logo
US tariffs threaten jobs in Asia's garment hubs

US tariffs threaten jobs in Asia's garment hubs

Fashion Network11-07-2025
Across Asia, unions and industry groups are raising alarms over the impact of higher tariffs by the United States on garment workers.
High tariffs might force companies to shut down or relocate to neighboring countries that offer lower tariff rates, resulting in significant job losses, they warn.
'The potential loss of jobs will cut the income and ability for workers to sustain their daily lives,' said Ath Thorn, vice president of the Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers' Democratic Union, which represents 80,000 workers across 40 factories.
Several countries in Asia have received notice of new tariff rates imposed by the United States, set to take effect August 1, following the end of a 90-day pause on tariffs.
Manufacturing hubs such as Bangladesh and Cambodia will face tariffs of 35% and 36% respectively, while neighboring countries are still negotiating with the U.S. government.
U.S. President Donald Trump announced the new tariffs through official letters posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, on July 8.
The U.S. remains the largest export destination for Bangladeshi garments. The country's exports to the U.S. totaled $8.4 billion last year, with $7.34 billion coming from garments.
In 2024, Cambodia exported nearly $10 billion worth of goods to the U.S., accounting for almost 40% of the nation's total exports, according to government customs statistics.
More than half of U.S. imports from Cambodia were garments, footwear and travel goods such as luggage and handbags—a sector that makes up nearly half of Cambodia's export revenue and employs over 900,000 workers.
Unions and industry groups warn that workers could be hit hard if higher tariffs push companies to relocate or shut down operations.
While Cambodia is facing a reduction from the 49% rate imposed in April, anxiety persists in the country's garment sector, one of the key pillars of its developing economy.
Meanwhile, the U.S. and Vietnam have reached a trade agreement that sets a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods.
'With a neighbor next door enjoying significantly lower tariffs, many companies may choose to leave Cambodia,' said Yang Sophorn, president of the Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions, which represents thousands of women garment workers who support their families.
This fear is echoed by experts in Bangladesh, where a 35% tariff is set to take effect.
Selim Raihan, professor of economics at Dhaka University, said Bangladesh risks losing competitiveness if countries like India, Indonesia and Vietnam receive more favorable trade terms.
Such disparities could complicate supply chain decision-making and undermine investor confidence, he said.
'As production costs rise and profit margins shrink due to the tariff, many garment factories may be forced to scale back operations or shut down entirely,' Raihan said.
The new 35% tariff on Bangladeshi goods is more than twice the current 15% rate.
'With more than doubled tariff rates, can you imagine how the cost of the products will rise?' said Mohiuddun Rubel, former director of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) and now additional managing director at textile firm Denim Expert Ltd.
'The question is what happens to the tariffs for main competitor countries like India and Pakistan,' Rubel added.
The U.S. is negotiating a trade deal with India, while reciprocal tariff rates for Pakistan have not yet been announced.
Outsized effect on women
Potential layoffs in the garment industry would have an outsized effect on women workers, which Sophorn said could cripple entire families.
'If these women lose their jobs because high tariffs force factories to shut, it will not only impact Cambodia's economy, but now children may not be able to go to school and aging parents may not be able to afford medicine,' Sophorn said.
'The situation for women garment workers is already bad, but it will get worse if these tariffs were to come into effect.'
Many of the women she represents have taken bank loans to support their families and rely on garment industry jobs to repay debts.
'If they lose their job, it means they will lose everything,' Sophorn said.
Tariffs would directly impact a significant portion of Bangladesh's four million garment workers, most of whom are women from low-income and rural backgrounds, Raihan said.
Thorn suggested that Cambodia continue negotiations to reduce the tariff burden or find alternative ways to expand exports and create jobs.
'If not, we will face problems,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tensions, clashes and low expectations loom over EU-China summit
Tensions, clashes and low expectations loom over EU-China summit

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Tensions, clashes and low expectations loom over EU-China summit

