logo
​​The housing gender gap: Why women still face roadblocks in buying homes and building home equity

​​The housing gender gap: Why women still face roadblocks in buying homes and building home equity

Yahoo21-05-2025

Though they buy homes in greater numbers, single women lag behind men when it comes to building home equity and wealth.
Women wait longer to purchase, pay more for homes when they buy — taking out larger, pricier mortgages — and get less when they sell.
Both economic constraints (wage disparities) and psychological mindsets hold women back from homeownership.
Resources are available to help women overcome these challenges, including federal and non-profit programs that provide homeownership education and down payment/closing cost assistance.
The biggest asset most Americans own is their home: It's the bedrock of their wealth and financial worth. But unfortunately, that rock is less substantial for one sex than for another.
For single women, wealth accumulation achieved through home equity lags behind that of single men, according to a Yale School of Management study, 'The Gender Gap in Housing Returns.' Women pay more to buy a home, and reap less when they sell it. They can afford a smaller chunk of the homes on the market and the homes they do purchase tend to be worth less, making their ownership stake less valuable, other studies show.
Various reasons exist for this state of affairs, including the continuing wage disparity between the sexes, which has narrowed slightly over the past two decades but continues to exist. The result is women earn about 1.5 percent less in annualized returns from their homes than men — and that 'overall, gender differences in housing explain up to 30 percent of the gender gap in wealth accumulation,' the Yale study says.
Current gender data
The median weekly earnings of women in the first quarter of 2025 was nearly 84% of men's weekly income
Among U.S. states, California, Vermont and New York have the smallest gender pay gaps among full-time year round employees; Utah, Louisiana and Alabama, the largest
Among U.S. homebuyers:
20% are single women
8% are single men
62% are married couples
Women pay more for their mortgages than men in 49 states — as much as $7,000 more in interest over a loan's term
Being denied a loan or financial product made 24% of women feel more stressed about the state of their finances, vs. 19% of men, according to Bankrate's Credit Denials Survey
Women today have the same rights as men when it comes to acquiring and owning property. But it was not always so. While they could inherit real estate — and, by 1900, hold title to it in their own names — purchasing it was often difficult. In fact, well into the 20th century, American women typically couldn't take out a mortgage without having a man co-sign the application. It was technically legal for banks to refuse loans and credit to unmarried women, or require a husband's permission for a married female applicant.
Things began to change with the passage of the Fair Housing Act in 1968 and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in 1974.
'The Fair Housing Act made it illegal for women to be discriminated against when buying a home and securing a mortgage,' says Miloney Thakrar, founder and principal at Mind the Gender Gap, Inc., a consulting firm focused on gender equity. 'Enactment of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in 1974 made it illegal for creditors — such as a lender or broker — to discriminate on the basis sex, including sexual orientation and gender identity or marital status. In other words, women were finally able to secure a mortgage independently without needing a male cosigner. '
These two pieces of federal legislation — along with women's increasing earning power and presence in the workplace — substantially smoothed the female path to homeownership. In 1981, 73 percent of home buyers were married couples, while just 11 percent were single women and 10 percent were single men, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Fast forward to 2024: 62 percent of homebuyers are married, while 20 percent are single women and 8 percent are single men.
In fact, single women have bought more homes than single men every year since at least 1981. The single best year to date for single women in the real estate market was 2006, when they accounted for 22 percent of home buyers.
But that doesn't mean it's easy for women. Particularly amid current market conditions, says Jessica Lautz, the NAR's deputy chief economist and vice president of research. 'Single women are facing an increasingly unaffordable housing market and are purchasing on the lowest household incomes,' says Lautz.
Still, she adds that 'single women are such a force in the market, there may be recognition from experts, such as mortgage brokers and Realtors, that these women have done their homework and any hurdle in their way, they will surmount.'
