff or Play-In teams to fare better against the West (21-10) than their own conference. So, as we head into our small-market fever-dream NBA Finals of pesky 10-deep squads that swarm and scrap and run and press and are generally the league's two most annoying teams to play against, that's my biggest question: Will an Indiana upset be the final, definitive proof that the regular season's predictive value for the postseason has diminished? Or will a Thunder romp to the title prove that the rule of 52 wins and a top-three seed still holds? That's the overarching storyline, but I've got five others that are a bit more micro as we look at this series. The biggest hurdle for this series being remotely competitive is whether Indiana can avoid turning the ball over against the Thunder's voracious, swarming defense that appears to have six players and about 14 arms. The good news is that the Pacers were largely successful in this one regard in the regular season. In their two meetings against the Thunder, they turned it over on only 10.9 percent of possessions, which would be a near league-leading figure and is far below the league-best 14.9 percent the Thunder forced from their frazzled opponents in the regular season. That shouldn't be a huge surprise; Indiana had the league's third-lowest turnover rate in the regular season, and its two All-Stars, Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal Siakam, both had individual turnover rates below 10 percent in the regular season. Haliburton averaged more than five assists for every turnover in both the regular season and the playoffs. Advertisement The importance of avoiding those miscues is two-fold: First, it gives the Pacers more chances to score but also takes away the Thunder's ability to run on the Pacers. Oklahoma City's speed and skill in transition are deadly, but the Thunder are a much more manageable foe playing station-to-station in the half court. Second, if the Pacers can keep the ball from prying hands long enough, they can unlock more of the open corner 3s that are the Achilles heel of the Thunder's defensive scheme. The bad news for the Pacers: Even with the turnover management, they still lost both games. The Thunder blew them out 132-111 in Oklahoma City on March 29. They also rallied for a 120-114 win in Indiana in a game that was played on Dec. 26 because the NBA needed to show us four lottery teams on Christmas Day. (I jest, but not having the Thunder on Christmas in particular was an own goal by the league that was readily apparent at the time.) If the Pacers can avoid turnovers and still can't beat the Thunder, what hope do they have? We'll get into that in a bit, but let's pivot to their opponent first. The Thunder start two bigs in Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein, but coach Mark Daigneault abandoned that lineup early and often in the postseason, particularly in the conference finals. It's notable in this case because the Pacers like to play fast, and because the Thunder don't seem to have a readily available foil for Siakam at power forward in particular. We don't know the answers here because Holmgren didn't play in either regular-season game, but in the second one, Daigneault leaned heavily on small ball. Hartenstein played 14 minutes, and Kenrich Williams played 26; forget two bigs, OKC wasn't even playing with one. This is a sometimes-wrinkle that Daigneault loves and could use heavily against a Pacers team lacking post threats. While he's been highly flexible with his sub patterns, one consistent pattern has to been to end first and third quarters with Kenrich Williams as the only 'big' in a small lineup captained by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander while Jalen Williams and Holmgren rest, then start second and fourth quarters with Gilgeous-Alexander resting, Jalen Williams and Holmgren in the game and Aaron Wiggins replacing Kenrich Williams for more offensive support. There's an opposite point here for Indiana, which might not have much incentive to continue using a 10-man rotation whose last two players (Ben Sheppard and Thomas Bryant) have mostly been ineffective in the playoffs (yes, I saw Game 6 against New York). Playing Bryant, in particular, might be a non-sequitur if the Thunder are playing small anyway, which