Love Island fans slam show as ‘rigged' as they fear for fan favourite star
With five couples all still vying to make it into the ITV2 dating show's final, the past raft of contestants are back to end someone's dream early by collectively voting to dump one pair.
4
4
However, cautious fans have been left panicking that the direction of who they choose to vote off could have been manipulated - and it has left them fearing for one fan-favourite.
They think Shakira Khan could be axed over her romance with Harry Cooksley in favour of warring pair Dejon and Meg.
Dejon was seen bickering with his girlfriend over the last two episodes with many viewers questioning how they have remained in the villa - especially given that popularity for the pair is low.
With one couple already dumped, fans have begun to fear the worst and speculate as to what's to come on Sunday night's show.
Writing on X, one viewer said: "Old islanders choosing who to dump days before the final.. Meg and D will still sail to the final when the past few days has shown they aint it!!
"Ugh so bloody rigged it's not even funny."
Another added: "This is rigged cause no way the ex islanders will dump Meg and Dejon."
A third then posted: "I feel like they rigged the votes because they wanted Meg and Dejon to face the old islanders."
Before a fourth chimed in to say: "Guys it's so rigged! The producers want Dejon & meg to win."
Fearing for Shakira, someone else said online: "istg if the dumped islanders pick Shakira and harry and use harry as a scapegoat…"
Love Island fans slam Dejon for 'huge overreaction' as the girls play a trick on the boys
As another wrote: "If Shakira, Toni or Yas are dumped by those past islanders istg never use that twist again."
The Sun were the first to reveal that many of this year's Islanders would be making a return to the Majorcan villa for the jury trial vote twist.
The cast returned to the villa for the always-shocking Islander Jury on Friday and sent this pair packing.
In scenes that will air on Sunday night, former cast made their epic returns to make the huge decision.
Former Islanders including Harry Cooksley's ex Emma Munro, Billykiss Azeez, and smitten couple Harrison Solomon and Lauren Wood, voted for the couple they wanted to boot.
While The Sun can't reveal their identities at this crucial stage of the ITV2 dating show, we can share that Islanders made their decisions having watched back footage and been shocked by what they saw.
4
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Meghan Markle aides who accused her of bullying were frightened of 'what she would do to them' because of her 'infinite capacity for revenge', veteran royal correspondent claims
Royal aides who accused Meghan Markle of bullying were frightened of 'what she would do to them' after they spoke out, it was claimed today. The Duchess of Sussex's staff were left 'in a psychologically delicate state' and 'viewed her capacity for revenge as infinite', an expert has alleged. Meghan, 43, has always denied the allegations of bullying while she was working as a royal, which she described as an orchestrated smear campaign against her. Veteran royal correspondent Valentine Low broke the bullying story in May 2021, just before Harry and Meghan were to appear on screen with Oprah Winfrey to discuss Megxit. He claims that some of the royal staff who had worked with the Sussexes were still in a 'very fragile state' more than two years later - and despite the royal couple having emigrated 5,000 miles away to the US. 'They were very worried about what Meghan would do to them. They viewed her capacity for revenge as infinite', Mr Low said. 'They'd left the employ of the Royal Family and they still were in a psychologically delicate state as a result of what happened to them at that time'. He added: 'If they [the Sussexes] were difficult to work for then, they're difficult to work for now'. Mr Low was speaking to American royal commentator Kinsey Schofield's Unfiltered YouTube show. He told her that he believes that Harry and Meghan tried to stop and then discredit his story detailing allegations of bullying, adding that he believes that the fact they have lost 25 staff since 2017 shows they remain tough to work for. ''It was a very important factor, the litigious nature of Harry and Meghan. I had sight of various bits of documentary evidence. I saw things which totally backed up the story. I had utter confidence', he said. 'Before publication we put the allegations to Harry and Meghan and we got a very very long letter from their lawyers. Sometime later we got another slightly less long letter from their lawyers. It was very very feisty, very strong, saying basically "watch out". 'Then we published and after that we didn't hear a word from them'. Valentine said the story had to be published before the Oprah interview. 'If the story had come out after the Oprah interview, it would have just looked like sour grapes. It'd be lost in the noise. Meghan would come across as this this heroine, this person who'd been victimised', he said. 'The whole narrative would be about what she and Harry said about their experiences with the royal family. It would just get lost and no one would really care. 'You look back to the Diana years. Stories had come out that the marriage was in trouble. No-one knew for certain until Andrew Morton's book came out. People then realised that it was the truth. 'That is what happened with my bullying story'. He said when a newspaper ran the Meghan bullying story and 'doesn't get sued' it means 'there's probably something in it and suddenly you realise all those tabloid stories earlier suggesting she might be Duchess Difficult, actually maybe they're true'. A spokesman for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex accused Mr Low of 'recycling false, offensive, and long-discredited allegations' and spreading 'harmful gossip'. 