logo
GAA star accused of assaulting boy, 12, says he was 'protecting himself'

GAA star accused of assaulting boy, 12, says he was 'protecting himself'

Former All-Star and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler, Niall Gilligan told Gardai that he acted in a reasonable manner to protect himself from injury and assault from others at the Jamaica Inn hostel on October 5th 2023.
At Ennis Circuit Court today, the jury heard that Mr Gilligan made a pre-prepared statement to Gardai at Shannon Garda Station on February 19th 2024 in response to the then allegation that he assaulted a 12 year old boy with a stick at the Jamaica Inn hostel on October 5th 2023.
On Friday, the jury was also told that the 12 year boy that Mr Gilligan is alleged to have assaulted sustained a fractured bone in his left hand. Medical reports from October 2023 show that the boy on examination also had a 2 cm wound to his right forearm, a 2 cm wound to his right shin, bruising to his right shoulder while medics also believed that the boy lost consciousness briefly earlier on October 5th 2023.
The boy's hand was placed in a splint and he was advised not to engage in contact sports for one month after its removal later on October 20th 2023. Photographs of the boy's injuries were also shown to the jury along with the muck-stained clothes that the boy was wearing on October 5th.
In evidence, the boy's father said that he first brought his son to a VHI clinic at Raheen, Limerick on the evening of October 5th 2023.
He said: 'Once they (medical staff) started cutting his clothes off him they were finding more and more injuries.'
He said: 'They found he had soiled himself which led them to believe that he was unconscious at some stage.'
He said that medics at the VHI Clinic made the decision that the boy should be transferred by ambulance to the A&E at University Hospital Limerick (UHL). The boy's father said that he didn't believe his son's initial story that he had fallen off his bike.
He said: 'I definitely didn't think that he fell off a bike. He was covered head to toe in muck.' The father said that his son 'had a swollen hand and he was limping. He was talking quite fast as well and he was pale so I imagine adrenaline and shock."
The father told the jury today that he got Niall Gilligan's phone number on the evening of October 5th after his son had told him what had occurred earlier where Mr Gilligan is accused of assaulting the boy with a stick. Niall Gilligan (file photo) (Image: ©INPHO/Donall Farmer)
Mr Gilligan (48) of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge, denies the charge of assault causing harm with a stick at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5th 2023.
In evidence, the father said that he phoned Mr Gilligan and said: 'I said I am currently in A&E with my son who you just viciously attacked.' The father said that Mr Gilligan did not respond to the allegation.
In his account of the phone call, in his prepared statement read out in court by Dec Garda Noel Carroll, Mr Gilligan said: 'He said that his son got hurt. I made no comment to that after his son and others had broken into my building and caused extensive damage, including lighting a fire, releasing my fire extinguishers, breaking windows, writing graffiti."
Mr Gilligan said that he decided there and then to take legal advice 'as soon as I could about this call and make a formal complaint to the Gardai about the damage and trespass'.
Mr Gilligan was formally arrested on suspicion of assault at Shannon Garda Station on February 19th 2024 and accompanied there by his solicitor, Daragh Hassett, Mr Gilligan denied any assault and said that on October 5th 2023 at the Jamaica Inn hostel: 'I acted in a reasonable manner to protect myself from injury and assault from a person or persons unknown to me in the conditions that prevailed.'
In the statement running to five pages, Mr Gilligan added: 'I acted in a reasonable manner to protect my property from destruction by fire and further damage.' He said: 'I didn't know who or what was coming at me that night."
'Something was coming at me, wasn't retreating or calling out to me so I had to defend myself as any reasonable person would. I feel sorry for the boy but the fact is that if he and others hadn't broken into my property, lit a fire, stole the keys and caused other damage, this incident would never have happened."
He said: 'Since this incident, there has been despicable commentary about me over what actually happened - none of which is true. I am glad that I have the opportunity to set the record straight."
On the incident with the boy at the Jamaica Inn, Mr Gilligan told Gardai that he realised on the evening of October 5th 2023 'that I wasn't alone in the building'.
He said: "I went back down slowly picking up a wooden stick I found on the ground. As I entered the hallway, I heard voices and then saw two people running away to my left towards the external door I had come in. I then heard footsteps fast coming behind me over my right shoulder. I felt I was going to be attacked so to protect myself I drew out with the stick on two occasions and then kicked out twice.
'I shouted at the person to get back as I did this. At that stage, I could see that I was dealing with a male youth. I grabbed him by his coat or jacket and brought him out of the building. We went around the back to see where the other two intruders had gone to. When we got around the back we got entangled in the dark and fell on top of each other on a slippery path under the pine trees."
Mr Gilligan said that he told the youth 'never to again enter my property". He said: 'I proceeded to walk him out to the front gate. I asked him his name at this stage. He gave his name. He made no complaint of any injuries to me.'
He said: 'At that stage, I met Pat Donnellan who was parked outside. I told him that managing the property was a nightmare.' Mr Gilligan said that he had been "very concerned about fire and vandalism at the Jamaica Inn hostel'.
He said: 'Around this time there were rumours in Sixmilebridge that I was going to lease the building as accommodation for asylum seekers." Mr Gilligan added: 'There was resistance locally to this and there was no truth in that rumour as I had never been approached but I was concerned about an arson at the property especially after a fire had been lit and fire extinguishers were discharged.'
Mr Gilligan said that as he had every concern that the building would be burnt out, he said that rang the Gardai on October 4th just before lunchtime and the call rang out. He said: 'I called into Sixmilebridge Garda Station a few times that day but did not get to meet any Garda on duty." He said that he called to the Garda Station on the morning of October 5th 'but there was no one there'.
Mr Gilligan said that he purchased the Jamaica Inn hostel in 2022 and sold it on in late 2023 to a company in Shannon who required accommodation for staff.
At the conclusion of the evidence on Friday, Judge Francis Comerford told the jury that they had heard a lot of evidence today.
He cautioned: 'Don't come to any firm conclusions in your own minds until you have heard all the evidence, the speeches by the lawyers and the charge from me.'
The trial continues before a jury of seven men and five women on Monday.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michael McDowell pushed for British amnesty for IRA members without trial, UK files reveal
Michael McDowell pushed for British amnesty for IRA members without trial, UK files reveal

