Legal experts warn MK Party's call for lifestyle audits for judge could undermine judicial independence
The MKP not happy with the country's judges
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
Legal experts have warned that a call by the Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) for the implementation of lifestyle audits for judges could insinuate illegal conduct by judicial officers and possibly undermine their rulings.
Non-governmental organisations in the legal sphere, political parties, and legal experts have argued that there are already proper channels to raise concerns about judges without impugning their character, emphasising that any allegations must be substantiated.
This reaction follows the MKP's statement this week, calling for a lifestyle audit for judges. The party is unhappy with several court judgments that it believes do not make sense and indicate that the judges may not be serving the South African public but rather other interests due to inducements.
MKP spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said they have been concerned for some time about the conduct of judges, which they believe no longer serves the public interest. He cited recent rulings, such as the dual citizenship verdict delivered by the Constitutional Court and the case involving MKP leader John Hlophe's suitability to sit in the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), as triggers for this call.
'Members of Parliament are required to declare their assets; therefore, the same standards should apply to judges, who wield immense constitutional power and influence. Judges must be held to an even higher standard of scrutiny and accountability in society. South Africa cannot afford to have a judiciary that is shielded from the same transparency expected of other arms of state.
'Judges are not infallible but human and prone, like all of us, to error and influence, including even bias, whether conscious or otherwise,' it said.The MKP in their statement called for the immediate implementation of lifestyle audits and the declaration of assets for all members of the judiciary, from the highest echelons of the Constitutional Court to the lower benches.
These audits must be conducted swiftly, independently, thoroughly, and regularly, it said.
'Transparency is not a threat; it is a necessity. The integrity of our courts depends not only on the law but on public trust, and that trust must be earned through openness, not opacity.
The MKP will not rest until the judiciary is held to the same, if not higher, ethical standards expected of any public servant. The days of sacred cows are over. South Africans are watching, and they demand answers,' said the party.
Mbekezeli Benjamin of Judges Matter said the requirements in the judges' code of conduct are much stricter than even those of MPs.
'We are not aware of any legal requirement for any holders of constitutional office – including judges – to be subject to lifestyle audits. Judges are already subject to the most stringent asset and income declarations of all public office bearers.'
He noted that only judges are required to declare their income and assets of their immediate family members, including their spouses and children.
'Unlike Members of Parliament or Cabinet ministers, judges are also required to declare the income, assets, and interests of their immediate family.
'Unless a compelling argument is made as to why any particular judge would need to be subjected to a lifestyle audit over and above the declaration requirements, it's not clear why judges would be subject to a rule that no other constitutional office-bearer is subject to. To maintain their independence and ethics, there is also a strict and well-known system to control conflicts of interest and recusal in specific cases. There is therefore no reason to doubt that judges are only influenced by the law and the Constitution,' he said.
He noted that according to the JSC Annual Report 2023/24, all 252 judges in South Africa are in full compliance and have declared all their assets.
Glynnis Breytenbach, DA Shadow Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, said 'I do not necessarily agree with the views of the MKP, but have no further comment. It is mischievous to malign the integrity of the judiciary without concrete evidence.'
Constitutional expert and lawyer Mpumelelo Zikalala cautioned that great care needs to be taken in handling such matters. He noted that calling for a lifestyle audit on an individual could imply suspicion of corruption.
Zikalala emphasised that judges have a code of conduct that they must comply with.He pointed out that every judgment made in the country has its roots in the Constitution. Those who feel there is something wrong can call for a constitutional amendment when those are open.
'There are processes that are followed. If there is a feeling that there is something wrong with the judgment and the process, you can complain to the Judicial Service Commission and present facts. What you cannot do is make allegations that are not substantiated.'
THE MERCURY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Discussing BBBEE redress policies effect on the economy
JOHANNESBURG - The critique of South Africa's so-called "racial policies" by the United States has again put BBEE in the spotlight. READ: Ramaphosa defends BEE policies in Parliament Broad-based economic empowerment measures were put in place to counter apartheid policies that disadvantaged different groups of South Africans through poorer education, a lack of promotion and confiscation of their assets and rights. Many have argued it's not working. An academic says that the complex problems affecting the country's economic growth cannot be reduced to policies aimed at redress. Dr Khwezi Mabasa, the Economic and Social Policy Lead at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung South Africa, discussed this with eNCA.