'These claims—rooted in anonymous, unverifiable sources—form part of a broader and deeply troubling agenda that seeks to dehumanise a woman who has consistently stood up for fairness, dignity, and truth', they said. The spokesman said Meghan 'has faced years of unfounded attacks' part of a 'never-ending smear campaign'. 'Meghan remains undeterred by the noise and firmly focused on her family and work', the spokesman said. Jason Knauf, who is CEO of Prince William's Earthshot Prize, was once exceptionally close to the exiled couple. The New Zealander was one of just two people Harry told he was proposing to Meghan before they fell out over the Duchess' alleged poor treatment of staff. He and his colleagues have since been dubbed the 'Sussex Survivors'. He quit the royal household after accusing the Duchess of Sussex of mistreating two colleagues and undermining their confidence. Meghan has been haunted by claims she bullied royal staff - and Mr Knauf has repeatedly stood by his claims. In February this year, Jason insisted he 'wouldn't change a thing' and has 'no regrets' after he accused Meghan Markle of bullying staff 'out of the royal household'. In his first TV interview he stood by his complaint about the alleged 'totally unacceptable' behaviour of the Duchess of Sussex that leaked just before the couple's Oprah interview in 2021. 'The Duchess seems intent on always having someone in her sights', he had written in an 2018 email where he accused Meghan of 'bullying' and undermining the confidence of two staff. Harry later addressed the bullying claims in the Sussexes' Netflix docu-series, saying it was false and all the result of him and Meghan speaking truth to power. 'I can't think what my mum went through all those years ago by herself', he said. 'To see this institutional gaslighting that happens, it's extraordinary. And that's why everything that has happened to us was always going to happen to us because if you speak truth to power, that's how they respond'. Jason quit the royal household in 2021 but in April this year Prince William made him CEO of his beloved Earthshot Prize. Mr Knauf, a New Zealander who worked as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 's press secretary, appeared in a new documentary for 60 Minutes Australia, Where There's A Will - broadcast four months ago. In 2018, he had sent an internal email raising concerns about Meghan's alleged poor treatment of staff in the royal family, which was later leaked after Megxit. 'I am very concerned that the Duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year. The treatment of X was totally unacceptable,' he allegedly wrote. 'The Duchess seems intent on always having someone in her sights. She is bullying Y and seeking to undermine her confidence. We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behaviour towards Y.' He also said the estrangement between Prince Harry and Prince William has been 'hard and sad' but added that William has chosen to be 'private' about it. Jason was made a Lieutenant of the Royal Victorian Order by the Prince of Wales at Windsor Castle in 2023 - showing how good the relationship still is. And then he returned to work for William this year. The Duchess of Sussex, 43, has always denied the allegations of bullying, which she described an orchestrated smear campaign against her. Harry and Meghan's spokesman said at the time: 'Let's just call this what it is-a calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation.' There was also a statement to the media calling the bullying claims defamatory. Buckingham Palace launched an internal review into the bullying claims, but the findings were never made public. Prior to their disagreement, Jason said he'd had 'great times' working with the Sussexes, and said their 2018 Windsor wedding was a 'magical experience'. He said: 'We had lots of great times, working on their wedding was an amazing magical experience and I wish them absolutely all the best with their lovely family.' Writing in his biography about the staff who serve the royals - titled Courtiers - author Valentine Low said the palace 'needed evidence of the duty of care the organisation had showed them [the Sussexes]'. Mr Low wrote that Meghan was already leaving a 'trail of evidence behind, so that when the time came for them [Harry and Meghan] to leave the monarchy, she would be able to say: look how they failed to support me'. Such as when Meghan went to HR for help and was given a 'sympathetic hearing' but the department was ultimately there to deal with 'employee issues, not members of the Royal Family'. Samantha Cohen and other courtiers were aware of bullying allegations lodged against the Sussexes as early as 2018. 'Samantha The Panther', as she was known, told Australian media that she was one of ten staff members interviewed by the Palace following the complaints. However, it was Meghan that won in the battle to air her grievances first when - according to Mr Low - she 'hijacked the narrative by making it all about her mental health' and all the things royal staff had done to help the couple succeed were forgotten, allowing Meghan to point out all the times they had failed her. These failures were then singled out for millions to see during the Sussexes' interview with Oprah in 2021. Among her claims that concerns about her mental health were not taken seriously by staff, the couple also said separately that the Royal Family was racist. Producer and journalist Jane Marie, who worked with Harry and Meghan during the development of Archewell Audio projects, insisted to Vanity Fair that Meghan is 'just a lovely, genuine person'. Other staff members have claimed that she would send her employees gifts ranging from dog leashes to skincare products. These wildly varying accounts of the work culture Meghan presides over are supported by a source that worked with her in the run-up to her wedding in 2018, who said she was 'lovely when it is all going her way but a demon when the worm turns'.
