Breakthrough in breast cancer research could stop the disease from spreading
Scientists have achieved a significant breakthrough in the battle against breast cancer by dismantling the very components that enable the deadly disease to metastasise. Researchers have discovered that cancer alters the metabolism of certain immune cells, causing them to release a metabolite known as uracil, which aids in constructing a 'scaffold' within distant organs, facilitating the growth of secondary tumours.
By inhibiting the enzyme uridine phosphorylase-1 (UPP1), responsible for producing uracil, scientists were able to prevent this 'scaffold' from forming in mice and rejuvenated the immune system's capacity to eliminate secondary cancer cells, thereby thwarting metastasis. This groundbreaking work was carried out in the laboratories of Professor Jim Norman and Professor Karen Blyth at the Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute and the University of Glasgow.
This discovery paves the way for potentially potent new methods to combat cancer – identifying uracil in the bloodstream could signal early indications of cancer metastasis, while impeding UPP1 with medication could halt its progression before it even begins.
The study's lead author, Dr Cassie Clarke, from the Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute and University of Glasgow, said: "This study represents a major shift in how we think about preventing the spread of breast cancer. By targeting these metabolic changes as early as possible we could stop the cancer progressing and save lives."
Published in Embo Reports, the research indicates that crucial metabolic alterations take place prior to the dissemination of cancer, presenting an essential opportunity for intervention.
Identifying these alterations at an early stage could enable treatments to prevent cancer cells from migrating throughout the body and establishing tumours in different locations.
Dr Catherine Elliott, Cancer Research UK's director of research, explained: "Discoveries in cancer research have made huge strides in making breast cancer a far more treatable disease than ever before. However, metastasis - when cancer spreads - is a major factor in breast cancer becoming harder to treat especially if the cancer returns months or even many years later.
"This discovery gives us new hope for detecting and stopping metastasis early and ensuring people have many more years with their families and loved ones."
With approximately 56,800 people receiving a breast cancer diagnosis in the United Kingdom annually and roughly 11,300 people dying from it each year, discovering innovative approaches to combat it remains crucial. Due to research breakthroughs, breast cancer has evolved into a significantly more manageable illness, yet when it metastasises to different parts of the body, effective control becomes increasingly challenging.
Comprehending the mechanisms behind breast cancer's spread is essential to preventing the disease from becoming uncontrollable with existing treatments. The research team is now delving deeper into precisely how UPP1 alters immune cell behaviour, examining the function of immune cell metabolism in early breast cancer development, and evaluating the potential of medications that inhibit immune cell metabolism to prevent cancer onset.
Simon Vincent, the chief scientific officer at Breast Cancer Now, said: "This is an exciting piece of joint research that expands our understanding of how secondary breast cancer develops.
"The researchers discovered that high levels of a protein called UPP1 may make some cancers, including breast cancer, more likely to spread to other parts of the body, where the disease becomes incurable.
"In mice, targeting the UPP1 protein before secondary breast cancer developed led to fewer secondary breast tumours and a boosted immune response in the lungs.
"Now we need more research to see if this new insight can be turned into new drugs that stop secondary breast cancer, and potentially other secondary cancers, in their tracks. With around 61,000 people living with secondary breast cancer in the UK, research like this is vital."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
As influencers spread ‘toxic' claims, what is the truth about sunscreen?
