After Pope Francis: A Round Table With David French
Below is a transcript of an episode of 'The Opinions.' We recommend listening to it in its original form for the full effect. You can do so using the player above or on the NYT Audio App, Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts.
The transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
David French: I'm David French. I'm an Opinion columnist at The Times, where I write about law, politics and religion. I'm not Catholic, but I've always admired Pope Francis. He was empathetic. He was compassionate. He cared for the most marginalized and vulnerable members of society.
But I also knew that he'd become a bit of a lightning rod within the church, both because of his own statements and decisions, and because he was pope during a particularly divisive time in world history. And, of course, the church itself struggled with its own sharp divides over everything from gay rights to women's rights to the traditional Latin Mass.
Pope Francis came into office promising to make a mess and to shake things up. So, to talk about how that played out in a fractured world, I'm here today with David Gibson and Leah Libresco Sargeant. David is the director of the Center on Religion and Culture at Fordham University, and he once covered the Vatican as a journalist. Leah is a writer and author of the upcoming book 'Dignity of Dependence.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
24 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: The road to peace will begin when Israel ends its occupation
To the editor: It's ironic that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he now wants to take over Gaza by expanding the war and turning over the strip to friendly Arab forces ('Netanyahu says Israel plans to take over all of Gaza in bid to destroy Hamas,' Aug. 7). Netanyahu and his radical religious parties have always wanted the expulsion of Palestinians from the strip. The world is watching an ongoing genocide in real time. Israel is wiping out cities, schools and universities along with the historical culture of the Gaza people, as it did in the Palestinian villages in 1948. Eliminating Hamas is justification to the West for his barbaric war. Starvation as a weapon of war is just a continuation of Netanyahu's war of expulsion and annexing the territories. The U.S. — especially the past and current presidents — has enabled this spoiled child to do as he pleases. The solution for peace for Israel and the Palestinians has always and will always be for an end to the occupation and freedom for the Palestinians who have endured occupation for 60 years. Is it not enough that Israel has affected the mental and physical future of a generation of children and caused the loss of future doctors, academics and other professionals? George J. Mouro, Rancho Mirage ... To the editor: The Times continues to show the tragic pictures of the children starving in Gaza. My heart goes out to them. My question to The Times is this: Why aren't you showing the body of a dead Jew who was slaughtered on Oct. 7, 2023, next to the picture of a starving child of Gaza? It is time for the Arab world to send in an Islamic multi-country army to destroy Hamas. Then the Arabic countries could use their oil wealth to feed the children, allow Israel to withdraw from Gaza and build a peaceful country where there will be no more starving children. Mark Walker, Yorba Linda
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Sheldon H. Jacobson: ‘Made in America' is alive, well and misunderstood
The president supports purchasing goods that are 'made in America.' To encourage this, Donald Trump has imposed tariffs on imports from literally every country that the U.S. does business with, with 10% to 15% as the floor baseline. His hope is that tariffs would push more companies to move their manufacturing and production operations stateside, which he believes would reduce the $1.2 trillion trade deficit in goods (in 2024). Yet the aspirational goal of buying goods made in America is misguided and largely an unreachable myth. Many well-known American companies rely on importing their consumer goods. Apple imports the majority of its iPhones, with China accounting for 80% of its manufacturing capacity. With 155 million iPhone users in the U.S., and iPhones holding over 57% of the smartphone market, Americans' love affair with iPhones is here to stay, independent of where they are assembled. Nike manufactures nearly all of its athletic shoes and sportswear abroad, with Vietnam, China and Indonesia as their primary factory locations. It is difficult to attend a college football game without seeing the Nike swoosh somewhere on the field, given that the company sponsors the majority of top-ranked college football teams. Its presence at March Madness is also indisputable, sponsoring 60% of the men's and women's teams that participated in the 2025 tournament. None of these teams are prepared to boycott Nike because it manufactures its products overseas. Wrangler, the company known for its jeans, makes most of its clothing items oversees. For those intent on buying items made in America, they do make a few lines domestically (the 27406 and 1947 collections). Another popular jean manufacturer, Levi-Strauss, also manufactures the majority of its products overseas. The reason that such iconic all-American companies have moved their production capacity to China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and Mexico, among others, is cost. Labor costs in these countries are significantly lower than in the U.S. Given that American consumers are highly price sensitive, they demand lower prices. Since consumer spending is 70% of the nation's gross domestic product, which now rests at around $30 trillion, anywhere costs can be reduced to keep prices competitive is an opportunity that companies have exploited, and they will continue to do so. Yet all the companies listed manufacture nondurable goods, which have short shelf lives. Indeed, measuring 'made in America' only at the most basic or lowest level of consumption is