‘Classrooms into closets': LGBTQ student club ban clears Texas Legislature
The wide-ranging education bill, Senate Bill 12, cleared its final hurdles before heading to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk, after the latest version of legislation, crafted in a conference committee of House and Senate members, advanced from both chambers on Saturday.
'SB 12 isn't about protecting children or parental rights,' said Rep. Jessica González, a Dallas Democrat who serves as vice-chair of the Texas House LGBTQ+ Caucus. 'It's about silencing them. It's about erasing families, banning truth and turning our classrooms into closets.'
Democrats called particular attention to a portion of the bill banning LGBTQ clubs at public schools.
The bill, called the 'Texas Parent Bill of Rights' by supporters, says student clubs cannot be 'based on sexual orientation or gender identity.'
Public schools also cannot provide instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity, the bill says.
The measure sparked a tense exchange between Rep. Erin Zwiener, a Driftwood Democrat, and the bill's House sponsor Rep. Jeff Leach, a Plano Republican.
Zwiener asked whether the bill bars students from organizing gay-straight alliance clubs. During the back and forth, Leach said the bill will not allow 'gay clubs' or 'straight clubs' in schools.
'We shouldn't be sexualizing our kids in public schools, period,' Leach said. 'And we shouldn't have clubs based on sex. I believe that, and that's what the bill does.'
That doesn't mean students have to hide who they are or that he believes in bullying or discrimination, Leach said.
'If a student is struggling with their sexuality or their identity, and they want to talk to their friends at school about it, or talk to a teacher or talk to a counselor, that's fine, if they have the parent's consent,' Leach said. 'But we do not need to have school sponsored and school sanctioned sex clubs. Period.'
'Wow,' Zwiener said.
These clubs are the place where LGBTQ students feel safe and can build a social network where they're not bullied, Zwiener said, sharing that she came out to one friend when she was 16 and didn't tell anyone else for a decade.
There's been a generational change since then, and teenagers who are LGBTQ are feeling safe enough to come out, in a way that didn't exist when she and Leach were in school, Zwiener said.
Leach countered that schools were not 'hyper-sexualized' the the way they seem to be moving today.
Rep. Rafael Anchia, a Dallas Democrat, called the bill 'bad policy.' Clubs for LGBTQ students are no more about sex than the 4-H club, ROTC or the basketball team, Anchia said.
Anchia said his daughter served as the vice president of her school's Pride club.
'They'd get together, and they'd watch movies,' he said. 'They'd color. They'd go to musicals. It was about a kid who felt weird who found her people.'
Leach later apologized for remarks offending anyone or being taken in a way that wasn't intended. Leach said he misspoke.
'I apologize for that word blunder,' Leach said.
Leach said he believes strongly in the bill. Parents should have a 'seat at the head of the table,' when it comes to their child's education, he said.
His daughter is in a club called PALS, which stands for peer assisted leadership, Leach said. There's an array of students who are struggling with issues teenagers face, and who think and believe different things, he said.
Leach's daughter has learned 'not to separate yourself with people that you agree with,' but to learn how to reason with each other and be respectful and kind, Leach said.
'Those clubs are the clubs that we should be promoting, and those are the clubs that this bill protects,' Leach said. 'And I would hope that a student would feel eager to join those clubs. Feel eager to be free to express themselves and wrestle with the things they wrestle with, and to do life with their fellow students.'
Among its various measures, the legislation outlines a ban on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives in public schools.
It says school districts cannot assist with 'social transitioning,' banning the use of 'a different name, different pronouns, or other expressions of gender that deny or encourage a denial of the person's biological sex at birth.'
The bill also requires school boards to let parents submit comments electronically and adopt a policy for grievances.
It says a school district cannot withhold information about a child from parents, and outlines parents' right to information about their child's health, including mental health. Districts must give parents information about their rights when they first enroll their child in a district, among other required notices.
Near the start of the legislation is a prohibition on the 'infringement of parental rights.' It reads:
'The fundamental rights granted to parents by their Creator and upheld by the United States Constitution, the Texas Constitution and the laws of this state, including the right to direct the moral and religious training of the parent's child, make decisions concerning the child's education, and consent to medical, psychiatric, and psychological treatment of the parent's child ... may not be infringed on by any public elementary school or secondary school or state governmental entity' unless the infringement is to 'further compelling state interest, such as providing life saving care to a child' and is 'narrowly tailored using the least restrictive means to achieve that compelling state interest.'