The summit between the European Union and China, scheduled to take place on Thursday, comes at a pivotal moment for both sides. On paper, at least. Donald Trump's return to the White House has upended the geopolitical chessboard, undermining age-old alliances, inflaming simmering tensions and throwing global trade into head-spinning turmoil. The chaos is such that Brussels and Beijing, long at odds over a string of disagreements and recriminations, began toying with the idea of resetting ties and reinforcing cooperation to weather the Trump-induced storm. The fact that the summit coincided with the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations only added to the speculation of an impending rapprochement. In May, Chinese President Xi Jinping said the anniversary offered a chance to "properly handle frictions and differences, and open up a brighter future for China-EU relations". Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and António Costa, the president of the European Council, played to the prevailing narrative, committing themselves to "deepening our partnership with China". But then the tide shifted and the tone soured. Beijing's decision to restrict exports of rare earths, the metallic elements that are crucial for manufacturing advanced technologies, caused widespread alarm across European industry and was rebuked by von der Leyen. "China is using this quasi-monopoly not only as a bargaining chip, but also weaponising it to undermine competitors in key industries," she said at the G7 summit in June. "We all witnessed the cost and consequences of China's coercion." Beijing immediately hit back at the Commission chief, calling her speech "baseless" and "biased", but offered an olive branch to build a "win-win" partnership. The damage was done, however. By the time von der Leyen and Costa meet with Xi on Thursday, there are scant expectations for any concrete solution. Hopes are so low for the meeting that officials in Brussels point to the fact of the one-day summit in Beijing happening at all as an achievement. (Under protocol rules, the summit was supposed to happen on EU soil, as both sides take turns as hosts.) "For the EU, the deliverable is a substantive, open and direct conversation between the two of us on every aspect of our relationship," a senior official said last week, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the occasion. A second senior official described the summit as a "unique opportunity" to communicate the bloc's concerns with the view of obtaining results "in the short term". "We go there with the expectation that the Chinese will first understand our concerns and, second, take concrete actions to meet our concerns," the official said. "Otherwise, we will have to defend our own interests." No-limits friction There are certainly no shortage of issues to be resolved, with myriad disputes straining EU-China relations since the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the extensive list of friction points, which range from cyberattacks against state agencies to human rights violations, two stand out: Beijing's "no-limits" partnership with Moscow and the trade imbalances caused by industrial overcapacity. For the past three years, Europeans have been aghast at seeing a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council stand firmly by the side of an aggressor nation in breach of the core principles of the UN Charter. Brussels has repeatedly accused China of acting as the "key enabler" behind Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and supplying 80% of the components that the Kremlin uses to manufacture weapons. Several Chinese entities have been targeted by the bloc for enabling the circumvention of economic sanctions. Last week, two Chinese banks were blacklisted, triggering Beijing's fury. "We urge the EU to stop harming the lawful interests of Chinese companies without any factual basis," said Guo Jiakun, spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry. "China will do what is necessary to firmly safeguard the legitimate and lawful rights and interests of Chinese companies," he added. Von der Leyen and Costa are set to raise Ukraine during their face-to-face meeting with Xi, however unlikely their pleas are to be heard. The Chinese leader has shown no signs of wanting to disengage from Russia, attending Vladimir Putin's Victory Day parade earlier this year as guest of honour. "We can say that China is de facto enabling Russia's war economy. We cannot accept this," von der Leyen said earlier this month. "How China continues to interact with Putin's war will be a determining factor for EU-China relations going forward." An 'unsustainable' relation On trade, the stakes are equally high – and the expectations, equally low. The bloc has grown increasingly anxious about its ballooning deficit with China, which last year surpassed €300 billion in goods. The figure risks expanding in 2025 due to sluggish demand from Chinese consumers and Trump's prohibitively high tariffs. The European Commission has set up a special task force to monitor the potential diversion of Chinese products from the US to the EU market. The executive is also keeping a close eye on Beijing's lavish use of subsidies, which have been blamed for artificially lowering prices to the detriment of European competitors. "The present situation is unsustainable. We need rebalancing," said a senior official. The dispute came to a boil in October when the EU slapped steep duties on China-made electric vehicles (EVs) to offset the effects of state aid. Decrying the measure as a "naked act of protectionism", Beijing responded with probes into EU-made brandy, pork and dairy, which Brussels then denounced as unfair and unjustified. Another recurring grievance among Europeans is the regulatory barriers that China has erected to encroach upon the private sector and give preference to domestic companies. The row recently led the Commission to exclude Chinese providers of medical devices from European public tenders. Beijing retaliated with a similar ban. Initially, the July summit was considered the stage to reach a common understanding on these open fronts and announce tentative solutions to some of them. While the disputes will still be addressed as part of the busy agenda, the rise in tensions indicates they will remain unresolved as neither side believes the other is ready to relent. The only deliverable that von der Leyen and Costa can reasonably hope for is a joint declaration on climate action ahead of the UN climate conference later this year. Substantial concessions in other fields are improbable, warns Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "Beijing appears confident that time is on its side," Bachulska said. "China's strategic calculus, dominated by its rivalry with the US, currently assesses the EU as too internally fractured to exert meaningful pressure or leverage on Beijing, thereby closing any perceived 'window of opportunity' for a significant reset in relations, despite US actions."

