How to run a strategy pre-mortem with ChatGPT's o3 model
{{^loggedIn}} {{/loggedIn}}
{{#loggedIn}} {{/loggedIn}}
Next Story
Jaspreet Bindra ,Anuj Magazine Let's say you are a project manager preparing to launch a product or a strategy. And you want a peek into all the ways it could fail. Imagine you could look into the future to see all the ways your product or strategy could fail. (Pixabay) Gift this article
Let's begin with the term 'pre-mortem'. Unlike a post-mortem that analyses the reasons behind a particular outcome, a pre-mortem is a structured exercise done before you launch a major initiative. Everyone imagines the strategy has failed badly two years in the future and works backward to list the reasons. The team then turns those hypothetical failure causes into risk-mitigation actions or design changes while there's still time.
Let's begin with the term 'pre-mortem'. Unlike a post-mortem that analyses the reasons behind a particular outcome, a pre-mortem is a structured exercise done before you launch a major initiative. Everyone imagines the strategy has failed badly two years in the future and works backward to list the reasons. The team then turns those hypothetical failure causes into risk-mitigation actions or design changes while there's still time. Why is doing pre-mortems so hard?
Because it's not just logic at play—it's ego, politics, and fear. Leaders hesitate to run pre-mortems because they're already emotionally invested in the strategy. Confirmation bias creeps in—we look for reasons it'll work, not why it might fail. And then there's the fear factor: calling out what could go wrong can feel like you're betting against the team. So the session becomes a formality. Risks are raised, maybe even nodded at, but rarely owned or acted upon.
The tool to use: ChatGPT o3 model. Access via https://chatgpt.com/ Example:
A chief strategy officer at a telecom firm greenlights a bold expansion into the Asia-Pacific market using AI-driven cybersecurity. Before execution, she runs a pre-mortem with OpenAI's o3 model using the following prompt: Assume that the following strategy, which was selected as the most promising option after red teaming and simulation, has failed spectacularly two years after implementation.
Strategy chosen: [[Insert final strategy description here]]
Your task is to conduct a pre-mortem analysis—working backward from failure to identify what could have gone wrong.
Critically evaluate and respond to the following:
1. What were the early warning signs we missed or ignored?
2. What flawed assumptions turned out to be false?
3. Which internal weaknesses—talent, systems, incentives, org structure—amplified the failure?
4. What external shocks (market, regulation, geopolitical, tech evolution) derailed the strategy?
5. Where did execution break down (timing, leadership, resourcing, dependencies)?
6. Which stakeholders (clients, partners, employees) resisted or disengaged, and why?
7. What feedback loops or course-correction mechanisms were missing or underused?
8. If you could go back, what 3 specific safeguards or contingency plans would you embed in the strategy before launch?
Be brutally honest. Your goal is not to defend the strategy but to make it failure-proof. What makes ChatGPT o3 special?
1. Advanced reasoning capabilities: The o3 model excels in complex tasks requiring step-by-step logical reasoning.
2. Multimodal integration: o3 seamlessly combines text and visual data, allowing it to interpret and reason about images, charts, and graphics within its analytical processes.
3. Real-time tools access: The model incorporates live tools usage into its reasoning, enabling it to extend its capabilities at the inference time. Also read
How to crack research papers at breakneck speed
How to identify if an image is generated by ChatGPT
Mastering complex research papers faster with NotebookLM's Mind Maps
Eliminating repetitive phrases in ChatGPT responses
Note: The tools and analysis featured in this section demonstrated clear value based on our internal testing. Our recommendations are entirely independent and not influenced by the tool creators.
Jaspreet Bindra is co-founder and CEO of AI&Beyond. Anuj Magazine is also a co-founder. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Klarna CEO says AI could cause a white-collar job crisis and recession
When Klarna announced in 2024 that its AI assistant could handle the work of 700 customer service agents, it made headlines as one of the earliest real-world examples of large-scale job automation. Now, a year later, Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski is raising the alarm himself: artificial intelligence might not just be replacing roles, it could be putting the global economy at risk. Speaking on The Times Tech podcast, Siemiatkowski said, "There will be an implication for white-collar jobs," warning that such a shift "usually leads to at least a recession in the short term." Siemiatkowski added: "Unfortunately, I don't see how we could avoid that, with what's happening from a technology perspective."advertisementKlarna, best known for its "buy now, pay later" services, has been at the forefront of AI adoption. The company partnered early with OpenAI to roll out an assistant that has now handled over 2.3 million customer queries. The automation helped the company reduce its headcount from 5,500 to 3,000 employees over the last two years. While the move boosted Klarna's revenue per employee and lowered costs, it also highlighted a difficult truth: AI doesn't just improve efficiency; it removes the need for humans in many has been among the few tech leaders willing to speak openly about AI's potential to eliminate jobs. "I want to be honest, I want to be fair, and I want to tell what I see so that society can start taking preparations," he But in a candid speech at Klarna's headquarters in May, the CEO admitted the company may have overcorrected. "From a brand perspective, a company perspective, I just think it's so critical that you are clear to your customer that there will always be a human if you want," he said. And so, last month, Klarna decided to shift back a little. The company started recruiting human agents again, testing a flexible, remote support model where agents can log in as needed – much like ride-share drivers do."Two things can be true at the same time," Siemiatkowski told a London SXSW audience last week. He believes AI is still crucial for handling repetitive or "boring" tasks, but human interaction remains essential for empathy and nuanced balancing act reflects a wider industry trend. Tech leaders like Google's Sundar Pichai and Microsoft's Satya Nadella have all noted that AI now writes around 30 per cent of their companies' code – and in the case of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the company may soon (in about 18 months) start to use AI to write 100 per cent of code. Zuckerberg has also said that AI is already equal to a mid-level engineer and could soon outperform even top coders. OpenAI's Sam Altman recently claimed that AI generates 50 per cent of the code at some firms, and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicted that by the end of this year, all code will likely be companies like Duolingo and Shopify are laying off human staff and replacing them with AI. Shopify now requires managers to prove that a task can't be done by AI before hiring a not all industry voices believe the outcome has to be dire. Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, advised teenagers to embrace AI as the defining tech of their generation. At Google I/O, he said the industry could create "more valuable, usually more interesting jobs," even if old ones disappear. He emphasised skills like adaptability and creativity as essential for future-proof Siemiatkowski, the short-term outlook remains grim. He believes CEOs have been downplaying the economic risk posed by AI. "I don't want to be one of them," he said.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Eye for AI: Stocks recover as tech giants spend big on AI infrastructure — what lies ahead?
