Debunking Myths About Smartphones and Brain Tumors
Last Updated:
While concerns persist, experts affirm that mobile phones emit non-ionizing radiation at safe levels, with no conclusive evidence linking them to serious health risks like cancer.
Many people recognize the personal benefits of mobile services, though the public may also express concerns about possible risks from the radio signals used by mobile devices. Research across several countries indicates that a significant percentage of the population has a limited understanding of how mobile phones operate and how levels of radio signals are regulated and controlled.
Some individuals may have encountered claims suggesting potential risks from long-term mobile phone use or that certain people are more sensitive to radio signals. Mobile phone users may attribute certain symptoms to their phone usage. Parents, while acknowledging the personal safety benefits mobile phones offer their children, may simultaneously worry about possible health risks.
Dr. Rvaikanth Vuppu, Consultant – Neuro and Spine Surgeon, Manipal Hospital, Vijayawada, shares all you need to know:
A mobile phone is a low-power radio transmitter that, under good network coverage, operates at levels similar to those of a cordless home phone.
Mobile phones are tested for compliance at maximum power, and international exposure guidelines are designed to be protective of all individuals.
If users remain concerned, they can reduce their exposure by using a hands-free kit or limiting the duration of calls.
Cancer is another health concern often raised in the context of 5G deployment, both by the public and researchers. Numerous studies have examined the effects of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) on humans, with mixed results.
In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on an observed increased risk for glioma — a malignant form of brain cancer — linked to wireless phone use.
For example, Carlberg and Hardell (2017) concluded that RF radiation should be considered a human carcinogen due to its potential to cause glioma. In contrast, Vila et al. (2018) found no clear association between RF or intermediate frequency (IF) EMF exposure and glioma or meningioma. These contradictory findings underscore the need for further research to assess whether 5G could contribute to cancer development.
Concerns about 5G and DNA damage stem from misunderstandings about radiation. For many people, the term 'radiation" evokes alarming associations with nuclear disasters or cancer. However, only higher-frequency radiation, such as ultraviolet (UV), X-rays, and gamma rays, is ionizing — meaning it can break molecular bonds and damage DNA. The radio waves used in 5G technology are non-ionizing and lack the energy to cause such damage.
The non-ionizing nature of 5G means it cannot physically cause cancer in the same way ionizing radiation might. This distinction is critical: while 5G uses radiofrequency radiation, it operates at power levels far below those capable of harming biological tissue or altering DNA.
Regarding the IARC classification:
On May 31, 2011, radiofrequency electromagnetic fields were classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on limited evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic schwannoma, both associated with long-term wireless phone use. However, for other types of cancer and environmental or occupational exposures, the evidence was deemed inadequate.
The IARC summary notes indications of increased glioma risk among individuals in the highest 10% of cumulative phone use. However, researchers did not observe a consistent trend of increasing risk with greater duration of use. The conclusions were tempered by potential biases and errors, which limit the strength of the findings and preclude a definitive causal interpretation.
In response, many health authorities have emphasized the need for further research while reaffirming that individuals can take practical steps to reduce mobile phone exposure. Importantly, the WHO continues to support the adoption of international RF-EMF exposure limits as a precautionary measure.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Debunking Myths About Smartphones and Brain Tumors
Last Updated: While concerns persist, experts affirm that mobile phones emit non-ionizing radiation at safe levels, with no conclusive evidence linking them to serious health risks like cancer. Many people recognize the personal benefits of mobile services, though the public may also express concerns about possible risks from the radio signals used by mobile devices. Research across several countries indicates that a significant percentage of the population has a limited understanding of how mobile phones operate and how levels of radio signals are regulated and controlled. Some individuals may have encountered claims suggesting potential risks from long-term mobile phone use or that certain people are more sensitive to radio signals. Mobile phone users may attribute certain symptoms to their phone usage. Parents, while acknowledging the personal safety benefits mobile phones offer their children, may simultaneously worry about possible health risks. Dr. Rvaikanth Vuppu, Consultant – Neuro and Spine Surgeon, Manipal Hospital, Vijayawada, shares all you need to know: A mobile phone is a low-power radio transmitter that, under good network coverage, operates at levels similar to those of a cordless home phone. Mobile phones are tested for compliance at maximum power, and international exposure guidelines are designed to be protective of all individuals. If users remain concerned, they can reduce their exposure by using a hands-free kit or limiting the duration of calls. Cancer is another health concern often raised in the context of 5G deployment, both by the public and researchers. Numerous studies have examined the effects of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) on humans, with mixed results. In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RF electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on an observed increased risk for glioma — a malignant form of brain cancer — linked to wireless phone use. For example, Carlberg and Hardell (2017) concluded that RF radiation should be considered a human carcinogen due to its potential to cause glioma. In contrast, Vila et al. (2018) found no clear association between RF or intermediate frequency (IF) EMF exposure and glioma or meningioma. These contradictory findings underscore the need for further research to assess whether 5G could contribute to cancer development. Concerns about 5G and DNA damage stem from misunderstandings about radiation. For many people, the term 'radiation" evokes alarming associations with nuclear disasters or cancer. However, only higher-frequency radiation, such as ultraviolet (UV), X-rays, and gamma rays, is ionizing — meaning it can break molecular