Iraq relieved but still on edge after Israel-Iran ceasefire
The guns have fallen silent for now, but in Iraq, no one is truly at ease.
A fragile calm has descended over the region as Iran and Israel agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire, ending a dangerous spiral that pushed the Middle East to the brink of all-out war. In Iraq, the mood is one of cautious relief mixed with a lingering anxiety over what comes next.
While Iraq was spared the direct strikes, it once again found itself in the eye of the storm and felt the tremors acutely. The missiles, drones and fighter jets of both warring sides flew over the country, while heavily armed, Iran-backed Shiite militias in Iraq, threatened to join the fight to strike US or Israeli targets.
'Those were the most difficult days for us,' a senior Iraqi diplomat told The National. 'The crisis was beyond our control and influence, and we were on the brink of a wide-scale war if the armed factions intervened.
'We're breathing a sigh of relief now, but we're not out of the woods yet.' He warned that 'the embers remain beneath the ashes', pending negotiations between Iran and the US that American President Donald Trump suggested would take place next week.
Alarmed at the war's potential to plunge Iraq and the wider region into chaos, the highest Shiite religious authority in Najaf expressed grave concern over the unfolding crisis. In an unprecedented move, Shiite spiritual leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani issued two statements last week, condemning the Israeli strikes and calling on the international community to intervene.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani tried to walk a delicate tightrope between Washington and Tehran and urged calm throughout the crisis, calling on Iran to consider diplomacy instead. The Iraqi government also asked both Iran and US as well as Tehran-allied militias to prevent Baghdad from being caught up in the conflict.
The ceasefire gives us a break, not a solution
Baghdad taxi driver Khalid Jaber
Israel launched a surprise raid on Iran on June 13, unleashing a wave of strikes against dozens of targets, including nuclear factories and military command centres. The strikes killed senior Iranian figures, among them armed forces officers and top nuclear scientists.
That ignited a 12-day air war between the long-time foes. Iran's health authorities have said that 627 people were killed and 4,870 were injured, while Israel put its toll at 28 killed and 1,386 injured. The war ended with a retaliatory missile salvo from Iran against a US military base in Qatar in response to an American intervention to bomb Tehran's nuclear centres.
Mr Al Sudani welcomed the ceasefire, expressing hope that the agreement 'will be strong and cohesive and not fragile'. His adviser on political issues, Hussain Allawi, said Iraq was 'committed to supporting peace and stability in the region, and looks forward to a new phase that consolidates security and development'.
Iraqis have recently witnessed unprecedented political and security stability, encouraging the government to launch a series of infrastructure projects and introduce reforms to improve the country's business environment and public services. Several mega-deals have been signed with major international companies and countries, mainly in the field of energy. The nation is also preparing for a national election in November.
Iran in retreat
The war will probably force Iran to 'retreat and reassess its calculations, significantly altering its behaviour at least during the next four years with Trump in the White House', said Ihsan Al Shammari, head of the Iraqi Political Thinking Centre.
Mr Al Shammari believes that Iran's waning influence will have a ripple effect on its proxies in Iraq and that will 'lead to the weakening of its allies, resulting in a vastly different political reality'.
He sees the non-involvement of the militias as part of an Iranian strategy as it 'still relies on maintaining these proxies, therefore it attempted to shield Iraq from any repercussions that might open the door to a new equation'.
However, he added, the presence of these groups could be on the table of upcoming negotiations in order to 'disarm them and undermine their political influence'.
Across Iraq, the mood is sombre.
Despite the current truce, many Iraqis are still fearful about the unresolved tension between Iran and Israel, between militias and the state, and between competing global interests.
'The ceasefire gives us a break, not a solution,' Baghdad taxi driver Khalid Jaber, 56, told The National.
For him, the recent flare-up served as a stark reminder that Iraq's stability is perpetually at risk from conflicts it cannot control.
'Iraq may not have been bombed, but it was under siege in every other sense – politically, emotionally and economically,' he added.