Luxury heavyweights struggle to shake off shopper fatigue
Luxury heavyweights struggle to shake off shopper fatigue

Fashion Network

time2 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

Luxury heavyweights struggle to shake off shopper fatigue

LVMH and Kering are expected to report another drop in quarterly sales, deepening investor worries about a prolonged downturn in the 400 billion dollar luxury market as brands face the threat of hefty US import tariffs. The results, kicking off with LVMH on Thursday, will likely show that any revival in demand for pricey fashion in the key US and Chinese markets remains elusive. Uncertainty unleashed by US President Donald Trump 's trade war has caused volatility in stock markets, weighing on consumer confidence. Trump's threat of 30% tariffs on imported EU goods risks hurting luxury houses that make products in France and Italy. They will be wary of lifting prices for US consumers after signs that previous rounds of price hikes slowed demand. "The level of price increases has been too much" at a number of brands, alienating the "aspirational" middle-income shoppers, said Caroline Reyl, head of premium brands at Pictet Asset Management. LVMH's fashion and leather goods division, home to Louis Vuitton and Dior, is expected to show sales down 6% year-on-year, its fourth consecutive quarterly decline, according to a Visible Alpha consensus forecast. Gucci, Kering's main earner which is undergoing an overhaul, has struggled for twice as long and is seen reporting sales down nearly a quarter from a year earlier. After two years of slowing sales, unease about the health of the industry is growing, with customers balking at higher price tags. Shares of LVMH are down nearly 27% since the start of this year, while shares of Kering are down 15%. Shares of Hermes and Richemont, which cater to mostly wealthy clients, were little changed, with the former down 0.9% and the latter up 1.6% over the same period. LVMH, Europe's most valuable listed company as recently as January, has slipped to fifth place. "It seems that investors are starting to worry about the long-term structural attractiveness of the industry," UBS analysts said last week. Sales of handbags - previously a growth engine - have been weak as shoppers opt for timeless, investment-grade jewellery. Brands including Dior, Gucci and Chanel have recruited new designers, but it takes time for fresh styles to enter stores. Brands like Louis Vuitton and Prada are offering more products below 1,000 dollars, like a new hybrid ballerina-sneaker shoe, for example, and emphasising beauty products, said Bain consultants. But that carries risks. "The aspirational skew of the brand is unhelpful currently," said HSBC analysts, highlighting problems at Louis Vuitton. "Some inconsistencies, we feel, are likely starting to have consumers wonder." Consensus forecasts peg organic sales of LVMH down 3%, while Kering is seen down 13%; Hermes and Prada are expected to show a 10% rise, as Prada's Miu Miu label takes market share from rivals. Kering will report its results on July 29, while Hermes and Prada are due to report on July 30.

US and Japan strike trade deal, avoiding Trump's threat of 25% tariffs
US and Japan strike trade deal, avoiding Trump's threat of 25% tariffs

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

US and Japan strike trade deal, avoiding Trump's threat of 25% tariffs

05:52 From the show Reading time 1 min After months of negotiations, the US has reached a trade deal with Japan. US President Donald Trump celebrated the agreement on tariffs in a social media post, while Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba hailed the deal, which sets duties on Japanese exports to the US at a rate of 15 percent. In this edition, we look at what exactly has been announced by both sides and what it means for Japan's auto sector, which is responsible for a quarter of all exports to the US.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store