logo
Neanderthals were not ‘hypercarnivores' and feasted on maggots, scientists say

Neanderthals were not ‘hypercarnivores' and feasted on maggots, scientists say

The Guardian25-07-2025
For hungry Neanderthals, there was more on the menu than wild mammals, roasted pigeon, seafood and plants. Chemical signatures in the ancient bones point to a nutritious and somewhat inevitable side dish: handfuls of fresh maggots.
The theory from US researchers undermines previous thinking that Neanderthals were 'hypercarnivores' who stood at the top of the food chain with cave lions, sabre-toothed tigers and other beasts that consumed impressive quantities of meat.
Rather than feasting on endless mammoth steaks, they stored their kills for months, the scientists believe, favouring the fatty parts over lean meat, and the maggots that riddled the putrefying carcasses.
'Neanderthals were not hypercarnivores, their diet was different,' said John Speth, professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of Michigan. 'It's likely maggots were a major food.'
Neanderthals were thought to be top of the food chain because of the high levels of heavy nitrogen in their bones. Nitrogen builds up in living organisms when they metabolise protein in their food. A lighter form of the element, nitrogen-14, is excreted more readily than the heavier form, nitrogen-15. As a result, heavy nitrogen builds up in organisms with each step up the food chain, from plants to herbivores to carnivores.
While the levels of heavy nitrogen in Neanderthal bones place them at the top of the food chain, they would not have been able to handle the amount of meat needed to reach those levels, the researchers say.
'Humans can only tolerate up to about 4 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, whereas animals like lions can tolerate anywhere from two to four times that much protein safely,' said Speth.
Since many Indigenous groups around the world routinely consume maggots in putrefied meat, the researchers decided to explore their potential role. The experiments were not for the squeamish.
Dr Melanie Beasley, a member of the team at Purdue University in Indiana, was formerly at the Forensic Anthropology Center, or Body Farm, at the University of Tennessee. There, researchers study donated human corpses that are left to decompose. The work helps forensic scientists hone their techniques, for example, to ascertain for how long people have been dead.
Beasley measured heavy nitrogen in putrefying muscle and the maggots that infested the corpses. Heavy nitrogen rose slightly as muscle putrefied, but was far higher in the maggots. The same process would have occurred in carcasses the Neanderthals stored, Beasley said.
The finding, reported in Science Advances, suggests that rather than consuming meat as ravenously as lions and other hypercarnivores, Neanderthals acquired high levels of heavy nitrogen by eating maggots, which themselves were enriched with heavy nitrogen.
'The only reason this is surprising is that it contradicts what we westerners think of as food,' said Karen Hardy, professor of prehistoric archaeology at the University of Glasgow. 'Elsewhere in the world, a very wide range of things are eaten, and maggots are a great source of protein, fat and essential amino acids.'
'It is a no brainer for Neanderthals,' she added. 'Put out a bit of meat, leave it for a few days then go back and harvest your maggots, its a very easy way to get good nutritious food.'
'How does it shift our thinking? The Neanderthals as top carnivores was nonsense, it was physiologically impossible. So this makes sense, but also explains these high nitrogen signals in a way that nothing else has done so clearly,' Hardy said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue whales have gone silent. Why that has scientists worried about Earth's biggest animals ... and the ocean
Blue whales have gone silent. Why that has scientists worried about Earth's biggest animals ... and the ocean

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Blue whales have gone silent. Why that has scientists worried about Earth's biggest animals ... and the ocean

