Ramaphosa will not testify in Phala Phala trial
The case was postponed due to an accused's pregnancy.
At least 22 witnesses are lined up to testify in the Phala Phala trial, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) says.
Imanuwela David, Ndilinasho Joseph and Froliana Joseph appeared in the Modimolle Magistrate's Court on Monday in connection with the burglary at President Cyril Ramaphosa's farm in February 2020.
They are accused of breaking in and stealing $580 000 (about R10.4 million).
ALSO READ: ConCourt ruling on Phala Phala report 'not a blow' for Ramaphosa – Presidency
On Monday, Magistrate Peter Manthata granted a postponement of the matter to 15 September, 2025 due to Froliana Joseph's pregnancy.
NPA Limpopo spokesperson Mashudu Malabi-Dzhangi said the 22 witnesses lined up for the trial showed that the state had a strong case against the three.
However, the president will not be among the witnesses.
'We can get someone from the farm. It could be a manager or administrator to be part of the trial, not the president,' Malabi-Dzhangi told the SABC.
ALSO READ: Many compliance questions remain in Phala Phala dollar saga
She added that the NPA had filed an extradition request with the Namibian government for two more suspects. She said the trial against the three would continue while the state attempts to extradite the other two.
Phala Phala spotlight
The burglary at Ramaphosa's farm was brought to light by former State Security Agency director-general Arthur Fraser after reporting the matter to the police in June 2022.
Fraser accused Ramaphosa of kidnapping and money laundering, triggering investigations into the president.
In November 2022, an independent panel appointed by then-National Assembly speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula found that there was 'prima facie' evidence that Ramaphosa may have violated sections 96(2)(a) of the constitution and 34(1) of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act with the aim of keeping the investigation of the burglary private.
ALSO READ: 'Phala Phala will never die' – EFF and ATM take on Ramaphosa and NA over panel's report
In March 2023, members of parliament voted against a DA motion to establish an ad hoc committee to investigate the burglary at the farm.
Since then the NPA has decided not to pursue prosecution against Ramaphosa, while the Public Protector, the South African Revenue Service and the South African Reserve Bank have cleared him of wrongdoing.
Ramaphosa has denied any wrongdoing in the farm matter.
'I have endeavoured, throughout my tenure as president, not only to abide by my oath but to set an example of respect for the constitution, for its institutions, for due process and the law.
'I categorically deny that I have violated this oath in any way, and I similarly deny that I am guilty of any of the allegations made against me,' he previously said in a statement.
READ: NEXT: 'No dirty dollars' – Ramaphosa calls out DA for 'jumping to conclusions' about farm matter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Court declares Hlophe's designation to JSC unconstitutional and unlawful
The court said it was concerning that MK Party deputy president John Hlophe continues to refuse to acknowledge any wrongdoing or accept accountability, despite the adverse findings made against him by the judicial conduct tribunal, the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and the court. The Western Cape High Court on Monday ruled that it was invalid and unconstitutional for the National Assembly (NA) to designate Hlope as a member of the JSC. The court also slapped Hlophe and the MK Party with a punitive costs order because of their statements they made that underscored their ongoing efforts to undermine the judiciary. In February last year, Hlophe became the first judge in democratic South Africa to be removed from office by parliament for gross misconduct. Hlophe then became an MP for the MK Party. Last year, the NA designated six MPs, including Hlophe, to serve on the JSC. The lawfulness of the decision was challenged by the DA, Freedom Under Law (FUL) and Corruption Watch. In September last year, three urgent applications by the three parties challenging the assembly's decision to designate Hlophe were heard simultaneously by the Western Cape High Court. The DA and Corruption Watch sought interim relief under Part A of their applications, interdicting Hlophe from participating as a JSC member pending the outcome of the proceedings in Part B. FUL sought final relief through the judicial review. The full court last year granted the interim interdicts sought by the DA and Corruption Watch. It also said FUL's application would be heard simultaneously with Part B of the DA and Corruption Watch applications. The court judgment on Monday said the matter before it concerned two narrow questions. First, whether the NA properly exercised its right and duty to consider whether Hlophe was suitable for designation to the JSC. Second, whether Hlophe, who had just been recently removed from the judicial office for gross misconduct and continued to denigrate and denounce the judicial system, was suitable for appointment. The applicants relied on a number of grounds for review of the NA's decision. One was that the NA committed a material error of law as it failed to properly exercise its discretion when it designated Hlophe to serve on the JSC, acting on the mistaken belief that his position as an MP and his nomination by the MK Party completed his designation. Another ground was that the decision to designate Hlophe, a judge recently impeached for gross misconduct, was unreasonable and irrational. They said the purpose of the JSC was to foster public confidence and respect for the judiciary and the rule of law. Designating an impeached judge who had demonstrated a complete disregard for the judiciary's integrity to participate in appointing judges undermined this purpose. The speaker of the NA indicated she would abide by the decision of the court. The MK Party and Hlophe opposed the application. The court said the decision by the NA fell to be set aside on the basis that it failed to properly consider relevant considerations, but instead considered various irrelevant considerations in arriving at its decision. 