Louisiana ethics board wants state Senate to reject bill that lifts complaint confidentiality
The Louisiana Board of Ethics expressed alarm Friday that the Louisiana Legislature is just one vote away from eliminating confidentiality for people who provide tips about government misconduct. 'This is all just abusive. It's just trying to dissuade someone from filing a complaint,' said retired attorney William Grimley, a Louisiana Senate appointee to the ethics board since 2022, about House Bill 160 sponsored by Rep. Kellee Hennessy Dickerson, R-Denham Springs.
Other members of the 15-person board nodded in agreement with Grimley. As a last-minute effort to stop the legislation, they instructed their staff to send a letter from the board expressing their concerns about the bill.
The board members also said they intended to personally contact their own senators and Gov. Jeff Landry's office to warn about the legislation.
'I think it will have a drastic chilling effect on the number of complaints you receive,' Ethics Administrator David Bordelon told board members. 'We often receive complaints that are asking not to be disclosed because there's some sort of relationship or some sort of fear of retaliation.'
Under the bill, investigations into ethics law violations would still be kept private and shielded from the public unless the board votes to bring charges. But the name of a person who provides a tip about alleged wrongdoing would be revealed to whoever they accused of misconduct. Currently, the identity of someone providing a tip to the ethics board is never shared with the target of an investigation.
Dickerson said she is bringing the bill to protect government officials from political retaliation similar to what she experienced personally. In 2023, the ethics board voted to fine Dickerson $1,500 when she was a member of the Livingston Parish School Board and running for state representative. The members concluded she had broken state ethics laws by inappropriately helping a public school teacher get paid for doing construction work at the high school where the teacher was employed. State law doesn't allow public employees to perform contract work for their employers.
'I believe this is a fight for truth and justice and to give you the knowledge to know who is fighting against you,' Dickerson said of her legislation.
Her bill would likely encourage 'witness tampering and documents not being provided,' Bordelon said. The tipster might experience harassment and intimidation from the subject of the investigation even before the probe gets underway, he added.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Dickerson said she has guarded against intimidation in her bill by allowing any tipsters to sue the accused for damages if they experience harassment. Critics of the legislation said those lawsuits would be expensive and not financially feasible for many members of the public.
The ethics administrator also reiterated that the board – not the person providing the tip – decides whether to charge someone with ethical misconduct. Even if the person who submitted the complaint to the board is politically motivated, the board is not. 'It's the board that is the accuser,' Bordelon told members. 'You make your decision based on the facts and the evidence that we present to you as staff.'
Dickerson included another barrier to ethics investigations the board found troubling. It requires people submitting tips to the board to either have them signed by a notary, which costs money, or to deliver them personally to state ethics administration headquarters in downtown Baton Rouge. Currently, the public can submit tips via mail and sometimes electronically.
'Imagine somebody in Grand Isle complaining about their local councilman. They would have to either pay a notary to notarize a statement … or drive to Baton Rouge and file it with us in person here,' Bordelon said.
Dickerson also wants to limit materials the ethics board can use to launch an investigation to just tips from the public and reports from state officials. The board has no existing limits on the sources it can use to launch an investigation.
For example, it undertook 18 investigations from 2020-23 based on news reports that resulted in a discovery of wrongdoing. Under the bill from Dickerson, a former broadcast journalist, they would no longer be able to use a news story as the basis for an inquiry.
This year, Landry and legislative leaders have gotten behind a few bills that would dramatically curb the ethics board's authority to pursue investigations. Lawmakers said the effort is a response to overzealous enforcement by the ethics board that crossed the line into harassment. Still, it's not clear whether Landry supports Dickerson's legislation. His staff hasn't endorsed it during public hearings like they have other ethics bills.
Recent ethics board appointees from Landry and lawmakers are also among those worried about Dickerson's bill.
'I would love for 100% compliance and to put us out of business. But you know, that's not happening,' said Jason Amato, a former St. James Parish Council member who Landry picked to lead the ethics board earlier this year.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
'I'd love to be able to cancel our monthly meeting because we didn't have any items on the agenda. But I'm only six months in, and that isn't happening anytime soon,' he added. Lawmakers have until Thursday to decide whether to send Dickerson's proposal to Gov. Jeff Landry's desk to be signed into law. The House voted 88-7 for the bill last month, and it is scheduled for Senate debate Sunday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Press
a day ago
- American Press
Jim Beam column:Is cheaper insurance lost cause?