Shares of companies that provide infrastructure for artificial intelligence (AI) development bounced back from a tumble earlier this year, as spending by Big Tech restores investor confidence in the tumultuous sector, reported Bloomberg. Goldman Sachs Group tracked two baskets — one tracking AI data centres and electrical equipment stocks, which rose 52 per cent, and another that follows shares of companies that supply power for data centres, which also rose 39 per cent. Both went up from their April lows. Individual standouts in these baskets include Vertiv Holdings Co, which has notched a 94 per cent gain since April 4, as well as Constellation Energy Corp, which went up 75 per cent in that same period. The world's largest technology companies, including Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Meta are continuing to spend big on artificial intelligence, mitigating doubts over whether money will continue flowing to the firms that are essential to AI infrastructure, said Bloomberg. Forecasts for capital expenditures to support AI demand are up by 16 per cent since the beginning of the year, according to Bloomberg Intelligence's Robert Schiffman. 'Earnings season reminded investors that generative-AI doesn't run on buzzwords — it runs on concrete, copper and gigawatts,' CEO of Roundhill Financial Dave Mazza told Bloomberg. Shares of AI infrastructure companies are witnessing an uptick over the business potential of artificial intelligence which sparked a spending spree on data centres to fund the development of AI programs like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude, reported Bloomberg. A strong start in 2025 unravelled as worries over competition from China's DeepSeek startup and broader uncertainty over global trade led investors to be wary of the billions of dollars of investment made during the period. Concerns that tech giants such as Microsoft were walking away from data centre projects further pushed the selloff. Investor sentiment improved when President Donald Trump announced the pause of most of the tariffs he had rolled out in early April, which fuelled a rally that pushed the S&P 500 Index near an all-time high hit in February, as per Bloomberg data. Another reason is the latest earnings season which helped investors gain confidence in the sector, as big tech companies indicated they were continuing to lay money out on AI development. Among these was Meta, which signalled that the hundreds of billions in AI spending it had flagged earlier in the year was still on track, said Bloomberg. Recent corporate deals also suggest that spending on AI infrastructure remains intact. Amazon plans to invest $10 billion in North Carolina to expand its data centre infrastructure to support AI and cloud computing technologies, reported Bloomberg. Deputy chief investment officer at Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions, Max Gokhman told Bloomberg that investor confidence in AI could take another hit if the trade war once again heats up and sparks concerns that a downturn in global economic growth will see companies cut on AI spending. 'If the economy falls into a recession, margins will be under pressure, companies will be forced to lay off workers and cut spending on AI,' Gokhman told Bloomberg.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Ahead of WWDC 2025, former Apple employees reveal why LLM Siri is still not ready
Just hours before Apple's WWDC 2025 event, fresh information from former Apple employees has come to light, offering some clarity on why the company's new AI-based Siri is still not ready for launch. While Apple is reportedly working on a major upgrade to its voice assistant using large language models (LLMs), insiders say the project has been tougher than to a report from Financial Express, the company has been trying to build these LLM features on top of the existing Siri system, which already works on millions of devices worldwide. But this approach has brought several issues. According to ex-employees, combining old machine learning code with newer AI models has caused frequent bugs and slowed down development. On the other hand, companies like OpenAI, which started from scratch with their voice assistants, have avoided such problems and moved ahead former Apple employee said that it was clear from the beginning that just adding new layers to Siri would not be enough. Inside Apple, some leaders had described the plan as 'climbing the hill,' meaning they wanted to slowly improve Siri instead of completely rebuilding it. However, the results have reportedly been disappointing. 'It's clear they stumbled,' the person said, highlighting the gap between expectations and reality. As of now, there is no confirmation on when the new version of Siri will be released. While there are chances that Apple may talk about it during WWDC 2025, reports suggest the final rollout could take until 2027. That is still a long way off, especially at a time when rivals are already offering more advanced conversational though Apple is known for waiting until its products are polished, the delay in Siri's upgrade raises questions about whether the company is falling behind in the AI race. For now, fans and developers might get a preview of what is coming, but they should not expect the new Siri to be available anytime latest Apple WWDC 2025 event will start tonight at 10:30PM and it is expected to showcase updates to Apple's operating systems — iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS 26, visionOS 26, watchOS 26, and tvOS 26. A fresh design across platforms and improvements in Apple's AI tools are expected to take the spotlight, according to several reports. You can stay tuned to India Today Tech for all the updates.