It's summertime in the UK and social media is awash with influencers airing their concerns about sunscreen. Among them is reality TV star Sam Faiers from The Only Way Is Essex, who believes sunscreen is 'full of toxic ingredients'. None of her family wore sunscreen, she said, adding that her children had built up 'a really good tolerance' to the sun. Some of the claims appear to be fuelled by a US doctor who told his followers: 'Be careful what you smear on yourself and your children.' Here we look at the science behind sunscreen and sun exposure. It's all down to the high energy ultraviolet (UV) rays. These cause premature skin ageing and wrinkles by degrading collagen and elastin. Collagen gives skin its firmness and structure, while elastin makes it stretchy. UV rays can also damage the DNA in skin cells, leading to mutations that ultimately drive skin cancers. One in three cancers globally is a skin cancer, and the main driver is UV rays. 'Too much UV radiation from the sun is the main cause of melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer,' said Dr Claire Knight at Cancer Research UK. 'That's why it's important to develop good sun safety habits from a young age and protect your skin when the sun is strong using shade, clothing and sunscreen together.' When the summer sunshine arrives, the skin responds to protect itself. The outermost layer, the epidermis, thickens and many people develop a tan, as cells in the skin called melanocytes produce more UV-absorbing melanin. Not everyone tans though, and acquiring a tan itself results in DNA damage. 'Most of that damage gets repaired, but some of it doesn't, it causes mutations and those can go on developing throughout life to give rise to skin cancer,' said Brian Diffey, emeritus professor of photobiology at Newcastle University. 'Sun exposure in childhood is a critical period for developing skin cancer, particularly melanoma, later in life.' He advises using sunscreen when the sun can harm your skin and not bothering when the UV index is less than three, which in the UK is generally from mid-October to mid-March. Sun creams contain filters that absorb UV rays. They protect by reducing the amount of UV that reaches the skin where it can cause burning and other damage. There are two main types of UV filters. The first are inorganic compounds, typically zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. The second are organic compounds, where organic simply means they contain carbon. Both types are manufactured and added to creams, sprays and lip salves. Many sunscreens contain inorganic and organic UV filters to improve sun protection. They trace back to a 2019 study conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Researchers found traces of organic UV filters, namely avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene and ecamsule, in people's blood after applying sun cream. The concentrations exceeded the level at which the FDA recommends companies do specific tests for toxic effects. Dr Tro Kalayjian, who runs a US weight loss clinic, posted the paper on X, adding: 'Be careful what you smear on yourself and your children.' The study prompted the FDA to call for more work on the compounds, but the authors stressed that they were not warning people off the products. 'These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen,' they wrote. The study looked at sunscreen under 'maximal use conditions', which meant really slathering the cream on. Under real conditions, people apply about one tenth of that used in the study, Diffey said. That alone would bring three of the four ingredients below the FDA's threshold, he added. The inorganic UV filters, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, have raised few concerns because they are not easily absorbed into the bloodstream. They can still, however, have an environmental impact when they wash off sun cream-covered swimmers and accumulate in water and marine life. More questions surround organic UV filters such as oxybenzone. These are endocrine disruptors, meaning they mimic natural hormones. Whether they cause harm at the doses people get from wearing sun cream is unclear, but a number of studies have looked at levels of benzophenones (which include oxybenzone) in urine and linked higher levels to effects on sperm and poorer fertility, with affected couples taking longer to conceive. Regulatory bodies around the world are seeking more information from manufacturers on organic UV filters, but some countries are already taking action. The UK's Office for Product Safety and Standards plans to tighten limits on oxybenzone next year, bringing them more in line with Europe. Today, UK sunscreens can contain up to 6% oxybenzone, but in 2026 the maximum concentration will be reduced to 2.2% for products that are applied to the whole body. Creams and sprays for the face and hands, and lip salves, can still contain 6%, as they are applied to smaller patches of skin. In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has recommended a reformulation of sunscreens and additional safeguards on three chemical compounds, including oxybenzone. In the US, an FDA review is ongoing. Some social media posts have spread claims that sunscreens cause cancer, but that is false. 