'The NA was obliged to consider a glaringly relevant fact, namely that the NA had recently impeached Dr Hlophe for gross misconduct.' The court said the NA, similar to all other organs of state, was bound by the constitution and required to comply with the constitutional obligation it imposed. 'We are satisfied that the decision to designate Dr Hlophe must be reviewed and set aside on each of the grounds advanced. The NA's decision is inconsistent with ... the constitution. 'This inconsistency, in and of itself, renders the decision unlawful. The National Assembly's designation of Dr Hlophe was neither a lawful nor rational decision considering his impeachment and the reasons thereof,' the court said in its judgment. In awarding a punitive costs order, the court said that after the full court had granted an interim interdict in Part A of these proceedings last year, Hlophe had launched an attack on the credibility of the presiding judges. When refusing leave to appeal against the punitive costs order, the full court made reference to certain remarks made by the MK Party and Hlophe after its judgment in Part A. It said the wanton attack on the judiciary could not and should not be tolerated by courts in the interests of preserving the rule of law and safeguarding the institutional integrity of the justice system. The court on Monday said, notwithstanding the findings of the full court regarding these public statements, both Hlophe and the MK Party continued to stand by those statements in their supplementary answering affidavits in the review proceedings. 'It is concerning that Dr Hlophe continues to refuse to acknowledge any wrongdoing or accept accountability, despite the adverse findings made against him by the (judicial conduct tribunal), the JSC and the courts. He maintains that the conduct that was found to constitute gross misconduct should be permissible among judges.' TimesLIVE
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Is the DA's push for policing power devolution justified?
The debate surrounding the devolution of policing powers reemerged over the weekend after Portfolio Committee on Police chairperson Ian Cameron attended a ride-along in Manenberg. Image: Ian Cameron/Facebook/Supplied The DA's repeated call for the devolution of policing powers is facing sharp scrutiny with one political analyst labelling it a copout. The debate surrounding devolution reemerged over the weekend after Portfolio Committee on Police chairperson Ian Cameron (DA), attended a ride-along in Manenberg. Cameron posted on social media about his ride-along which he undertook with fellow DA MPs Lisa Schickerling and Nicholas Gotsell, and how they joined the Special Operations team of the City of Cape Town's metro police in Manenberg and surrounds on Friday. 'I am a firm believer that they should have more policing powers. Why wouldn't we allow this brilliant group of people to be able to do more? Just imagine if we could do something like ballistic testing and gang violence investigation, decentralised? The impact for communities that suffer under the scourge of violence would be significant,' Cameron said. '...It's so exciting to see the work that they do, along with law enforcement, and of course, the renowned LEAP programme. 'I want to zoom in on Metro (Police), this past week I brought a motion in Parliament to ask once again that the Minister of Police (Senzo Mchunu) please give more policing power to Metro Police. 'It is significant because (they) not only do incredible work on the ground, but if they have more policing power, they could actually put more people behind bars, and keep them there… 'Imagine if they could do more investigations, or if they could do some of the ballistic testing? The legislation already allows for this,' Cameron said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In another post, Cameron elaborated that municipal officers may currently arrest and confiscate weapons but cannot build court-ready case dockets. He said that function is reserved for SAPS, 'where backlogs, skill shortages, and delays continue to cause severe disruptions in justice being served, if at all.' 'The Police Minister has the power to change this immediately. Under the SAPS Act, he can devolve investigative functions to competent municipal authorities via regulation. He has the legal authority.' In response to Cameron's remarks Police Minister Senzo Mchunu's spokesperson, Kamogelo Mogotsi, said: 'The ministry's focus is on ensuring that the high levels of crime in the country are reduced. A number of enablers have been identified by the ministry, which will be used to fight crime. 'Furthermore, following the National Policing Summit which was convened in April, various measures will be implemented that will usher in a new type of policing - one that is effective, efficient, responsive and professional.' However, political analyst Sanusha Naidu explained that this issue has been an ongoing gripe for the DA regarding what they can and cannot do under the safety and security portfolios. Naidu said that the party is seeking to mimic what the National Party wanted to do during the negotiation for the transition into democracy, 'in other words, what they want is not a unity state, but rather a devolved set of powers that are defined along the lines of a federal state'. '...This discussion around a unity state versus a federal state is that you can't go back (to when the Constitution was being made) and ask the question, as you have a Constitution that defines powers,' Naidu said. 