Release of Scot held in India ‘at top of agenda' for UK Government, says Murray
Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh activist from Dumbarton near Glasgow, was arrested while in India for his wedding in 2017, and has been held ever since – despite having been cleared of one of the cases against him earlier this year.
But he still faces charges at a federal level, which his supporters – who claim an initial confession he made was as a result of torture – fear could take years to come to a conclusion.
Ahead of a meeting between Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on Thursday to sign a new trade deal between the two countries, Mr Johal's brother Gurpreet suggested it is a 'golden' chance to secure his release.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Thursday, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the issue is 'complex' but the UK Government is working to resolve it.
'The Government are doing all we possibly can to get this resolved,' he said.
'There was a recent meeting, just at the start of June, between the Foreign Secretary and his counterpart in India to try and get these issues resolved.
'So it's right at the top of the agenda and we can assure and re-assure that we're doing everything we possibly can to get these issues resolved as quickly as possible.'
Speaking earlier on the same programme, Gurpreet Singh Johal – a serving Labour councillor in West Dunbartonshire – said: 'Raising the case is not enough, it's what we've been saying since day one.
'There's a golden opportunity here for the Prime Minister now, prior to the deal being signed or as the deal is being signed, that he strongly calls for Jagtar to be returned to his family so he can continue his married life.'
Mr Murray added: 'The call is for these issues to be resolved and we're all fully on the same page in terms of having to get them resolved as quickly as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
China to explain redacted blueprints for 'mega-embassy' in London
If China does not do this, the deputy prime minister has ordered it to 'identify precisely and comprehensively' the withheld parts and explain why the floorplan for the basement and other areas of the Royal Mint Court development have been 'greyed out'. According to Rayner's (pictured) letter to the Chinese embassy, she highlighted that two suites of anonymous rooms and a tunnel were redacted 'for security reasons'. Other buildings on the plans were also partly greyed out, including the Cultural Exchange Building and Embassy House. It also highlights a Home Office request for a 'hard perimeter' around the embassy that may represent a 'material amendment to the application that would require further consultation'. The letter asked for further information in order for the Housing Secretary to make a 'lawful determination' on whether to allow the site to go up, adding that 'no view has been formed yet.' The new embassy, if built, would sit opposite the Tower of London in the former Royal Mint and would be China's largest in Europe. Critics fear the site will become the centre of increased espionage operations and may be used to harass Chinese dissidents. The US has already expressed 'deep concern' over the project, as it sits close to the City of London, home to some of the world's largest financial institutions. MPs in the Netherlands have also raised similar concerns. The site was sold to China by the UK government in 2018 for £255million. A full decision on whether the embassy will be allowed to be built will be made by September. It comes after diplomatic sources warned the Mail on Sunday that the new embassy will have on-site accommodation for more than 200 intelligence officers. A source said: 'There will effectively be a student-style campus for spies in the heart of the City. And those spy dungeons are so deep that the sensitive cables are virtually at head height.' The MoS can also reveal that the embassy plans exempt a 'cultural exchange' section from 'inspection and verification' by UK authorities. A US security source said 'cultural interests/exchange' is a 'euphemism for intelligence and security services', adding: 'It's where they often stuff their security and intelligence staff, among other diplomats. And if it's a "cultural" centre/space, why do they always declare it off limits in planning documents?' Ex-Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said: 'Everywhere there is a mega embassy... Chinese state-sponsored, trans-national repression of those who have fled the Chinese state or who criticise it grows dramatically. It's simple: a bigger embassy has more spies and more repression.' Shadow Levelling Up Secretary Kevin Hollinrake (pictured) said Labour had been 'caught red-handed trying to ram through this sinister embassy' in a 'desperate attempt to woo the Chinese Communist Party to bail out their failing economic policies'. He added: 'It is shocking Labour want to sign a legal document that will ban British officials checking what is being built in the embassy building. This is yet another surrender document from a Labour Government that puts foreign interests over British interests.'
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Are Trump's tariffs pushing rivals India and China closer together?