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signed legislation last year that was favorable for property insurance companies, so I was a little upset when I got my annual home insurance premium statement. It was $3,097, which is $287 higher than last year's premium. I shouldn't have been surprised since most of the insurance bills I have received during my adult life have always been higher each year. I purchased a long-term care insurance policy in 1998 and the first year's annual premium was $694. It was $2,536 this past February. The Louisiana Illuminator reported last year that the bills Landry signed will benefit the insurance industry with new freedom to raise rates on customers, cancel policies and walk away with lighter legal penalties when they refuse to pay claims. The Illuminator said the bills were part of state Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple's agenda to create what he called a 'free market' for insurance companies in the state. Less regulation would bring in more companies, he said, and that should lead to lower rates. Two bills this year that might have given homeowners some relief didn't do it. One was defeated and the other one was watered down to do almost nothing. Since the 2024 laws didn't lead to lower rates for me, I decided to lodge a protest with my insurance agent. As it turns out, the woman I spoke with said the increase was an inflation factor that increased my home's replacement coverage. I have been dealing with that problem every year with my long-term care company. It said I could lower the premium each year if I lowered the amount the insurance would pay each day for nursing home care. It only pays $83 a day, so why would I lower something that is already too low. Yes, and that is exactly what happened at my insurance agent's office. I could lower my home replacement coverage to get a lower premium, but that isn't a wise choice. So I went online when I got home and paid the $3,097 premium. The average annual premium for a $300,000 home in Louisiana, probably twice the value of my home, is $6,184, which is No. 2 in the nation, according to Nebraska is No. 1 at $6,366. Florida is No. 3 at $5,728. It's $3,103 in Arkansas, $3,468 in Mississippi and $4,085 in Texas. Some of the pro-insurance company bills passed in 2024 may eventually reduce home insurance costs, but home and business owners are tired of waiting. Meanwhile, some companies have already started canceling or not renewing up to 5% of their policies each year allowed under a new law. A disabled citizen told me at exercise recently that she and others who live in a mobile home park have had their homeowner policies canceled. She appealed for some help. When new home insurance laws were passed in 2020, promises were made when Jim Donelon was insurance commissioner that rates would be lowered. However, the Illuminator said after four years, rates only increased. My Medicare premium has continued to increase over the years, along with my secondary healthcare insurance, and my prescription drug coverage. Almost any bill I get these days for anything is always higher. I am a living example of the high cost of auto insurance in Louisiana. You've seen what my home insurance costs, and my auto insurance is even higher. Because of two minor wrecks I had over a three-year period, the annual premium was over $4,536. One of those wrecks was wiped off the record and next year's premium will be $3,868, still much too high. The average annual car insurance rate in Louisiana is $2,734, third highest in the nation, according to Florida is the highest at $3,289. New Jersey is No. 2 at $2,768. It's $2,346 in Texas, $1,505 in Mississippi and $1,814 in Arkansas Real Reform Louisiana in a recent news release said Louisianans pay among the highest auto and homeowners insurance premiums in the country. It said the state's auto insurers have the third highest profit margins and some of the best loss ratios in the country. Isn't it amazing how long Louisianans have been waiting for lower home and auto insurance costs? Doesn't seem fair, does it? Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at


American Press
06-08-2025
- American Press
Allen Police Jury rescinds ordinance regulating carbon capture injection wells
Allen Parish police jurors rescinded an ordinance Monday regulating injection wells in the parish while tabling a separate measure opposing Class V and VI injection wells. During the meeting, Police Juror Joe Perkins opposed rescinding the ordinance despite a federal lawsuit posing a significant financial risk to the parish. Perkins argued the ordinance, requiring parish permits for injection wells, was crucial for safeguarding local residents and should be maintained. 'I'm all for keeping this ordinance into place,' Perkins said. 