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The birthday 'gimmick' Meghan Markle project that never was: Royal expert reveals the Duchess's scrapped plans that would've featured Adele and Stella McCartney but was 'quietly shelved'
As Meghan Markle celebrates turning 44 today, royal observers may be reminded of the bold campaign she launched for her birthday in 2021 - which was dropped almost as quickly as it began. Meghan celebrated her 40th birthday by announcing an initiative to help women back into work after the pandemic in a film featuring Melissa McCarthy and a 'comedy' cameo by Prince Harry. In a project titled '40x40', she asked 40 of her friends to commit 40 minutes of their time to mentor and support women going back to work. Meghan was hoping to create a domino effect of counselling wider than her circle. But soon after the Archewell campaign went live, there was radio silence from the Duchess. Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail he believes the initiative was a 'gimmick' designed to 'boost Meghan's appeal'. He said: 'The idea seemed, on the face of it, an imaginative way to celebrate her 40th birthday. 'It also promoted the cause of gender equality which she had publicly supported for many years. 'What made this particularly significant was that she had several top celebrities on board.' He said: 'Melissa McCarthy starred in a rather dotty video launching the idea with Harry doing some juggling in the background. 'Adele and Stella McCartney publicly backed it, as well as Princess Eugenie. 'Apart from Serena Williams, Meghan and Harry have struggled to get A-list support for their projects, being reportedly estranged from, for example, David and Victoria Beckham. 'Some of the big names who attended their wedding hardly knew them. 'However, this potentially worthy project appears to have been quietly shelved, lending credence to the claim that Meghan is incapable of organising anything properly. 'There was never any clear idea of how it would be funded or how exactly it would be beneficial to spend just 40 minutes with someone. 'Also underlining the Sussexes' global reach, this was supposed to have a "ripple effect" around the world boosted by social media. 'She called for "a global wave of compassion and positive change". In a statement on the Archewell website, Meghan described how the scheme was meant to empower the millions of women who lost their jobs during Covid 'This has not happened and very few reportedly shared her birthday poem connected to this project. 'It was clearly just a gimmick designed to boost Meghan's appeal, which she may have overestimated both then and now.' And this was not the only time Meghan appeared to over-reach and under-deliver in her promises. The royal expert said: 'Her new cookery series With Love, Meghan has failed to reach the Netflix top 300 for the first half of this year, which is ominous news for the Sussexes. 'Perhaps she would benefit from 40 minutes of mentorship! 'She recommended "time spent in service to others", a topic about which she knows very little, though she did, as a senior working royal have the chance to serve and didn't last long in it.' Meghan has always touted herself as an independent person and has embarked on a number of projects both before and after marrying into the Royal Family. Before marrying Harry, Meghan was an actress, starring on the hit series Suits, and an avid lifestyle blogger as the creator of The Tig, where she wrote about style, food and travel. It was quite popular until she had to shutter its doors in 2017 ahead of her wedding. And while the public opinion about them started to sour after they stepped back from the Royal Family, it didn't stop them from getting Hollywood business deals. Together, the couple only became more lucrative as they pursued a combined $120million deal with Spotify and Netflix. Their faces suddenly became splashed across TV screens more than ever as they completed a series of interviews and documentaries one after another. Meghan also launched her 'Archetypes' podcast on Spotify, where she interviewed various power players like US talk show host Andy Cohen and tried to 'subvert the labels that try to hold women back'. However the podcast didn't seem to take off as it was promptly canceled after one season. Meghan, Harry and the Spotify team produced only one 13-episode series of a podcast for the company and then parted ways. They were later called 'f***ing grifters' by Bill Simmons, who was the head of podcast innovation and monetisation at Spotify at the time. This did not help Meghan's reputation of being hard to work with. Personal branding and publicity expert Katrina Owens told the Daily Mail Meghan's projects have all seemed to be 'short-lived' and lacking follow-through in a way that feels 'messy and uncoordinated'. At the end of her 40x40 video, McCartney said: 'See you at 50!' Perhaps we will finally see her project come to light in six years time. Daily Mail contacted Archewell for comment. Meghan: Hey Melissa, do you have a second? McCarthy: Hey yeah, of course. I'm working on that email I told you I was going to do - that organic garden? That's what I'm doing. [McCarthy is seen solving a Rubik's Cube, unaware that her camera is on] Meghan: You know your camera's on, right? I can see you. McCarthy: Aha, hang on, I'll be right back. [McCarthy gets up from her chair] Meghan: No no, it's no problem, its fine. McCarthy: I think this will probably seem better for you. [McCarthy sits back down wearing a posh hat and carrying a cup and saucer] Meghan: Ok, it's my 40th birthday and I've got an idea. McCarthy: I know what it is. Meghan: Really? McCarthy: My first guess- is it another photoshoot under a tree where you're looking very peaceful? Meghan: Peaceful under tree is me every day. McCarthy: No? Ok. Are we finally getting matching tattoos? [McCarthy holds up an illustration showing Meghan and McCarthy surrounded by roses underneath a banner which says: 'Besties Forever'] Meghan: I mean, you know I already have something very similar across my back. McCarthy: This one's you, and that one's me, cause sometimes I'm like: Are we twinsies? Meghan: You know, maybe we save it for when I turn 50. McCarthy: Are you finally going to do a Suits reunion. Meghan: Why would I do a Suits reunion for my birthday? McCarthy: Why would the cast of Friends do a reunion for my birthday? But they did it. Meghan: They did say they would only ever do it for a historical event. I think the bigger idea is - McCarthy: Yacht party, yacht party! Who's ready for a yacht? [McCarthy puts on a beach hat and sunglasses while Meghan giggles] McCarthy: When you say no yacht, do you mean zero yachts? [Meghan shakes her head] Meghan: No, here's the idea. Because I'm turning 40, I'm asking 40 friends to donate 40 minutes of their time to help mentor a woman who's mobilising back into the workforce. Over two million women in the US alone and tens of millions around the world have lost their jobs due to Covid. And I think if we all do it and all commit 40 minutes to some sort of active service, we can create a ripple effect. You in? McCarthy: Yes times 40. Forty forty forty, and then 40 times I say yes. Is it ok if I still do it in the hat? Meghan: I wouldn't expect anything else. McCarthy: Thanks friend. Bye friend. Meghan: Cheers.
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Alan Davies: Think Ahead review – comedian addresses his childhood abuse in return to stage
It's been 10 years since Alan Davies's last standup show, since when, he says, he has had a third child, and surpassed – by distressing margins – the ages of lance corporal Jones in Dad's Army and 'the mad old git in Back to the Future'. Another significant development was his 2020 book revealing the story of his childhood sexual abuse by his father. In his new show, Think Ahead, Davies addresses that on stage – and demonstrates, with reference to his laboured breathing, that he is experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder while doing so. That can't be anything other than a compelling stage moment, to see a 'people-pleasing comedian' (his words) of 30 years' standing open up – and so rawly – about a difficult subject unaddressed in his comedy until now. Davies does so with honesty and a lightness of touch. He acknowledges that it's an awkward topic for mirth, and makes good choices about when to set the jokes aside and when to find the funny. The funny? This was a dad who made colour copies of his child sexual abuse images on the household printer ('How many trips to Rymans?!') and whose diary, when unearthed by Davies years later, focused exclusively on golf. Davies's abuse is not the main focus of Think Ahead, far from it, and the remainder delivers one big-laughs set-piece after another. There is material about his youngest son, now nine, and some choice ranting in Alf Garnett-alike character as a man apoplectic about Ulez. There's also plenty of blue humour, of a type that couldn't fail to tickle a crowd, but which Davies elevates with his vivid image-making – of the sexual position you should adopt in the event of Viagra-induced heart attack, say, or of his experience delivering a poo sample for cancer screening. How do these very disparate routines fit together? You could argue that the childhood abuse material is dissonant with the broad sex comedy elsewhere. It also underpins it somehow, offsetting with shade the light of Davies's default people-pleasing superficiality, making the laughs wilder because they are harder won. The upshot is a striking new show, a cross-section of the 59-year-old's life now that reveals parts his previous shows couldn't reach. At Orchard at Gilded Balloon, Edinburgh, until 10 August. All our Edinburgh festival reviews. The NSPCC offers support to children on 0800 1111, and adults concerned about a child on 0808 800 5000. The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac) offers support for adult survivors on 0808 801 0331