Donald Trump 's sweeping tariffs on India in response to its oil purchases from Russia could prompt Delhi to set aside its longstanding rivalry with China and explore closer cooperation. Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday, raising the total duty to 50 per cent — among the highest imposed on any U.S. trading partner. India criticised the move, calling it "unfair and unfortunate". Trump has said he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end its three-and-a-half-year war with Ukraine. Russian president Vladimir Putin has shown no public sign of altering his stance despite the deadline. It said it "will take all necessary steps to protect its national interests" and added that the purchases were driven by market factors and the energy needs of India's 1.4 billion people. Although India has been one of Washington's key strategic partners in countering China's dominance in the Asia-Pacific region, experts warn that the latest wave of U.S. tariffs could prompt Delhi and Beijing to seek closer ties. Trump has also sought closer ties with Pakistan, repeatedly claiming credit for brokering a ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad, a claim rejected by the Indian government. Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from arch enemy Pakistan has also not gone down well in New Delhi, two Indian government sources told Reuters. The new tariffs were announced just as Indian prime minister Narendra Modi prepares for his first visit to China in over seven years, suggesting a potential realignment in alliances. Modi is scheduled to visit China, where leaders of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation will gather for the Summit in Tianjin from 31 August to 1 September. India and China this year have sought to repair ties strained by the 2020 border skirmish between the two militaries. This year, both nations resumed the Mansarovar Yatra and ended the visa freeze for tourists. In recent years, successive U.S. administrations, even Trump during his first tenure as president, have strategically deepened ties with India, but analysts believe the latest actions risk dragging the relationship to its lowest point since the US sanctioned India in 1998 over its nuclear tests. Trump has been accused of selectively targeting India for purchasing Russian oil, whereas the EU continues to import liquefied natural gas from Russia. The trade talks between India and the U.S. broke down after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. Trump has intensified his criticism of Delhi and Moscow, labelling them as "dead economies" in a social media post last week. "The next round of negotiations between the trade teams in August will ask more of India, but the question is, what would India give? The U.S. side must also take into account India's strategic importance as a China counterweight," says Farwa Aamer, the director of South Asia Initiatives at Asia Society. She adds: "If U.S.-India ties get strained further, it only helps China to maintain and expand its influence. It also makes a strong case for India to ensure that its own relations with China remain stable." India's growing closeness to China has sounded alarm bells in the Republican party, with Nikki Haley, the former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., warning Trump against burning the carefully crafted ties with New Delhi. "Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India," she writes on X. Trump's executive order on Wednesday did not mention China, which also imports Russian oil, but later said he could announce similar further tariffs on Chinese goods. Last week, U.S. treasury secretary Scott Bessent warned China that continued Russian oil purchases could trigger new tariffs, as Washington prepares for the expiry of a U.S.-China tariff ceasefire on 12 August. When asked about targeting India, Trump hinted at a wider crackdown on nations importing Russian oil. 'It's only been 8 hours. So let's see what happens. You're going to see a lot more... You're going to see so many secondary sanctions,' he told reporters. The EU in 2024 had a bilateral trade of €67.5bn (£58.6bn) in goods with Russia, India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said this week. He claimed that European imports of LNG in 2024 reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. About 17 per cent of Europe's gas still comes from Russia, via the TurkStream pipeline and LNG shipments, according to Reuters. He pushed back against Washington's claims, saying that India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict in 2022. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets' stability,' he added. The decision to import Russian oil was 'meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer'. 'However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' he added. 'The decision to double tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent is another example of the deliberate and muscular unpicking of the rules‑based multilateral global system,' says Marco Forgione, the director general of the Chartered Institute of Export & International Trade. Modi is also under tremendous domestic pressure to stand up to his long-term friend, Trump, whom the Indian opposition parties have accused of bullying. "India is now in a trap: because of Trump's pressure, Modi will reduce India's oil purchases from Russia, but he cannot publicly admit to doing so for fear of looking like he's surrendering to Trump's blackmail," says Ashley Tellis at Washington's Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "We could be heading into a needless crisis that unravels a quarter century of hard-won gains with India." Indian state refiners have in recent days stopped buying Russian oil as discounts narrowed and pressure from Trump rose, Reuters reported. Modi, in his first statement after the tariff announcement, claimed that " India will never compromise on the well-being of its farmers, dairy (sector) and fishermen". "And I know personally I will have to pay a heavy price for it," he added. Trump's tariffs are poised to mostly impact leather, chemicals, footwear, gems and jewellery, textiles, and seafood exports. India exported goods of around $87bn in the fiscal year ended March 2025 to the U.S., which accounts for about 2 per cent of India's GDP. If the proposed 50 per cent duty on Indian goods is enforced on 21 August, pharmaceutical exports, which are subjected to a different duty structure, may be the only products still shipped from India to the US. One Indian government source told Reuters that India needs to gradually repair ties with the U.S. while engaging more with other nations that have faced the brunt of Trump tariffs and aid cuts, including the African Union and the BRICS bloc that includes Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa. While India mends ties with China, Putin is expected to visit New Delhi this year. Moscow on Tuesday, Russia said the two countries had discussed further strengthening defence cooperation "in the form of a particularly privileged strategic partnership'. 'Russia will attempt to exploit the rift between the U.S. and India by proposing the restoration of the Russia-India-China trilateral and new projects in defence,' says analyst Aleksei Zakharov at the Observer Research Foundation. "India will undoubtedly be mindful of structural factors such as sanctions against Russia and will seek to find a compromise with the Trump administration."
