
Should you invest in the UK government bond that will pay you 5.375% interest for 30 years?
The Treasury has launched a new gilt that is set to pay a rate beating the current best buy savings accounts.
The government bond, launched last week, will pay 5.375 per cent interest until January 2056.
Investors will receive their interest payments as well as the face value of the bond at the end of the period.
The rate offered by the gilt is far ahead of the top savings rates currently offered by banks, with the best non-bonus cash Isa rate from Tembo currently paying 4.80 per cent. CMC Invest offers an Isa with a rate of 5.7 per cent, but this drops to 4.85 per cent after three months.
Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell said: 'In the current market, 5.375 per cent equivalent interest could have investors jumping for joy. A bank offering that rate on a cash savings account might have a long line of people queuing up to hand over their money.
'While that might sound enticing, deciding if the investment is attractive is not as straightforward as you think.'
The Government's latest gilt issue will pay interest ahead of the current best buy savings deals
Government gilts are essentially IOUs issued by the UK Government on which they will pay a set interest rate over a stated period.
Generally, these bonds are considered low risk investments, with the Government having never yet defaulted on a coupon payment during the term or a gilt repayment at the end.
UK government bonds are becoming increasingly popular investments as retail investors look to make the most of the tax benefits they offer. Interest on gilts is taxed as income, but the bonds are free from capital gains tax.
Coatsworth said: 'Gilts have also appealed to investors who have used their annual Isa allowance – they've been buying gilts with the hope that prices go up and they can make a quick profit. Gilts are advantageous because you don't pay any tax on capital gains.'
Meanwhile, the shift towards gilts also comes amid concerns that the Government will make changes to the current cash Isa allowance.
What's the catch?
The 5.375 per cent gilts began trading on Wednesday, meaning that they can no longer be bought from the Debt Management Office at auction. This means that the gilts can only be bought on the secondary market, but this is subject to liquidity, and the price may change.
Gilt yields are subject to market movements, meaning that if the price rises, the yield will fall and if the price falls the yield will rise.
Coatsworth said: 'If interest rates go up, gilt yields could also move higher. That means future gilt issues could have a more attractive headline yield and investors might sell their existing gilts to buy the newer ones. That process could push down the price of existing gilts.'
He added: 'Inflation also matters when weighing up gilts. Gilt prices tend to fall when inflation rises by more than expected because investors tend to demand a higher yield to compensate for the erosion of the investment's value and purchasing power.'
If you sell a gilt when the price has fallen, you will likely make a capital loss
However, if you intend to hold the gilt until it matures that wouldn't matter, but then it is best to 'forget' about it until the time rolls around and redeem it for par value.
The first interest payment on the 5.375 per cent gilt will be made on 31 July this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Shaken by crises, Switzerland fetters UBS's global dream
BERN, June 6 (Reuters) - Switzerland announced reforms on Friday to make its biggest bank UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab safer and avoid another crisis, hampering the global ambitions of a lender whose financial weight eclipses the country's economy. UBS emerged as Switzerland's sole global bank more than two years ago after the government hastily arranged its rescue of scandal-hit Credit Suisse to prevent a disorderly collapse. The demise of Credit Suisse, one of the world's biggest banks, rattled global markets and blindsided officials and regulators, whose struggle to steer the lender as it lurched from one scandal to the next underscored their weakness. On Friday, speaking from the same podium where she had announced the Credit Suisse rescue in 2023 as finance minister, Switzerland's president Karin Keller-Sutter delivered a firm message. The country would not be wrongfooted again. "I don't believe that the competitiveness will be impaired, but it is true that growth abroad will become more expensive," Keller-Sutter said of UBS. "We've had two crises. 