Despite all of the progress, achieving homeownership and substantial home equity is still challenging for many women. Much of that has to do with the fact that they make smaller down payments and take out bigger mortgages, meaning they start out with less of an ownership stake than single men do.
When it comes to buying, the difficulty is often due to economic problems. According to Bankrate's Down Payment Survey, coming up with the cash can be challenging for women: over half (54 percent) of the female respondents saw expenses from down payments and closing costs as a very significant obstacle. Moreover, when asked, 'How long, if at all, do you anticipate it will take you to save up for a down payment on a home?,' 22 percent of women who would like to own a home someday responded they'd never be able to save enough — compared to just 17 percent of men who felt that way.
'There is a significant difference between the household income of single men and women who purchase homes. The household income will influence the number of homes in their price range and make the search more difficult in some areas,' Lautz observes: Among first-time homebuyers, $88,300 (for him) compared to $72,500 (for her), according to NAR data.
'Women who are trying to get on the first rung of the homeownership ladder are starting from behind,' agrees Orphe Divounguy, senior economist for Zillow, the real estate platform. 'This is partly because single mothers experience a significant pay gap. In addition to the disparities in the labor market, research shows that women tend to have worse credit market experiences than men.'
A 2022 Zillow study found that women have access to 18 percent less of the real estate market than men because of the wage gap: In other words, they could buy nearly one-fifth more of the available homes (and presumably, higher-priced homes) if they made as much money as their male counterparts. This in turn, contributes to a 'home value gap': the fact that the homes owned by women tend to be worth less overall than those owned by male-headed households — specifically, worth 92 percent of male-owned homes, according to Zillow data.
In addition to all of the challenges already mentioned, the Yale study indicates women pay more for the homes they do buy — and not because they're purchasing pricier places. Rather, they 'negotiate worse discounts relative to the list price' of a home, the Yale study says. To put it bluntly, they don't bargain as well as male home buyers.
'Unfortunately women are known not to be as good at negotiation as men; chalk it up to practice or different levels of comfort with one-on-one negotiations,' says Laura Adams, a personal finance author and speaker. 'That may leave them buying a home at a higher price than a male counterpart would.'
And with mortgages, every little bit negotiated off the price counts. Even paying $5,000 or $10,000 more for the purchase price of a home can really add up over time and make it harder to develop as much equity, says Adams.
Being negotiation-challenged handicaps women on the selling side, too: Despite buying at higher prices, female homeowners tend to list their properties for lower prices and recoup lower proceeds from the sale, according to the Yale study.
Yet another factor impacting the amount of home equity wealth women accumulate is waiting longer to purchase a home. The median age of single female first-time homebuyers is 40 years old, vs. 34 for their male counterparts, according to NAR data. That could largely be due to financial reasons — it taking women longer to amass the money. (In Bankrate's Down Payment Survey, when asked, how long do you anticipate it will take you to save up for a down payment, 74 percent of aspiring female homeowners anticipated it would take at least one year, vs. 79 percent of aspiring male homeowners.) But it could also reflect a less secure mindset.
In many cases, 'women [still] feel like they need to have a partner to buy a house with,' says Austin, Texas-based real estate agent Stephanie Douglass, who with business partner Kristina Modares co-founded the brokerage Open House Austin specifically to educate and encourage single female house-hunters. 'Maybe they feel like they're not handy or it's something they feel is too risky to do on their own, but in that time they're waiting, they're losing out on so much equity.'
The current interest rate environment is another reason single women are increasingly holding off on buying, adds Douglass. 'They still understand the benefits of home ownership, but the interest rates are making it very hard for one person to afford a mortgage here in Austin and across the nation,' says Douglass. 'Single women are the ones who are going to have to wait more often just because of interest rates.'
The good news is: Up-and-coming generations are not holding off on homeownership. Close to half (42 percent) of millennials (ages 28-43) have purchased a home alone, compared to 34 percent of Gen Xers (ages 44-59) and 22 percent of baby boomers (ages 60-78), according to Bankrate's Homebuying Trends Survey.