'We will wait for the next shock and wondering if we'll be able to weather the storm again.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Legal experts tell Fifa Israel breaking international law as it considers sanctions
A group of legal experts that includes two former UN special rapporteurs has told Fifa that Israel and its football association is breaking international law by holding professional football matches on occupied Palestinian territory. The unprecedented letter to international football's governing body comes as it continues to deliberate over whether it should sanction the Israeli Football Association (IFA), after a proposal submitted by the Palestine Football Association (PFA) in March 2024. Over a year later, two Fifa committees are still investigating the complaints, one of which relates to discrimination by the IFA, the other to Israeli football teams playing in illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian territory. Since the start of its war on Gaza, Israel has also killed over 350 Palestinian footballers, including Hani al-Masdar, one of Palestine's greatest players, and has destroyed the blockaded enclave's pitches and stadiums. In December 2023, footage showed Israeli troops turning Gaza's al-Yarmouk, once a 9,000-seat football ground, into a makeshift internment camp for Palestinian detainees. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Beitar Jerusalem, whose Israeli fans call themselves 'the most racist team in the country', has a de facto policy to exclude Arabs and Palestinians. The club has received support from senior Israeli government figures, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Letter to Fifa In the letter to Bruno Chiomento, chairman of Fifa's governance, audit and compliance committee, which is investigating what it calls 'the participation in Israeli competitions of Israeli football teams allegedly based in the territory of Palestine', the group of judges, lawyers and scholars outlined the 'unassailable facts' relating to the illegality of Israeli settlements. The 30 signatories to the letter include former UN special rapporteurs on human rights in occupied Palestine John Dugard and Michael Lynk, Ardi Imseis, who is representing Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Israeli historian Ilan Pappe and William Schabas, a member of the Sierra Leone truth and reconciliation commission. 'This letter doesn't explicitly tell Fifa to suspend or expel Israel, but it leaves them in no doubt that that's what their own rules require them to do' - Nicholas McGeehan, FairSquare The letter cites ICJ's 2024 pronouncement on Israel's illegal occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It refers as well to the Fourth Geneva Convention, to UN Security Council Resolutions 446 from 1979, and to 2016's UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which describes settlements as 'a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution'. 'In light of the above, the governance, audit and compliance committee need not concern itself with the question of the legality of Israeli settlements, but simply the issue of whether Israeli teams continue to play football matches in settlements in the West Bank,' the letter reads. 'If that is the case, as the PFA alleges and the IFA has never denied, then the IFA is ipso facto in violation of article 64 (2) of the Fifa Statutes, which states that 'Member associations and their clubs may not play on the territory of another member association without the latter's approval'.' Legal obligations Nicholas McGeehan, founder of FairSquare, a non-profit human rights group, told Middle East Eye that 'it speaks to the seriousness of the issue at hand, that academics of this stature would make an intervention like this'. McGeehan said that while 'this letter doesn't explicitly tell Fifa to suspend or expel Israel from international football, it leaves them in no doubt that that's what their own rules require them to do.' Shane Darcy, a law professor who signed the letter and is the deputy director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights, told MEE that the ICJ opinion of 2024, which found that Israel's presence in occupied Palestine was unlawful and must be ended 'as rapidly as possibly', was 'especially significant'. 'International organisations such as Fifa must play their part to ensure the respect of long-established rules' - Shane Darcy, Irish Centre for Human Rights 'Moreover, the court said that international organisations - which would include Fifa - are under an obligation not to recognise as legal the unlawful situation arising from Israel's presence in the West Bank,' he said. By allowing Israeli teams to play there, Darcy said, Fifa was not just going against its own statutes, it was going 'against fundamental precepts of international law as laid out by the World Court'. 'At a time when international humanitarian law is being disregarded with impunity in Gaza, international organisations such as Fifa must play their part to ensure the respect of long-established rules by its members.' The PFA first complained to Fifa about Israeli teams playing matches in occupied West Bank settlements, including Ma'aleh Adumim, Kiryat Arba, Givat Zeev, Bikat Hayarden and Ariel, in 2013. Four years later, in 2017, Fifa's council declined to take any action, saying that the 'final status of the West Bank territories is the concern of the competent international public law authorities', and that Fifa 'must remain neutral with regard to political matters'. In May 2024, after the PFA submitted its request to adopt sanctions against Israel, citing international law violations and the failure of the IFA in 'taking decisive action against discrimination and racism', Fifa President Gianni Infantino ignored requests for the matter to be put to a vote at the 74th Fifa congress. The decision has continued to be deferred since then. The IFA has called the Palestinian Football Association's request a 'cynical political move'.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran's uranium stock largely intact, say European officials
