Couple win long-running battle to keep £20k summer house in their garden... by moving it by one metre
Martin Keyes and Catherine Curran locked horns with local planners over their garden retreat after receiving a letter telling them it had to come down.
The pair, from Greenock on the west coast of Scotland, applied for retrospective planning permission but were told by Inverclyde Council to remove the hut.
Having been told it was 'too big' and too close to a neighbouring house, despite receiving no complaints, the couple appealed - but lost after councillors conducted a site visit.
They've since found a way around the demolition order, paying more money above and beyond the £20k they've spent on the house to shimmy it a metre over.
Mr Keyes and Ms Curran now say they plan to enjoy their summer house, with a guarantee of no further disturbances from prying planners.
They've even renamed it 'Victory Bar' in recognition of their win over the meddling local authority.
Mr Keyes, of nearby Glasgow, said: 'To be honest I think it is less private than before but we did what they wanted.
'Now we are looking forward to enjoying our summer house. We are just waiting for the official paperwork.
'But we were never going to be forced to tear it down. That was not an option.
'We decided to call it Victory Bar, because it is still standing. I can't wait to enjoy more nights in our summer house now it is finally safe.'
Last year, the couple were told that retrospective planning permission had been refused nearly four years after it was built.
Officials said it was 'not acceptable' in terms of its scale and size, and had a 'detrimental impact' on neighbouring properties despite no objections being filed.
At the time the couple said that they would refuse to tear it down and lodged an appeal.
Following a site visit by members of the local review body, the decision was taken to refuse an appeal.
Mr Keyes could not attend the hearing as he was working a night shift.
Ms Curran added: 'We tried to explain to the officers that the summer house was in the best position.'
The couple even submitted a petition to the council from neighbours and friends in support.
Determined not to be beaten, Ms Curran and Mr Keyes took action to secure the future of their summer house.
With guidance from council planners they moved the summer house and restructured their garden.
A relieved Ms Curran, 50, said: 'It has been very stressful and we are glad it is over. We won and we have our summer house.
'We would like to thank our neighbours and friends for their support.'
She added: 'We can move on now and enjoy our summer house stays.'
A spokesperson for Inverclyde Council said: 'In the event of a retrospective planning application and any subsequent appeal both being refused due to breaches of the planning guidelines, we will endeavour to work with the applicant to explore options available to them and whether there are ways to meet relevant planning guidelines.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
14 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow's 'tenement time bomb' needs action now
Labour MSP Paul Sweeney describes the state of the tenements as a powder keg. 'It is a time bomb across Glasgow,' he says. 'Mainly because when something goes wrong, people are caught out.' Glasgow is home to around 77,200 properties dating back before 1919. The tenements are home to more than a quarter of the city's population, and many of them are situated within conservation areas. But though many of the buildings are listed, the city lacks a cohesive strategy for maintaining their upkeep. Real fears have emerged that Glasgow's tenements will soon be facing an existential crisis unless something radical is done to protect them. Glasgow would cease to be Glasgow without its iconic sandstone and redstone tenement blocks. They make up the defining character of the city with their honey blonde or rusty red bricks forming the basis of each neighbourhood. In the 1970s, Housing Action Areas (HAAs) pumped in grant funding and strict oversight to save thousands of buildings but those schemes ended nearly three decades ago. The tenement stock is quietly sliding back into crisis. Mr Sweeney would like to see the HAAs brought back. A 2018 survey of Glasgow's tenements found that around 46,600 of the properties need structural, weather-tightening and restoration work. One third of the blocks lacked a factor and 5% were in serious disrepair, with roofs in particular in need of attention. The properties are more than 100 years old, and major components, like stonework and drainage, are reaching the end of their lifespan. Blocked gutters, leaky roofs and failing stonework lead to dampness and rot. Climate change means Glasgow is only going to get more rainfall, accelerating the deterioration. Since 1969, the council has had the power to step in on repair issues thanks to the Housing (Scotland) Act, and the focus has always been on the older, pre-1919 tenements. Big money was poured into the buildings in the 1980s to keep them standing, but now, 40 years on, major parts of these blocks, like the roofs, are hitting the end of their natural lifespan. And roof repairs can cost owners as much as £20,000 each. (Image: NQ) Councillor Jon Molyneux has represented the Pollokshields ward for the Green Party since 2017. The scene at this street corner earlier this month was all too familiar. The tenement across the road had been gutted by a fire in 2019. He says his inbox has been flooded by people who have been directly affected by the collapse, those forced from their homes. But he has also seen a huge spike in emails from homeowners who fear what might happen to their own tenement building. 'You have got people living in a block who do really care about maintenance and work, but it's hard to bring people together to get things agreed and moved forward,' Councillor Molyneux says. 