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Gordon Brown's intervention shows Rachel Reeves is out of ideas
What exactly is Gordon Brown up to? Having largely kept his counsel in recent years, the former prime minister took to the airwaves on Thursday morning to set out what was effectively an alternative budget. Among the ideas he was pushing were ramping up tax on the gambling industry to pay for lifting the two-child benefit cap; ignoring fiscal rules when it comes to defence spending, and teaming up with other European countries to keep procurement costs down. If you understand the way Westminster works, it would be tempting to think this was Rachel Reeves using an elder statesman to 'pitch roll' her own ideas – in other words using a stooge to test the public's reaction so she could deny all connection with it if it went down badly. If anything though, the opposite is true. Ms Reeves did not ask Mr Brown to put the proposals out there, and his intervention was largely unhelpful. Mr Brown may have been a controversial prime minister but he was broadly respected as chancellor, the role he filled for 10 years. His favourite word was prudence, a word no one associates with Ms Reeves as she taxes the economy towards oblivion. The problem, then, for Ms Reeves is that having a predecessor coming up with novel ideas reminds voters how few she has of her own, and just how little room she has for manoeuvre after killing off growth with her jobs tax. Mr Brown did not spring his media appearance on Ms Reeves – he is far too polite to do that. I'm told they spoke at the weekend, when Mr Brown set out what he was going to say, and that Ms Reeves did not try to dissuade him. Ms Reeves has enormous respect for Mr Brown, who is something of a political idol for her, but the Treasury's private response to his appearance on BBC Radio 4's Today programme and a column in The Guardian is telling. Treasury insiders have questioned the figures quoted by Mr Brown in his miracle cure for child poverty. Mr Brown used figures from a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which said that the betting industry only paid £2.5bn in tax, and that another £3bn could be raised by 'taxing it properly', in Mr Brown's words (money that could be spent on lifting the two-child benefit cap). A betting industry source told The Telegraph the true amount of tax paid is £4bn, and one government insider questioned whether the IPPR's figures were 'credible' and suggested think tanks needed better scrutiny. Ms Reeves has launched a consultation on gambling taxes and on child poverty and Mr Brown, a lifelong campaigner for reducing child poverty, has submitted detailed proposals to both. Ms Reeves does not, however, see the two issues as inextricably linked. One Treasury source said that no government could be expected to indulge in a game of 'whack a mole' – the phrase that irritated politicians tend to reach for when they are asked how the Treasury is going to solve this problem or that. The same source said: 'We have done breakfast clubs, free school meals, there is a child poverty taskforce later in the year and we are not going to pre-empt that.' On the issue of putting defence spending outside of Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, the same source pointed out that while Germany has made such a move, it can afford to do so because it has much lower levels of debt, and that however Ms Reeves tries to raise money for increased defence spending, 'borrowing is still borrowing'. As for Mr Brown's suggestion that European members of Nato should use their combined spending power to bring down the costs of procurement, a source close to Ms Reeves said: 'Rachel has been leading the work in Europe on how European countries can do more together.' Ms Reeves and Mr Brown are 'close and speak a lot', but that is not the same as saying they are on the same page. The brutal truth is that every time Mr Brown offers up ideas about how Labour could solve society's problems, a comparison is automatically made in the public's minds that only makes Ms Reeves look feebler.