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods
NEW YORK (AP) — Court papers in a voting technology company's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News point to Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro as leaders in spreading false stories about election fraud in the weeks after Democrat Joe Biden's victory over President Donald Trump in 2020. Arguments for summary judgment by Smartmatic were filed in lightly redacted form this week at the New York Supreme Court. It's like a bad rerun for Fox: Similar revelations about its conduct following the 2020 election came in a lawsuit by another company falsely accused of doctoring votes, Dominion Voting Systems. Fox agreed to pay Dominion $787 million in a 2023 settlement after the judge found it was 'CRYSTAL CLEAR' that none of the claims against the voting system company were true. In short: Fox let Donald Trump aides spread conspiracy theories despite knowing they were false because it was what their viewers wanted to hear. Fox was trying to hold on to viewers who were angry at the network for saying Biden had won the election. Fox said it was covering a newsworthy story. It accuses the London-based company, which had only Los Angeles County as a client for the 2020 election, of exaggerating its claims of damages in the hope of receiving a financial windfall. Pirro now working in the second Trump administration The focus on Pirro is noteworthy because the former Fox personality now serves in Trump's second administration as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. Smartmatic, relying on emails and text messages revealed as part of the case, said Pirro was using her position as a Fox host in 2020 to help Trump and persuade him to pardon her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021. In a text to then-Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in September 2020, Pirro said, 'I'm the No. 1 watched show on news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and the party,' Smartmatic said in court papers. One of her own producers, Jerry Andrews, called Pirro a 'reckless maniac,' Smartmatic said. He texted after one of her shows in November that it was 'rife (with) conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television." The court papers said Pirro also suggested 'evidence' of supposed fraud to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell that she could use on a television appearance — material that also was spread by Bartiromo. Bartiromo still works at Fox, and in 2020 had shows on both the news channel and Fox Business Network. The court papers uncovered messages showing her desire to help Trump: 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence, I know you can,' she texted to Powell. Dobbs, whose business show was canceled by Fox in February 2021, texted to Powell four days after the election, saying 'I'm going to do what I can to help stop what is now a coup d'etat in (its) final days — perhaps moments," a reference to Biden's victory. Dobbs died in 2024. A central figure in Fox's 'pivot' Smartmatic portrayed Pirro as a central figure in Fox's 'pivot' to deemphasize Biden's victory because it angered Trump fans. Instead, the network found that ratings jumped whenever claims of election fraud were discussed, it said. As in the Dominion case, the discovery process helped Smartmatic find messages and statements that seem embarrassing in retrospect. For example, in early December, Fox's Jesse Watters texted colleague Greg Gutfeld that 'Think of how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' Fox, in a response to the newly-revealed court papers, pointed to an ongoing corruption case involving Smartmatic and its executives, including a claim by federal prosecutors that it used money from the sale of voting machines to set up a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' Fox said. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' Smartmatic has already settled similar defamation claims against Newsmax and One America News Network in relation to their post-2020 election coverage. ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and

Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Virginia candidates spared over possible debates. Here's what they finally agreed to.