'It only takes one owner to not be forthcoming, to not engage in the process, to then start to create problems.' Patchwork ownership of tenements means that while each flat owner is responsible for their share of common repairs, without a mandatory owners' association, it only takes one person to stall progress. There are currently no legal requirements for sinking funds, and absentee landlords can make the process even more challenging. Understanding your insurance coverage before tragedy strikes is paramount to ensure you don't get hit by any pricey gaps in your coverage. 'None of it is straightforward,' he adds. 'There is an opportunity for people who think they might be in a similar situation to understand what the situation is. And people have a legal right to request sight of building insurance.' The flat in Pollokshields that crumbled in July was already in a serious state of disrepair, its dramatic crash to the ground had almost been expected. But it sent alarm bells ringing for any other homeowner whose property was a tenement. Attempts to safeguard the collapsed tenement (and the other across the street) had been caught up in a bureaucratic quagmire with owners, insurers, Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government all having to be consulted. And still, the issue went unresolved five years on from the initial blaze. The Scottish Parliamentary Working Group on Tenement Maintenance was set up in 2018 to bring experts and MSPs together in a cross-party effort to fix Scotland's crumbling tenements. The group's three key proposals were: five-yearly building inspections, mandatory owners' associations and a sinking fund for repairs. But five years later, the law has yet to change. 'The task of actually developing the legislation has been punted off to the Scottish Law Commission,' Councillor Molyneux says. 'It's obviously not going to happen in the current parliament. It just feels like it's not being given the political priority that it should.' The Scottish Law Commission is currently working on a final recommendations report for its project on tenement law and compulsory owners associations, which they are aiming to deliver to the Scottish Government by next spring. Councillor Molyneux says that in the meantime, Glasgow City Council should be considering a type of emergency resilience fund for those displaced by major damage that forces traumatic evacuations. 'It would be really beneficial, just to be able to make things a bit easier for people when life has been really tough,' he says. 'We should be thinking, how can we better support citizens in those situations?' Mr Sweeney says that Glasgow's community-based housing associations already provide a good 'skeleton' to implement common repair funds. A more refined process to help tenement owners finance repairs would go a long way. But what if the work needs to be done immediately? 'Rather than having grants, we could have a patient loan scheme,' Sweeney says. 'It could recycle the money into a common fund. It would make the money stretch further.' The council could also put together a building maintenance team, he says. A team to go around in a cherry picker with a hacksaw and some weed killer, destroying the ever-present buddleia and clearing the gutters while the street sweepers tackle the roads below. 'This year, we're celebrating 50 years of community housing associations in Glasgow,' he adds. 'That was a big intervention that was made to save the tenements that time around. We're now reaching a point where we need another big wave of activity around that scale.' Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1
Times
a day ago
- Times
Class snobbery is at heart of NHS gender war
Outside the tribunal in Dundee, Jane Russell KC, stopped to pet a border collie. 'Would that be a female dog or a male dog?' asked a mischievous Scot. Russell laughed nervously. 'Ha-HAH! Well, I don't know. How would you know?' she mumbled, then darted into the building. Does Russell, a keen horsewoman who celebrated taking silk by galloping through London on a steed called Jupiter, really believe biological sex is 'complicated', that babies — and, presumably, dogs and horses — are randomly 'assigned' male or female at birth by a midwife/vet? Or is this just fashionable sophistry she deploys to defend her clients NHS Fife and the trans-identified male doctor Beth Upton? Certainly for Sandie Peggie this postmodern conceit is no joke. A nurse for 30 years, she was suspended, put through internal disciplinary hearings and at this tribunal has endured scrutiny of every intimate matter, from her menstrual cycle to whether she loves her lesbian daughter, just for upholding a basic truth: sex is real. Of all such cases — and I've followed many — none encapsulates the shibboleths, snobberies and magical thinking of our age so well. Day after day we heard doctors and managers of Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, relate how they unashamedly closed ranks against a working-class nurse, whose rights, feelings or even basic humanity fell beyond their #BeKind purview. It started on Christmas Eve 2023, when Peggie rushed to the female changing rooms, fearing that a sudden menstrual flood — a common occurrence around menopause — had soaked her scrubs. When Dr Upton entered, Peggie says she told him he was making her feel uncomfortable and asked him to leave. But this incident, which sparked almost two years of litigation, isn't the most shocking. Twice before, Peggie had come in to change, seen Upton, turned around and waited outside until he left. She'd said nothing, just declined to undress in front of him. But Upton reported her anyway and — amazingly — his line manager Dr Kate Searle took his side: 'Beth felt uncomfortable with someone behaving differently like that.' Even silent dissent wouldn't do. The only acceptable course of action was for Peggie to tamp down her embarrassment and strip — only then could a six-foot-tall man's belief that he is a woman remain intact. Did Searle ask Peggie how she felt? 