The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop
ordered two US nuclear submarines
to move closer to Russia over the weekend in response to online nuclear threats from Russia's former president, Dmitri Medvedev, a global, collective frisson of fear was understandable.
The US President's move came as part of a verbal exchange with Moscow over a new 10-day deadline to Vladimir Putin to commit to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face 'secondary sanctions' against countries that buy Russian oil.
And yet, the strategic significance of the deployment is unclear – Trump did not clarify whether the submarines were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed, and, even if the latter, how their redeployment would enhance the ability they already have, wherever they are, to deliver their deadly payloads against Russia.
This symbolic act is thus largely a rhetorical reminder to the Russian President of the US president's newfound, belated determination to pursue some form of peace in Ukraine and his expectation that Putin will fall into line. So far the Russian president has shown no intention whatsoever to do so.
READ MORE
The respective nuclear postures, however, remain an important and dangerous backdrop to the confrontation between the superpowers. Both Russian and US thresholds for the use of nuclear weapons, particularly their first-use, have long been deliberately ambiguous – a very Trump-like ambiguity.
Unlike a no-first-use policy, which commits a country only to retaliate in response to a nuclear attack, ambiguity, it is argued, forces adversaries to consider the possibility that any aggression could provoke a devastating nuclear response, even in a non-nuclear conflict. A first-use option, it is said, deters conventional aggressors who may believe that their superior non-nuclear forces could succeed.
Both the US's and Russia's nuclear doctrines, the latter revised as recently as last year, do not limit their options to responses to nuclear attack by others .The US doctrine allows considerable latitude. It says: 'The US would only consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the US or its Allies and partners.'
The Russians reserve the right to employ nuclear arms 'in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation involving the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is under threat.' Russia is also reported to have in place a automatic system to launch nuclear missiles if the country's leaders have been killed by a strike from another state.
And both leave the ultimate decision to press the nuclear button not to parliaments, but to their two presidents , Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump could meet Putin as soon as next week, White House official says
US President Donald Trump could meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week as he seeks to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, a White House official said. The official cautioned that a meeting has not been scheduled yet and no location has been determined. The official was not authorised to speak publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss internal plans. The White House said Mr Trump was also open to a meeting with both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Trump would be their first since Mr Trump returned to office this year. Russian President Vladimir Putin and US special envoy Steve Witkoff shake hands during their meeting in Moscow on Wednesday (Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) It would be a significant milestone in the three-year-old war, though there is no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. News of a potential meeting with Mr Putin, which was first reported by The New York Times, came hours after Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met Mr Putin in Moscow. Mr Trump had posted earlier on Truth Social that Mr Witkoff 'had a highly productive meeting' with Mr Putin in which 'great progress was made'. It was not immediately clear if Mr Putin or Mr Zelensky had agreed to any meetings with Mr Trump. Mr Zelensky has been willing to meet face-to-face with Mr Putin to end the conflict, but Russia has repeatedly rejected the idea. Mr Trump has met Mr Zelensky several times this year, including a contentious February meeting in Washington. Though he has not yet met Mr Putin this year, Mr Trump met with him five times during his first term. Mr Trump said earlier on Wednesday that he updated America's allies in Europe and that they will work toward an end to the Russia-Ukraine war 'in the days and weeks to come'. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky.' Her statement did not address the potential timing of any meeting. Mr Witkoff met Mr Putin days before the White House's deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face severe economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. The meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff lasted about three hours, the Kremlin said. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said Mr Putin and Mr Witkoff had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on the Ukrainian crisis and, in a nod toward improving relations between Washington and Moscow, 'prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation' between the United States and Russia.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails additional $100bn Apple investment in US