'There's zero evidence for that,' said Antony Young, emeritus professor of experimental photobiology at King's College London. 'Skin cancers are caused by mutations, and almost all skin cancers have a mutation that is highly UV specific.' Others raise concerns over vitamin D deficiency. In the summer, most of our vitamin D is made through sun on our skin. But Young and his colleagues found that sunscreens have little impact on the vitamin D people make. The amount of sunlight needed to produce vitamin D is far below what it takes to cause sunburn. According to some doctors, concerns over skin cancer have eclipsed the broader health benefits of sunshine. Tentative research suggests that people who get more sun may have a lower risk of heart disease, high blood pressure, autoimmune diseases and even certain cancers. 'Sunburn is a risk factor for melanoma, but sunlight is good for you,' said Prof Richard Weller at the University of Edinburgh. 'You can use sunscreen, you can use a hat, or you can pop inside, whatever is good for you. Just don't get sunburned.' 'My general advice is to enjoy the sun, but don't get sunburned,' Young added. 'You can limit your time, or choose your time, or protect yourself, whether that's by shade, clothing or sunscreen. And sunscreens do work.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Experts: Alcoholic drinks should have clear cancer warning
By Leading cancer experts have echoed public concerns that alcoholic drinks should be slapped with an explicit warning that they cause the disease, following concerning research released today. According to the experts, warning labels could help raise better awareness of the health risks associated with alcohol , which has been linked to seven types of cancer. 'They should carry strong, clear messages about the health risks, which include the risk of cancer, far beyond vague advice like "consume in moderation"', the letter continued. Evidence cited by health experts shows that alcohol consumption significantly increases the risk of breast, bowel, stomach, head, neck, liver and mouth cancer. According to Cancer Research UK, the risk increases with every extra unit of alcohol per day—with eight per cent of breast cancer cases diagnosed annually in the UK directly linked to alcohol consumption. Currently NHS guidelines advise drinking no more than 14 units of alcohol a week—the equivalent of six pints of beer or 10 small glasses of wine—though the charity says there is no safe level. 'The two biggest risk factors of getting breast cancer are your age and being a woman, neither of which we can do anything about—but you can control how much you drink. 'So if you want to reduce your risk of breast cancer, you need to cut down.' According to the latest NHS figures, 81 per cent of adults said they had consumed alcohol in the past year – with men more likely than women to have done so (84 per cent compared to 78 per cent). A recent report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine found that even at low levels—defined as one or less drink a day for women—alcohol was associated with a 10 per cent increase in breast cancer risk. Drinking more than three pints a day however was associated with an increased risk of mouth, neck, bowel, liver and breast cancer, according to a 2015 study of over 570 cases. The WCRF added that just two drinks a day could significantly increase the risk of colorectal cancer—which can be found anywhere in the large bowel. It is one of the most common types of cancer in the UK. Experts are now calling on health care professionals to remain vigilant and provide interventions for those exceeding recommended limits, reminding people that any alcohol consumption increases the risk of cancer. In February, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared: 'Clear and prominent health warning labels on alcohol, which include a specific cancer warning, are a cornerstone of the right to health.'
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
As influencers spread ‘toxic' claims, what is the truth about sunscreen?
It's summertime in the UK and social media is awash with influencers airing their concerns about sunscreen. Among them is reality TV star Sam Faiers from The Only Way Is Essex, who believes sunscreen is 'full of toxic ingredients'. None of her family wore sunscreen, she said, adding that her children had built up 'a really good tolerance' to the sun. Some of the claims appear to be fuelled by a US doctor who told his followers: 'Be careful what you smear on yourself and your children.' Here we look at the science behind sunscreen and sun exposure. It's all down to the high energy ultraviolet (UV) rays. These cause premature skin ageing and wrinkles by degrading collagen and elastin. Collagen gives skin its firmness and structure, while elastin makes it stretchy. UV rays can also damage the DNA in skin cells, leading to mutations that ultimately drive skin cancers. One in three cancers globally is a skin cancer, and the main driver is UV rays. 'Too much UV radiation from the sun is the main cause of melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer,' said Dr Claire Knight at Cancer Research UK. 