Should the Middle Class Really Be Worried About the State of Social Security? Experts Weigh In
Social Security is one of the most widely used and misunderstood government programs in America. With headlines warning of funding shortfalls and political gridlock, middle-class retirees and those under 55 are left wondering whether the federal safety net program will be there when they need it.
Be Aware:
For You:
GOBankingRates talked to experts to uncover whether the middle class really should be worried about the state of Social Security.
Social Security remains a cornerstone of retirement planning for millions of Americans. However, its financial foundation is under increasing strain. The program's trust funds are projected to be depleted by 2035.
'This does not mean that Social Security goes away entirely or that it runs out of money,' said Shawn DuBravac, an economist at Avrio Institute. 'It means the program no longer has enough money to cover scheduled benefits.'
This looming shortfall is primarily due to demographic shifts, such as the baby boomers' retirement and increased life expectancy, which have led to a higher ratio of beneficiaries to workers. In 2024, the Social Security Administration paid nearly $1.5 trillion in benefits to more than 72 million beneficiaries, highlighting the program's extensive reach.
'If no changes are made, Social Security payments will rely exclusively on incoming payroll taxes, and these taxes are expected to cover only 77% of schedule benefits,' DuBravac said. 'So, Social Security doesn't run out of money, but benefits could be cut unless action is taken.'
Read Next:
Middle-class Americans should be concerned about the potential for reduced benefits, delayed retirement ages or higher taxes.
Reduced benefits could mean retirees receive 20%-25% less than expected, which can be especially destabilizing for those without pensions or significant savings. Delayed retirement ages may require people to work longer than planned, potentially into their late 60s or 70s, while higher payroll taxes could shrink take-home pay during prime earning years.
'The middle class should worry about reduced future benefits, especially if Congress delays reform,' DuBravac said. 'Certain parts of the middle class likely earn too much to qualify for need-based programs, but too little to self-fund retirement fully. These families will feel the most squeeze.'
Despite these issues, experts said Social Security is not on the brink of collapse. The program continues to collect payroll taxes and has broad political support, making complete dissolution highly unlikely.
'Social Security is a foundational part of the American retirement system, and it's not going anywhere,' said Rob Rickey, a certified financial planner and chief growth officer at StraightLine. 'But changes may still come, especially for younger workers, in the form of delayed retirement ages or adjusted benefit formulas.'
While Social Security isn't going away, it won't stay the same, either.
To ensure its long-term viability, policymakers will need to consider reforms, such as adjusting payroll tax caps, modifying benefit formulas or raising the retirement age.
Proposals have been made to gradually increase the full retirement age (FRA) to 69. For instance, one proposal suggests raising the FRA by three months per year for those age 62 starting in 2025, reaching 69 for those age 62 in 2032.
Nevertheless, experts said middle-class Americans should prepare for potential changes in Social Security.
'As public benefits crumble or decline, it is wise to start thinking about saving more,' said Benjamin Talin, a public policy consultant and founder and CEO of More Than Digital. 'So, think about maximizing your 401(k) [plans], IRAs or other retirement accounts now.'
Rickey said individuals should minimize their dependency on Social Security by building resiliency in their retirement plan.
'You can do this by increasing your personal savings, ensuring you are appropriately investing for your risk level and time horizon to continue growing your retirement assets, and by creating multiple streams of income for retirement,' Rickey said.
He added, 'Also, do not forget about your spending. Understanding your budget and controlling costs can strengthen your ability to minimize the impact of any income reduction during retirement.'
More From GOBankingRates
5 Luxury Cars That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Spring 2025
8 Items To Stock Up on Now in Case of Tariff-Induced Product Shortages
Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy
The 5 Car Brands Named the Least Reliable of 2025
Sources
Shawn DuBravac, Avrio Institute
Congressional Research Service, 'The Social Security Trust Funds in 2024 and Beyond.'
Social Security Administration, 'Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs.'
Rob Rickey, StraightLine
Congressional Budget Office, 'Raising the Full Retirement Age for Social Security.'
Benjamin Talin, More Than Digital
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Should the Middle Class Really Be Worried About the State of Social Security? Experts Weigh In
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's DOGE efficiency agency says it slashes $25B in federal spending as rehiring begins
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced on Wednesday it has decreased its annual non-defense federal obligations by an additional ~1.9% since last month. As of June 8th, annual non-defense federal obligations are down 22.4%, or ~$25B, as compared to 2024, DOGE announced on X. The cut marks an additional ~1.9% reduction from last month's figures, which were announced on May 8. Doge's Greatest Hits: Look Back At The Department's Most High-profile Cuts During Trump's First 100 Days "Cash outlays will follow as obligations come due," DOGE wrote in the post. "Our initiative to reduce wasteful spend, consistent with the DOGE Cost Efficiency Executive Order, continues to bear fruit." On May 14, DOGE announced the current year's non-defense federal obligations were down 20.5% as compared to 2024. Read On The Fox News App The announcement came minutes before Fox News Digital was first to report the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is rehiring more than 450 previously fired employees belonging to multiple divisions within the agency's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The rehired CDC employees came from the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention; the National Center for Environmental Health; the Immediate Office of the Director, and the Global Health Center, according to an HHS official familiar with the matter. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told CBS News in April some personnel who were cut shouldn't have been. Doge Ends 108 'Wasteful' Contracts, Including For An 'Executive Transformational Leadership Training Program' "We're reinstating them, and that was always the plan," Kennedy said. "Part of the—at DOGE, we talked about this from the beginning, is we're going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstated, because we'll make mistakes." In addition to the HHS rehires, the Internal Revenue Service, Food and Drug Administration, State Department, and Department of Housing and Urban Development started rehiring employees let go during DOGE cuts, the Washington Post reported. Doge Takes A Chainsaw To Federal Spending With 7 Major Victories This Week: 'Got To Be Done' Another roadblock this week was a ruling from U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York, who ruled to restrict the agency's access to federal databases. The Trump administration previously said DOGE could not work effectively with the limitations, noting DOGE needed to access Social Security information to root out fraud. Fox News Digital's Alec Schemmel and Danielle Wallace contributed to this article source: Trump's DOGE efficiency agency says it slashes $25B in federal spending as rehiring begins


Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Chicago Bears Weigh Sale of McKenna's Minority Stake
The Chicago Bears are exploring a sale of the minority stake owned by the late Andrew McKenna Sr., according to people familiar with the matter. The exact size of the stake isn't known. McKenna died in 2023. The descendants of George Halas, the team's founder, own approximately 80% of the team. In addition to McKenna's stake, some shares are owned by insurance billionaire Pat Ryan, 88. Ryan and McKenna originally purchased 19.7% of the club in 1990.


Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
S&P 500 Halts Rally Near Record as Big Tech Swoons
Bloomberg Television brings you the latest news and analysis leading up to the final minutes and seconds before and after the closing bell on Wall Street. Today's guests are Saira Malik, Nuveen, Nancy Lazar, Piper Sandler, Steven Zaccone, Citi, John Flavin, Portal Innovations, Lisa Abramowicz, Bloomberg News, David Bahnsen, The Bahnsen Group, Brent Thill, Jefferies, Seema Shah, Sensor Tower, Raj Ganguly, B Capital Group, Matthew Freund, Barings BDC, Jason Kelly, Bloomberg News. (Source: Bloomberg)