logo
Daughter of man pushed to death by his partner upset by leniency of sentence

Daughter of man pushed to death by his partner upset by leniency of sentence

BreakingNews.ie22-07-2025
The daughter of a man who died after being pushed by his partner has told of the family's upset at what they perceive as the leniency of the sentence and how they were censored when providing victim impact statements.
Karen Ryan's father James 'Shay' Ryan died after his partner Olesja Hertova 'forcefully' pushed him. Hertova was sentenced to two years and nine months in prison when she pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court on July 4th.
Advertisement
The sentence was backdated to when she went into custody in August 2024.
Ms Ryan told RTÉ radio's Oliver Callan show that she had been suspicious of the circumstances surrounding her father's death as there had been a history of domestic violence by Hertova against her father and their daughter Ellie, which she had reported to Tusla.
However, she was told that the details of the domestic violence had to be retracted from her victim impact statement because Hertova pleaded guilty.
'If this had gone to trial, all that domestic violence history would have been allowed into trial. But because she had admitted to manslaughter, it's not allowed in. So what we would like to see is a change in the reform of this.
Advertisement
'So that just with domestic violence for a start, they would allow call-outs, anything to do with domestic violence (to be entered into evidence).
"So the judge can turn around and say, was there a history of domestic violence in this home? And the judge could look and then the judge could make his own decision, okay, well there was a history of domestic violence, he didn't realise that there was a history of domestic violence there.'
'I've taken Ellie into my home. Ellie now lives with me. I can't put into words any of trauma that she's experienced. None of that can come into the victim impact statements. I can't mention the word domestic violence.
"That all had to be retracted and then on top of that after I've handed that over and they retract that then they go 'okay, now we're handing it over to Olesja's defence team and they can retract whatever they want out of that.'
Advertisement
It was frustrating that none of the calls to Tusla or the gardai could be included in the statements. The family had been 'shocked, upset, frustrated, angry' at the sentence of two years and nine months.
'I don't think there's enough words in the dictionary to describe how the whole family felt. We were brought in by the DPP a couple of weeks prior to this to say that she's probably going to serve less than five years. We were told that any domestic violence incidents that were called to the house would not be taken into effect because she had admitted to it and it wasn't going to trial.
'She had no prior convictions. My dad had two safety orders that were never put through the courts. When we were going through his documents in the house, we found one of them.
"Ellie had told us that her mam had found one of them and ripped them up so my dad couldn't activate the other one, and we found one in the house when we were clearing up.
Advertisement
'We don't know (why he did not activate the safety order). Now, I do know that she had threatened my dad before saying that she was going to take Ellie back to the Czech Republic.' She said she would encourage anyone experiencing domestic violence, be they male or female, to speak to someone.
'Just speak to somebody, anyone, and just have a chat, just please don't end up like our family, and also remember, if there's kids in the family home, they're going to be suffering as well.
Ms Ryan said that she would never stop Ellie from seeing her mother. 'At the end of the day, it's still her mum. So I would back her 100 percent if she wanted to see her mum.
"At the moment she has no interest in seeing her mum and she was very, very disappointed and angry with the sentence that the judge did pass down. And I can 100 percent understand the loss that she has with her mam and her dad.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grooming gangs and sexual abuse statistics
Grooming gangs and sexual abuse statistics

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Grooming gangs and sexual abuse statistics

John Harris is correct that sexual offending by grooming gangs in many towns and cities across England over the past 20 years or so has heightened fears about the safety of women and girls and undermined community relations (Rightwingers warn of another blaze of summer riots in Britain – but they're the ones striking the match, 10 August). This being the case, it is vital to more fully understand the grooming problem by examining it in its wider context. It seems undeniable that the on-street grooming model that has so dominated our news often involves men of Pakistani heritage. However, research by the Home Office-funded Vulnerability Knowledge and Practice Programme reveals that only 3.7% of the 115,489 child sexual abuse and exploitation (CSAE) offences recorded by the police in England and Wales in 2023 (the most recent year for which figures are available) involved 'group-based contact offences', of which majority-Pakistani-heritage grooming gangs would have been just a part. These figures also reveal that while Asian or British Asian individuals accounted for approximately 5% of all CSAE offenders, they make up roughly 9% of the British population over the age of 16 years, ie Asians are underrepresented in statistics relating to CSAE perpetrators. Similarly, Asian or British Asian children represented 4% of CSAE victims. It could be argued then that political figures on the right and the left should be exploring why the Asian community is responsible for a disproportionately low amount of CSAE and examining what UK society might learn from Bernard GallagherVisiting fellow, Connect Centre for International Research on Interpersonal Violence and Harm, University of Central Lancashire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Teacher who sent explicit pictures to 15-year-old boy banned for life
Teacher who sent explicit pictures to 15-year-old boy banned for life

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Teacher who sent explicit pictures to 15-year-old boy banned for life

A teacher who sent explicit pictures of herself to a 15-year-old pupil has been banned from the profession for life. Georgia Lowe, 27, was caught when 'inappropriate' notes were found by the boy's mother. Her relationship with him began with late-night email sessions using emojis and nicknames, months after she started in the role, a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) panel heard. When the affair came to light, Ms Lowe was suspended by the school, but she contacted the pupil again, sending him sexual images of herself, the TRA panel was told. After resigning, the teacher was found guilty of engaging in sexual communication with a child and was handed a 14-month suspended jail term, the panel heard. Ms Lowe began working as a trainee teacher at Kingsmead School, Staffordshire, in July 2021. In September that year, when she was 'responsible' for the then 15-year-old, she began emailing him as late as 10pm, the panel was told. Her messages included heart symbol emojis, would often end with a kiss, and used nicknames, the panel heard. Ms Lowe wrote to the pupil using phrases like 'make me proud', 'try not to miss me too much' and 'you've already made my day', the TRA was told. In October 2021, the boy's mother found notes she believed were from Ms Lowe and reported her concerns to the school. An investigation was launched, and Ms Lowe was suspended, the panel heard. Despite having 'a warning shot across her bows', the teacher contacted the boy again, and sent him intimate photos, the TRA was told. Ms Lowe resigned in November 2021 and was charged by the police. She initially denied the charge before changing her plead to guilty on the day of trial, the panel heard. Ms Lowe was sentenced to 14 months jail, suspended for 18 months, and was put on the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years. In his sentencing remarks, the judge said Ms Lowe committed a 'gross breach of trust' and 'used the environment in which you were working with (the pupil) to pursue what was evidently your sexual interest in him'. 'You moved on to the passing of inappropriate notes to him, and ultimately, by the end of the period that we are concerned with, matters escalated to private digital communications between you and him, including you sending him images of yourself in your underwear,' the judge said. 'The concerning aspect of your case is that after matters came to light, by his mother having found out what was going on, you were spoken to, and yet you still had another face-to-face meeting with him at school, and ultimately, when the investigation was launched and you were suspended from work, you contacted him again, and that included the sending of the images of yourself to him. 'That was a warning shot across your bows, the investigation at school, and the suspension, but you did not bring your pursuit of him to an end at that point in time.' On behalf of the Secretary of State, decision maker Marc Cavey said Ms Lowe's behaviour was 'incompatible with working as a teacher'. He decided she should be prohibited from teaching indefinitely.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store