would theoretically make Obi Toppin as a backup center much more appealing. Advertisement I kind of buried the lede here. In the two regular-season meetings, Indiana had nothing for the league MVP. Gilgeous-Alexander had two brilliant games against the Pacers, finishing with 45 points and eight assists on 15-of-22 shooting in a tight win in Indiana in December. He then posted 33 points and eight dimes in just 31 minutes in a blowout win in March. He had one turnover combined in the two games. Aaron Nesmith missed the first game and played only 23 minutes in the second, but he's likely to get first crack at Gilgeous-Alexander because of his superior screen navigation, and Andrew Nembhard is so good off the ball that it sometimes feels like a waste to put him on the ball. However, the Pacers likely will have a similar plan to the one they threw at Jalen Brunson in the conference finals, attempting to wear him down by rotating multiple defenders who pick him up 94 feet throughout the game. Sheppard, Bennedict Mathurin and perhaps even T.J. McConnell will all get turns. The Pacers even tried Toppin on Gilgeous-Alexander in the regular season. Indy likely will sprinkle in dollops of zone, too, after Denver used it successfully against the Thunder in the second round. (Minnesota's inability to muster an effective zone defense despite its individual defensive talent was one reason the Western Conference finals weren't closer.) One other micro-thing to watch is something I call the 'Shai shoulder.' The Thunder guard is very good at getting just enough contact with a defender to knock him off balance without hitting hard enough for it to be an offensive foul, opening space for his stepback middies. Watch here, for instance, as Sheppard gets both shoulders before the MVP rises from his office at the free-throw line: Indiana seemed primed for this in the Cleveland series against the Cavs' Ty Jerome, who had a similar ploy to get into his floaters. Nembhard, in particular, is a master of sidestepping opponents' attempts to put a shoulder into him. It didn't help at all in the first two meetings, but with more time to prepare for one specific opponent, it's possible the Pacers could use this trick in their favor. Advertisement The battle of the point guards is the main attraction, but the All-Star forwards in this series could have just as much to say about the outcome. Siakam was the MVP of the Eastern Conference finals, an indefatigable force who tormented the Knicks with his 94-foot sprints to the cup. Jalen Williams, meanwhile, has been a worthy second star in the Thunder's run through this postseason after falling short in the same role a year earlier in Oklahoma City's upset loss to Dallas. On paper, the matchups would seem to favor Siakam, but he wasn't good in either game in the regular season. The Thunder have no natural matchup for him in terms of size — the one thing they lack in their Noah's Ark of a roster is a true power forward — and may end up leaning on a combination of Holmgren, Williams and Alex Caruso to check him. If the Thunder stay big (see above), Siakam could exploit the Holmgren matchup at the start of halves, similar to the way Minnesota's Jaden McDaniels did during the Wolves' best moments in the conference finals. On the flip side, Siakam is much less prone to backing down and turning his back to the defense than some other fours, which could make siccing Caruso on him slightly more problematic than doing the same against, say, Julius Randle. On the flip side, Williams is a problem that doesn't lend itself to great answers from Indiana's end, particularly if Nesmith is on Gilgeous-Alexander. Nembhard gives up size, and using him on Williams diminishes his strength as a help defender, while Haliburton is too vulnerable as a one-on-one defender. Putting Siakam on Williams and Nembhard or Haliburton on Holmgren is another possibility; in theory, the Thunder could post up Holmgren on one of those two guards, but in practice, he couldn't even post up Mike Conley last round. Williams also gets a lot of run with the second unit to begin the second and fourth quarters, and the Pacers need to think carefully about how the bench rotation looks against him. Mathurin has the physical tools to check him, but he can be erratic in practice; Sheppard is dogged but undersized. This is where the injury to Jarace Walker in Game 6 against the Knicks stings; he'd be perfect for the bench minutes against Williams but will be out for at least the first two games after a gruesome ankle sprain. The Pacers and Thunder both play fast and use more players than most teams. In Indiana's case, it's part of a programmatic strategy to wear down opponents throughout a game and a series. Advertisement The Pacers run after opponent made baskets, pressure the ball full-court following their own and get into their offense as quickly as any team in the league. The flip side of that is that they use a 10-man rotation, even if the back end of that rotation isn't particularly good. They're gambling that the bad minutes from their ninth and 10th men will be more than offset by the diminishment of the opponents' best players over 48 exhausting minutes. Indiana didn't lead the league in pace, but both the Pacers and Thunder were in the top seven. In the Thunder's case, it's more of a pure track meet effect from the speed of their transitions after turnovers and missed shots. Oklahoma City also spams subs throughout the evening, with Daigneault often using 10 or even 11 players in a single half, even in the playoffs. What's remarkable and less discussed, however, is each team's strength going back the other way. Oklahoma City and Indiana were first and second in opponent fast-break points this season and had been even stingier in the playoffs: The Thunder have allowed just 9.3 per game and the Pacers 9.4 in a league where the median team gave up 15.3 in the regular season. One way for the Pacers to pull off the upset is to extend the series enough that they wear out the Thunder. But it's much harder to play this game against the youth and depth of the Thunder than it is against, say, New York, and the schedule of the finals is much more spread out, with two days off between every game except Games 3 and 4. Contrast that with the every-other-day schedule of the second round and conference finals that helped them exhaust the Knicks the past two seasons. It's also possible the Thunder turn the tables a bit. It's easy to see a scenario where Pacers' back-end-rotation players like Sheppard and Bryant prove unplayable in this series and Indiana's top eight ends up overextended, or one where the Thunder dial up the heat on Haliburton so much that it empties his tank. I want this to be a great series as much as anyone. The Pacers are a remarkable story of a finals team built with no tanking and a series of shrewd moves in a flyover market, and they have adopted as unique a style of play as any team in the league. The Thunder may be building an all-time juggernaut, and it may or may not be even better when they remove all their tall people and just let five perimeter players run around like crazy. For however long this series goes, it should be fun. I'm just not sure that it's going to go that long. There are hints of places where the Pacers could find an advantage, be it via avoiding turnovers, finding corner 3s or utilizing Siakam's matchup. Rick Carlisle is a certified warlock who will max out whatever edges he can find and throw out wild Plans E and F if the first few ideas don't work. Advertisement Unfortunately, Indiana didn't seem to have great answers for Oklahoma City's attack in the regular season, and that was with Holmgren missing both games. This Thunder squad might be embarking on the first chapter of the NBA's next dynasty. They had arguably the third-most dominant regular season in NBA history (only the 1996 Bulls and 2016 Warriors have an ironclad case that theirs was better) and have followed it up with a playoff run that has included wins by 51, 43, 32, 26 and 30. I think we're looking at a first championship for the Thunder franchise (say 'Seattle,' and you lose a finger) and a third straight five-game finals. Emotion alone likely gets the Pacers a win in one of their two home games, but this series shapes up as a coronation. If so, we can hold off on declaring a new era of playoff outcomes … and instead introduce the Thunder Era. Oklahoma City in 5 (Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Joe Murphy, Nathaniel S. Butler / NBAE; Gregory Shamus / Getty Images; Alonzo Adams / Imagn Images)