Bankrate insights
Women (22 percent) are more likely to agree than men (17 percent) that 'I will never be able to save enough for a down payment on a home' according to Bankrate's Down Payment Survey.
The application and review process for obtaining a home equity loan today is no different for singles than it is for married couples, nor is it different for different genders. In general, lenders consider the same types of criteria — credit score, debt-to-income ratio (DTI), income and the amount of equity in the home.
Additionally, by law a lender may not deny a loan applicant based on marital status, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), nor can they deny a married individual credit in their own name. Lenders are also prohibited from evaluating applicants on the basis of their sex, including sexual orientation and gender identity, and a sex-related condition (such as pregnancy).
'The process doesn't differ significantly between married couples and single people,' says Thakrar. 'However, when taking into consideration all of the qualifications…the process may take longer for married couples, because it may take longer to collect and analyze all the necessary information to make a determination.'
While the process of getting a home equity loan or a home equity line of credit (HELOC) does not differ, single women may have less available home equity to tap, compared to single men or married couples. As the Zillow report indicates, homes owned by women are generally worth less overall. And of course, due to disparities in pay, single female applicants may have less income, fewer assets and greater debts, which could lessen their chances of approval or of getting the best loan terms.
Housing and mortgage discrimination is an issue that has impacted the homebuying landscape in America for more than a century. In particular, the practice of redlining, which dates back to the 1930s, involved lenders outlining in red areas on maps where Blacks (and other non-white groups) lived and categorizing them as highly risky investments. This systematic segregation included denial of financing and other housing-related services and opportunities based on race.
Women historically have been impacted by mortgage discrimination in other ways. A higher percentage of female-only borrowers are denied mortgages than their male-only counterparts; they have a higher denial rate than couples as well. They also have been unduly victimized by 'pinklining,' a term introduced in a 2016 survey funded by several nonprofit organizations. It refers to the practice of systemically targeting and subjecting women to exploitative and predatory lending techniques and products. Women of color in particular have been 'steered toward subprime loans even when they could have qualified for prime loans,' the 'Pinklining' report charges. The higher interest rates, fees and penalties of these loans make it more likely for female homeowners to fall into ever-tightening debt traps and foreclosure, it further notes.
And, not surprisingly, homeownership progress hasn't been equal for all women. A report from the Urban Institute shows that while 70 percent of white female-headed households were homeowners in 2019, just 59 percent of Asian, 45 percent of Black and 40 percent of Hispanic female-headed households owned their home.
Yet, despite all this — and their weaker credit/income qualifications — women default less on their mortgages than their male counterparts, an Urban Institute study found. This fact holds true across all ethnic groups.
The Fair Housing Act, a subsection of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, outlawed the practice of redlining and discrimination in the real estate industry. Its protections were extended by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974, which prohibited discrimination specifically against credit or loan applicants on the basis of sex or marital status, and in a 1976 amendment, on the basis of race, color or religion.
The subsequent Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) has sought to address mortgage discrimination in a proactive way. Adopted in 1977, the CRA 'requires the Federal Reserve and other federal banking regulators to encourage financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they do business, including low- and moderate income neighborhoods,' according to the Federal Reserve.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) enforces these acts. It also operates the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, whose mission is ensuring that there are equal housing opportunities for everyone, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, national origin or family status.
Though it seems there may still be more work to be done addressing discrimination based on gender and race as well. 'Discrimination based on sex and familial status are among the most common fair housing complaints filed with federal agencies, along with discrimination based on disability and race,' notes a National League of Cities report.
If you're a single woman seeking a mortgage or home equity loan or HELOC , there are resources available to educate you about these products.
Bankrate insights
According to Bankrate's latest Credit Denials Survey, among U.S. adults who applied for a loan or financial product since December 2023, men and women were denied a mortgage in roughly equal numbers (5% and 4%, respectively). However, when it came to home equity loans or credit lines, double the number of women's applications were denied compared to men's (6% vs. 3%).
Some of the available resources include:
Federal Trade Commission consumer advice site
The FTC provides a series of descriptive articles regarding the risks of a home equity loan and a home equity line of credit (HELOC), explaining the basics of how they work, and how to shop for them.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau federal mortgage rules guide
This educational guide outlines exactly what you can expect under government regulations (and protections) when shopping for a mortgage. It covers what type of information lenders legally can and will request from you, financial qualifications for a mortgage, and ways to spot lending discrimination.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development housing counselors
HUD offers housing counseling and education services for home buyers. It has counseling service locations throughout the country and counselors can also be reached by phone.
In practical terms, there are resources that can help women become homeowners, including help with the significant hurdle of a down payment and of closing costs.
These resources include:
Home Ready
Fannie Mae offers this mortgage product. Requiring as little as 3 percent down, it is designed to help low-income borrowers and is open to both first-time and repeat homebuyers. Home Ready can be used to purchase or refinance a home.
Home Possible
Sponsored by Freddie Mac, Home Possible is another program that requires only a minimal down payment of 3 percent. In addition, this program allows mortgages to include co-borrowers who do not live in the same home, which can be helpful for low-income women who need assistance from relatives to secure a mortgage.
Closing cost assistance programs
The National Council of State Housing agencies maintains a directory of closing cost assistance programs around the country. Some programs cover up to 100 percent of closing costs.
National Homebuyers Fund
NHF, a non-profit corporation, offers down payment assistance programs. Over the past two decades it has awarded more than $538.4 million in funds.
The housing gender gap is not a problem that will be solved overnight, and many of its underlying causes — pay inequity, financing difficulties — are beyond any one individual's control. But there are ways women can address their home-buying behavior.
First of all, understand the local real estate scene. 'It's important to know whether it's a buyers or sellers market and whether there are a lot of homes on the market when you are negotiating,' Douglass says. Being armed with that information is crucial to your bargaining position.
When it comes to negotiating, 'Know what cards you can lay on the table and be willing to walk away,' Douglass adds. 'There's often a very emotional tie with women thinking 'I love this house,' and 'This is where I want to be.' Disconnecting the emotional tie' is important: You also have to consider the purchase rationally, as an investment and wealth-building asset.
Doing so can help women make sounder homebuying — and home-equity building — decisions.
What is home equity?
Home equity is the portion of your home that you own outright. Basically, it is the difference between what your home is worth and how much you still owe on your mortgage — current home value minus outstanding loan balance(s). The amount of home equity you have is the basis for determining how much you can borrow via a home equity loan or home equity line of credit (HELOC).
What can home equity be used for?
Your home equity can be borrowed against to pay for many of life's significant expenses. It can be used to settle or consolidate outstanding debts or loans, pay your kids' educational costs, or finance home repairs or renovations. Tapping it for home-related expenditures is especially popular, as the loan interest can then be tax-deductible, up to a certain amount.
What are the criteria for qualifying for a home equity loan?