Iran's uranium stock has remained largely intact following US and Israeli strikes on the country, European officials have reportedly said. Citing preliminary intelligence reports, two European officials told the Financial Times that Iran's stockpile of 408kg of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not concentrated in Fordow, one of its two main enrichment sites. The reports said it had been distributed to various other locations across the country. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that just five days into the war, its inspectors lost track of Iran's uranium stocks. That amount, which could be easily transported in a container by truck, is enough for 10 nuclear warheads if Iran were to pursue weaponisation. Before Israel's attack, Iran and the US were in talks to curb the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday, after hostilities ended, that his country was willing to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme. Since launching strikes on Iran over the weekend, Trump has moved to de-escalate tensions. He thanked Iran on Monday for providing advance notice about its retaliatory strike on the US's al-Udeid military base in Qatar. Trump then announced a ceasefire a few hours after the attack. On Tuesday, he lashed out at both Israel and Iran when the truce appeared to wobble, saying the two foes "have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing'. Speaking at the Nato summit on Wednesday, Trump said both Iran and Israel were 'tired, exhausted' and 'satisfied to go home and get out'. He also said he would have no problem with Iran selling its oil to China. The US slapped sanctions on Iran's oil sales to Beijing during the nuclear talks. 'They just had a war. They fought it bravely. They are in the oil business… they are going to need money to put that country back into shape…. If they are going to sell oil, they are going to sell oil,' Trump said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
UK government faces fresh questions over legality of F-35 exports to Israel
The chair of the UK parliament's international development committee has raised major concerns over the government's legal justification for continuing to send British-made F-35 components to Israel. In a letter sent to business secretary Jonathan Reynolds on Thursday, Labour MP Sarah Champion said that she was troubled by the government's decision to allow the export of the parts indirectly to Israel, given its own assessment that there were clear risks of serious violations of international humanitarian law by Israel in Gaza. "I remain concerned that there is a real risk that weapon components, manufactured in the UK, could be used in attacks, including those on aid workers or humanitarian infrastructure," she wrote. "Adherence to the rule of law, including international law, is fundamental if we are to take a position of leadership on the world stage. We must respect, and ensure respect for [international humanitarian law]." Last September, the government suspended around 30 arms export licences after a review ordered by the newly elected Labour government found that Israel might have used British-made weapons in serious violations of international law in Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters UK-made F-35 components sent to the F-35 programme's global pool were exempt over concerns that there was no way to stop sending British parts destined for Israel without disrupting the entire global fleet and endangering international peace and security. Court documents in a legal challenge to the government's arms exports to Israel show that senior British officials talked to their American counterparts shortly before the announced suspensions to try to stop UK parts from going to the pool, but concluded that there were too many obstacles. One main issue was that, under the governing MOU, the F-35 programme is overseen by an executive steering board, which is chaired by the US and comprises representatives of participating states, and makes decisions by consensus. All participant states would have to agree for components being used in Israeli F-35s to be limited, and logistics that are not currently used would have to be put in place to separate out components destined for Israel, the court documents outlined. However, Champion questioned whether the exemption of the UK-made F-35 parts from the suspension was compatible with the UK's legal obligations, particularly under the Arms Trade Treaty and the Genocide Convention. She has asked Reynolds 10 questions focused on these issues, including what legal authority the government has relied upon for the exemption. She also asked whether the government accepted that the duty to prevent genocide in Gaza had been triggered. If so, what steps "is the UK taking to employ 'all means' and do 'all in their power' to prevent genocide, as far as possible?" she wrote. Similar concerns have been raised by the UK-based Global Legal Action Network (Glan) and the Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq, which have challenged the UK government's decision in the High Court. They have also been raised by business and trade committee chair Liam Byrne in a series of letters sent to Foreign Minister Stephen Doughty over the past seven months. Most recently, Byrne has proposed that Doughty and other Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence ministers appear before his committee before the summer recess to answer questions, among other issues, about government data which shows that licences for the export to Israel of $169m worth of military equipment were approved in the three months following the September 2024 supensions. Champion's questions come as the UK government announced this week plans to purchase 12 new F-35 jets that can carry US nuclear weapons. She has asked Reynolds for answers by 11 July.