'That's why it's important to develop good sun safety habits from a young age and protect your skin when the sun is strong using shade, clothing and sunscreen together.' When the summer sunshine arrives, the skin responds to protect itself. The outermost layer, the epidermis, thickens and many people develop a tan, as cells in the skin called melanocytes produce more UV-absorbing melanin. Not everyone tans though, and acquiring a tan itself results in DNA damage. 'Most of that damage gets repaired, but some of it doesn't, it causes mutations and those can go on developing throughout life to give rise to skin cancer,' said Brian Diffey, emeritus professor of photobiology at Newcastle University. 'Sun exposure in childhood is a critical period for developing skin cancer, particularly melanoma, later in life.' He advises using sunscreen when the sun can harm your skin and not bothering when the UV index is less than three, which in the UK is generally from mid-October to mid-March. Sun creams contain filters that absorb UV rays. They protect by reducing the amount of UV that reaches the skin where it can cause burning and other damage. There are two main types of UV filters. The first are inorganic compounds, typically zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. The second are organic compounds, where organic simply means they contain carbon. Both types are manufactured and added to creams, sprays and lip salves. Many sunscreens contain inorganic and organic UV filters to improve sun protection. They trace back to a 2019 study conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Researchers found traces of organic UV filters, namely avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene and ecamsule, in people's blood after applying sun cream. The concentrations exceeded the level at which the FDA recommends companies do specific tests for toxic effects. Dr Tro Kalayjian, who runs a US weight loss clinic, posted the paper on X, adding: 'Be careful what you smear on yourself and your children.' The study prompted the FDA to call for more work on the compounds, but the authors stressed that they were not warning people off the products. 'These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen,' they wrote. The study looked at sunscreen under 'maximal use conditions', which meant really slathering the cream on. Under real conditions, people apply about one tenth of that used in the study, Diffey said. That alone would bring three of the four ingredients below the FDA's threshold, he added. The inorganic UV filters, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, have raised few concerns because they are not easily absorbed into the bloodstream. They can still, however, have an environmental impact when they wash off sun cream-covered swimmers and accumulate in water and marine life. More questions surround organic UV filters such as oxybenzone. These are endocrine disruptors, meaning they mimic natural hormones. Whether they cause harm at the doses people get from wearing sun cream is unclear, but a number of studies have looked at levels of benzophenones (which include oxybenzone) in urine and linked higher levels to effects on sperm and poorer fertility, with affected couples taking longer to conceive. Regulatory bodies around the world are seeking more information from manufacturers on organic UV filters, but some countries are already taking action. The UK's Office for Product Safety and Standards plans to tighten limits on oxybenzone next year, bringing them more in line with Europe. Today, UK sunscreens can contain up to 6% oxybenzone, but in 2026 the maximum concentration will be reduced to 2.2% for products that are applied to the whole body. Creams and sprays for the face and hands, and lip salves, can still contain 6%, as they are applied to smaller patches of skin. In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has recommended a reformulation of sunscreens and additional safeguards on three chemical compounds, including oxybenzone. In the US, an FDA review is ongoing. Some social media posts have spread claims that sunscreens cause cancer, but that is false. 'There's zero evidence for that,' said Antony Young, emeritus professor of experimental photobiology at King's College London. 'Skin cancers are caused by mutations, and almost all skin cancers have a mutation that is highly UV specific.' Others raise concerns over vitamin D deficiency. In the summer, most of our vitamin D is made through sun on our skin. But Young and his colleagues found that sunscreens have little impact on the vitamin D people make. The amount of sunlight needed to produce vitamin D is far below what it takes to cause sunburn. According to some doctors, concerns over skin cancer have eclipsed the broader health benefits of sunshine. Tentative research suggests that people who get more sun may have a lower risk of heart disease, high blood pressure, autoimmune diseases and even certain cancers. 'Sunburn is a risk factor for melanoma, but sunlight is good for you,' said Prof Richard Weller at the University of Edinburgh. 'You can use sunscreen, you can use a hat, or you can pop inside, whatever is good for you. Just don't get sunburned.' 'My general advice is to enjoy the sun, but don't get sunburned,' Young added. 'You can limit your time, or choose your time, or protect yourself, whether that's by shade, clothing or sunscreen. And sunscreens do work.'
