
The man who's destroying Spain
In the mid-1990s, Spain's socialist prime minister Felipe Gonzalez saw his political career collapse under the weight of a corruption scandal. A Supreme Court investigation revealed a fraudulent contracting scheme that illegally funded the Socialist party's (PSOE) election campaigns. Despite intense media pressure from government-aligned outlets, two brave judges upheld the rule of law.
Three decades later, another socialist Prime Minister – Pedro Sanchez – faces a similar reckoning. But this time, the scandal combines political manipulation, personal ambition and institutional degradation.
Corruption is as old as power itself, yet in Sanchez's case it takes on a uniquely modern and dangerous form. His rise began with his 2014 appointment as secretary general of the PSOE. After failing in the 2015 general elections and again in 2016, he defied party moderates who wanted to abstain and allow the conservative Mariano Rajoy of the People's party (PP) to form a government. Instead, Sanchez pushed for a far-left coalition, leading to internal conflict and his forced resignation amid allegations of vote manipulation in a party committee. That alone would have ended most political careers.
But 'Spain is different', as the old tourist slogan said. Sanchez refused to fade away. Instead, he rebuilt his base through grassroots campaigning and was re-elected as party leader in 2017. A year later, leveraging corruption accusations (which never led to convictions) against the PP, he led a successful no-confidence motion that ousted Rajoy and installed him as Prime Minister.
At the time, Sanchez proclaimed that 'corruption dissolves trust in governance, erodes social cohesion and destroys faith in institutions'. Now those words haunt him.
Sanchez finds himself surrounded by scandal. His wife is under investigation for influence-peddling and abuse of power. His brother faces allegations of fraud. His former minister and close ally José Luis Abalos is under judicial scrutiny, and another top aide, Santos Cerdan, is in preventive detention for fraud and organised crime. The attorney general, reportedly aligned with Sanchez, is being investigated for leaking secrets to harm a political rival. Senior figures in public companies are also being probed for allegedly financing the PSOE through rigged contracts.
Sanchez himself has never convincingly answered accusations of academic plagiarism; nor has there been a satisfactory response to the ongoing investigation by the Guardia Civil into potential fraud in the 2019 local elections and suspicious patterns in the 2023 general election's mail-in voting, when the Socialist vote spiked far above historical norms.
What sets Sanchez apart isn't just the scandals. It's the method. He is widely assumed to be lying, but then claims he merely 'changed his mind'. He once said that governing with the far-left Podemos party kept him up at night – only to form a coalition with them. He condemned Catalan separatists for sedition, then offered them amnesty in exchange for political support. These betrayals are tactics in his relentless grip on power.
Sanchez has also weakened Spain's democratic institutions. His government has attempted to reshape the judiciary by appointing more sympathetic judges and discrediting those who uphold the law. These attacks echo the tactics used against independent judges during the Gonzalez era.
This institutional degradation is perhaps the most dangerous consequence of Sanchez's premiership. Spain no longer just suffers from the corruption of individual politicians; the system has been remodelled to protect those in power and punish those who question it.
On the international front, the situation is equally troubling. Sanchez has held meetings with sanctioned Venezuelan officials and overseen questionable oil imports from the Maduro regime. He signed a Nato commitment to increase defence spending to 5 per cent, only to declare later that he had no intention of honouring it. Such duplicity undermines Spain's credibility abroad.
Sanchez likes to present himself as the captain of a ship. But it matters little to him if the ship is the Titanic, as long as he's the one at the helm. And rather than confronting this threat with urgency, the opposition seems to believe if they just wait long enough, power will simply fall into their laps.
But they underestimate him. Sanchez isn't Captain Ahab – he's Moby Dick. He will destroy anyone who tries to bring him down. And in doing so, he offers a blueprint for other far-left movements in Europe: consolidate power, corrupt the institutions and rewrite the rules.
That is Spain's socialist problem. And the world would do well to pay attention.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Donald Trump threatens to revoke Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
Donald Trump has said he is considering "taking away" the US citizenship of actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits a government from doing so. In a post on Truth Social on Saturday, the US president said: "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship." He also labelled O'Donnell, who has moved to Ireland, as a "threat to humanity" and said she should "remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her". O'Donnell responded on Instagram by posting a photograph of Mr Trump with Jeffrey Epstein. "You are everything that is wrong with America and I'm everything you hate about what's still right with it," she wrote in the caption. "I'm not yours to silence. I never was." O'Donnell moved to Ireland with her 12-year-old son in January after Mr Trump had secured a second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage and that she would only return to the US "when it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America". O'Donnell and the US president have criticised each other publicly for years, in an often-bitter back-and-forth that predates Mr Trump's move into politics. 2:46 This is just the latest threat by the president to revoke the citizenship of someone he has disagreed with, most recently his former ally Elon Musk. But the two situations are different as while Musk was born in South Africa, O'Donnell was born in the US and has a constitutional right to American citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, said the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the fourteen amendment of the constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. "The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born US citizen," he added. "In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people."