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
New documentary shines a light on the environmental damage caused by Elon Musk's tech ambitions
In the broiling shadow of rocket flames and broadband dreams, the inconvenient truths of Elon Musk's techno-utopia are being tidily shuffled out of frame. Canadian director Julien Elie's haunting new black-and-white documentary film, Shifting Baselines, does not shout its message. It doesn't need to. The scorched landscapes of Boca Chica, Texas, where Elon Musk's SpaceX has set up shop, speak for themselves. They whisper of seabirds gone silent, of beaches turned to junkyards, and of a natural world redrawn by a billionaire's imagination. Back in South Africa, the airwaves have been thick with chatter about Musk's Starlink satellite network finally getting a potential regulatory green light to operate here after sustained pressure from Musk himself and the Trump administration. Some have hailed the prospect of Musk's high-speed internet in rural areas as a form of digital salvation for South Africans marooned, in a communications sense, in the hinterland. That there could be benefits, in particular, for rural schools and rural police stations seems clear. It has also been notable how many voices have been happy to overlook the reality that there already exist alternatives, some of which have been pioneered by local businesses at considerable expense; and that the projected costs of a Starlink terminal (around R6,000) and the monthly fee (at least two or three times the average internet contract) will put it far beyond fantasy for the vast majority of South Africa's rural citizens. But amid the enthusiastic flag-waving for this latest piece of technological deliverance, there has been an even more deafening silence about its environmental cost. Starlink junk burning up ozone layer Shifting Baselines' title refers to a concept coined by the marine biologist Daniel Pauly, who explains how each generation accepts the ecological degradation of its lifetime as its new normal. Over time, we forget what the planet of our ancestors once looked like, smelled like, sounded like. It is a quiet kind of erasure. The documentary shows us the once-thriving ecosystems around Musk's rocket launch sites reduced to industrial debris, and the community of Boca Chica transformed into a workers' colony for Musk's Starbase operation. The birds are dwindling in numbers. The fish are tiny. And the sky, once a canvas for stars, is now obscured by satellites and space junk. SpaceX's satellite constellation, Starlink, makes up more than 60% of all satellites orbiting Earth. According to the UK-based space firm Space Forge, about 40% of the material now burning up in Earth's atmosphere comes from Starlink satellites, which are designed to last only five years and disintegrate on entry. That translates to at least 500kg of incinerated hardware every day. Harvard astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell told in October 2024 that there is now a Starlink satellite re-entry almost every day. Some days see multiple burn-ups. These are not elegant, imperceptible disappearances. They contribute to atmospheric pollution in ways that are only just beginning to be studied. An October 2024 letter to the US Federal Communications Commission, signed by more than 100 top space scientists, warned urgently that the effects of these satellites have yet to be adequately researched. Their concerns were unequivocal: the pace of satellite deployment has vastly outstripped the regulatory frameworks meant to assess their environmental impact. 'Over just five years, Starlink has launched more than 6,000 units and now make up more than 60% of all satellites. The new space race took off faster than governments were able to act. Regulatory agencies review individual licences and lack the policies in place to assess the total effects of all proposed mega-constellations,' they wrote. 'Until national and international environmental reviews can be completed, we should stop launching further low Earth orbit satellites as part of constellations that provide consumer internet connectivity.' Meanwhile, light pollution from the Starlink array is already interfering with astronomers' work. It affects projects like South Africa's own Salt telescope, a major scientific facility — and genuine national treasure — whose vision of the stars is now often smeared by the unintended signatures of broadband ambition. If Starlink comes to South Africa, the astronomer Federico di Vruno told Reuters this week, 'it will be like shining a spotlight into someone's eyes, blinding us to the faint radio signals from celestial bodies'. Tech-optimism is eclipsing climate change realities Elie's film returns often to scenes of spectators in lawn chairs, watching Musk's rocket launches with misty eyes. Most are Boomers clearly nostalgic about the Space Race of their youth. Some describe the spectacle of a SpaceX launch as their 