Blue whales — the largest animals on Earth — aren't singing as much anymore, and that's got scientists concerned. A study published in PLOS analyzing six years' worth of acoustic data collected from the ocean's floor found that blue whale vocalizations have been decreasing as the animal's food sources have disappeared. The monitor — a hydrophone sitting on the sea floor off the coast of California — collected sounds from the various creatures in the ocean, including multiple whale species. By coincidence, the recordings began during a marine heatwave that is unprecedented in modern times. According to the study, the heatwave reduced the amount of krill available for blue whales to consume. As the krill disappeared, so too did the blue whale songs. Over the course of the acoustic collection, blue whale songs deceased by approximately 40 percent. 'When you really break it down, it's like trying to sing while you're starving,' John Ryan, a biological oceanographer at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute told National Geographic. 'They were spending all their time just trying to find food.' The marine heating event began in 2013, when a stubborn, dense pool of hot water — later dubbed "The Blob" — moved from the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska down the eastern North American coast. In some places the ocean temperatures were more than 4.5 Fahrenheit above average due to the heating. The Blob grew and covered a 500 mile wide and 300 feet deep region in the Pacific Ocean. By 2016, it covered approximately 2,000 miles of the Pacific Ocean. The increase in temperature allowed for toxic algae blooms that killed off krill — tiny, shrimp like creatures — and other marine life. 'When we have these really hot years and marine heatwaves, it's more than just temperature,' Kelly Benoit-Bird, a Monterey Bay Aquarium marine biologist and co-author of the paper told National Geographic. 'The whole system changes, and we don't get the krill. So the animals that rely only on krill are kind of out of luck.' The blue whales were among those animals who were out of luck. They feed on densely packed krill — their huge mouths take in thousands of gallons of water at once, sucking in enormous numbers of the tiny creatures — but without krill present, they went hungry. Ryan said the whales have stopped singing because they're "spending all their energy searching" for food. "There's just not enough time left over—and that tells us those years are incredibly stressful," he said. Climate change, driven by the human burning of fossil fuels, will only make the situation worse, the researchers warn. The world's oceans already absorb more than 90 percent of the excess heat from climate change. 'There are whole ecosystem consequences of these marine heat waves,' continues Benoit-Bird. 'If they can't find food, and they can traverse the entire West Coast of North America, that is a really large-scale consequence.'

Doctors decry RFK Jr decision to slash mRNA vaccine grants: ‘Our nation will pay in lives'
Doctors decry RFK Jr decision to slash mRNA vaccine grants: ‘Our nation will pay in lives'

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Doctors decry RFK Jr decision to slash mRNA vaccine grants: ‘Our nation will pay in lives'

Doctors are sounding the alarm about potentially deadly consequences of the Trump administration's decision to slash $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development, saying the 'deeply troubling' move could leave Americans defenseless in the face of a biological attack, or another pandemic. Leading physicians and vaccine specialists were among the medical and scientific experts who told The Independent that years of progress had been lost, including the lessons learned during Covid. 'This is a deeply troubling development that will, in the short term, leave the U.S. poorly prepared for a pandemic or biological attack, and, in the long term, stifle medical innovation upon which so many Americans depend for life saving cures,' Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health, said in an email. Health and Human Services Sec. Robert F Kennedy Jr announced Tuesday the termination of 22 projects, including contracts with Emory University and Covid shot-makers Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. 'We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate,' Kennedy said. While Kennedy, who has questioned Covid vaccine safety and previously falsely claimed the measles vaccine contains fetal debris, cited a review of 'the science' in terminating the project. But Dr Nuzzo said the 'attack on mRNA vaccine technology rests on phony and false claims, proven so by real facts and evidence'. She continued: 'It is, however, aligned with his long-held and deadly determination to sow doubts about all vaccines and to restrict the ability of the American people to access vaccines. Our nation will pay dearly for this decision in dollars and lives.' The mRNA vaccines work differently from traditional vaccines, which inject a weakened virus into the body to trigger an immune response. Instead, mRNA vaccines teach the cells to make small and harmless pieces of virus that trigger the same response. The anti-vaxxer movement and Kennedy have inaccurately claimed that mRNA Covid vaccines are deadly and that vaccines 'poisoned' American children but they are safe according to decades of public research and countless government assessments. The only mRNA vaccines currently available are Covid vaccines. They were able to be brought to market so quickly because scientists didn't need the virus to make them, and the vaccine material can be created in a lab. Research also has been underway to produce mRNA vaccines against cancer and other infectious diseases, work that has been going on for decades. 'While most would associate mRNA vaccine technology with Covid, it was in development for over half a century and the U.S. government's partnership in that development goes back decades,' Richard Hughes IV, a former vice president of public policy at mRNA vaccine manufacturer Moderna who teaches vaccine law at George Washington University Law School, told The Independent. 'These kinds of partnerships are what drive innovation and save us from public health emergencies. When we lose this kind of progress, we create future public health risks.' Scientists know it's only a matter of time before the next pandemic, when vaccines may once again be needed en masse. Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases physician and Clinical Associate Professor at Stanford University School of Medicine, said that no other vaccine technology could provide the world with a vaccine as quickly as is need during a pandemic. He noted that Kennedy's decision was rewriting the history of the pandemic and the lifesaving track record of mRNA vaccines. 'Vaccines aren't some niche drug. We're not talking about some rare skin cancer drug. We're talking about medicines that apply to literally every human being on the planet and we should have learned from the Covid pandemic that everyone is potentially susceptible to pandemic,' Dr Scott said. In what experts have labeled an assault on science, the Trump administration has eliminated grants and dramatically reduced the workforce of federal health and science agencies. Theses actions, and Kennedy's mRNA cuts, are likely in response to government vaccine mandates and restrictions, Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told The Independent. 'It's a tremendous step backward, the is politicization of science, and RFK Jr., who has been a lifelong anti-vaccine propagandist and science denialist, is now making policy,' he said.