In general, lenders look for a good credit score (above 700 to get the best rates), a low debt-to-income ratio, a minimum percentage of equity in your home (usually at least 20 percent) and sufficient income for repayments. Not that different from mortgage criteria, actually.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation
20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation

When selecting investments, it is easy to get hung up on a particular metric, such as a dividend yield or a price ratio, but investors need to look deeper or they might miss opportunities. Inc. AMZN provides an example: Its stock has typically traded at a high price-to-earnings ratio. Investors tend to look at a stock's forward P/E ratio, which is the price divided by analysts' consensus estimate for earnings per share over the following 12 months. Over the past 10 years, Amazon's stock has traded at an average forward P/E of 79.5, while the S&P 500 SPX has traded at an average forward P/E of 18.7, according to FactSet. But Amazon's stock was up 855% for 10 years through Friday, while the S&P 500 returned 235% with dividends reinvested. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? My father-in-law has dementia and is moving in with us. Can we invoice him for a caregiver? 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? 20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation It turns out that for Amazon's management team, bottom-line earnings traditionally weren't a focus. The emphasis was on reinvesting most of the cash being generated to expand the business in multiple directions. So the Amazon story was about revenue growth, rather than EPS growth. And that brings us to Nvidia Corp. NVDA. Last week Laila Maidan looked into Nvidia's relatively high forward P/E and explained why the stock might still be considered a bargain for long-term investors, based on analysts' expectations for the company's revenue growth. Nvidia's stock traded at a forward P/E of 28.1 at Friday's close, while the S&P 500 traded at a weighted forward P/E of 21.4. It is not a surprise to see Nvidia trading at a P/E valuation that is 31% higher than that of the index. But based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, Nvidia is expected to increase its sales per share at a compound annual growth rate of 41.7% through 2026, versus an expected sales-per-share CAGR of 5.5% for the S&P 500. All such estimates in this article are adjusted by FactSet to match calendar years; about 20% of companies in the S&P 500 have fiscal reporting periods that don't match the calendar. For Nvidia, investors pay a premium for the higher expected growth rate. And that sets the stage for a stock screen. Which companies trading at low P/E multiples are also expected to increase revenue quickly? For this screen we are looking at revenue growth projections — specifically sales per share. We are using the per-share numbers because they reflect expected dilution to a company's share count if it issues new shares to help fund an acquisition. Merging with a competitor will obviously make revenue increase. But if the share count rises significantly, sales per share will be lower. The per-share numbers help investors to understand whether or not a company might have overpaid for an acquisition. Starting with the S&P 500, we narrowed the list to companies trading at forward P/E ratios of 14 or less — half Nvidia's valuation. Actually, we rounded down, so the list was confined to stocks trading at a forward P/E of less than 14.5. Then we sorted the list by expected sales-per-share CAGR from calendar 2024 through 2026, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 stocks in the S&P 500 with the highest expected sales-per-share CAGR through 2025 among those trading at a P/E of less than 14.5: Company Ticker Industry Forward P/E Expected sales-per-share CAGR from 2024 through 2026 Expand Energy Corp. EXE Integrated Oil 12.0 39.6% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI Computer Processing Hardware 14.1 31.9% EQT Corp. EQT Integrated Oil 13.6 26.0% Micron Technology Inc. MU Semiconductors 9.4 23.2% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA Integrated Oil 8.3 21.2% First Solar Inc. FSLR Solar Power Equipment 8.7 20.5% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH Hotels/ Resorts/ Cruiselines 7.9 15.9% Incyte Corp. INCY Pharmaceuticals 10.7 15.5% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX Computer Peripherals 12.4 15.0% Gen Digital Inc. GEN Software 11.1 13.0% DaVita Inc. DVA Medical/ Nursing Services 11.6 12.0% Oneok Inc. OKE Oil & Gas Pipelines 14.2 11.8% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH Managed Healthcare 11.7 11.8% Aptiv PLC APTV Electrical Products 9.0 10.9% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH Managed Healthcare 12.5 10.7% Elevance Health Inc. ELV Managed Healthcare 10.5 10.4% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL Computer Processing Hardware 11.4 10.2% American International Group Inc. AIG Multi-Line Insurance 12.2 10.2% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA Hospital/ Nursing Management 14.4 9.9% Ball Corp. BALL Containers/ Packaging 14.3 9.7% Source: FactSet You may need to scroll the table to see all of the data. It is a varied list. Super Micro Computer SMCI ranks second, with a 31.9% CAGR expected for sales per share through 2026. The stock soared last month after President Donald Trump announced investment agreements with Saudi Arabia to build data centers in the U.S., which lifted suppliers of related equipment. Read: Super Micro's stock keeps surging. Here's what might come next. It might surprise you to see UnitedHealth Group UNH on the list, in light of the company's numerous difficulties. These have included higher-than-expected costs in its Medicare Advantage business, reports of a government investigation into possible healthcare fraud and the departure of Chief Executive Andrew Witty. But with the stock having tumbled 40% this year through Friday, with dividends reinvested, analysts working for brokerage and research firms believe the worst is over, with 21 out of 29 analysts polled by FactSet rating UnitedHealth a buy or the equivalent. Only three of the analysts rate the stock a sell or the equivalent. Leaving the companies passing the screen in the same order, here is a summary of analysts' opinions about the stocks: Company Ticker Share buy ratings Share neutral ratings Share sell ratings May 30 price Consensus price target Implied 12-month upside potential Expand Energy Corp. EXE 90% 10% 0% $116.13 $128.45 11% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI 47% 41% 12% $40.02 $40.69 2% EQT Corp. EQT 72% 24% 4% $55.13 $60.63 10% Micron Technology Inc. MU 85% 12% 3% $94.46 $123.95 31% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA 83% 17% 0% $24.31 $33.41 37% First Solar Inc. FSLR 78% 20% 2% $158.08 $202.43 28% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH 72% 28% 0% $17.65 $23.65 34% Incyte Corp. INCY 45% 52% 3% $65.06 $73.95 14% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX 59% 36% 5% $117.94 $119.88 2% Gen Digital Inc. GEN 45% 55% 0% $28.48 $31.83 12% DaVita Inc. DVA 9% 83% 8% $136.26 $167.14 23% ONEOK Inc. OKE 67% 33% 0% $80.84 $106.75 32% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH 42% 47% 11% $305.04 $356.93 17% Aptiv PLC APTV 68% 23% 9% $66.81 $75.76 13% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH 73% 17% 10% $301.91 $376.05 25% Elevance Health Inc. ELV 75% 25% 0% $383.84 $491.94 28% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL 81% 19% 0% $111.27 $136.52 23% American International Group Inc. AIG 55% 45% 0% $84.64 $90.88 7% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA 59% 34% 7% $381.39 $387.95 2% Ball Corp. BALL 61% 33% 6% $53.58 $61.23 14% Source: FactSet Any stock screen has its limits and should only be used as a tool as part of your own research if you are selecting individual companies for investment. Click on the tickers for more about each company. Read: Tomi Kilgore's detailed guide to the information available on the MarketWatch quote page 'You never know what might happen': How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? Strategists forecast a sizzling summer for small-cap stocks 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I'm afraid to ask her': My stepmother won't show me my father's will. What now?

Scott Galloway sends strong message on Morgan Stanley and work
Scott Galloway sends strong message on Morgan Stanley and work

Miami Herald

time44 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Scott Galloway sends strong message on Morgan Stanley and work

Scott Galloway, the popular podcaster and New York University professor, spoke with LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky on June 3 and revealed his path to success. The discussion involved some words of weakness and strengths that Americans may find important and inspiring. Significantly, Galloway revealed why he decided to leave Morgan Stanley. Don't miss .the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "The reason I left the corporate world was I literally recognized, 'I don't have the skills for this.'" Galloway told Roslansky on LinkedIn's The Path. "I was too insecure. People would go into a conference room at Morgan Stanley, and I would assume they were talking about me." "I couldn't handle people getting promoted that I didn't think were smart," Galloway continued. "It was a jambo of nerves and insecurity and I realized I am not cut out for the corporate world. I'm just not good at it. It wasn't because I thought, 'I'm so awesome. I need to let my freak flag of entrepreneurship fly.' I just knew I wouldn't be successful at a big company." Related: Scott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threat Galloway talked more about how he found his calling, including some bad advice from wealthy people that he suggests people might not want to follow. "The worst advice the billionaires give is 'follow your passion.'" Galloway said. "Anyone who tells you to 'follow your passion' is already rich." "What I would say to anyone in their twenties is: 'Your job is to workshop.' If you're