How Israel's war has unfolded from the 2023 Hamas attack to the plan to occupy Gaza City
Survivors have been driven from their homes and stalked by disease and starvation.
The conflict has reverberated across the region.
Iran and its ally Hezbollah launched strikes on Israel in support of Hamas. The Houthis in Yemen targeted shipping through the Red Sea.
Israel invaded southern Lebanon to confront Hezbollah, killed senior Iranian officials and scientists, attacked Iran's nuclear programme and launched airstrikes on Yemen and Syria.
Here's a timeline of the major moments in Israel's evolving military footprint in Gaza.
1) October 7, 2023: Hamas attacks Israel
Hamas, which has controlled the Gaza Strip since 2007, launches a surprise assault on southern Israel, firing thousands of missiles and sending in fighters on paragliders, in trucks and on foot. They attack military posts, kibbutzim, and a music festival.
Israel says around 1200 people were killed, two-thirds of them civilians, and 251 more, some already dead, were taken hostage. The Israel Defence Forces respond with retaliatory airstrikes on the enclave.
2) October 2023: Israel orders siege and ground invasion
Within days, Israel orders a 'complete siege' of Gaza. The enclave, home to more than two million Palestinians, has already been under a blockade for 16 years.
Now, Defence Minister Yoav Gallant says, 'no electricity, no food, no fuel' will be allowed to enter.
Israel calls up 360,000 reservists. The military gives more than a million people in northern Gaza 24 hours to evacuate southward. Hundreds of thousands heed the warning; others refuse to leave.
In late October, Israel launches a ground invasion. The Biden Administration in the United States had warned that a full-scale assault could cause heavy civilian casualties.
By November 2, troops are 'surrounding' Gaza City from 'a number of different angles', Chief of Staff General Herzi Halevi reports.
3) November 24, 2023: The first ceasefire
Israel and Hamas agree to pause fighting.
Hamas releases more than 100 Israeli hostages. Israel releases 240 Palestinian prisoners and allows more aid into Gaza.
After a week, the ceasefire breaks down and fighting resumes. Each side blames the other.
4) December 2023: War resumes
On December 4, Israeli forces push south toward Khan Younis. Earlier, the IDF had encouraged civilians to go to the city for safety.
Israel's actions across Gaza would come to follow a pattern: order mass evacuations, launch an offensive, withdraw, and in many instances return weeks or months later.
That's the case in northern Gaza.
In January 2024, the Israeli Army announces it has 'completed the dismantling' of Hamas' command structure, and in May says it has finished its mission in the refugee camp of Jabalya.
But in June, the military again orders Palestinians to leave Gaza City, which is in the north, and later launches a punishing new offensive in Jabalya.
Israel withdraws most of its troops from southern Gaza in April 2024, even as it prepares for an offensive in the southern city of Rafah.
In July, the military again orders Palestinians to leave parts of Khan Younis and later directs the evacuation of an area it had designated a safe zone.
In early 2024, Netanyahu outlines his vision for post-war Gaza: Israel will maintain indefinite military control of Gaza and assume greater control of the enclave's border with Egypt.
He leaves open the possibility of Palestinian Authority officials playing a role.
In June, he says the 'intense phase of the war will come to an end very soon' but cautions that this 'does not mean that the war will be over'.
By late 2024, visual analysis and interviews show Israel is demolishing northern Gaza and fortifying military positions there.
The following month, the IDF confirms it is creating a buffer zone inside Gaza.
5) January 2025 ceasefire
Israel and Hamas agree to the first phase of a ceasefire and hostage release deal in mid-January. Negotiators say the goal is a three-stage peace process.
Over 42 days, Hamas releases 33 Israeli and dual-national hostages, while Israel frees about 1800 Palestinian prisoners and detainees and agrees to increase aid into Gaza.
Israel also allows Palestinians to return to the north, scene of some of the worst fighting and destruction.
The first phase of the ceasefire ends in early March, with no agreement on how to proceed.
Israel then blocks the entry of all aid into Gaza and breaks the ceasefire by launching large-scale airstrikes on the enclave.
The fate of the small number of hostages still believed to be alive there is uncertain.
6) Israel launches new ground operation in Gaza
In May, the military announces new ground operations.
The IDF will 'increase control over the Gaza Strip by dividing the territory and moving the population', it says.
The war continues. In July, Israel for the first time pushes into parts of Deir al-Balah, the only Gazan city to have been spared major ground operations or widespread devastation.
