This Word Means: Aircraft carrier
Addressing officers and sailors onboard INS Vikrant off the coast of Goa, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Friday (May 30) said that Pakistan would have split into four parts if the Navy had come into 'full form' during Operation Sindoor.
INS Vikrant is one of two aircraft carriers in the fleet of the Indian Navy, the other being the flagship INS Vikramaditya. It is the Navy's most potent weapon as well as its most strategic asset, one that Pakistan simply has no answer for.
As the name suggests, an aircraft carrier is a warship meant to serve as a seagoing airbase, one that allows for both the deployment and recovery of aircraft.
A carrier typically comes with a functional flight deck from and on which fighter jets, helicopters, and small military transport planes can take off and land, as well as a hangar to park these aircraft. Its main offensive weapon are fighter aircraft, which can ensure air superiority even in places far away from home.
But aircraft carriers are also massive, multi-billion floating targets for enemies. This is why they seldom travel alone, and generally lead what is known as a 'carrier strike/battle group' comprising destroyers, missile cruisers, frigates, submarines, and supply ships. These other ships both protect the carrier and add to its offensive capabilities.
Carriers came into their own during World War II, by which time fighter aircraft had become advanced and reliable enough to become more capable than the naval guns as offensive weapons. Aircraft carriers could strike much deeper into enemy territory than any other ship, and do so with a level of unprecedented accuracy.
Today, a carrier is considered the most potent marine military asset for any nation, and essential for any 'blue water navy', that is, a navy with the capacity to project power in the high seas. But only a very select group of nations possesses an aircraft carrier, fewer possess more than one carrier, and fewer still possess the capability to build one.
INS Vikrant was the first indigenously-built aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy. Vikramaditya is a modified Russian Kiev-class carrier. The Navy plans to add a third carrier into its fleet over the next decade or so.
With a displacement of 45,000 tonnes, INS Vikrant is the largest warship to have ever been built in India. The Navy claims that roughly 76% of the ship comprises indigenous content, including 23,000 tonnes of steel, 2,500 km of electric cables, 150 km of pipes, 2,000 valves, and a wide range of finished products including rigid hull boats, galley equipment, air-conditioning and refrigeration plants, and steering gear.
Vikrant can carry up to 34 aircraft, with Russian-made MiG 29K fighter jets being its primary offensive weapon. It is operated by a crew of 1,600, and effectively operates like a small town in the high seas, one that has its own hospital with two operation theatres and an ICU, workshop for mechanics, and three galleys which can feed 600 people at a time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS
New Delhi, The Indian government has made it clear that Pakistan, the perpetrator of terrorism, "cannot be equated" with India, the victim of cross-border terrorism, the Centre told Parliament on Thursday. Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said this in a written response to queries in the Rajya Sabha. The Ministry of External Affairs was asked how the government has countered claims of "India-Pakistan hyphenation in global diplomacy" and the diplomatic measures taken by the government to address "China's growing influence over Pakistan" in terms of intelligence and military cooperation. "The government of India has made it clear that the perpetrator of terrorism, i.e., Pakistan, cannot be equated with the victim of cross-border terrorism, i.e., India. This unequivocal message was consistently reiterated during interactions with interlocutors in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor," Singh said. The seven all-party delegations, which visited various global capitals in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, also "emphatically conveyed" the above message while demonstrating India's strong national consensus and resolute approach to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, the MoS said. "The issue of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, was taken up with the Chinese Foreign Minister during his recent visit to India," he added. The MEA was also asked how the government plans to strengthen India's foreign policy narrative in 2025-2026. "The global community widely acknowledges India's robust democracy, economic progress, military might, technological prowess, civilisational heritage, and its contribution in addressing global issues," Singh said. The government's engagement with various stakeholders, including think-tanks and academic and research institutions, serves to highlight India's foreign policy achievements and priorities, he said. "Government undertakes a series of targeted public diplomacy initiatives to carry forward India's message to the world and continues to make all endeavours to further strengthen India's voice in global affairs. "It also constantly monitors all developments having a bearing on India's security and national interest and takes all required steps in this regard," Singh said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Wire
33 minutes ago
- The Wire
Gujarat School Principal Admits ‘Mistake' After I-Day Skit on Pahalgam Attack Draws Ire from Muslims