The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens to revoke born-in-USA Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship and calls her ‘Threat to Humanity'
Amid a disaster in Texas, conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and a trade war of his own making, President Donald Trump on Saturday took time out to issue a threat that he'll strip the citizenship of U.S.-born comedian and talk show host Rosie O'Donnell, a longtime critic. In a major escalation of his war of words with adversaries, the president wrote on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship.' He continued: 'She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!' The president has no power to strip anyone of citizenship, but since returning to the White House, Trump has sought to end birthright citizenship, guaranteed to Americans under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The 14th Amendment states: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Overturning the automatic right to citizenship for anyone born in the United States is currently the subject of a legal battle, with a federal judge just this week blocking an executive order that seeks to unilaterally redefine who qualifies as a citizen. This paves the way for another major Supreme Court case involving the president's birthright citizenship challenge. Several courts have already struck down the president's attempt to block citizenship from newborn Americans who are born to certain immigrant parents. In another alarming move, a recently unveiled memo from the Department of Justice outlines the Trump administration's plans to 'maximally pursue' denaturalization of American citizens, marking a radical expansion of the president's anti-immigration agenda. Approximately 25 million people in the U.S. are naturalized citizens, or immigrants who completed the lengthy legal process to become citizens. According to the June 11 memo, the Justice Department's civil division will 'prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.' That evidence would need to be proof that an individual 'illegally procured' citizenship through fraud or other means. It is rare, but it does happen. In the first Trump administration, there were 94 denaturalization cases. Joe Biden 's administration pursued 64 such cases. These play out in civil courts where the burden of proof is 'clear and convincing evidence,' and a judge, not a jury, makes that decision. O'Donnell was born in Commack, New York, in 1962. Her mother was of Irish American descent, and her father was an immigrant from County Donegal, Ireland. Days before Trump's return to the White House, the 63-year-old comedian left the U.S. and moved to Ireland, which she says has helped improve her health and sleep. Nevertheless, she remains a fierce critic of Trump, and on Sunday, she blamed him for the impact of the deadly flash floods in Central Texas in a lengthy TikTok video. 'And, you know, when the president guts all of the early warning systems and the weather forecasting abilities of the government, these are the results…' O'Donnell said in part. As many as 129 people are known to have died in the disaster, with contributing factors being an insufficient early warning system and the timing of the storm, which hit as it did in the middle of the night. In March, O'Donnell questioned how Trump comfortably won every swing state in the 2024 election, claiming that one of his 'best friends owns and runs the internet,' likely referring to former 'first buddy' Elon Musk. Despite her long-running criticism of the president, there is no evidence that O'Donnell is a 'threat to humanity.'


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump's mass layoffs hit State Department as 1,300 workers are axed in deep state purge
The State Department has officially fired more than 1,300 workers after it warned them late on Thursday that mass layoffs were set to commence. The department sent layoff notices to 1,107 civil servants and 246 foreign service officers with assignments in the United States, the Associated Press reported. The notices said positions were being 'abolished.' The employees affected were also told they'd lose access to the State Department headquarters in Washington D.C., their emails and their shared drives by 5pm on Friday. The layoffs come only days after the Supreme Court cleared the way for Trump 's executive order allowing mass layoffs across the federal government to proceed, despite ongoing legal challenges. Employees, some of whom were crying, were seen exiting the State Department holding boxes of their belongings. Staffers who weren't laid off lined up in the lobby and applauded for their former colleagues. Outside the building were dozens of former colleagues, ambassadors, members of Congress and others who were protesting. Signs seen in the crowd said, 'Thank you to America's diplomats,' and 'We all deserve better.' 'We talk about people in uniform serving. But foreign service officers take an oath of office, just like military officers,' Anne Bodine, who retired from the State Department in 2011 after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, told the AP. 'This is not the way to treat people who served their country and who believe in "America First."' Friday's firings were part of President Donald Trump's mission to dramatically shrink the size of the federal government. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, though not yet commenting on the layoffs, was the one who proposed to Congress the reorganization of his department in late May. The State Department also lauded the Supreme Court ruling that allowed this reorganization to go through unchallenged. 'Today's near unanimous decision from the Supreme Court further confirms that the law was on our side throughout this entire process. We will continue to move forward with our historic reorganization plan at the State Department, as announced earlier this year,' the department posted on X, which was later reposted by Rubio himself. Rubio said officials took 'a very deliberate step to reorganize the State Department to be more efficient and more focused.' 'It's not a consequence of trying to get rid of people. But if you close the bureau, you don't need those positions,' Rubio told reporters Thursday. 'Understand that some of these are positions that are being eliminated, not people.' Foreign service officers affected will be placed immediately on administrative leave for 120 days, after which they will formally lose their jobs. For most civil servants the separation period lasts 60 days. Critics say the scale of cuts floated at the State Department will 'leave the US with limited tools to engage as a leader on the world stage during this critical juncture,' making it hard for many offices to carry out their missions. The cuts follow Trump's earlier elimination of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) - a major pillar of America's global aid apparatus that employed over 10,000 people worldwide. Diplomats warn the gutting of both agencies in a single year could cripple US influence abroad, especially as conflicts intensify in the Middle East and Ukraine, and China expands its global footprint. The American Foreign Service Association, the union that represents diplomats, urged the State Department last month to hold off on job cuts. Notices for a reduction in force, which would not only lay off employees but eliminate positions altogether, 'should be a last resort,' association President Tom Yazdgerdi said. 'Disrupting the Foreign Service like this puts national interests at risk - and Americans everywhere will bear the consequences.' While the administration is framing the cuts as streamlining, critics say the real effect is a hollowing out of US diplomacy with human rights, refugee resettlement, and war crimes offices facing extinction under the restructuring.