On Friday, Israel announces Netanyahu's plan to occupy Gaza City, the first step in a phased military takeover of the enclave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
Swarbrick kicked out of Parliament after refusing to apologise
Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick has again been kicked out of Parliament after refusing to apologise for a comment she made yesterday in the House. Yesterday, Swarbrick was kicked out of Parliament during an urgent debate on recognising Palestine as a state. The debate was called after Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the Government was weighing up its position on the issue. In recent times, the UK, Canada, France and Australia have announced plans to recognise Palestine as a state. During the debate on Tuesday, Swarbrick said MPs could "grow a spine" and support her bill which would impose sanctions on Israel. ADVERTISEMENT Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick, left, and Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee. (Source: 1News/Getty) In response, Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee said: "That is completely unacceptable to make that statement. Withdraw it and apologise." When she refused, Brownlee said she would have to leave for the rest of the week and removed her from the House. However, Brownlee later signalled he would again give Swarbrick the opportunity to apologise in the House today, where she then could avoid being barred. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the legal fight to get a New Zealand woman and her child out of US immigration detention, sliding house prices, and Taylor Swift's big reveal. (Source: 1News) Returning to the House today, Swarbrick refused to withdraw and apologise, and at first, didn't leave when asked. Brownlee then called a vote to name her, which the majority of MPs supported. Swarbrick then removed herself from the House. ADVERTISEMENT Peters: 'Wasn't offensive enough to be booted' New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. (Source: 1News) Earlier, when heading into the House, NZ First leader Winston Peters spoke out against Swarbrick's removal. "I didn't agree with one thing she said, but it wasn't offensive enough to be booted out," he said. "If you can have John Key say 'get some guts', or accept the C-word — which was outrageous — then how can you be offensive in that context? "Parliament is a robust theatre for debate. People have serious emotional concerns about what they believe in, and to take away the essence... about the emotional concern you are talking about, is to neuter the place, and that's bad for New Zealand's democracy." Netanyahu 'lost the plot' – Luxon ADVERTISEMENT Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. (Source: 1News) On his way into the House, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon issued fresh criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his role in the war in Gaza. 'I think what's happening in Gaza is utterly appalling. I think Netanyahu has gone way too far, I think he has lost the plot." Luxon said overnight attacks on Gaza City were "utterly unacceptable". 'He is not listening to the international community, and that is unacceptable.' Labour leader Chris Hipkins was today asked whether he would agree with Luxon's comment on Netanyahu. "Probably, yes, actually, that's probably quite an astute observation." Hipkins said he took a moment to pause before answering, looking surprised, because of the "strength of the language". ADVERTISEMENT 'Uncharted territory' – Swarbrick Swarbrick speaking to reporters today. (Source: 1News) After leaving the House, Swarbrick said Brownlee had "been explicit about the fact he was the member who took personal offence" to her comment yesterday. "We are in uncharted territory. As far as I am aware, there is no situation where a Speaker has asked for somebody to withdraw and apologise, that person has refused to apologise, then been ordered to leave the House, i.e. being punished, the person has complied, and then the Speaker has sought to reopen the issue the very next day. "It would appear that now we are in a position where things are being completely made up." When asked about Luxon's comments on Netanyahu, Swarbrick said: "The Government has yet to put any meaningful substance behind their words." She said the very least the Government could do was "apply the exact same approach they did to Russia" – again referencing her bill to apply sanctions to Israel.
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Netanyahu has 'lost the plot': Luxon
By Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira of RNZ The Prime Minister says the war in Gaza is "utterly appalling" and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "lost the plot". Christopher Luxon's comments came on a tense day in Parliament, where Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick was 'named' for refusing to leave the House following a heated debate on the government's plan to consider recognising Palestinian statehood. Speaking to media, Luxon said Netanyahu had "gone too far". "I think he has lost the plot and I think that what we're seeing overnight - the attack on Gaza City - is utterly, utterly unacceptable" he said. Luxon said Israel had consistently ignored pleas from the international community for humanitarian aid to be delivered "unfettered", and the situation was driving more human catastrophe across Gaza. "We are a small country a long way away, with very limited trade with Israel. We have very little connection with the country, but we have stood up for values, and we keep articulating them very consistently, and what you have seen is Israel not listening to the global community at all. "We have said a forcible displacement of people and an annexation of Gaza would be a breach of international law. We have called these things out consistently time and time again. "You've seen New Zealand join many of our friends and partners around the world to make these statements, and he's just not listening," the prime minister said. The government is considering whether it will join other countries like France, Canada and Australia in recognising Palestinian statehood at a UN Leaders Meeting next month. Luxon said recent attacks could "extinguish a pathway" to a two-state solution. "I'm telling you what my personal view is, as a human being, looking at the situation, that's how I feel about." he said. Labour leader Chris Hipkins has called the war an "unfolding genocide", echoing the comments made by former prime minister Helen Clark, who visited the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Palestinian territory this week. "She's used the words 'unfolding genocide', and yes, I do agree with that. That's a good description of the situation at the moment." Hipkins said calling it an "unfolding genocide" meant that we were not "appointing ourselves judge and jury" because there was still a case to be heard before the International Court of Justice. "Recognising that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza is an important part of the world community standing up and saying, we're not going to tolerate it. "We should recognise that there is now a growing acknowledgement around the world that there is an unfolding genocide in Gaza, and I think we should call that for what it is, and the world community needs to react to that to prevent it from happening," Hipkins said.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Recognition of Palestine - NZ weighs decision amid global pressure