misleading. In a free-market economy, new ideas for companies that are nurtured and grown in America is what should define 'made in America.' Indeed, it is the American entrepreneurial spirit that defines what is 'made in America,' not the actual operations and facilities that produce the products. One place to look for future 'made in America' companies is the number of patents issued in the U.S. Nearly 400,000 patents were issued in 2020, the largest number in history. However, the recent downward trend is a red flag for 'made in America' companies yet to be launched. Focusing on where companies are launched, and how they succeed is what makes them American. New business applications have been surging, with 5 million such applications filed in 2023, providing some hope that 'made in America' companies continue to be a priority. And nowhere is such entrepreneurship being fostered and grown more than at American universities. Almost one-third of college students aspire to launch their own business. Where students study is also important, as they often launch their new business in the same state. This makes universities the ideal incubator for new businesses. All such economic value is why efforts to remake higher education are misguided, destructive and will ultimately hurt not only universities, but everyone. The president's dislike of DEI may be his publicly stated reason behind his attacks on higher education. Yet throwing the baby out with the bathwater will stifle American entrepreneurship and make everyone, across all socioeconomic groups, poorer. Indeed, the president's approach in controlling higher education will provide headwinds to achieve his objective of economic growth and prosperity. Long after he has left office, the carnage of his actions will be felt for all. 'Made in America' is more than just about goods produced and services delivered. It is about companies launched, new innovations uncovered and inspired entrepreneurship. That is where the focus on 'made in America' should be, and facilitating such an environment is what can 'Make America Great Again.'
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Is Putin laying a trap in Alaska, or is Trump?
ANCHORAGE — The first presidential summit in years between Russia and the United States is on, setting nerves in Europe and Ukraine on a knife's edge. But President Trump may have a surprise in store for Vladimir Putin. Efforts to scuttle the high-stakes meeting have not been subtle. European officials issued statements in recent days on the futility of Trump negotiating with Putin over Ukraine without Ukraine, urging the U.S. president on Wednesday to not cut a unilateral deal. Kyiv warned that Moscow's proposals for peace — rewarding its war of conquest with territorial concessions — are a nonstarter. Many Russia experts are hoping one side simply decides to call it off. Despite their efforts, the summit — haphazardly scheduled on American soil with days to spare — is moving ahead, with Trump scheduled to host the Russian leader at a U.S. military base in Anchorage on Friday, the first meeting of its kind since 2021. Experts fear Putin may be laying a trap for the Americans, manipulating Trump in private to solidify Russia's position on the battlefield. But Trump suggested Wednesday that he would demand Putin agree to a ceasefire in Alaska. 'There will be very severe consequences' if he doesn't, Trump told reporters. Hosting the meeting is an about-face from Trump, who over much of the summer appeared in the throes of a remarkable transformation on Putin, criticizing the Russian leader in harsh terms for the first time. To the relief and delight of Europe, Trump appeared to be losing his patience — embarrassed, even — at Putin's open refusal to heed his calls for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But Trump's threats of a response, increasing sanctions against Russia and its trading partners, lasted only a matter of days. On Aug. 6, the president's special envoy on the crisis, Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor with no experience in diplomacy and no background in the region, was dispatched to Moscow. Planning for a summit began within hours of his departure from the Kremlin. On Tuesday, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the summit would amount to a 'listening session' for Trump on Putin's interest in peace, battlefield reports emerged of a significant Russian breach in Ukrainian lines. In a phone call, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Trump that Putin was 'bluffing' on his commitments to peace, pressing ahead with an offensive to gain more territory. 'There should be joint pressure on Russia, there should be sanctions — and there should be a message that if Russia doesn't agree to a ceasefire in Alaska, this principle should work,' Zelensky said Wednesday. 'It sure looks like it's moving in the wrong direction,' John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor in his first term, told The Times, dismissing Witkoff as a chief culprit behind what he fears is a coming diplomatic crisis: 'Better send the Bobbsey twins.' The perils of this meeting, Bolton said, lie in Putin's skills as a manipulator. The Russian president may well convince Trump that his designs on Ukraine are reasonable — and the only way forward. 'There's a very grave risk it does become an almost take-it-or-leave-it proposition for Zelensky,' Bolton said. On Wednesday morning, Trump criticized the media for being 'very unfair' to him for quoting 'fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton.' Russia invaded the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea and its eastern regions in 2014, and launched a full-scale invasion of the country in 2022. Nearly a million Russian soldiers have been killed or wounded in pursuit of Vladimir Putin's war of conquest, according to independent analysts, with hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers adding to the casualty count. 'Clearly, Trump wants to sit down with the guy that he thinks is his friend again,' Bolton said. 