
A Method For Maximizing Memories With Money
Sahil Bloom recently shared a jarring stat: 'By the time your child turns 18, you've spent ~95% of the time you will ever spend with them in your lifetime,' based on research from the American Time Use Survey done by Our World in Data.
At first glance, many parents feel a sting of, 'Geez, am I being [or have I been] a poor steward of the limited time I've been given to spend time with my kids!?' But I don't think this is a revelation rooted in guilt.
Making Is Great. Maximizing, Even Better.
Furthermore, as someone with two older kids (21 and 19) and one much younger (17 months), I can tell you that some of the most priceless moments I've spent with the older kids occurred after they were 18.
And perhaps that's the point. This statistic is simply a reminder to heighten our awareness, to better appreciate those younger moments that often feel more like monotony or even drudgery—and then to do a better job crafting experiences that will maximize those valuable memories that we hope will mark our relationships with friends and family at any age.
And by the way, spending money on experiences is the way to get the most bang for our buck. Or, as Kumar, Killingsworth, and Gilovich put it in their 2020 study, "People derive more satisfaction from experiential purchases (e.g., travel, entertainment, outdoor activities, meals out) than material purchases (e.g., clothing, jewelry, furniture, gadgets), both in prospect and retrospect."
So, how can we maximize these experiences—these memories we're creating—and increase the rate of return on the money we invested? Perhaps from an unlikely place. I recommend applying an evidence-based approach to relationship management that I learned from author, consultant, and former actuary Mo Bunnell:
One of the best pieces of parenting advice I ever got was that, to optimize the lessons I hope to instill in my children, I need to give up on the proactive lecture [sigh] and instead be ready to deliver the important (and hopefully concise) insight reactively, at the moment that the kids express their curiosity.
While I've not always followed this excellent advice, it has borne much fruit when I have— especially on the big stuff. With stuff like faith, family, work, money, education, sex, drinking, drugs, and rock-and-roll, it's been more natural to address these matters when the kids make a comment or ask a question. And trust me, parents, if we have ears to hear, they will signal their curiosity, and we will learn from our kids.
This works no differently in crafting the best experiences of any size or scope, and with anyone, but especially our family members. If and when we become students of those we love, they will show us what interests them.
Then, we have an opportunity to pour fuel on the fire of that nascent curiosity. If your kids show interest in trains, why not ask them on a Saturday morning if they would be interested in going to a nearby train station? If they show interest in plants or flowers, ask them if they might like to plant a seedling or build a raised-bed garden with you. They show interest in music, ask them if they'd like to go to a concert.
Now, I realize that we can't make every shred of curiosity into an extravagant occasion—and nor should we. Money is great memory fuel, but while most experiences cost something, they need not be expensive to captivate our attention and leave a meaningful mark.
And with kids (of any age), we may need to redirect their curiosity into a more reasonable (or less costly) direction—but without putting a wet blanket on their inquisitiveness.
'Well, going to the moon may not be in the cards, but what about a trip to the planetarium?'
'What's a planetarium?'
'Ooh, it's a special place where…'
One of the keys to memory maximization is giving our loved ones a chance to have some agency in the experience we're planning. You might love live music, and you may have good reason to introduce your kids to music you love—but what about asking them who they would like to see in concert?
Maybe you even create a rhythm of going back-and-forth between who chooses the next musical act you'll see. This is an approach that I have directly benefited from, as I've now had unforgettable experiences seeing U2, Kendrick Lamar (twice), Mumford & Sons (twice), JID, My Morning Jacket, J. Cole, Tame Impala, and many smaller acts, all with my young adult kids—and you can guess which ones were their ideas. (You might be surprised. 😊)
Here, we divert from Mo Bunnell's method and back to the wisdom gained from the above-referenced study: 'People derive more satisfaction from experiential purchases … than material purchases … both in prospect and retrospect." (Italics are mine.)
You know this to be true, right? One of the key factors adding to our most memorable experiences is anticipating that experience and rehashing thereafter.
Before all those concerts, for example, we made up playlists enshrining our favorite songs that we would listen to weeks in advance and on the way to the show. Then afterward, we'd bounce back-and-forth discussing our favorite moments of each show—and creating a sharable playlist from the night's setlist.
Now, years beyond any of those events, every time one of those songs comes on when we're all together (or apart), we're immediately taken back to the sights and sounds of these indelible memories.
The total value derived from those memories has long ago exceeded any investment—and that is my hope for you.
So, what memory can you begin planning to maximize this week? What information have your loved ones already shared that you can use to spark their curiosity? What experience can you build together, anticipate, and remember forever?
P.S. I had the opportunity to talk to Sahil Bloom recently about his new book, 'The 5 Types of Wealth," which was the inspiration for this post. You can click HERE to enjoy that conversation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Anixa Biosciences' Breast Cancer Vaccine Featured in NewsNation Interview
SAN JOSE, Calif., June 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Anixa Biosciences, Inc. ("Anixa" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: ANIX), a biotechnology company focused on the treatment and prevention of cancer, today announced that its CEO, Dr. Amit Kumar, was interviewed on NewsNation's "Elizabeth Vargas Reports" to discuss Anixa's breast cancer vaccine. The segment highlighted the potential of Anixa's vaccine to revolutionize the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Anixa's breast cancer vaccine is designed to train the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancerous cells before they can develop into invasive tumors. The vaccine targets a lactation protein, α-lactalbumin, which is only expressed in the breast when a woman is lactating but not at other times in her life or in other tissues. However, when a woman develops breast cancer many of the malignant cells will express α-lactalbumin. Activating the immune system, through vaccination, to direct cytotoxic T cells to the tumor cell expressing this protein may provide preemptive immune protection against emerging breast tumors that express α-lactalbumin. "We are pleased to have our breast cancer vaccine featured on NewsNation's 'Elizabeth Vargas Reports,' as this national exposure brings greater awareness to the importance of preventative cancer immunotherapy," said Dr. Kumar. "We believe we have made significant progress in the development of this vaccine, having recently completed enrollment in the Phase 1 clinical trial. We look forward to the next stage of development and are optimistic about the impact this vaccine could have in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer." The NewsNation "Elizabeth Vargas Reports" interview can be accessed here: About Anixa Biosciences, Inc. Anixa is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on the treatment and prevention of cancer. Anixa's therapeutic portfolio consists of an ovarian cancer immunotherapy program being developed in collaboration with Moffitt Cancer Center, which uses a novel type of CAR-T, known as chimeric endocrine receptor-T cell (CER-T) technology. This technology is differentiated from other cell therapies as the natural ligand of the FSHR receptor, FSH, binds to the FSHR receptor on the tumor cell instead of an antibody fragment. Moffitt is a world leader in cancer immunotherapy treatments, pioneering next-generation cell therapies such as CAR-T, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to harness the power of the immune system. The Company's vaccine portfolio includes vaccines being developed in collaboration with Cleveland Clinic to treat and prevent breast cancer and ovarian cancer, as well as additional cancer vaccines to address many intractable cancers, including high incidence malignancies in lung, colon, and prostate. These vaccine technologies focus on immunizing against "retired" proteins that have been found to be expressed in certain forms of cancer. The breast and ovarian cancer vaccines were developed at Cleveland Clinic and exclusively licensed to Anixa. Cleveland Clinic is entitled to royalties and other commercialization revenues from the Company related to these vaccine technologies. Anixa's unique business model of partnering with world-renowned research institutions on all stages of development allows the Company to continually examine emerging technologies in complementary fields for further development and commercialization. To learn more, visit or follow Anixa on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and YouTube. Forward-Looking StatementsStatements that are not historical fact may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect Anixa's current expectations concerning future events and results. We generally use the words "believes," "expects," "intends," "plans," "anticipates," "likely," "will" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, including those concerning our expectations, involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to, those factors set forth in "Item 1A - Risk Factors" and other sections of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this press release. Contact:Mike CatelaniPresident, COO & CFOmcatelani@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Anixa Biosciences, Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much Groceries Cost in the US Compared to Mexico, Canada and China
As much as housing skyrocketed in cost during and after the pandemic, food prices rose even faster. Read Next: Discover More: From 2020-2024, the USDA reports that food prices rose by 23.6%, compared to 23.0% for housing. But food inflation slowed dramatically in 2024, from a rate of 11.4% in 2022 to 5.0% in 2023 to just 1.2% in 2024. So how do U.S. grocery prices and affordability compare to our neighbors in Canada and Mexico, and to the second largest economy in the world, China? Grocery Cost Index: 71.75 (Numbeo) Share of Average Consumer Spending: 6.8% (USDA data processed by Our World in Data) In absolute terms, groceries cost more in the U.S. than in China, Canada or Mexico. 'The U.S. imports groceries from other countries like Mexico and Canada, for year-round availability,' explains consumer finance expert Aaron Razon of CouponSnake. 'Add in the high cost of local labor and the impact of trade policies and tariffs on grocery prices, it's really no surprise that groceries would cost more in the U.S. than it does in these other countries.' But as a share of the average American's budget, groceries take up the smallest percentage across these four countries, at just 6.8%. That makes grocery affordability in the U.S. better than its neighbors and chief rival. Grocery Cost Index: 65.35 Share of Average Consumer Spending: 9.7% Groceries cost a little less north of the border. Specifically, Numbeo reports that groceries cost 5.8% less in Canada when priced in the same currency. However, the median Canadian also earns less than the median American. The average Canadian household spends 9.7% of its budget on groceries. Grocery Cost Index: 38.22 Share of Average Consumer Spending: 25.7% That effect becomes much more pronounced in Mexico, where both incomes and grocery prices are lower. Numbeo reports that groceries cost 42.3% less in Mexico, in absolute terms. Accountant Shalini Dharna of Dharna CPA explains further. 'In general, consumers in Mexico tend to have less disposable income than in the U.S. and Canada, so in relative terms groceries are more affordable in the U.S. than in Mexico.' Plus, Mexican households have less access to imported foods than Americans do. Outside of major cities, many Mexican families primarily eat locally grown food. Grocery Cost Index: 34.18 Share of Average Consumer Spending: 21.2% Groceries cost even less in China: 53.1% less, to be exact. 'China's large-scale agricultural production and low labor costs put them at an advantage when it comes to affordability,' says Razon. The raw numbers don't tell the whole story, however. China has enormous wealth and cost-of-living divides, especially between rural and urban areas. Food takes up a large portion of the average Chinese household's budget — particularly for those low-wage rural workers providing that cheap labor. Grocery cost indexes from Numbeo. More From GOBankingRates Surprising Items People Are Stocking Up On Before Tariff Pains Hit: Is It Smart? 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value This article originally appeared on Here's How Much Groceries Cost in the US Compared to Mexico, Canada and China Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Insider
5 days ago
- Business Insider
InterGlobe Aviation Ltd (INDIGO) Gets a Buy from UBS
In a report released yesterday, Pramod Kumar from UBS maintained a Buy rating on InterGlobe Aviation Ltd (INDIGO – Research Report), with a price target of INR6,450.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at INR5,330.00. Confident Investing Starts Here: Kumar covers the Consumer Cyclical sector, focusing on stocks such as Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Bajaj Auto Limited, and Maruti Suzuki India Limited. According to TipRanks, Kumar has an average return of -11.1% and a 60.00% success rate on recommended stocks. InterGlobe Aviation Ltd has an analyst consensus of Moderate Buy, with a price target consensus of INR5,589.17, representing a 4.86% upside. In a report released today, Jefferies also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a INR6,300.00 price target. The company has a one-year high of INR5,665.65 and a one-year low of INR3,778.50. Currently, InterGlobe Aviation Ltd has an average volume of 35K.