Neither argument is strictly relevant to New Zealand's decision, which will be made by UN leaders' week in six weeks. The purpose of recognising Palestinian statehood is not to please Hamas or the Palestinian Authority or to infuriate Israel, although it will do all of those things. It is not to instantly magic up a happy ending to the misery in Gaza. It is to preserve the viability of a two-state solution, a state of Israel co-existing with a state of Palestine in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. Every country that has joined the latest international effort to recognise Palestinian statehood has cited that as the rationale. And the reason for that is that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu is redoubling efforts to undermine and reject a two-state solution, including plans to take control of Gaza City, and a symbolic vote in the Knesset (Israeli parliament) last month calling for Israel to annex the West Bank. 'The Netanyahu government's rejection of a two-state solution is wrong – it's wrong morally and it's wrong strategically,' said British Foreign Secretary David Lammy. 'The two-state solution is in mortal danger. It is about to give way to perpetual confrontation. That is something France simply cannot resign itself to,' said France's Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs, Jean-Noel Barrot. 'Prospects for a two-state solution have been steadily and gravely eroded,' said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. 'The Netanyahu Government is extinguishing the prospect of a two-state solution by rapidly expanding illegal settlements, threatening annexation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and explicitly opposing any Palestinian state,' said Albanese. As in New Zealand, the two-state solution has long been endorsed by most countries, and the United Nations, as the only fair long-term answer to two peoples with claims to the same land. Palestinians wait to receive hot meals with their pots and pans in Deir Al Balah, Gaza. Photo / Anadolu via Getty Images The alternative, one state of Israel, is one in which the Palestinian quest for a homeland would never be satisfied, one in which Palestinian rights would be subjugated and one in which conflict would be permanent. At times, Israel has supported a two-state solution. But Netanyahu, now in this third stint as Prime Minister, has actively undermined it by supporting Israeli settlements in the West Bank, in breach of international law. When New Zealand was preparing to co-sponsor UN Security Council resolution 2334 in 2016 – again in order to preserve a two-state solution - he described it as 'a declaration of war'. Netanyahu had already bullied Egypt out of co-sponsoring the resolution, but it passed, and Israel withdrew its ambassador from Wellington for five months. The United States, whose Secretary of State John Kerry had done a huge amount of work in the Middle East, abstained, allowing it to pass without dissent. The present has some echoes to back then. Today's rallying of the international community, once again to preserve the two-state solution, also serves to reinforce the position that this protracted conflict needs a political solution, not a military one. Since the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023 and the ensuing crisis, New Zealand's position has remained non-committal about when it will recognise Palestine and to 'focus on the needs of the moment'. It is the classic bob-each-way position of a small state, trying to keep onside with Israel by not recognising Palestine, and keeping Palestinians onside by saying it's just a matter of when, not if. But given that Israel has thumbed its nose at the international community and its disproportionate, horrific actions in Gaza, the question New Zealand must ask is whether it is still valid to try to please everyone. With movement on the issue from a large number of like-minded friends, Australia, Britain, France, and Canada give a small country the cover it might not normally have over such a major shift. No shift is likely without conditions. They could be similar to those accepted by France and Canada, such as commitments by the Palestinian Authority to reform its governance, commit to elections in 2026, exclude any role for Hamas, and demilitarise any Palestinian state. If a condition by New Zealand were to wait for recognition until an actual state was in place, that would be tantamount to the status quo. Foreign Minister Winston Peters took an oral item to cabinet on Monday about recognition of a Palestinian state, as opposed to a cabinet paper. That is not to say that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade won't have plenty of advice on recognition, and that is being prepared. But it is also a reminder that no matter what the official advice is, it will be a political decision. Peters himself, a former student of Hebrew, has been a hawk on Israel. He was critical of New Zealand sponsoring resolution 2334 in 2016. That meant his strong criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza last year and this year has carried more weight. Planes drop aid packages by parachute over western Gaza City, Gaza. Photo / Anadolu via Getty Images It is acknowledged by most countries that the United States and President Trump, Israel's strongest ally, hold the key to ending the conflict and what happens afterwards. And because Peters is sympathetic to the Trump Administration and its America First ethos, he is open to accusations of delaying recognition in order to please the United States. That is why Peters, despite professing to loathe the common refrain that New Zealand has an independent foreign policy on the basis that it implies that others don't, on Monday insisted that 'New Zealand has an independent foreign policy'. An important factor in how New Zealand is approaching the issue of recognition is the unique makeup of the Government. It is the prerogative of the cabinet to make such a decision. However, given that the cabinet avoids votes (National with 14 out of 20 would win every time) and operates on party consensus, it effectively gives a veto to each of the three parties in Government, National, Act and NZ First. That could lead to an outrageous outcome if, for example, every party in Parliament except Act favoured recognition of Palestinian statehood or if every party except Act and NZ First supported recognition. The parties other than Act, led by Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, and NZ First, led by Peters, represent 85% of the Parliament. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says the recognition of Palestine is a complex issue and will take time to work through. Actually, it is not that hard. What will be hard is presenting the views of a disparate Government to a country that has largely lost sympathy with Israel because of its appalling treatment of Palestinians. One of the reasons Peters might find it difficult to support recognition of Palestinian statehood is that he has spent the past year saying why New Zealand shouldn't. But when the circumstances change, as they have done, it is not unreasonable for the response to change.