The gloves tend to come off quickly in political debates. But while candidates running for office in Virginia's statewide races have yet to square up this year, they aren't holding back. Several have traded early jabs over debate participation, including which events they will or won't attend. When Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor, declined to participate in a debate hosted by CNN, her opponent's campaign called the decision 'absurd' and 'proof (Spanberger's) terrified of facing voters in an unscripted setting.' Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican candidate, had previously declined to participate in AARP Virginia's 'People's Debate,' held every gubernatorial election since 2006 and scheduled this year at Virginia State University. Spanberger's campaign made note of that too. 'After months of negotiations, Winsome Earle-Sears refused to participate' in the traditional debate, while Spanberger accepted the invitation a month prior, one press release read. Last month, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, declined to participate in a debate hosted by the news station WJLA-TV in Northern Virginia. His Republican opponent's campaign called that decision a failure. 'It's the right call — I wouldn't want to defend his record either,' said a spokesperson for Attorney General Jason Miyares's campaign. Jones's campaign at the time said they had already agreed to participate in the Virginia State Bar debate. The squabbling has made it difficult to pin down if and when candidates running for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general will face off. But now candidates in two races say they've finally reached agreements for debates this fall. Spanberger and Earle-Sears are slated to debate Oct. 9 at Norfolk State University, moderated by WAVY-TV. Miyares and Jones will participate in the Virginia State Bar debate in Richmond Oct. 16. Choosing to debate at all can be risky, particularly for frontrunners, said Karen Hult, a professor of political science at Virginia Tech. Candidates lose control over what they're asked and how their message is framed by viewers. And for Democrats, that risk might be painfully fresh. 'Everyone running for governor in Virginia has to be remembering what happened to the one-time frontrunner for the governorship in 2021, and that was former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who had, one could argue, a disastrous debate appearance,' Hult said. 'What he had to say about public schooling in response to a question in many ways helped Gov. Youngkin not only get the momentum, keep momentum and then ultimately win the governorship.' In Hampton Roads, a recent poll from Old Dominion University found that nearly 48% of respondents said they planned to vote Spanberger compared with 27% who said they favored Earle-Sears. Statewide, a poll from Roanoke College found Spanberger ahead by seven points, a narrower lead than in previous months. When it came to a gubernatorial debate, Spanberger, a former congresswoman, cited a preference for Virginia broadcasters and issues over a national outlet like CNN. Earle-Sears, the state's lieutenant governor, said she had a scheduling conflict for the People's Debate. 'I also think perhaps Spanberger was a bit concerned that a national interviewer would keep trying to put the race in a national partisan context and try to highlight that when Spanberger was in the US House, she was one of the more conservative Democrats,' said Hult of the former Congresswoman's decision not to participate in the CNN debate. 'I think she didn't want to be put in the position of having to contrast herself over and over again with, for example, AOC or some of the other really visible national Democrats that might be brought up in a national debate-sponsored kind of setting.' That shift, and more success with fundraising, might be why Earle-Sears is more inclined to accept a debate invitation now, Hult said. 'Those things have changed pretty dramatically, so they now are on a little bit more equal footing arguably,' she said. 'Moreover, (Earle-Sears) has gotten a nod that the Republican president is supporting her running for office, and she also has the support of the entire statewide Republican party and a quite popular — by comparison to the president — Republican governor of the state of Virginia. I think all of those things make Earle-Sears think, well, now may be the time to accept a debate, but only in a particular location, and only at a particular time.' Meanwhile, the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democratic state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi and Republican former radio host John Reid, have no debates scheduled so far. Reid previously challenged Hashmi to 10 debates across the state. Hashmi's campaign said they would consider any formal debate invitations as they come in and as her schedule permits, but that they have yet to receive any official invitations from nonpartisan news outlets. Both campaigns said they were asked to participate together in a candidate forum on The Politics Hour, a weekly program on Washington, D.C. radio station station WAMU. Given all the candidates' arguments about debates, are they still relevant? 'We don't really have much evidence that they change many people's views on who to vote for,' Hult said. What they can do, she said, is mobilize people to turn out to vote — or to stay home. Early voting begins Sept.19. Election Day is Nov. 4. Kate Seltzer, (757)713-7881
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Clip Of Sean Hannity Trying To Take Down Gavin Newsom Is Going Viral For His Complete Lack Of Self-Awareness
Sean Hannity's attempted slam of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was irony defined for many of the Fox News host's critics. On Wednesday, Hannity devoted several minutes of his prime-time show to attacking Newsom, who has recently taken to trolling Donald Trump on social media by mimicking the president's bombastic and combative tone. Related: Top Trump ally Hannity denounced Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender, as a 'radical' whose policies had wrecked California and dismissed his Trump impersonations as 'embarrassing.' Then came the line that went viral: 'I have a point. Results matter. A new performative, confrontational style. Maybe it wins you points with the loony, radical base in your party. But America is not going to vote for that record.' You can watch the full clip here: @Acyn / Fox News / Via Related: Critics pounced on the remark, arguing it sounded more like a description of Trump — and Hannity himself — than of the governor. @truthstreamnews / Via @KeysToTheRace / Via Related: @ChefjparkJohn / Via @marysupoppinz/ / Via @JasonPYYC / Via Related: @robfirsching / Via @AllwhichIam / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: