
Protecting the rule of law doesn't mean rule by lawyers
Only a generation or so ago, the worlds of law and politics were, if not entirely compatible, more connected with each other. Lawyer-politicians were a more common feature of public life, and the Lord Chancellor, who was a member of all three branches of the constitution, acted as a lynchpin, resolving tensions, speaking up for the judiciary whenever necessary and embodying our 'checks and balances' constitution. Judicial Review of administrative action was focused on errors in the process, rather than the underlying policy itself. The independence of the judiciary and the legal profession was unquestioned, but the hidden wiring of our system worked well.
The world has changed much since then, with the last Labour government playing a central role in tearing apart this careful relationship. The Human Rights Act, which came into force twenty-five years ago, helped to entrench an approach to the European Convention that has increasingly drawn judges into the political arena.
Then, Labour introduced its Constitutional Reform Act in 2005, and, in the name of separation of powers, the Judicial Committee left the House of Lords, becoming a Supreme Court. As such, the Lord Chancellor's role was downgraded, and the old principle of comity trampled upon. Instead of understanding, suspicion, remoteness and a degree of ignorance has filled the void.
Accompanying all this constitutional change has, in my opinion, been a cultural change. Lawyers like me who decided to go into politics to legislate and to develop policy were seen as oddities, as opposed to those who focused solely on a legal career. Instead of service in Parliament being viewed as part of the development of legal and indeed judicial knowledge, suspicion and contempt of the political process itself crept in.
In Parliament, some lawyers took up a campaigning stance, identifying with their clients rather than leaving their politics at the door of the office, chambers or the courtroom. The continuous nature of politics has meant a reduction in time and space to understand or examine judicial decisions, with their nuance and carefully reasoned explanations.
Let's get things straight. Firstly, it is never wise for a politician to wade into a debate about a particular court judgement without reading and understanding it first. As is so often the case, media reports about cases get key things wrong. Having read the immigration appeal tribunal judgement in question, I share and agree with the Lady Chief Justice's concerns. Judges cannot answer back unlike other figures in public life, and when inaccurate or highly personal attacks are made against them, they should be defended by both the LCJ and the Lord Chancellor.
Secondly, it is the case that judges are public figures, who make decisions every day in public courts. The principle of Open Justice means that we are entitled to know who is making these decisions and why. It also follows that discussion and indeed criticism of their judgements is not only legitimate but essential. Judges cannot expect to be immune from any comment about their work and politicians should be able to do this, as I and others have done on previous occasions.
But there is something else going on here. As our public discourse continues to coarsen, mainly thanks to social media, judges are not immune. There is a wellspring of justifiable judicial concern and anxiety about the threats and abuse that increasingly are being hurled at judges. As Head of the Judiciary, the Lady Chief Justice has an obligation to act to defend her colleagues. This isn't just about the safety of our judges but is also about their independence.
But we must be clear that the rule of law does not mean rule of lawyers. The supremacy of Parliament means that it has the power to change the effect of judicial decisions through legislation, with judicial oversight on the reverse side of the coin serving as a central political principle.
I very much hope that the Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor quickly find a way forward that reverses the 'continental drift' of law and politics further away from each other.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Starmer vows UK will recognise Palestine in weeks unless Israel ends crisis – but critics blast ‘reward' for Hamas
SIR Keir Starmer has vowed Britain will formally recognise Palestine by September unless Israel halts the bloodshed in Gaza. The PM issued the blunt ultimatum to Benjamin Netanyahu after an emergency Cabinet meeting and under mounting pressure from Labour ministers and MPs. 2 2 But the Israeli Government and political rivals blasted the move as reckless - warning the move risks rewarding Hamas for its terror attacks. The Israeli Foreign Ministry said: "The shift in the British Government's position at this time, following the French move and internal political pressures, constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages." A Reform UK spokesperson added: "Recognising Palestine as a state does little more than reward Hamas for their actions on October 7. "This decision is being made at the wrong time and is a knee jerk reaction by Keir Starmer to appease the hard left forces inside and outside of his party." Sir Keir told ministers the situation was now 'increasingly intolerable', with horrifying scenes of starving children and hospitals overwhelmed. And in a televised address, he declared: 'I have always said that we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution.'With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act." He said the UK would recognise Palestine ahead of September's UN General Assembly unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, allows humanitarian aid into Gaza, halts West Bank annexation plans, and commits to serious peace talks. The PM also said the UK would assess progress before the summit but warned no one side would be allowed to block the decision. The announcement follows weeks of intense pressure from across Labour, with several top ministers and dozens of backbenchers pushing for action. Foreign Secretary David Lammy today also set out Britain's position at a two-state summit in New York. He said the devastation in Gaza was 'heartbreaking' and that Israel limiting aid to the region had 'horrified the world'. Amid global alarm over famine conditions, Israel announced at the weekend it would suspend fighting in three areas for 10 hours a day and open safe routes for aid. The UK is taking part in coordinated aid drops, though agencies have warned the new steps still fall far short of what is needed to stop starvation. Sir Keir, speaking alongside Donald Trump at Turnberry on Monday, said the British people were 'revolted' by the images from Gaza. The US President suggested peace talks had hit a snag, saying Hamas had become 'very difficult to deal with' as they now held only a small number of Israeli hostages. Sir Keir has started working with France and Germany on a plan to 'bring about a lasting peace' in the Middle East - and shared the details with President Trump during their meeting in Scotland.


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump flies back to US after five-day visit to Scotland
Donald Trump has departed Scotland as his five-day visit comes to an end, with Air Force One taking off from RAF Lossiemouth in Moray. The president concluded his trip by opening a new golf course at his resort in Menie, Aberdeenshire, on Tuesday morning. After playing on the new course, he flew by helicopter to the RAF base. During his visit, he had earlier stayed at his other Scottish resort at Turnberry in South Ayrshire, where he enjoyed several rounds of golf. Despite the mostly private nature of the trip, he hosted Sir Keir Starmer at both resorts on Monday. EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen also took part in a meeting with him at Turnberry on Sunday. As Mr Trump cut the ribbon on the new course in Aberdeenshire, he said he would play a quick round before returning to Washington to 'put out fires all over the world'. The US president teed off in front of an invited crowd including golfers, football stars, Scottish First Minister John Swinney and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. Just before hitting the first ball at the New Course, the US president told those gathered on a grandstand: 'We started with a beautiful piece of land, but we made it much more beautiful.' Mr Trump added: 'I look forward to playing it today. 'We'll play it very quickly and then I go back to DC and we put out fires all over the world. 'We did one yesterday – you know we stopped the war. We've stopped about five wars. 'That's much more important than playing golf. As much as I like it, it's much more important.' The president met First Minister Mr Swinney on Monday evening at a private dinner, and the two had a more formal meeting on Tuesday ahead of the course opening. This meeting focused on Scotch whisky tariffs and the situation in Gaza. During a lengthy media event alongside Sir Keir on Monday, Mr Trump spoke of his 'great love' for Scotland and said he wanted to see the nation 'thrive'. A number of protests against the president's visit took place around Scotland during his time in the country. On Monday afternoon, a small number gathered in the nearby village of Balmedie in Aberdeenshire, sitting by the roadside and holding anti-Trump placards.


Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why Starmer should think twice before bringing up Jimmy Savile
There were slack-jawed faces and gasps of shock among Labour advisers on Tuesday morning when Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, issued the talk show equivalent of a declaration of war on Nigel Farage. On Sky News, Mr Kyle defended the Government's online safety legislation from a barrage of criticism by Reform UK by suggesting the party's leader was aligned with Britain's most notorious paedophile. 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers peddling hate, peddling violence,' he said. 'Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he would be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children.' Mr Kyle's attack followed an announcement by Reform that the party would scrap online safety legislation if it won the next election. His allegations – and his refusal to withdraw them – were in every group chat in Westminster within minutes. 'That language came as a bit of a surprise,' said one Labour source. 'There's a good case to be made here about the principle of what he was saying, but perhaps the analogy that he used could have been better thought out.' Mr Farage, never one to turn down a fist fight, responded by posting on X: 'Peter Kyle's comments on SkyNews are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise.' By 11.30am, the Reform leader had set up an impromptu press conference in which he called the remarks 'so below the belt it's almost not true'. But rather than retracting the accusation, Labour doubled down. Reliable surrogates of the party leadership posted online graphics of Mr Farage, with the caption that his party 'would scrap laws keeping children safe online'. Mr Kyle himself posted: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act, you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' The Telegraph has established that the minister's attack linking Mr Farage to Savile was not a slip of the tongue, but a line cleared in advance by Downing Street and given to Mr Kyle for the morning round of broadcast interviews. It is part of a wider attempt by the Government to hit back hard against Reform, which is eight points ahead of Labour in the polls. But it also presents a major challenge for Sir Keir Starmer, who has been on the receiving end of similar rhetoric himself. In 2022, Boris Johnson accused Sir Keir at Prime Minister's Questions of 'failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile', sparking a week-long Westminster row in which Mr Kyle was one of his boss's biggest defenders. Mr Johnson said later that he was referring to failures by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), rather than Sir Keir himself as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), to take action against Savile before he died. At the time, the comments were condemned by Richard Scorer, a lawyer who represented victims of Jimmy Savile. On Tuesday, Mr Scorer told The Telegraph he felt the same way about Mr Kyle's comments. 'It is completely wrong for any politician of any party to seek to score points using the suffering of Savile victims,' he said. 'Victims and survivors want to see action to protect children, not weaponisation of their suffering for political purposes.' The latest Savile row opens the door for Mr Farage to go after Sir Keir's record as DPP at the time the first complaints against the BBC star were filed. Four historic allegations of sexual assault by Savile were investigated by police in both Surrey and Sussex in the 2000s. Surrey Police interviewed Savile in 2009, when Sir Keir was DPP, and consulted one of the service's lawyers. The lawyer decided there was insufficient evidence for a prosecution to be brought against him. Reform sources indicated on Tuesday that they could focus on Sir Keir's record as a prosecutor. They also pointed to the fact that the Prime Minister blocked an attempt to hold a national grooming gangs inquiry when the Conservatives tabled an opposition motion to set one up in January. A source close to Mr Farage pointed out that Mr Kyle had voted in line with the Government against an inquiry. In June, Sir Keir about-turned and announced that a full national inquiry would take place, prompting accusations from Reform that he had made the decision for political reasons. Some Labour sources said they were now concerned about how the conflict between Sir Keir and Mr Farage on child sexual abuse could play out. Farage campaigning on crime The Reform leader is known for his willingness to take political rhetoric further than his colleagues – and to lean into a media storm to boost his public profile. The clash comes a fortnight into Mr Farage's six-week campaign on crime, during which he has already pledged to halve crime and deport criminals to other countries, possibly including El Salvador. A Labour source accused the Reform leader of 'crocodile tears' over Mr Kyle's attack, adding: 'You can't lay gloves on people without expecting it to come back on you.' The Government's stance has been compared to Labour's controversial attack on Rishi Sunak during the general election campaign, when the party posted a graphic that claimed the then prime minister did not believe people convicted of child sexual assault should go to prison. At the time, Sir Keir said he 'stand[s] by every word' and would continue to prosecute the record of the Tories on controversial issues.