bonds and damage DNA. The radio waves used in 5G technology are non-ionizing and lack the energy to cause such damage. The non-ionizing nature of 5G means it cannot physically cause cancer in the same way ionizing radiation might. This distinction is critical: while 5G uses radiofrequency radiation, it operates at power levels far below those capable of harming biological tissue or altering DNA. Regarding the IARC classification: On May 31, 2011, radiofrequency electromagnetic fields were classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on limited evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic schwannoma, both associated with long-term wireless phone use. However, for other types of cancer and environmental or occupational exposures, the evidence was deemed inadequate. The IARC summary notes indications of increased glioma risk among individuals in the highest 10% of cumulative phone use. However, researchers did not observe a consistent trend of increasing risk with greater duration of use. The conclusions were tempered by potential biases and errors, which limit the strength of the findings and preclude a definitive causal interpretation. In response, many health authorities have emphasized the need for further research while reaffirming that individuals can take practical steps to reduce mobile phone exposure. Importantly, the WHO continues to support the adoption of international RF-EMF exposure limits as a precautionary measure. First Published:
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
How to manage high blood pressure with simple lifestyle tweaks
Just under a month ago, the world celebrated Hypertension Day on May 17. Considering an even more recent report published by online medical site Healio, Hypertension unawareness rose from 2013 to 2023, you might reason that having a day just for this condition that silently creeps on us is essential. Furthermore, a May 2024 WHO (World Health Organisation) report states that Indians have been consuming nearly twice the recommended amount of sodium (10.98 gms). And this is making the population more susceptible to high blood pressure (hypertension). WHO's recommendation is to use Lower Sodium Salt Substitutes (LSSS). Unavoidable as hypertension or blood pressure is, Lounge spoke to experts to know if there are simple tweaks you could make to your daily to control this condition before it turns severe. Also read: A guide to understanding inflammation and ways to combat it's negative effects 'While the risk of developing hypertension increases as one ages, recent research has revealed alarming statistics about its prevalence among Indian adolescents, with rates as high as 25 per cent. That's why it's important for people with a family history of diabetes and hypertension to start getting regular BP checks in their mid-20s. Others can wait until their early 30s to start testing for hypertension," says Dr Anuja Agarwala, vice president, Indian Dietetic Association, Delhi. According to Agarwala, parents should be aware that hypertension can exist in children too. So, if high blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases run in the family, schedule regular BP checks for your children too. SYMPTOMS 'About a decade back, hypertension would happen to those in their 50s. These days, due to high stress, lifestyle, genetic factors and addictions, people are getting hypertension at even 28. And the risk is higher if you're obese," notes Dr Swarup Swaraj Pal, head of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at Gleneagles Hospital, Mumbai. Pal explains that hypertension happens when calcium gets deposited in the lining of the blood vessels, causing it to harden. This adds pressure to the heart as it's pumping harder. If left unattended, this can eventually result in cardiovascular disease. The most common symptoms of hypertension, according to Pal, are sleep deprivation, an inability to focus, throbbing headaches and fluctuation in energy levels. More serious symptoms could include blacking out and being on the verge of collapsing. 'Get your blood pressure checked every three-six months, especially if you're above 30," he advises, and reiterates that the risk of one being affected by hypertension is high if you have parents who are obese or have a history of heart disease. 'While women are more or less protected by the hormone estrogen till age 45 or 50, after menopause, they too are at a risk of suffering from hypertension," Pal adds. Hypertension, Agarwala says, manifests in symptoms as small as headaches. 'What makes it particularly dangerous is that it does not cause specific symptoms until it's too late. If not managed well, hypertension can lead to serious health issues, such as heart disease, stroke and kidney disease," she cautions. Also read: Why short bursts of cold showers are good for you WAYS TO MANAGE HYPERTENSION Apart from medication, Agarwala's top tips for managing hypertension naturally include quitting drinking and smoking; getting adequate sleep for about eight hours; reducing exposure to stressful environments– if your work environment is stressful, step out every four hours or so; and exercise three-four times a week. She cannot stress enough about the importance of physical exercises. 'It is important to make time for it at least 3-4 times a week. But those who are unable to dedicate time for exercise should try and include more walking into their daily routine. Walking 10,000 steps a day is considered beneficial for your cardiovascular health." It's also crucial to be aware of how sodium insidiously adds up in your diet. It might be the chutney you eat at lunch or those rice crackers you have at tea. According to Agarwala, including fruits and vegetables in your diet is another effective way to maintain healthy blood pressure. GET CREATIVE WITH INGREDIENTS Mysuru-based Dr. Jamuna Prakash, former professor, food science and nutrition, University of Mysore, says, managing hypertension isn't about entirely cutting out namkeens us Indians are so fond of from our diet, but consuming it judiciously. 'Whilst cooking, pairing salt with low-sodium seasonings like MSG (monosodium glutamate), along with an assortment of herbs and spices, can bring out an ideal balance of umami, saltiness, and other traditional Indian flavors—making for a satisfying meal without the need for additional sodium," she says. Adding smokiness to your paneer and chicken preparations can provide additional complexity to the flavor profile of the dish, says Mumbai-based chef Ajay Chopra. 'Borrowing from culinary practices around the world, like using kombu or seaweed broth, as done in Japan, can create umami in certain soups and curries. Adding lemon juice is another way to add flavour to your dishes, and stimulate your taste buds," he notes. Sumitra Nair is an independent journalist based in Kochi. Also read: Anxiety attacks: When should you get treated?