'You have a Constitution that essentially enables for a unity state. 'The Western Cape is a push-and-pull factor of tension. It is constantly in an elasticity of tension, as you have that one issue of 'look at us, we've done so well'... The DA has used the idea that it is the ruling party in the Western Cape to push a narrative that 'we have a better handle on how to govern', now the reason why they are able to push that is because…everywhere else is broken. 'So if you look at what the DA tried to do in Gauteng, and Eastern Cape when Athol Trollip was part of the DA… they are constantly trying to push the narrative that 'we govern better' but what they don't tell you is that the governing comes from such a low base in comparison to the rest of the country.' 'When you think about the optics and narrative when you live in the City of Cape Town, you can see the contradictions of that narrative… It is a complete copout to say that you can't address the issue because we don't have the powers to do so. It is easy. 'However, let's make the assumption that we give you the powers to do so, will you be able to do it, and I think that they are hiding behind this argument… There is no tried and tested argument because we don't have a benchmark for them to try it,' Naidu said. 'There is no benchmark to say, 'hang on, is there another method or methodology or another intervention you can make?' If you are still waiting for these powers to be devolved, you have to go back to the Constitution." Cape Argus
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Olorato's death shows justice system's failure
Olorato Mongale's killers were released on bail, despite previous cases. A broken justice system failed her and countless others in South Africa. Just over a month ago, the two people who became the main suspects in the murder case that became a national focus point were arrested for kidnapping and robbing a woman in Brakpan on the East Rand. On 26 April they were released on bail. Nothing strange there. Everyone who appears in court suspected of committing a crime is entitled to bail, unless there are conditions that make the presiding magistrate believe they will not return to court to face justice, or that they are a threat to the public or witnesses in the case they are facing. The two suspects in the murder of Free State woman Olorato Mongale were facing similar charges in other cases, yet they were released on bail. And the country is shocked that they did exactly what they were accused of doing in a previous case. There is no logic or sense to this kind of application of the law. It is time South Africa faced the reality that Mongale was murdered by men who were let loose by institutions tasked with protecting her. ALSO READ: WATCH: Olorato Mongale remembered as 'light extinguished too soon', police vow action It might sound alarmist, but even a cursory glance at the case shows that the police, the courts and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) let Philangenkosi Sibongokuhle Makhanya and Bongani Mthimkhulu out on bail in April. What is sad is that even as Mongale's family desperately searches for closure that might never come because one of the suspects was shot dead in confrontation with the police, all arms of the a criminal justice system can each give what they think are acceptable reasons for letting the suspects go. And the public must just accept those reasons. The system, the whole system, not just the NPA, is broken. It has become fashionable to just heap all the blame on the NPA in cases where the system fails to deliver justice for citizens. But the truth is that the NPA is just one of the cogs in the system. The police must arrest the suspects and investigate if such suspects are deserving of bail. They must look at establishing whether the suspect has a stable address. Makhanya and Mthimkhulu being arrested for robbery and kidnapping in Brakpan using a vehicle whose owner resides in KwaZulu-Natal should set the alarm bells off. ALSO READ: 'The system is broken': Olorato Mongale's family outraged ahead of funeral Establishing car ownership and verifying addresses should be the easiest part of policing. Yet cops fail to do this regularly. Part of the reason they fail is that, unlike in the movies, South African cops do not have a computer screen on their desks. In the era of artificial intelligence, cops in this country are not always online. They must schedule time in front of a computer to do a basic identity search on a suspect. They operate in offices equipped with just a desk for their physical docket which, for the right price, can be made to disappear. And dangerous suspects are set loose to terrorise vulnerable communities. President Cyril Ramaphosa's government, from Police Minister Senzo Mchunu all the way down to that unnamed prosecutor in Brakpan, must take responsibility for what happened to Mongale. The country must stop calling it an 'NPA bungle' and lay the blame on all the institutions and people responsible for the death of any woman, man or child at the hands of a person who should not be walking the streets. Yes, men kill women and that should be acknowledged, but the government and all its institutions allow it to happen. Mongale would be alive if the government had protected her. NOW READ: New development in Olorato Mongale murder case