'And from Putin's point of view, he doesn't want any pesky Europeans around — and particularly not Zelensky. He wants to see if he can correct the damage he did.' Seven years ago, entering a meeting with his Russian counterpart, Trump set a similar bar for success as Leavitt has this week. 'I don't expect anything,' Trump said in an interview at the time from Scotland, before leaving for Helsinki. 'I go in with very low expectations.' On Air Force One en route to Helsinki, he cast himself as a dealmaker and tweeted that, 'no matter how well I do at the Summit, if I was given the great city of Moscow as retribution for all of the sins and evils committed by Russia,' it would still not be enough to earn him praise. He repeated the turn of phrase Wednesday morning in his post criticizing Bolton. 'If I got Moscow and Leningrad free,' Trump wrote, 'as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal!' What resulted was a meeting and subsequent news conference that produced one of the most notorious moments of Trump's first term. On the heels of calling the European Union a 'foe' of the United States, Trump stood beside Putin and took his side over the U.S. intelligence community, disputing its assessment that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election. Experts fear that a similar diplomatic rupture could unfold if Trump, deferential to Putin, emerges from their meeting Friday siding with the Russian leader over Ukraine in the war. In recent days, Trump has said that a deal between the two sides would have to include land 'swapping' — territorial concessions that are prohibited by the Ukrainian Constitution without a public vote of support — and that he would give Zelensky the 'courtesy' of a call after his meeting with Putin, if all goes well. 'This will be the first U.S.-Russia summit brought about by sheer ignorance and incompetence: The U.S. president and his chosen envoy mistook a Russian demand for a concession,' said Brian Taylor, director of the Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs at Syracuse University. 'Ultimately, this is not a war about this or that piece of territory, but about whether Russia can establish political control over Ukraine, or whether Ukraine will remain free to choose its own domestic and international path,' Taylor said. 'Trump's false suggestion again that Zelensky is somehow at fault for Russia invading Ukraine indicates he still does not understand how we got here or what's at stake.' Konstantin Sonin, a professor at the University of Chicago who has been sentenced in absentia to 8½ years in prison in Russia for publishing information on a Russian massacre of Ukrainian civilians at Bucha, said that Trump's attempts to negotiate away Ukrainian territory could be diplomatically disastrous — but will make little difference on the ground. 'This is not a very popular view, but I am not sure that the U.S. has that much leverage over President Zelensky to force him into major concessions,' Sonin said. 'Many European countries would support Ukraine no matter what — even at the cost of their relationship with the U.S. With full withdrawal of the U.S. support, the catastrophic scenario, Ukraine will still be able to fight on.' Kremlinologists tend to believe Putin's training as a KGB officer at the end of the Cold War gave him unique skills to navigate the world stage. In Helsinki — as he had so often done with other world leaders, including the queen of England and the pope — Putin kept Trump waiting for half an hour, seen as a move to throw off the U.S. delegation leading up to the meeting. Last week, in his meeting with Witkoff, the Russian president offered an Order of Lenin to a CIA official whose son died in Ukraine fighting for Russian forces. Russia watchers fear that Friday will be no different. Already, Putin has secured a meeting with the U.S. president on his own terms. 'Whatever else you think about Putin, he's an experienced and clever ruler who has successfully manipulated Trump in the past,' Taylor said. 'Putin's intransigence in rejecting Trump's proposed ceasefire led not to the sanctions that Trump promised to apply last Friday, but an invitation to the United States for a summit at which the U.S. president has already signaled he will endorse territorial changes achieved through military conquest.' But there may also be pitfalls in store for Putin, experts said. Trump's shift in tone on Putin since a NATO summit in The Hague in June suggests it is possible, if unlikely, that Trump is preparing to enter the meeting with a tougher stance. In recent months, the president has seen political benefit in catching world leaders off guard, berating Zelensky and South Africa's leader in the Oval Office with cameras rolling. At the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit, showered in praise by European leaders, Trump said in unusually clear terms that he was with the alliance 'all the way.' Days later, he accused Putin of throwing 'meaningless ... bull—' at him and his team over the Ukraine war. 'I think there is some risk for Putin,' Sonin said. 'He is not comfortable in any kind of adversarial situation — he quickly gets angry and defensive. And President Trump has the ability to put people in uncomfortable situations publicly. He has never done this to Putin before, but who knows.' To Bolton, the best outcome of the summit would be that Putin fails to persuade Trump that he's seriously interested in peace. 'I don't think that's going to happen, but it's possible,' Bolton said. 'I think in the environment that they've got, one on one — only Russians and Americans present — that's ideal for Putin to do his thing.' 'So he's got what he wants,' Bolton added. 'He's on American soil, with no one else around.' The must-read: Schools to open with unprecedented protections for children and their parents amid ICE raidsThe deep dive: Here are the EVs you can buy for less than $35,000The L.A. Times Special: The dark side of California's backyard ADU boom: How much do they ease the housing shortage? More to come,Michael Wilner—Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
