Paul Ince banned from road after admitting drink-driving
The 57-year-old appeared at Chester Magistrates' Court on Friday where he admitted driving his black Range Rover while over the limit on June 28 in Neston, Cheshire.
District Judge Jack McGarva told Ince: 'The message has got to be if you're going to drive you don't drink at all.'
He was banned from driving for 12 months, fined £5,000 and ordered to pay a £2,000 statutory surcharge and £85 costs.
Arriving at court, he signed an autograph with a fan and posed for a selfie with another.
Ince had a reading of 49 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath when he was stopped by police after driving on Chester High Road, the court heard.
Nigel Jones, prosecuting, said: 'On the day in question, the defendant was witnessed by an off-duty police officer driving a vehicle perceived to be swerving across the road.'
He said the car swerved across the central reservation, hitting bollards and causing two tyres to burst.
The car then pulled into a petrol station where police officers attended.
Frank Rogers, defending, said: 'My client finds himself today facing the huge impact of a ban, but he accepts he only has himself to blame for that.
'He misjudged the fact he believed at the time he would be under the limit.'
Mr Rogers said Ince had been at Heswall Golf Club for a competition and had not eaten before having two drinks in the clubhouse.
He said: 'He felt fine to drive, of course we now know that he shouldn't have done.'
He said that as he was driving home, Ince approached a roundabout at about 20mph when his phone slipped and he instinctively reached for it and veered the car, clipping the kerb.
He said: 'The vehicle didn't collide with the bollards. He's clipped both sides of the island, damaging tyres.'
He said an alert came up on the car about the tyre pressure and Ince pulled into a garage where he inspected the damage, called his wife and was about to call the Range Rover assist helpline when police arrived.
Mr Rogers said Ince had been driving for 39 years and had three points on his licence.
He is a frequent visitor and supporter to the Future Youth Zone charity in Dagenham, where he grew up, and also supports Claire House Children's Hospice in Wirral, he said.
Mr Rogers outlined Ince's playing career and said he then went into management.
He added: 'He now does a limited amount of media work and charity work.'
He said Ince, of Quarry Road, Neston, wished to apologise to the court.
District Judge McGarva said: 'I am going to presume he has substantial assets, given the playing career you have outlined to me.'
Mr Rogers said: 'He may well have substantial assets but certainly not substantial income.'
As he left court, Ince handed a piece of paper to a reporter with a picture of the central reservation and bollards on.
The former West Ham, Manchester United, Inter Milan and Liverpool midfielder won 53 caps for his country.
After retiring, he moved into management, most recently working for Reading between 2022 and 2023.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
Justice Department asks court to unseal Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts
The Department of Justice on Friday asked federal judges to unseal grand jury transcripts in the criminal cases of notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his convicted procurer of young girls, Ghislaine Maxwell. The formal requests came one day after President Donald Trump said he asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." Trump suggested he was taking that step in order to tamp down on the growing pressure from his own supporters to release the so-called Epstein files. "This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!" he wrote in a Truth Social post at the time. Less than two weeks earlier, the Justice Department said in a memo that it would not disclose any more information related to Epstein's federal sex trafficking case after conducting an "exhaustive review." But since then, "there has been extensive public interest in the basis for the Memorandum's conclusions," Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in separate court filings in the Epstein and Maxwell cases in Manhattan federal court. "While the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation continue to adhere to the conclusions reached in the Memorandum, transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration," Blanche wrote. "Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts," subject to appropriate redactions, he wrote. Those redactions encompass "victim-related and other personal identifying information," Blanche wrote. A footnote in the identical documents says that a similar request will be filed in federal court in southern Florida. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 in Florida to soliciting an underage prostitute. Epstein was arrested in 2019 and killed himself in prison weeks later. Maxwell, his longtime confidant, was convicted in 2021 of acting as a recruiter of young girls who would later be abused by Epstein. She is currently serving a 20-year sentence in a federal prison in Florida. Earlier Friday afternoon, Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against media giant Rupert Murdoch and multiple Wall Street Journal journalists, hours after they reported that a collection of birthday letter to Epstein in 2003 included a "bawdy" message signed by Trump. The president has denied penning the message.


New York Times
20 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Jeffrey Epstein Grand Jury Records: What Comes Next?
President Trump on Thursday directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask a federal judge to release transcripts of grand jury testimony related to the 2019 indictment of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. On social media, he said that 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' relating to Mr. Epstein should be released, 'subject to Court approval.' On Friday, Ms. Bondi followed through. In court filings, she asked federal judges to unseal grand jury transcripts from Mr. Epstein's case, and the prosecution of his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell as well. The request falls short of demands by Mr. Trump's critics to release all of the government's files on Mr. Epstein, who died in federal custody while awaiting trial. Generally, grand jury evidence is narrowly tailored by prosecutors to fit the criminal charges they want to file. So even if judges agree to unseal the grand jury testimony, it is unlikely to offer anything approaching an exhaustive accounting of what F.B.I. agents and prosecutors learned about Mr. Epstein's activities. And the requests by the Justice Department to release the material will now most likely be only the beginning of a complicated process of review, redaction and potential release of testimony. Here's how it might work. What is a grand jury? Grand juries are groups of citizens who hear evidence from prosecutors and witnesses in secret, and then decide whether to formally indict a person under investigation. Grand juries are used in both state and federal courts; they are typically convened to gather and weigh evidence before charges are filed in most felony cases. Compared with a trial, the grand jury process is friendlier to prosecutors, as jurors do not hear from lawyers representing the accused. And the standard for indicting people for a criminal offense is lower than the one for finding them guilty at trial. Why is grand jury material sealed? Grand juries are intended to be a screening mechanism, one that serves as a check on prosecutors to make sure that the government has a solid case before it brings criminal charges against someone in open court. Their proceedings are kept secret to protect the reputations of the people under government investigation who may turn out to be innocent or who are never charged with a crime. Secrecy also makes it easier to obtain full and truthful testimony from witnesses. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Trump sues Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch over Epstein letter story
President Donald Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal's parent company, accusing the newspaper of libeling him after the outlet published an article that said the president contributed a drawing of a naked woman as part of a bawdy birthday gift for Jeffrey Epstein, according to a federal court docket filing on Friday.