2008 and 2023," she said. "If you see something that is broken, you have to fix it." During the global financial crisis of 2008, UBS was hit by a losses in subprime debt, as a disastrous expansion into riskier investment banking forced it to write down tens of billions of dollars and ultimately turn to the state for help. Memories of that crisis also linger, reinforcing the government's resolve after the collapse of Credit Suisse. For UBS, which has a financial balance sheet of around $1.7 trillion, far bigger than the Swiss economy, the implications of the reforms proposed on Friday are clear. Switzerland no longer wants to back its international growth. "Bottom line: who is carrying the risk for growth abroad?" said Keller-Sutter. "The bank, its owners or the state?" The rules the government proposed demand that UBS in Switzerland holds more capital to cover risks in its foreign operations. That move, one of the most important steps taken by the Swiss in a series of otherwise piecemeal measures, will make UBS's businesses abroad more expensive to run for one of the globe's largest banks for millionaires and billionaires. Following publication of the reform plans, UBS Chairman Colm Kelleher and CEO Sergio Ermotti said in an internal memo that if fully implemented, they would undermine the bank's "global competitive footprint" and hurt the Swiss economy. The reform would require UBS to hold as much as $26 billion in extra capital. Some believe the demands may alter the bank's course. "It could be that UBS has to change its strategy of growth in the United States and Asia," said Andreas Venditti, an analyst at Vontobel. "It's not just growing. It makes the existing business more expensive. It is an incentive to get smaller and this will most likely happen." Credit Suisse's demise exploded the myth of invincibility of one of the wealthiest countries in the world, home to a global reserve currency, and proved as unworkable a central reform of the financial crisis to prevent state bailouts. For many in Switzerland, the government's reforms are long overdue. "The bank is bigger than the entire Swiss economy. It makes sense that it should not grow even bigger," said Andreas Missbach of Alliance Sud, a group that campaigns for transparency. "It is good that the government did not give in to lobbying by UBS. The question is whether it is enough. We have a banking crisis roughly every 12 years. So I'm not really put at ease." UBS CEO Ermotti had lobbied against the reforms, arguing that a heavy capital burden would put the bank on the back foot with rivals. The world's second-largest wealth manager after Morgan Stanley is dwarfed by its U.S. peer. Morgan Stanley shares value the firm at twice its book value, compared with UBS's 20% premium to book. On Friday, the bank reiterated this message, saying that it strongly disagreed with the "extreme" increase in capital. But others are sceptical that the government has done enough. Hans Gersbach, a professor at ETH Zurich, said there was still no proper plan to cope should UBS run into trouble. "The credibility of the too big to fail regime remains in question."


Sky News
21 minutes ago
- Sky News
Roman Abramovich: From rags, to riches, to 'ripping off' Ukraine
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈 The government is threatening to take former Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich to court over the proceeds of the sale of the Premier League club. Three years after being sanctioned for the oligarch's links to the Russian president, £2.5bn remains frozen in a bank account. The funds are earmarked for Ukrainian aid, but where will they end up? In today's episode, Niall Paterson talks to financier and author Bill Browder and Sky's sports correspondent Rob Harris about how Abramovich went from orphan to oligarch and where sanctions leave him today. Lawyers for Abramovich did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Katie Price no show at court over bankruptcy-related debts
Katie Price has failed to show up in court to find out if more of her income will go directly towards paying off money owed under her two former glamour model from Sussex was declared bankrupt in November 2019 and again in March last year, and the bankruptcies have since been the mother-of-five, who did not attend the hearing in London on Friday and was not represented, still owes money as a result and had previously reached a voluntary agreement over her August Ms Price was warned by a judge about her non-attendance, after she was arrested for failing to show up for a previous hearing on the matter in July. Barrister Darragh Connell, representing trustees, told the specialist court she has not paid the arranged £12,500 a Connell asked Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Sebastian Prentis to make an income payments order, which means money would go from any salary towards Price's outstanding order relates to 10 the judge asked for more evidence to be provided to the court about Price's "reasonable domestic needs".Last August, a judge ruled that Price's income from social media platform TikTok be suspended as part of efforts to pay off her in February last year, a judge at a specialist bankruptcy court ordered that she must pay 40% of her monthly income from the adult entertainment website OnlyFans until February next hearing will take place later in the year, on a date to be confirmed