Just in: Sydney has ranked in the top 10 most liveable cities in the world for 2025
For more than two decades, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) has released its Global Liveability Index, ranking 173 cities across five key metrics: stability, healthcare, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure. The 2025 rankings have just dropped, with Copenhagen overtaking Vienna after a three-year reign to take the title of the world's most liveable city. Coming just behind Zürich in fourth place is Melbourne, which retained its 2024 ranking with an overall score of 97 out of 100. That's well above this year's global average liveability score of 76.1.
Once upon a time, Melbourne ruled the Global Liveability Index – named the world's most liveable city for a remarkable seven years straight. While it dropped to eighth place in 2021 and tenth in 2022, the Victorian capital has bounced back, holding steady in the top five globally for the past three years and proudly claiming Australia's number one spot.
And our very own Sydney also held onto its overall liveability score of 96.6, but overtook Calgary, jumping from seventh place in 2024 to sixth in 2025. Both Melbourne and Sydney matched perfect scores for healthcare and education (100 each), also scoring strong marks for stability (95) and infrastructure (96.4). But Melbourne pulled ahead in the culture and environment category, scoring 95.8 to Sydney's 94.4.
In 2025, one more Australian city quietly crept into the top ten – and that was Adelaide in ninth place with an overall liveability score of 95.9. That's a huge leap from the city's 11th place ranking in 2024 and an even bigger jump from 30th place in 2022. Adelaide shares the same ratings as Melbourne and Sydney across all categories except culture and environment, where it scores a solid 91.4. Could this rising star outshine Australia's biggest cities on next year's Global Liveability Index? We'll have to wait and see.
Here are the world's 10 most liveable cities
Copenhagen, Denmark
Vienna, Austria
Zürich, Switzerland
Melbourne, Australia
Geneva, Switzerland
Sydney, Australia
Osaka, Japan
Auckland, New Zealand
Adelaide, Australia
Vancouver, Canada
.
.
Plus, .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Google to pay $36M fine for anticompetitive deals with Australia's largest telcos
Google has agreed to pay a 55 million Australian dollar ($36 million) fine for signing anticompetitive deals with Australia's two largest telcos that banned the installation of competing search engines on some smartphones, the U.S. tech giant and Australia's competition watchdog said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had commenced proceedings in the Australian Federal Court on Monday against the Singapore-based Google Asia Pacific division. The court will decide whether the AU$50 million ($36 million) penalty is appropriate. Under the anticompetitive agreements, which were in place for 15 months until March 2021, Telstra and Optus only pre-installed Google Search on Android phones sold to customers. Other search engines were excluded. In return, the telcos received a share of the advertisement revenue Google generated from those customers. Google accepted that the agreements were likely to have the effect of 'substantially lessening competition,' the commission said. Google has also signed a court-enforceable undertaking that commits the company to removing certain pre-installation and default search engine restrictions from its contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telcos, the commission said. The tech company said in a statement: 'We're pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns, which involved provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time.' Commissioner chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said: "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.' 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,' Cass-Gottlieb added. Last year, Telstra, Optus and their smaller rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the commission that they would not renew or make similar deals with Google to limit search options.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The new $4 Woolworths bag solves a common supermarket gripe we've all complained about
A new shopping invention at Woolworths solves the annoying issue of shopping bags slumping at the supermarket's self-checkouts. The Aussie supermarket has just launched its innovative Click N Stay™ bag, a $4 reusable shopping bag that's specifically 'designed to stay open, so you can scan and pack with both hands'. This innovation was developed to make it easier for customers who are scanning and packing their own shopping at self-service checkouts, or when they're using the new Scan&Go trolley devices. The bags are conveniently designed to stay upright and open in the bagging area thanks to a unique locking mechanism at the top. On either side of the top of the bag is the word "Push", which indicates the way it should be manoeuvred to lock the bag open. On the opposite internal side of the bag is the word "Pull", which indicates where the bag can be released to close. This bag cleverly solves the common self-checkout issue of fumbling to hold a floppy shopping bag open with one hand, while simultaneously scanning and packing items with the other hand. For added convenience, the size of these bags has also been designed to perfectly fit inside Woolworths' green trolleys. The new shopping bag was revealed on Woolworths' social media channels in an 11-second video accompanied by a caption heralding it as: 'the upgrade you've been waiting for'. Woolworths have launched their new innovative Click N Stay™ bags range Woolworths shared a short social media video to their TikTok and Instagram accounts, demonstrating their Click N Stay™ bags in-action at a self-checkout The explanatory video shows the new Click N Stay reusable bags in action as they're locked in place and positioned standing upright and open in the self-checkout bagging area. The video voice-over explains that the bags are designed to 'stay open while you scan and pack'. On both Instagram and TikTok, delighted shoppers praised the invention for resolving a long-standing self-checkout issue. 'Aaaamazing!!' read one reply. 'Love these!' added another. The $4 bags are made from at least 90 per cent recycled plastic, and come in three vibrant Australian icon-themed designs. There's a 'Cockatoo & Wattle' pale pink bag and a light blue 'Coffee & Finger Bun' bag. There's the 'Famous Aussie Things' green bag, which features cute illustrations of things like a 'barbie', 'seagulls' and 'hills hoist'. The new Woolworths shopping bags come in three Australian icon-themed designs, 'Cockatoo & Wattle' (left), 'Famous Aussie Things' (centre) and 'Coffee & Finger Bun' (right) 'Love the designs,' commented one shopper in reply to Woolworths' social media video. The new reusable bag range comes following the rollout of Scan&Go trolleys in new Woolworths stores. However, not everyone was convinced by the new supermarket bag. Several shoppers noted in the comments that there was a time not so long ago when shopping 'bags used to be free'. Another person remarked that the $4 price tag was a significant increase on the current 25-cent brown paper bags. However other social media commenters saw the merit in upgrading. '[T]hey've gotta be better than the paper bags,' read one reply. 'The brown paper bags rip every time,' added another. In response to this, Woolworths' own social media team responded: 'Funny you say that… our Click N Stay™ bags were literally made for this moment.' The new range of Click & Stay bags joins Woolworths' existing reusable bag range, which includes their signature Green Totes, Chiller Bags, Art Bags, and foldable fruit-shaped Fabric Bags.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Qantas fined over £43 million for illegally sacking 1,800 workers during Covid pandemic
A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59m or £43m) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120m ($78m) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labour laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney -based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90m ($59m), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125m ($81m) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas 's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," she said. 'Over the past 18 months, we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50m ($33m) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40m ($26m) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history, and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted to illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court, alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been cancelled.