The skit sparked anger among the local Muslim community and left Muslim students and their families distressed, as the children who were playing the role of terrorists were dressed in burqas, wielding guns. Screengrab from a video of the skit showing burqa-clad students wielding guns, while other students are dressed in white and saffron. Photo: By arrangement New Delhi: For Fozia*, a class seven student at a school in Gujarat's Bhavnagar, Independence Day celebrations mean that her fellow schoolmates would be dressed in saffron, white and green – the tricolour – with Bollywood songs about patriotism blaring from speakers on school premises and no classes at all. Like every year, she was excited this time too. The students at her school – Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Prathmik Shala, an all-girls' school in Bhavnagar's Kumbharwada area – were preparing for a skit to be performed on August 15; the theme was events that led up to 'Operation Sindoor'. As the students, teachers and administration seated themselves at the school's assembly ground, words like 'Pahalgam', 'terrorist', 'Hindu', 'Muslim' began echoing amid the silence of the audience. The students acting in the skit were dressed in clear demarcation of roles – those playing victims of the attack were dressed in white and saffron, with saffron bindi (a decorative dot) on their forehead, while the students playing the role of terrorists were dressed in burqa, wielding guns. This sparked anger among the local Muslim community and left Muslim students at the school and their families distressed, some of whom started protesting amid the play. Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam School in Bhanvanagar's Kumbharwada. Photo: By arrangement The burqa-clad students were engrossed in carrying out the script and kept the skit going. However, as the video reached the parents, a huge crowd showed up at the school demanding answers from the administration. 'Both my daughters attend the same school. It is founded in the name of Abdul Kalam sahab, and this is what is being allowed. My wife, my mother and my sisters wear the burqa, should Hindu girls think of them as terrorists now?' a parent told The Wire. Bandharan Bachav Samiti, a local organisation rallying for equal constitutional rights for all, said that locals from the Muslim community were extremely hurt at the idea of the skit that the school allowed to be performed for the Independence Day assembly. It signified a total lack of sensitivity towards its Muslim students. The Samiti sees this gravely hurtful, anti-Muslim and communal action by the school staff which has indeed offended the Muslim community's sentiments. Locals from Muslim community gather outside the DEO office in Bhavnagar. Photo: By arrangement Speaking to The Wire, Zahurbhai Jeja, president of the Samiti, said, 'How is this being allowed at the school? When we first approached the school, they said they had no idea that the skit involved this kind of a dress up and thematic idea. Then they said that the children decided everything about the skit – from theme to costumes; they put the whole blame on students, thinking that no one would drag students to the police.' Jeja said that it was only because of the anger and efforts of the community that a notice was sent to Bhavnagar Municipal School Board administrative officer (AO) Munjal Badmaliya by district education officer (DEO) Hitendrasinh D Padheriya, who sought details of the Independence Day programme and questioned the issues raised regarding the skit at the school. He added, 'Why were burqa-clad female students made to assume the role of terrorists. At an all-girls school, Col. Sofiya Qureshi must be seen as an example of patriotism and bravado. But the staff chose to identify terrorists with burqas.' The school has more than 600 girl students. It came under scanner after videos of the I-Day programme appeared on social media. While the school returned to routine functioning subsequently, Muslim parents are unhappy to be sending their girls to the school. There is silence on the premises, one that does not signify discipline and focus, but regret. Rajubhai Dave, the principal at the school, has been smothered with parents' questions, allegations and accusations. The teaching staff and administration have been in panic since the parents and the Samiti wrote to the DEO, who has put the school under watch. The Bandharan Bachao Samiti speaks to Bhavnagar DEO regarding the school's Independence Day skit. Photo: By arrangement When The Wire reached out to Dave, he accepted that the skit had, in fact, happened exactly the way the locals are alleging. However, he said that the school administration had no information about it. When asked about why burqa was chosen to depict terrorists, Dave said that the concerned teacher chose the colour 'black' to depict them. However, when The Wire inquired as to why the students could not have worn other kinds of black costumes, with black masks etc, Dave said, 'We made a mistake, we shouldn't have let this happen.' In 2023, a video of students from Pearl School, a private school in Kutch district's Mundra town, had gone viral. In the video, the students were seen performing a skit wearing skull caps to depict the celebration of the Eid-al-Adha. In the video, students could also be seen performing namaz with some covering their heads with handkerchiefs. Female students stood in prayer. The Wire had reported that the videos caused outrage among some locals, who alleged that Islam was being 'imposed' on Hindu students through such skits and that the video 'hurt' Hindu sentiments. Subsequently, the school's principal, Priti Vaswani, was suspended. *Name changed to protect identity This article went live on August twenty-first, two thousand twenty five, at nineteen minutes past four in the afternoon. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Responsibility amidst shifting geopolitical winds? Case of humanitarian aid to Gaza
The United Nations (UN), created after World War II, was not just a replacement for the defunct League of Nations, but also an embodiment of the aspirations and actions of responsible actors in the international system to prevent the injustices witnessed in the preceding World Wars. Principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence all became core tenets of the rules-based international order. The UN Charter lays the groundwork for the UN's broader role in addressing international problems, including those of a humanitarian character. However, as the rules-based international order comes under tremendous strain due to hypocritical actions of the world's two biggest powers, namely the US and China, all principles that the world was expected to adhere to are being sacrificed at the altar of narrow and selfish national interests. A case in point is that of the humanitarian crisis that has been unfolding in Gaza. Palestinians queue to fill up on drinking water in the sweltering heat in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip on August 12, 2025.(AFP) Exacerbated by the Israel-Hamas conflict, the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza has exposed challenges in delivering aid to a population facing starvation and destruction. By August 2025, over 60,000 deaths have been reported, with malnutrition claiming lives, particularly among children. Israeli Defence Forces have released videos of Hamas stealing aid meant for the population in Gaza while USAID has stated there is no evidence of Hamas diverting or stealing aid meant for Gazans. If this was not enough, the actions of major powers like the US under President Donald Trump and China, reveal a troubling hypocrisy that undermines the UN Charter's principles of promoting peace, human rights and international cooperation. The UN Security Council (UNSC), tasked with maintaining global peace is paralysed by US and Chinese vetoes. The U.S. has vetoed resolutions calling for a ceasefire, citing Israel's right to self-defence, while China's veto in 2024 alongside Russia, signalled its own geopolitical ambitions. Vetoes stall UN agencies like the World Food Programme and leave aid delivery to less experienced groups like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which in any case has been critiqued because of its ties to the US and Israel. In May 2025, the US championed the GHF, claiming it delivers massive aid, with State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce calling UN criticisms the 'height of hypocrisy'. The fact is that the GHF's operations rely on private military contractors. The US approach contradicts the UN Charter's call for 'promoting and encouraging respect for human rights' in Article 1. Supporting a military-aligned non-governmental organisation undermines the principles of neutrality and impartiality that are central to humanitarian aid. The Trump administration's initial inaction in the 11-week blockade after the ceasefire collapsed in March 2025 further highlights a selective commitment to humanitarianism, driven completely by domestic optics, rather than by global responsibility. When it comes to China, Beijing's foreign ministry constantly emphasises support for a two-State solution and criticises the West's double standards. However, its $ 10 million pledge for reconstruction and relief is minimal compared to the billions needed for Gaza's recovery. By channelling aid through partners like the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization, China avoids direct involvement, reducing logistical risks, as well as tangible impacts. In May this year, disinformation handles, and a lot of them from China, went on an overdrive to portray Chinese jets air-dropping aid into Gaza. However, fact checks revealed that the images and the narratives were all fake. The attempt clearly was to showcase China as a saviour as compared to the West. Additionally, China's veto at the UNSC, which blocked a resolution that could have facilitated UN-led aid surges, showcases how humanitarian aid for Gaza is just a brownie point for China, to showcase itself as a better leader as compared to the US. The attempt is merely to counter western influence over addressing Gaza's humanitarian needs, and this contradicts the UN Charter's call for international cooperation, mentioned in Article 1. Both the US and China, as seen in their actions in Gaza, undermine the UN Charter's core principles. Article 2 emphasises sovereign equality and good-faith fulfilment of obligations. The Charter's Preamble also calls for saving generations from war's scourge, but the US's militarised aid via the GHF and China's geopolitically driven contributions perpetuate the sufferings of the people in Gaza. The vetoes of both the US and China at the UNSC on Gaza, as and when it does not suit their geopolitical ambitions, showcase how both, acting as two sides of the same coin, prioritise strategic interests over collective action. The crisis in Gaza, while political in nature and demanding the release of the hostages abducted by Hamas in 2023, also needs urgent humanitarian attention because it is ordinary people who get affected in military conflicts the most. The US's militarised approach and China's limited and strategically motivated aid undermine the UN Charter's moral and legal framework. It is pertinent that the international community holds these powers accountable, ensuring that aid reaches the most vulnerable in Gaza. This article is authored by Sriparna Pathak, professor, China Studies and International Relations, Jindal School of International Affairs, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat.
