State dental schemes see cuts of €800m since 2009
The Irish Dental Association (IDA) has said that State dental schemes have seen effective cuts of €800m since 2009.
Its annual conference in Kilkenny heard that there is a widening gap between those who can and can not afford dental care.
The association is seeking an overhaul of dental care for PRSI and medical card patients.
Fintan Hourihan, IDA chief executive, said that a failure to keep spending at 2009 levels has meant a real cut in spending of over €800m between 2009 and 2023 amounting to a lost decade in oral care.
He said that the poorest and most vulnerable have suffered the most and that a major investment is needed for the two State dental schemes, if lost ground is to be made up.
Mr Hourihan said there has also been a significant hollowing out of public dental services, evidenced by the 104,000 school children denied dental screening appointments in 2023, due mainly to a shortage of public-only dentists.
The HSE said that while the HSE's community dental service has been impacted by capacity challenges in recent years, it provided 106,964 targeted assessments to patients last year.
It added that this year's National Service Plan provides for 15 additional clinical positions.
The HSE said current access to free dental care for children is provided by the HSE Community Dental Service from within available resources, specifically an oral examination and necessary treatment for children at ages approximating to second and sixth class.
In some cases, fourth class with emergency care is provided for children of all ages up to 16.
A new three year oral health implementation plan for the national oral health policy, Smile agus Sláinte, is expected to be launched soon, as promised in the Programme for Government.
The HSE said this includes reform of services for medical card holders and for children among the priority actions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Plans for primary-care hub on site of Baggot Street hospital on hold amid residents' fears it may include methadone clinic
Several appeals have been lodged with An Bord Pleanála against the recent decision of Dublin City Council to grant planning permission for a proposed new medical centre to be located at the rear of the main hospital building on Baggot Street Upper. The HSE is hoping to develop the new primary-care centre, including a pharmacy, in vacant buildings that form part of the former Baggot Street Hospital site at the junction of Haddington Road and Eastmoreland Lane. The red-brick building, known formally as the Royal City of Dublin Hospital, has been closed as a hospital since 1987. The new facility, to be known as The Haddington Road Primary-Care Centre, will incorporate an existing three-storey Victorian building and a newly constructed building up to six storeys in height. However, the HSE has separately appealed against a condition imposed by Dublin City Council as part of the grant of planning permission to omit one floor of the proposed development because of the local authority's serious concerns about the height of the structure. The HSE claims the requirement to omit one of the six storeys would have minimal impact on the overshadowing of neighbouring properties but would make the development of the primary-care centre 'unfeasible'. The council's ruling is also being appealed against by several local residents and business owners, including the Pembroke Road Association. Although the residents' group recognised the need for a new primary-care centre in the area, it criticised its proposed height, which it said would be 'disruptive' and 'entirely excessive'. Together with other individual appellants, the Pembroke Road Association also expressed concern that a methadone clinic is being considered as part of the new facility. The group claims the layout of the proposed centre with an entirely separate pharmacy 'would indicate a methadone dispensing service'. ADVERTISEMENT However, Dublin City Council said any issue of the medical centre being used for dispensing methadone was under the remit of the HSE's operational governance and healthcare regulations rather than planning control. Planning files submitted by the HSE make no reference to any type of drug-treatment clinic being proposed. The HSE said it had identified a need to provide a new primary-care centre in a modern purpose-built building to serve the healthcare needs of the local community in the Baggot Street and Sandymount areas. The new facility will provide a range of services including public-health nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, social work, speech and language therapy and dietetics, as well as a pharmacy. Separately, council planners expressed concern about the lack of any future plans for development of the former hospital building, which it described as 'a sensitive protected structure' and asked the HSE to re-examine its potential reuse. However, the HSE said a report into the potential use of the building for use for healthcare purposes, which was carried out in October 2022, had concluded that it would 'present a number of serious challenges in terms of structure, fire safety, access, services, conservation, cost and time'. The HSE claimed the proposed development would not involve any works that would affect the special character of the protected structure or result in the removal of significant original fabric or features of interest. The HSE's chief executive, Bernard Gloster, informed the Department of Health last year that the former hospital is surplus to its needs as it is no longer deemed suitable for delivering public healthcare services. Last month, the HSE indicated the building is to be sold on the open market as no state agency wanted to use the premises. whose condition has deteriorated over the years. However, the HSE said the absence of a confirmed use for the buildings should not hinder the development of the proposed primary-care centre. Council planners said a masterplan for the entire site would have been better 'in terms of a meaningfully developed site rather than the current proposal'. 'The redevelopment of part of this site without consideration of this structure is worrying and is not considered planning best practice,' they added. The council said it has included 'robust conditions' to the grant of planning permission as the response of the HSE to a wide range of concerns raised over the plans was 'disappointing'. 'Minimal alterations were made which did not address these concerns,' it observed. The council acknowledged that they might affect the functionality of the new facility but said it had to ensure the amenity of adjoining structures and the future development potential of adjoining sites was protected. It also expressed disappointment with the delay by the HSE in disposing of the main hospital as it had a detrimental impact on the fabric of the building that was being protected. A ruling by An Bord Pleanála on the various appeals is due by early October.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Hip surgery becoming necessary for many children 'due to late diagnosis' amid lack of screening