Why we have Paul George to thank for the Pacers vs. Thunder NBA Finals
Why we have Paul George to thank for the Pacers vs. Thunder NBA Finals

NBC Sports

timean hour ago

  • NBC Sports

Why we have Paul George to thank for the Pacers vs. Thunder NBA Finals

Dive into the 2025 NBA Finals, and you'll see that Oklahoma City and Indiana have a lot in common: Both are led by dynamic point guards, both prefer an athletic and uptempo style, and both rely on pressure defense and steals to fuel easy transition points... And both are in the NBA Finals thanks to Paul George. Or, more specifically, what they got back when trading Paul George away. While George watches the NBA Finals from the same couch where he watched the entire playoffs (his 76ers didn't even make the play-in), here is how both of these teams used trading George away to set up the foundation of their Finals teams. INDIANA PACERS There was a time when Paul George seemed poised to become a Pacers icon. Drafted No. 10 by Indiana in 2010, he spent seven seasons with the team, being voted an All-Star four times and twice leading the team to the Eastern Conference Finals. However, as George was nearing the final year of his second contract, he informed the Pacers that he would not re-sign there, forcing the team to trade a fan favorite or risk losing him for nothing. In the summer of 2017, the Pacers traded George to the Thunder for Domantas Sabonis and Victor Oladipo, a duo that started out solidly in Indiana, making the playoffs five straight seasons (although they were never a threat to contend). After that five-year run, things started to fall apart, and the Pacers missed the playoffs entirely in back-to-back years. That's when Pacers GM Kevin Pritchard traded Sabonis to the Sacramento Kings for a package where Tyrese Haliburton was the centerpiece coming back (the Kings were willing to move on from Haliburton because they thought De'Aaron Fox was their future and they wanted a center to pair with him — and the Sabonis/Fox pairing did give Kings fans their only trip to the postseason in the past 19 years). Ultimately, it is the trade of George that brings Haliburton to Indiana, and with that the Pacers had the foundation needed to build an entertaining team that has returned the franchise to the NBA Finals. Oklahoma City Thunder George didn't want to be traded from Indiana to OKC, it was no secret around the league that he wanted to end up in Los Angeles. However, after an All-Star season in Bricktown, George decided to re-sign with the Thunder. Even though a return home to Southern California was always at the top of his wish list. A year later, in the summer of 2019, Kawhi Leonard was leaving Toronto (where he had just won a title) to go to the Los Angeles Clippers, but leveraged L.A. and told them to land him, they also had to get another star — Paul George. The Clippers talked to the Thunder and ultimately paid a steep price to get George: • Shai Gilgeous Alexander • Danilo Gallinari • A 2021 first-round pick that became Tre Mann • A 2022 first-round pick that became Jalen Williams • A 2024 first-round pick that became Dillon Jones • A 2025 first-round pick swap that has the Thunder picking 24th this season Then Clippers coach Doc Rivers was quick to say — and continued to say — that he didn't really want to give up Gilgeous-Alexander, although even he didn't think SGA would evolve into an MVP-level player. For the Clippers, it was a trade that proved star players were willing to come to them, something that mattered in the Los Angeles market but didn't pan out on the court as they hoped. For Oklahoma City, it ended up being a haul that may well win the Thunder a title with four more wins.

Former Indiana team doctor accused of sexual misconduct by at least 15 men's basketball players
Former Indiana team doctor accused of sexual misconduct by at least 15 men's basketball players

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Former Indiana team doctor accused of sexual misconduct by at least 15 men's basketball players

Former Indiana team doctor accused of sexual misconduct by at least 15 men's basketball players Content warning: This article contains alleged depictions of sexual misconduct At least 15 former Indiana University men's basketball players allege sexual misconduct by former team physician Dr. Bradford Bomba, according to ESPN. Advertisement Two former Indiana players — Haris Mujezinovic and Charlie Miller — originally filed a lawsuit against the university last October. Since then, at least three other ex-athletes have joined the lawsuit, and 10 additional men are planning to "pursue litigation," their attorney told ESPN. Bomba, who served as the team's physician for roughly 30 years, is accused of regularly giving players rectal exams during physicals. Rectal exams were not considered standard protocol for healthy, college-aged men at the time the exams were allegedly being performed, per ESPN. The former players believe those exams constitute sexual misconduct. They also allege university officials — including legendary coach Bob Knight — were aware of the exams and did nothing to stop them. Players claim they complained about the exams to Knight and former head athletic trainer Tim Garl, who continued to refer players to Bomba. Knight died in 2023. Garl served as the team's head athletic trainer for 45 years. Indiana declined to renew his contract in April. After the initial lawsuit was filed, Bomba was found competent to be questioned about the allegations. He took part in that deposition in December, invoking his Fifth Amendment right multiple times. Bomba, 89, died in May. Advertisement When the allegations dropped, Indiana commissioned an outside investigation into the situation. It determined that while Bomba did perform those exams, he did so in a "clinically appropriate manner." The investigation added there was "no evidence to suggest that Dr. Bomba achieved sexual gratification," per ESPN. At least two men reportedly considering filing suit contradicted those findings, with one claiming Bomba "fondled his genitalia" during a physical. Another man said Bomba performed a rectal exam on the man when he was a minor in high school. Indiana argued in court filings that the allegations by the ex-players fall outside the state's two-year statute of limitations regarding sexual-assault claims, per ESPN. In May, a magistrate judge allowed the plaintiffs to continue gathering records regarding the lawsuit. It's possible a presiding district court judge could dismiss the claims, however.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store