'I didn't make that approach.' Instead, after Christmas, Searle sat down with Upton and filled in an official complaint in which (she has admitted on oath) she incorrectly asserted that Peggie had compared him to the trans rapist Isla Bryson. Then, against all disciplinary protocol, Searle emailed other doctors to rally support for Upton, telling them to avoid 'foot in mouth' misspeaks which might stop Peggie, who was instantly suspended, being punished. Each day we learnt new ways in which senior hospital staff had persecuted a nurse with a flawless record. Jamie Doyle, head of nursing, wanted Peggie reported to the police. Upton claimed to have noted earlier incidents in which Peggie's hostility towards him had endangered patients. But no one corroborated these grave claims and an IT expert who analysed Upton's phone testified that these were not contemporaneous notes but added after the Christmas Eve row. (Peggie was cleared of these and other allegations in a separate hospital disciplinary inquiry.) Why did all of these senior people fall over themselves to take Upton's side, even at the expense of truth? Because trans identity tops an all-important oppression hierarchy and the purest form of virtue is being a 'trans ally'. To prove this, both the head of diversity, Isla Bumba, and Searle, an A&E consultant, claimed neither knew Upton's sex, or even their own. 'I've never had my chromosomes tested,' said Bumba. Does Searle do this before prescribing the correct drug dosage for a female patient? Of course not. No one really believes such absurdity: they mouth it out of religious obeisance. At the base of that purity pyramid are women like Sandie Peggie: boring, menopausal, the ancillary people who confront biological sex in every backside they wipe. Working-class Peggie doesn't hold the received opinions: Russell scoured a seven-year-long private Facebook group of nurses Peggie had holidayed with to find that she'd reposted horrible jokes about the Pakistani floods, is against sharia and illegal migration, and was initially upset that her daughter was gay. The notion was: this 'bigot' doesn't merit rights. But just as a black person who makes antisemitic jokes or a trans woman who posts 'Die in a fire, TERF' still deserve protection against discrimination or violence, Peggie, whatever her views, has the right to undress at work without being watched by a man. Now the Peggie tribunal evidence has concluded, the judgment will come later this year and she is predicted to receive a substantial payout. But the case of the Darlington nurses — who also objected to a man changing with them — is scheduled for a full tribunal in October; a similar case involving a Muslim nurse is pending, while Jennifer Melle, a black nurse who was racially abused by a trans-identifying male paedophile in police custody because she referred to him as 'Mister', is still suspended by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals Trust. Four months after the Supreme Court clarified the meaning of sex, it is an outrage that public money is still being squandered while women fight for basic rights. Why does the Health and Safety Executive not remind employers of 1992 workplace laws which mandate single-sex changing? Why are NHS England and the NHS Confederation allowed by the health secretary, Wes Streeting, to drag their feet? The ludicrous joke that sex is an unfathomable mystery has worn very thin.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Orkney farmer plans trailer abattoir to end lengthy trips
An Orkney farmer is part-funding her own abattoir so her rare breed Boreray sheep no longer have to be taken on a seven-hour trip to the mainland for islands have been without a slaughter house since 2018 but Jane Cooper says she hopes to have her Tiny Trailer Abattoir - the first of its kind in the UK - by next will fit on two trailers - one for the humane slaughter of the sheep and the second to store and chill up to 20 carcasses. The trailer system can be operated by one slaughterman. It will be able to move between farms around the islands, but each place it operates will have to comply with all regulations and be licensed separately as if it was a fixed island abattoirs are now able to use local vets to fulfil the role of official veterinarian supervising the process. Rural abattoirs across the UK are shutting down at an alarming rate. According to industry reports, more than a third have closed in the past two decades due to high running costs, retaining skilled staff and increased regulation. Ms Cooper said the ability to slaughter sheep on her own farm would greatly improve animal welfare standards."At the moment, I have to transport the animals on a ferry and then drive them to Dingwall," she said."It's a seven-hour trip. I'd rather walk them a few steps from the field and into a trailer."She added that her system would produce almost no waste."We will be able to use many more byproducts than just the skins and horns that we collect from the abattoir in Dingwall," she is funding up to half the £150,000 herself, with the rest coming from another expects the trailers will be on her farm by springtime next year. Ms Cooper has been farming her distinctive sheep on the Orkney mainland since animals are descendants of native sheep from Boreray island in St 2017, they were registered as a distinctive breed in their own flocks are now established in Orkney which work together through the Orkney Boreray Co-op Tiny Trailer Abattoir will be owned, operated and hired out by the Co-op on a not-for-profit basis. Ms Cooper said the design was a new concept in the UK but she was confident it would be a success."The butchers we already supply are confident their customers will be more than happy to pay an extra premium for our mutton once the sheep are slaughtered on our farm," she said."We are transitioning our farm business here at Burnside from mostly breeding to bringing in and finishing Orkney Boreray sheep bred and reared by other members of the Co-op."