US President Donald Trump will announce an additional $100 million investment by tech giant Apple in its US manufacturing network, White House officials said on Wednesday. It comes as Apple tries to avoid US tariffs on imports that will impact the cost of iPhones and other products in the US. The announcement will be seen by the Trump administration as a big victory is his crusade to restore domestic manufacturing. But the scale of the investment will raise concerns in Irish Government circles about what it might mean for the company's commitment to its Irish manufacturing base, which employs more than 6,000 staff. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. READ MORE 'President Trump's America First economic agenda has secured trillions of dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses,' White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' he said. In February, Apple said it planned to hire an additional 20,000 staff in the US over the next four years, as part of a $500 billion investment in the country during Trump's second term in office, a figure that is now expected to increase to $600 billion. The company made similar, smaller pledges during the Biden administration and Trump's first term, though it has not yet followed through on some of those promises. While Apple supports more than 450,000 jobs with thousands of suppliers and partners across 50 states, the president has been concerned at the company's plan to expand its manufacturing footprint in India. In May, Trump threatened Apple and other phone manufacturers with a 25% tariff on products made outside the United States. Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Anurag Rana and Andrew Girard said the latest Apple pledge of investment may 'soften the White House's ire' over Apple's heavy reliance on India for iPhone assembly. 'We anticipate Apple will focus on higher-end products, artificial intelligence labs and semiconductor engineering in the US, rather than mass-produced lower-end phones and accessories.' Mr Trump's announcement, which was reported earlier by Bloomberg, will include the creation of what the White House is calling the 'American Manufacturing Programme', which will focus on bringing more of Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing to the United States. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. The Apple announcement comes on the day that Mr Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India which, he said, was due to New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The order said the 25 per cent levies would be added to existing duties imposed on Indian imports in a move that will raise tensions with prime minister Narendra Modi's government. India has failed to reach a trade deal with Washington and was already facing 25 per cent tariffs on its exports to the US before Mr Trump's announcement. A 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports to the US is scheduled to come into force on Thursday. Both the European Commission and the While House had confirmed previously that the 15 per cent rate would include pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. However, comments by the US president on Tuesday when he warned of tariffs on pharmaceuticals of up to 250 per cent over coming years, naming Ireland as a target alongside China, will cause concern in Dublin. – Additional reporting Bloomberg, New York Times, Financial Times limited
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Important as ever' to fight nuclear proliferation, Hiroshima bombing commemoration in Dublin hears
Current tensions across the globe prove nuclear escalation 'is not a relic of the Cold War but an increasing, clear and present danger', a commemoration event of the Hiroshima bombing has heard. About 80 people attended an event in Merrion Square Park on Wednesday to mark the 80th anniversary since the first atomic bomb was used as a weapon. More than 140,000 people died as a result of the US attack on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, up to 80,000 of whom perished instantly, towards the end of the second World War . A further 70,000 people were killed in the city of Nagasaki, also Japan , after a another US bombing three days later. This was the last time an atomic bomb was used in warfare. READ MORE Those vehemently opposed to nuclear weapons stood alongside diplomats from several countries such as Ukraine , Austria, Egypt and New Zealand to pay tribute to those affected by the bombings. Speaking under a cherry blossom tree planted by the Irish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament 45 years ago, Norimasa Yoshida, charge d'affaires at the Japanese embassy in Ireland, said: 'We are capable of both incredible unity and profound stupidity. 'Eighty years may seem to someone a very long time. Indeed, it is always with a great sense of relief that I say no nuclear weapons have been used in war since those fatal days in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.' Humanity must 'never let that relief become complacency', he said. 'In this time of unprecedented conflict, it remains as important as ever to continue the fight against nuclear proliferation and for world peace.' [ 'Such a cruel sight': A visit to Hiroshima lives long in the memory ] Testimonies of survivors detailing how loved ones, friends and their 'beloved city was obliterated' were read out. Among them was that of Thurlow Setsuko (93), who recalled her four-year-old nephew's body being 'transformed' in the immediate aftermath of the bomb on Hiroshima. 'He kept begging for water in a faint voice until his death released him from agony,' her testimony read. Dr David Hutchinson-Edgar, chair of the Irish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), which organised Wednesday's commemoration, said it was a 'sombre event every year'. 'I think this year in particular the testimony of the survivors is so much more meaningful in light of the events going on in the world today, with the innocent suffering of children and civilians in Gaza , in Sudan , in other parts of the world,' he said. Adi Roche , vice-president of Irish CND and chief executive of Chernobyl Children International, who was the keynote speaker at the commemoration, said survivors in Hiroshima endured a 'living hell' on August 6th, 1945. While commemorative events such as this remembered the lives lost, these also acted as a warning, she said, citing recent attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities as an example of a 'very real danger'. 'Current tensions around the globe show us that nuclear escalation is not a relic of the Cold War but an increasing, clear and present danger,' Ms Roche said. 'I see a real trivialisation of the use of nuclear weapons and it's creeping into the language of world leaders today. We need to stop that and we need to take stock of where this is leading us.'