'Apollo moment'. SpaceX employees scrawl 'We are explorers' on bollards. But the documentary carefully strips away the romance to reveal a more uncomfortable truth. The rockets and satellites rise and return from land and skies now scarred by the vehicles of Musk's monomaniacal, megalomaniacal ambition. This is the paradox at the heart of the Musk myth. His obsession with space colonisation is sold as a response to climate collapse on Earth. Yet in pursuing that dream, he accelerates the very forces he claims to resist. The rockets that might someday touch down on Mars are poisoning the skies of Earth today. Each new satellite that promises to bridge digital divides also quietly widens the environmental ones. All the while, climate change — once seemingly the moral rallying cry of a generation — appears to be quietly slipping off the agenda. The inevitable reports are now emerging, a veritable flurry this past weekend alone, about the jobs that are already being lost to AI. What is virtually absent from the discourse is the ruinous environmental impact of the Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT: a November 2024 study found that just 16% of respondents were aware of the huge amount of water required to cool AI servers. Shifting Baselines invites us to look beyond the dazzle of innovation from the tech industry with which we are all bombarded daily to the dull, persistent erosion of the real world. It asks us to consider what we are losing in our quest to win the future — as the sky fills up with ghosts. DM here.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
MK Party axes Floyd Shivambu as SG over controversial visit with Prophet Shepherd Bushiri
Willem Phungula | Published 3 hours ago The Jacob Zuma-led MK Party (MKP) has fired Floyd Shivambu from his Secretary-General position for an unsanctioned visit with controversial Malawian fugitive Prophet Shepherd Bushiri who fled South Africa in 2020. Bushiri and his wife Mary fled the country in 2020 after being granted bail on charges including fraud and money laundering. A Malawian court recently granted South Africa's request to extradite the couple to face charges, including rape and fraud, and they have indicated their intention to appeal. In a statement read by the party's national chairperson Nkosinathi Nhleko, the party said Shivambu's visit to Bushiri was not sanctioned by the party and violated its' constitution. The party also announced that Shivambu will be redeployed to parliament. Jacob Zuma attended the press conference to announce Shivambu's axing on Tuesday in Durban and there were signs before the conference even started that Shivambu no longer part of the top leadership - he chose to sit closer to the media contingent and away from Zuma. 'On Monday, President Jacob Zuma met with the National Officials of uMkhonto weSizwe Party, to reflect on the state of the organisation. As part of the deliberations of the national officials, the matter pertaining to the recent trip undertaken by the Secretary General Floyd Shivambu to Malawi was reflected upon. "After lengthy discussions and considerable inputs from the national officials, it was concluded that the actions by (Shivambu) were found to be against the spirit and the prescripts of the MK Party Constitution. Most specifically, Section 3 (j) under 'Offences', which stipulates the following: j) Undertaking international trips and participating in activities and programmes that are opposed to the agenda of the MK Party or an allied party,' Nhleko said, reading from the statement In addition, the party said the visit came after the Republic of Malawi's Chief Resident Magistrate delivered a ruling that granted South Africa request for extradition. 'Based on the deliberations by the National Officials, it was reaffirmed that the trip was not an officially sanctioned programme of the organisation or the President, which therefore goes against the constitution of the party. "Due to the serious nature of this matter and its implications for the party, its image, values and principles, The President and the n ational officials were left with no other option but to act swiftly in addressing this m atter,' Nhleko said. Shivambu joined the MKP from the EFF in August last year and was immediately appointed as the national organiser, in November he was elevated to the position Secretary-General. In response, Shivambu said he had accepted that he had been removed as Secretary-General, saying he regretted his decision to go to Malawi. He also thanked Zuma for entrusting him with high positions in the party. Despite the party's citing of Shivambu's Malawi trip, dissenting voices within the party have also accused him giving senior positions to newcomers while overlooking founding members. Shivambu last month said no party member had raised their unhappiness with him in formal meetings of the party and he would not entertain faceless voices on social media platforms. [email protected]