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Is there a link between Vitamin D deficiency and heart attacks?
Recent studies explore the connection between vitamin D deficiency and heart attacks, revealing inconsistent findings. An Australian trial indicated that vitamin D supplementation might lower the risk of major cardiovascular events, particularly heart attacks and coronary revascularization. However, other research, including a Michigan State University study, found no significant reduction in cardiovascular disease risk with vitamin D supplements. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are on the rise across the globe. According to the World Health Organization, CVDs are the leading cause of death globally, taking an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. Researchers are looking at the factors that contribute to CVDs, especially heart attacks, and its link with Vitamin D deficiency has been gaining popularity of late. Is there a link between vitamin D deficiency and heart attacks? Let's take a look. What is vitamin D Vitamin D, also known as the 'sunshine vitamin', is a fat-soluble nutrient essential for maintaining healthy bones, supporting immune function, and promoting overall well-being. The body produces it when exposed to sunlight, and it's also found in certain foods and supplements. People in developed nations may have insufficient levels, particularly those with limited sun exposure or darker skin tones. Link between vitamin D deficiency and heart attacks Multiple studies have identified an association between low vitamin D levels and cardiovascular issues, including sudden heart attacks. Though observational studies have consistently shown a link between vitamin D levels and CVD risk, randomised controlled trials have found no evidence that vitamin D supplements prevent cardiovascular events. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo To see if there is a link, the Australian researchers conducted a Trial (2014–2020) in older adults. The 2023 study involved 21,315 participants aged 60–84, who were randomly assigned to receive either 60,000 IU of vitamin D or a placebo monthly for up to five years. The researchers also collected data on hospital admissions and deaths to identify major cardiovascular events, including heart attacks, strokes, and coronary revascularisation (treatment to restore normal blood flow to the heart). During the trial, most participants (80%) took their tablets regularly over five years. The researchers found that those who received vitamin D had a 9% lower rate of major heart-related events compared to the placebo group. The rate of heart attack was 19% lower and the rate of coronary revascularization was 11% lower in the vitamin D group, but there was no difference in the rate of stroke between the two groups. The findings suggested that vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events. 'This protective effect could be more marked in those taking statins or other cardiovascular drugs at baseline,' the researchers said. Representative image. Another 2021 study found that vitamin D supplementation lowered the risk of heart disease in people with dark skin. Though most of the darkly pigmented people are at greater risk of vitamin D deficiency, especially in areas with less sun exposure, supplementation drastically reduces the risk of blood vessel dysfunction, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. "Vitamin D supplementation is a simple and safe strategy to ensure vitamin D sufficiency. Our findings suggest that promoting adequate vitamin D status in young, otherwise healthy adults may improve nitric oxide availability and blood vessel function, and thereby serve as a prophylactic to reduce the risk of future development of hypertension or cardiovascular disease," the researcher said. Easy ways to increase your Vitamin D intake A 2019 Michigan State University study found that taking vitamin D supplements did not really reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. The large-scale study noted that vitamin D supplements did not decrease the incidence of heart attacks, strokes, or other major adverse cardiovascular events. "We thought it would show some benefit. It didn't show even a small benefit. This was surprising," the researchers said. They also suggested thinking twice before taking vitamin D to reduce the risk of a heart attack or other cardiovascular issues. "We don't recommend taking vitamin D to reduce this risk," they said. What you should do The NIH recommends a daily intake of 600 IU of vitamin D (mostly from foods) for people ages 1-70 and 800 IU for adults ages 71 and older. While vitamin D deficiency is linked to cardiovascular diseases, going overboard with supplements is not recommended. Getting too much can lead to adverse effects, including high calcium levels in the blood or kidney stones. To get adequate vitamin D, get incidental sun exposure. Also, eat vitamin D-rich foods, including fatty fish, fortified dairy products and cereals, and certain mushrooms. Also, consult a doctor before taking any supplements. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