Questions are being raised as to why 'worrying' gaps in care for children with hip dysplasia — first identified in 2017 and again in a Hiqa report last year — have not been addressed. Healthcare workers were raising alarms about diagnosis, including through a HSE steering group in 2017, even before the latest crisis around surgeries under Children's Health Ireland (CHI) hospitals. By January 2023, concern was so high two medical bodies made a submission to the National Screening Advisory Committee (NSAC). The National Child Health Public Health Programme and the National Clinical Programme for Paediatrics and Neonatology called for ultrasound screening for the condition for all babies instead of only those at high risk. Hiqa was then asked by the NSAC to compare the benefits of selective and universal screening. The NSAC reports directly to the health minister. Hiqa's report team included people from the HSE and Department of Health. The report advised against expanding screening, saying there is 'significant uncertainty' over benefits. However, it found existing systems are not a formal screening programme and not in line with HSE steering group recommendations. It said: Current practice is therefore not supported by the governance, end-to-end care, quality assurance, and monitoring of outcomes that would be associated with such a programme. It is not known how many babies are born annually with hip dysplasia, it said, citing Irish studies showing a range of 'between 400 and 1,800 babies'. Funding was provided by 2017 for ultrasound programmes in maternity hospitals. However, it is not mandatory to report patient numbers, diagnosis, or treatment. One consultant familiar with hip dysplasia care warned: 'So, essentially the steering group was there as spectators, helplessly trying to get information but not actually having the power to gather it and not having the power to act on it.' The urgency was highlighted by the CHI hip surgery audit. The consultant said: In the recent CHI report, if you subtract the unnecessary operations from the overall number, you are left with a lot of necessary operations. In many cases it is likely that they were necessary because of late diagnosis. This is because 'problems arise when the diagnosis is made late. The sooner you spot it, you can treat it in a harness or a brace. And the children respond very well and have excellent results'. However, without a national register, the doctor said 'we have no idea what the national rate of late diagnosis is. I would guess there are probably 80 to 100 babies per year who are presenting with late diagnosis'. Sinn Féin health spokesman David Cullinane questioned long delays in implementing the recommendations or a national audit, saying 'astonishingly the working group has now been disbanded'. 'The recent scandal into unnecessary hip procedures on children demonstrates the importance of the recommendations of the working group,' he said. 'It is worrying that these recommendations were not implemented and this has caused understandable concern for those involved in this valuable work.' The HSE said the steering group was disbanded this year. Its role was to identify ways to find babies at risk. 'These pathways are now in place nationally,' a spokesman said. Responsibility for this is now under the 'relevant clinical and operational governance lines' under each regional executive officer in the new HSE health regions. The Department of Health pointed to communication from the NSAC last month to the two bodies which raised concerns saying the best approach 'would likely be the systematic application of the current selective screening programme'. A spokeswoman said NSAC wrote to the health minister in March 2024 recommending against expanding screening. 'The NSAC Chair noted that the condition would be kept under review as new evidence emerges. This will be considered later this year,' she said. Hiqa confirmed its advice was submitted to NSAC.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Screening to help babies avoid hip dysplasia surgery still not in place, eight years on
A national screening programme to help babies with hip dysplasia avoid surgery is still not in place eight years after it was recommended. The steering group that made the recommendations was disbanded by the HSE this year. However, none of its recommendations have been implemented. Up to 100 children a year undergo invasive hip surgery because of a late diagnosis, it is estimated. In 2017, the steering group recommended the introduction of a national screening programme to avoid any unnecessary surgeries. Last year, the watchdog, Hiqa, raised concerns that the recommendation had still not been acted on. The watchdog said: 'Current practice is, therefore, not supported by the governance, end-to-end care, quality assurance, and monitoring of outcomes that would be associated with such a programme.' They found evidence that even in the limited approach taken to screening, 'there may be variation in the implementation' between hospitals. One consultant said that if problems with hip dysplasia are detected early enough there might not be any need for surgery. The consultant said: 'Problems arise when the diagnosis is made late. The sooner you spot it, you can treat it in a harness or a brace. And the children respond very well and have excellent results.' However, without a national register, the consultant said: We have no idea what the national rate of late diagnosis is. I would guess there are probably 80 to 100 babies per year who are presenting with late diagnosis. The consultant, who is familiar with care for hip dysplasia, said: 'The whole point about DDH [hip dysplasia] is if you treat it in time, it can nearly all be done non-operatively.' In recent weeks, there has been public outrage over the high number of surgeries and unnecessary surgeries in CHI at Temple St and the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Cappagh. The consultant said: 'In the recent CHI report, if you subtract the unnecessary operations from the overall number, you are left with a lot of necessary operations. In many cases, it is likely that they were necessary because of late diagnosis.' There is now concern in health circles at what the CHI crisis could mean for efforts to address the gaps. 'The whole thing is in chaos now. It's probably seen as toxic. There is no sense of urgency, no sense of determination to get this done,' the consultant warned. Sinn Féin health spokesman David Cullinane said that not only were recommendations not implemented, but also 'no national database or audit was ever put in place'. The recent scandal in to unnecessary hip procedures on children demonstrates the importance of the recommendations of the working group. 'It is worrying that these recommendations were not implemented and this has caused understandable concern for those involved in this valuable work.' The HSE said health regions are now responsible for screening. The Department of Health pointed to communication from the NSAC last month to doctor's groups who raised concerns saying the best approach 'would likely be the systematic application of the current selective screening programme'.