'The Louisiana Legislature back in the 1800s formed police juries and gave them the privilege and the power to protect the health and safety of their parish. How can they sit there and take this away from us and that's what this ordinance was more or less put there for to protect our people of this parish.' Despite Perkins' objections, police jurors voted 5-1 to rescind the ordinance, with Perkins casting the only dissenting vote. Police Jurors Roland Hollins and Allen Courville were not present. The decision to rescind the measure follows a lawsuit filed last month by ExxonMobile Low Carbon Solutions Onshore Storage against the Allen Parish Police Jury and Sheriff Doug Hebert III. The lawsuit alleges the police jury overstepped its authority and that the ordinance is invalid and unenforceable because it conflicts with state regulations, which would delay state-permitted activities. ExxonMobil plans to install state-approved test wells at two sites in Allen Parish. In an email to the American Press on Tuesday, a spokesperson for ExxonMobil thanked the police jury for rescinding the ordinance. 'We appreciate the Allen Parish Police Jury rescinding the ordinance so we can begin the careful, lengthy process of evaluating if this is the right geology for CCS (carbon capture and storage),' the email read. 'We've met with approximately 200 stakeholders across the parish – listening, learning, and showing up – and we'll continue to do so. CCS protects and grows industry jobs while providing real benefits that stay close to home. It's safe, it's proven, and it helps our communities grow – more tax dollars, more opportunity, and a chance for Louisiana to keep leading the way.' Hollins said in a recent Facebook post that the police jury has been placed in a difficult position while striving to protect its citizens and children's future. He accused legislators and the governor of prioritizing industrial interests over the well-being of the community, stating they have shown a disregard for landowners' rights and have not acknowledged risks associated with massive CO2 injection wells and pipelines. 'The state officials' commitment to industry is so strong, that they will leave a parish out on an island by themselves to be sued by a major corporation for having to defend their citizens,' Hollins wrote. He said the police jury took a bold stance to protect land, water, and citizens because state leaders have not. He said police jurors and members of the Louisiana CO2 Alliance will continue to fight against what he views as 'unconstitutional aggression against the citizens rights of Louisiana.' Additionally, the police jurors chose to table a resolution opposing Class V and VI injection wells in the parish due to the ongoing litigation. The resolution asserts that the wells threaten the community's health, safety, natural resources, and long-term well-being. Class V wells are primarily used for waste disposal into or above underground drinking water sources, while Class VI wells are used for injecting carbon dioxide into underground rock formations for long-term storage. Parish Administrator Jacob Dillehay raised concerns about adopting the resolution during active legal proceedings, noting it contains harsh language and names individuals involved in the lawsuit. 'I'm not sure how good of an idea this resolution would be to adopt, given that we are still in midst of that litigation,'Dillehay said. Police Juror Heath Ardoin supported Dillehay's view, urging the police jury to table the resolution until the lawsuit concludes. District Attorney Joe Green also advised caution, stressing the need for the resolution to be factual and accurate, and not to overstate anything. He described the proposed resolution as 'very broad' and indicated that it referenced the recent litigation. Green recommended deferring action until legislative action, or what the police jury wants to see done by the legislature as it affects the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and Natural Resources (LDENR), and until more specific details are available.
Yahoo
22-07-2025
- Yahoo
Louisiana lawmakers decline to hold veto override session
Gov. Jeff Landry addresses the Louisiana Legislature on opening day of legislative session, Monday, April 14, 2025, at the Louisiana State Capitol in Baton Rouge. (Hilary Scheinuk/The Advocate-Pool) The Louisiana Legislature has declined to reconvene for a veto override session this year. The majority of lawmakers – 87 members of the House of Representatives and 29 in the Senate – voted not to hold a special session in which lawmakers try to overturn Gov. Jeff Landry's rejection of bills. In all, the governor vetoed 15 pieces of the legislation and removed portions of three budget proposals that legislators could have voted to reinstate. The legislation Landry rejected dealt with matters ranging from new registered dietician regulations to a prohibition on outdoor balloon releases. Veto override sessions are extremely rare in Louisiana. There have been just three in the past 50 years, and they all took place from 2021-23. At the time, state government was politically divided with Democrat John Bel Edwards as governor and Republicans controlling the two legislative chambers. Edwards and the GOP legislative leadership were at odds over topics such as transgender rights and political redistricting. Landry and legislative leaders are all Republicans, making it much less likely lawmakers would openly buck the governor to overturn one of his decisions. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword