Northland Power Achieves First Power on Hai Long Offshore Wind Project
Hai Long offshore substation in the Taiwan Strait.
TORONTO, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Northland Power Inc. (TSX: NPI) today announced first power from its Hai Long Offshore Wind Project in Taiwan, marking successful energization of the project and connection to Taipower's grid. This achievement comes ahead of the second half of 2025, underscoring the project's strong construction momentum.
The milestone also includes the commissioning of both onshore and offshore substations, further demonstrating the project's progress toward full commercial operations, anticipated in 2027.
'Achieving first power is a significant milestone for Northland and reflects the dedication of our team and partners,' said Christine Healy, President and CEO of Northland Power. 'We extend our deepest appreciation to our joint teams, partners, and contractors for their extraordinary efforts.' Since the commencement of construction, Hai Long has made substantial progress, including the production of jacket foundations and pin piles, installation of the Hai Long 2 and 3 offshore substations, installation of all 219 pin piles, assembly of Taiwan's first locally manufactured 14 MW wind turbine nacelle and the installation of 14 out of 73 turbines.With a planned capacity of 1 GW, Hai Long will play a vital role in supporting Taiwan's renewable energy target of 15 GW of offshore wind between 2026 and 2035. Once operational, Hai Long will be among the largest offshore wind farms in the Asia-Pacific region, providing clean electricity to over one million Taiwanese homes.
'This milestone is a testament to the teamwork, technical excellence, and shared commitment from all involved,' said Toby Edmonds, Executive Vice President, Offshore Wind. 'First power represents real progress, not just for Hai Long, but for Taiwan's broader offshore wind ambitions. We're excited to keep building on this momentum.'
ABOUT NORTHLAND POWER
Northland Power is a Canada-based global power producer dedicated to accelerating the global energy transition. Founded in 1987, with almost four decades of experience, Northland has a long history of developing, owning and operating a diversified mix of energy infrastructure assets including offshore and onshore wind, solar, battery energy storage, and natural gas. Northland also supplies energy through a regulated utility.
Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with global offices in seven countries, Northland owns or has an economic interest in 3.5 GW of gross operating generating capacity, 2.2 GW under construction and an inventory of early to mid-stage development opportunities encompassing approximately 10 GW of potential capacity.
Publicly traded since 1997, Northland's Common Shares, Series 1 and Series 2 Preferred Shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols NPI, NPI.PR.A and NPI.PR.B, respectively.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains statements that constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws ('forward-looking statements') that are provided for the purpose of presenting information about management's current expectations and plans. Readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. Northland's actual results could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements may or may not transpire or occur. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or include words such as 'anticipates', 'expects,' 'believes,' or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' 'would' and 'could.' These statements may include, without limitation, statements regarding Northland's expectations for the completion of construction and anticipated timing thereof, the anticipated sequence of construction operations, the timing for and attainment of commercial operations, the expected generating capacity of the project, and the future operations of the project, all of which may differ from the expectations stated herein. These statements are based upon certain material factors or assumptions that were applied in developing the forward-looking statements, including the design specifications of development of the project, the current construction schedule of the project, the provisions of contracts to which Northland or a subsidiary is a party, as well as other factors, estimates, and assumptions that are believed to be appropriate in the circumstances. Although these forward-looking statements are based upon management's current reasonable expectations and assumptions, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Some of the factors include, but are not limited to, those described in the 'Risks Factors' section of Northland's Management's Discussion and Analysis and Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, which can be found at www.sedarplus.ca under Northland's profile and on Northland's website at northlandpower.com. Northland has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from current expectations, however, there may be other factors that cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations. Northland's actual results could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, and Northland cautions you not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements contained in this release are, unless otherwise indicated, stated as of the date hereof and are based on assumptions that were considered reasonable as of the date hereof. Other than as specifically required by law, Northland undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future events or results, or otherwise.
For further information, please contact:
Adam Beaumont, SVP, Capital Markets416-962-6262investorrelations@northlandpower.com
Victor Gravili, Head of Global Brand & Integrated Communications647-288-1105
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/17ae669f-e75d-409e-8587-a601cf05766aSign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Fauré Le Page Doesn't Identify As A Luxury Brand—Why That Matters
The Ladies First Bag is the Parisian Chic House's new, all-leather piece. It's rare for a heritage fashion house to dismiss the luxury label outright—especially one with 300 years of history. Yet at the recent Manila launch of Fauré Le Page's Ladies First bag, Augustin de Buffévent, the brand's Artistic & Communications Director, was quick to reject the term. 'We have nothing to do with luxury,' he stated in a matter-of-fact tone. 'We are a Parisian chic house and I am not at ease with the concept of luxury. To me, it doesn't mean anything anymore.' That distinction matters. Across Asia, brands are being forced to rethink what luxury actually means. According to a report, 87% of consumers now favor timelessness over trends while 80–92% rank material quality and craftsmanship above brand prestige when defining luxury. Meanwhile, the industry faces a reckoning with another industry report estimating the loss of some 50 million luxury buyers last year as inflation eats into purchasing power. In that context, Fauré Le Page's position feels less rebellious than it does well-calculated. The Ladies First bag marks a quiet milestone for the house. It's their first all-leather line, made from full-grain Armure Leather inspired by 18th-century cuirasses. The silhouette is structured but feminine, blending heritage with ease. Barrel-shaped clasps and bullet-like zipper pulls are subtle nods to the brand's origin as a purveyor of firearms to French nobility—though de Buffévent is quick to clarify: 'It's not a weapon. It's a weapon of seduction.' There's no rush here. Unlike fast‑fashion cycles or trendier labels vying for virality, Fauré Le Page plays a long game. 'Long-lasting items take time. We don't follow the crazy rhythm of fashion,' says de Buffévent. With rigorous 'torture tests' built into production, each bag is crafted to last—preferably a decade or more. He beams, 'I'm proud when I see someone carrying the same bag after ten years. Even more when my daughters steal bags from my wife.' I'm proud when I see someone carrying the same bag after ten years. Even more when my daughters steal bags from my wife. This slow‑craft approach aligns with evolving consumer behavior. A recent study found that 87% of luxury buyers across China, Japan, and Southeast Asia now prioritize quality, craftsmanship, and long‑term value over mere brand prestige, underscoring the rising demand for meaningful, substance‑driven luxury. The timing couldn't be more relevant. Some of the industry's biggest players have faced criticism over quality despite hiking prices. In May of this year, a TikTok user went viral after claiming that the straps of her Goyard St. Louis PM tote melted during a warm spring day, leaving stains on her shirt and questions about the bag's durability. It wasn't even summer yet. Incidents like this are fueling conversations about whether today's 'luxury' still lives up to the name. Other labels haven't been spared either: Chanel's classic flap bags have drawn complaints over uneven stitching and delicate leather, while Prada's nylon pieces have been criticized for fraying seams and faulty zippers after minimal use—all despite repeated price hikes in the last few years. So, who is the Ladies First bag made for? Forget demographics. 'I hate the term 'fashion victim,'' de Buffévent says. 'Women should create their own style. This bag is the perfect accessory for that.' With its sturdy form, refined detailing, and rich symbolism, it's less about signaling wealth and more about wearing conviction. At the launch of Fauré Le Page's Ladies First bag in Manila. Nikki Huang (Rustan's Commercial Group Merchandising Consultant), Augustin de Buffevént (Fauré Le Page Artistic & Communications Director), Anton Huang (SSI Group President) and Stephanie Chong (Fauré Le Page Philippines General Manager) Rather than chasing the new, Fauré Le Page refines what's already timeless. 'We're not in the fashion business,' he reiterates. 'Quality is at the heart.' And for a growing number of buyers, that's where real luxury now lives. In a market bloated with disposable 'It' bags and seasonal logo drops, Fauré Le Page offers a slower and sturdy alternative: one that values craft over clout, style over spectacle. With Ladies First, they are launching a new silhouette while sending a message. For those who are done with flash and ready for substance, this may be the new standard of luxury.
Skift
4 hours ago
- Skift
Air India Outlines Compensation, Relief Efforts After AI171 Crash
Air India's response following the AI171 crash has been swift and measured as it tries to counter misinformation. Air India Liveblog Ongoing coverage of the crash of Air India flight 171 from Skift's editorial team in India, Europe, and the United States. Ongoing coverage of the crash of Air India flight 171 from Skift's editorial team in India, Europe, and the United States. Get the Latest Updates Skift's coverage of the Air India crash is offered free to all readers. After Air India Flight AI171 crashed minutes after takeoff in Ahmedabad on Thursday, the airline confirmed the tragedy on X about 50 minutes later. Since then, it has posted two video messages from CEO Campbell Wilson, set up help centers and helplines, and provided regular updates as the situation unfolds. The airline's communication on X has been important in countering any misinformation. In the early hours of Friday, Air India confirmed that the total number of passenger and crew fatalities in the crash was 241 out of 242 onboard, with the sole survivor undergoing treatment. Here's what Air India has done so far: Messages From Campbell Wilson, Air India's Optics Since the crash, Air India shared two video messages by CEO Campbell Wilson. In the first video message, posted about six hours after the crash, Wilson confirmed the accident and talked about the status of efforts from Air India. The message came at a time when media channels in India were speculating about the number of casualties in the crash, even as rescue operations were underway. The video message, shot against a grey backdrop with Wilson dressed in a somber black suit, helped the airline set the tone. Air India also changed the colors of its website to black and white. Wilson shared his second video message late Friday evening from Ahmedabad to give more updates on the situation and reiterate the airline's support in the investigations. Wilson's video statement released Thursday shortly after the crash had striking similarities to the response from American Airlines CEO Robert Isom after the January crash of American Flight 5342 near Washington, D.C. Air India did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the similarities. However, during tragic incidents like the Air India crash, airline CEOs tend to follow a similar format in their statements. Airlines also pre-plan emergency responses to a range of scenarios. The International Air Transport Association recommends that airline crisis communications include templates for initial statements for an accident. IATA also recommends that the CEO serve as the primary spokesperson when responding to an incident. 'In principle, the CEO should be the primary spokesperson after an accident if there is loss of life or serious injuries,' IATA's best practices for the aviation industry guidebook reads. 'Their involvement demonstrates that he/she has taken personal responsibility for overseeing the response and understands the impact on those affected.'
Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The Plane That Crashed Yesterday Was the Same One a Dead Boeing Whistleblower Warned About
Critics of Boeing have long expressed criticisms of the 787 Dreamliner and the company's standards. Last year, a former quality manager at Boeing warned that the factory that made the 787 Dreamliner—one of the company's newer models of airplane—was plagued by shoddy work practices and poor oversight. John Barnett, who had worked for the airplane manufacturer for many years before becoming one of its most outspoken critics, said that Boeing was building the planes with 'sub-standard' parts and that its mandate of speed and efficiency was endangering lives. Barnett, who refused to fly on the Dreamliner, was also involved in a legal dispute with the company at the time that he died of an apparent suicide. Yesterday, the plane that Barnett had warned regulators about crashed in Ahmedabad, India, killing all but one of the passengers. The worst aviation disaster in recent memory, the crash has spurred fresh scrutiny of its controversy-plagued manufacturer. While it will take months to understand what actually caused the crash, if the source of the disaster ends up being a vulnerability in the plane's technical design, it won't be particularly surprising. Barnett, whose death sparked conspiracy theories due to his involvement in the legal case against his former employer, was one of a long list of critics who have long expressed concern about the company's manufacturing practices. The 787 was launched in 2011, with one of the advertised benefits being that Boeing could manufacture the aircraft more cheaply than its previous models. However, from the get-go, the plane was ridiculed for having an overly complicated assembly process. One critic, writing in 2013, noted that the plane was put together through a convoluted network of contractors, some of whom offered limited transparency. Another aviation commentator said that it was as if Boeing had said 'F*ck it. Let's throw out everything we've ever known or used in airplane production and use this new, unproven method.' Critics noted that the company had outsourced too many parts to too many different contractors and that there was a risk that all of those components might not properly fit together when the craft was finally assembled. Upon launch, the plane was almost immediately plagued by technical problems. In 2013, a series of battery-related fires in aircraft cabins caused the FAA to ground all of the 787s in the U.S. until the safety issues could be resolved. In 2015, the U.S. air safety authority discovered a software bug in the plane's generator-control units that could hypothetically lead to a 'loss of control' by the plane's pilots. The plane also suffered from fuel leaks and other issues. In 2019, the New York Times reported for the first time on the South Carolina plant where the Dreamliner was manufactured, noting that it was alleged to be 'plagued by shoddy production and weak oversight that have threatened to compromise safety.' Barnett—who, by that time, had already left the company—was quoted heavily in the article, saying that he hadn't 'seen a plane [come] out of Charleston yet that I'd put my name on saying it's safe and airworthy.' After Barnett's death, another whistleblower who had formerly served as an engineer at Boeing, Sam Salehpour, claimed that deficiencies in the way the 787 was assembled could cause the aircraft to 'break apart' in midair. Salehpour went on to testify about the issues in front of Congress, accusing his former company of being involved in a 'criminal cover-up.' He also implied something could 'happen' to him as a result of his outspoken criticism. Around the same time, other Boeing whistleblowers emerged from the woodwork to offer similar critiques of the airplane manufacturer, another of whom died. That spring, Boeing also admitted to falsifying documents about the 787, communicating to the FAA that it 'may not have completed required inspections to confirm adequate bonding and grounding where the wings join the fuselage' and that other misconduct may have occurred at the company. Boeing did not return a request for comment.