one of those people who knows exactly what you want to do and gets traction in it right away, that puts you in the 2% most fortunate," he said. "The key is just to keep trying, be resilient until you land on something you think you could be great at." Galloway explained his personal past and how it led to making choices that many would see as out of the ordinary. "I was raised by a single immigrant mother who lived and died as a secretary. Neither of my parents graduated from high school," Galloway explained. "Our household income was never over $40,000, so it wasn't a given that I was going go to college." Galloway talked more about his weaknesses and the fact that those problems did not discourage him. "I was remarkably unremarkable but America used to love unremarkable people," he said. "I got into UCLA with a 2.27 GPA and spent most of college watching Planet of the Apes. Now, you have to weigh off your economic situation, the value of the degree and if you could go out and make more money on your own." More on the U.S. economy: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway also discussed his warnings and about being an entrepreneur, particularly about romanticizing the notion. For Galloway, it appears he had some fears about leaving the Morgan Stanley and the corporate world. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security Galloway explains his experience with teaching college students about their hopes and dreams. "A ton of kids come to my office hours and they'll say, 'I have offers from Google and Salesforce, but I really want to start my own business,'" he said. "And I'll say, 'Don't be an idiot, go work for Google.'" Galloway clarified more about his thoughts on advising students. "They don't expect to hear that from me. We have a tendency to romanticize entrepreneurship," he said before asking a vital question. "Just ask yourself, 'Are you willing to risk public failure? Are you willing to be emotionally stressed? Are you willing to strain your relationships? Are you willing to borrow money from your in-laws?'" "With a prospect, you might have to show up at Thanksgiving having lost it," Galloway stressed. "Are you willing to sell everyone all the time?'" Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: ‘He's Right'
Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: ‘He's Right'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: ‘He's Right'

Chuck Schumer and Elon Musk sure make strange bedfellows – but this is politics, after all. The Senate Majority Leader from New York, a fierce critic of DOGE who's called Musk a liar and a hypocrite and accused the Tesla CEO of 'sabotaging' critical benefits and a 'hostile takeover' of federal government, pirouetted on Tuesday, declaring, without irony: 'He's right.' This rare moment of political reconciliation is thanks to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping federal spending package narrowly passed by the House last month and under consideration in the Senate. To put it mildly, Musk is not a fan. Days after the Space X chief and President Trump revealed at the White House that Musk's role at DOGE would be severely narrowed – possibly over his growing dislike of the Republican-backed bill – the X owner could hold his tongue no longer. On Tuesday, he posted a fiery screed against the bill. Schumer's agreement was so strong that he stepped to a Senate chamber podium and declared on Tuesday: 'I agree with Elon Musk.' Holding a printed placard of Musk's X posts, he read from them, word-for-word. 'Within the hour, [Musk] put on X the following,' Schumer said. 'I have it right here so you can all see it – he said, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You did wrong. You know it. It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion, and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.'' To make it clear he wan't joking, Schumer added: 'He's right.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 22, with a narrow vote of 215–214 and one member voting 'present.' The vote was largely along party lines, with all Democrats opposing; Republican Representatives Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson voted against it. 'If even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process and is Trump's buddy, says the bill is bad, you can imagine how bad this bill is,' Schumer told reporters. 'Musk said people shouldn't vote for the bill. Let's hope the Republicans follow him, not Trump.' Schumer wasn't the only Democrat who agreed with Musk, as Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Sen. Bernie Sanders also echoed his scathing distaste for the package. 'Breaking news: Elon Musk and I agree with each other,' Jeffries said in a press conference. 'The GOP tax scam is a disgusting abomination.' Incidentally, the words 'disgusting' and 'abomination' were certainly having a moment on Tuesday. 'Musk is right,' Sanders conceded on X. 'Let's defeat this disgusting abomination.' The post Chuck Schumer Admits He Agrees With Elon Musk: 'He's Right' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store