US appeals court reinstates drug-price conspiracy lawsuit against Sanofi, rival pharma companies
US appeals court reinstates drug-price conspiracy lawsuit against Sanofi, rival pharma companies

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

US appeals court reinstates drug-price conspiracy lawsuit against Sanofi, rival pharma companies

Aug 6 (Reuters) - Drugmakers Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and AstraZeneca must face a lawsuit from two health centers accusing them of conspiring to restrict drug discounts offered to community pharmacies that contract with providers serving low-income patients. A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled, opens new tab that federally funded Mosaic Health and Central Virginia Health Services can move ahead for now with their proposed class action. The appeals court in its unanimous order reversed a decision by a federal judge dismissing the lawsuit. The clinics contend the drugmakers schemed in 2020 to limit discounts on diabetes drugs that were available to safety-net providers purchasing drugs from some pharmacies through a federal program known as "340B." As direct competitors, the four defendants control the diabetes drug marketplace, which would make imposing restrictions "easy to coordinate and maintain,' Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez wrote in the ruling, joined by Circuit Judges Alison Nathan and Maria Araújo Kahn. A Sanofi spokesperson in a statement said the company was reviewing the opinion and considering its next steps. Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and AstraZeneca did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The companies have denied any wrongdoing. Brian Feldman, a lead attorney for the health clinics, in a statement called the 2nd Circuit's order a 'watershed moment' and said 'we look forward to seeking justice for safety-net providers.' Mosaic Health operates 22 clinics in New York, and Central Virginia Health Services runs 18 clinics in Virginia. The two clinics sued in 2021 seeking damages for alleged revenue lost from the discount program's savings. The plaintiffs told the appeals court that Sanofi and the other manufacturers made billions of dollars in additional profits 'at the expense of safety-net providers and, ultimately, the patients they serve.' In a court filing, the drugmakers called the plaintiffs' claims 'far-fetched' and said the clinics were trying to punish the companies for implementing policies designed to address what they said were 'well-documented' abuses of the 340B program. Drugmakers must participate in the program to receive funds from government health insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid. The case is Mosaic Health Inc v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-598. For plaintiffs: Brian Feldman of Aurelian Law For defendants: Allon Kedem of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Read more: Wegovy maker Novo hit with investor class action over revenue forecast cut AstraZeneca agrees to $51 million settlement in Seroquel antitrust class action Mylan to pay $73.5 mln to settle drug wholesalers' EpiPen antitrust claims US Supreme Court gives pharma companies a chance to thwart terrorism-funding lawsuit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store