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Michael McDowell pushed for British amnesty for IRA members without trial, UK files reveal

Michael McDowell argued as attorney general in 2000 that the British government could avoid a struggle to pass Westminster legislation to give 'on-the-run' IRA members an amnesty. Instead, Mr McDowell, who is now a member of Seanad Éireann, repeatedly suggested that the British could use a centuries-old law to grant pardons without prosecuting any of them. This seems to have been met with astonishment by British officials. The difficulties posed by Sinn Féin's demands for 'on-the-run' IRA members – some of whom were sought for offences such as murder – to be given guarantees features in British archive files released on Tuesday. The treatment of the IRA 'on the runs', better known simply as 'OTRs', became a major controversy in 2014 when it was revealed that nearly 300 IRA members had been given so-called 'comfort letters' saying they were not then wanted by British police. READ MORE The issue emerged in February 2014 when John Downey, an alleged IRA member, faced trial in London for the July 1982 Hyde Park bombing, which killed four British soldiers and seven horses. His Old Bailey trial collapsed when it emerged that he had received his comfort letter in 2007 even though there was an active warrant for his arrest. The trial judge halted the trial after ruling this was an abuse of process. Under Mr McDowell's proposal in 2000, which went farther than the comfort letter tactic later used, the British government would have been able, he said, to avoid bringing strongly opposed immunity legislation before Westminster. The idea 'first surfaced' at a meeting between Irish and British officials in Dublin in early November 2000 when the British side was told Mr McDowell believed London could grant 'pardons before convictions' to IRA members. The proposal was outlined in greater depth to the British side in November 2000 at 'a hastily arranged' meeting, where Mr McDowell was described in a British note as being 'quite a student of the English legal system, and admired its flexibility'. However, British officials doubted the idea from the off, saying a royal pardon could be used only after sentence, while a free pardon could expunge the effects of a conviction. Mr McDowell came back to his idea when he was included in the Irish delegation, which included Bertie Ahern , then taoiseach, which travelled from London with British prime minister Tony Blair for an EU meeting in Zagreb, Croatia, shortly afterwards. Here, Mr McDowell again argued that wanted IRA members could be given 'a prosecution amnesty', citing the decision by the British not to prosecute Soviet spy Anthony Blunt for treachery. 'His basic thesis seemed to be that our legal system was sufficiently flexible to allow immunity to be granted without the need for primary legislation,' the Northern Ireland Office's political director, Bill Jeffreys, told an official in the British attorney general's office. He said he had told Mr McDowell his proposal ran counter to the views of the British attorney general, who was 'unwilling' to give immunity to individuals on general public interest grounds. However, if Mr McDowell was arguing that the Northern Ireland secretary of state could 'pre-empt prosecution in a whole class of cases' then that would be 'an entirely new departure'. Widening the grounds for immunity 'seemed to me to run entirely against the trend, and would be very difficult to justify in today's conditions, when we would be expected to seek the necessary powers from parliament', Mr Jeffreys also said. Separately, the files also show the efforts Sinn Féin made to ensure leading IRA figures in the United States such as Gabriel Megahey would not be deported. Now, 25 years later, they are now facing fresh expulsion attempts by Donald Trump's administration. Bill Clinton , US president at the time, had wanted to 'tie off the loose end' created by the six men's issues before he left office, fearing the incoming George W Bush presidency would be less sympathetic. In 1997, US secretary of state Madeleine Albright 'persuaded the US attorney general to suspend deportation action' against the men on 'the foreign policy grounds that it would contribute to the NI political process'. The importance of the OTR issue to Sinn Féin is evident throughout the files, with the party's Gerry Kelly 'grumbling' to Northern Ireland Office officials 'that the lack of movement was causing Sinn Féin great difficulties'.

Inflatable boat tried to make rendezvous with ship at sea in bid to import drugs, court hears
Inflatable boat tried to make rendezvous with ship at sea in bid to import drugs, court hears

Irish Times

time8 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Inflatable boat tried to make rendezvous with ship at sea in bid to import drugs, court hears

A rigid inflatable boat tried and failed to 'rendezvous' with a ship off the south coast in an attempt to smuggle a large quantity of drugs into the country, the Special Criminal Court heard. A number of vehicles were later intercepted by gardaí at Tragumna Pier in Cork following a tip off from a member of the public, judges were told. Ten men were arrested by gardaí in March last year during operations in the villages of Tragumna and Leap near Skibbereen, Co Cork, where a jeep, camper van, articulated truck and rigid inflatable boat were seized as part of the suspected drug smuggling operation. After gardaí intercepted the vehicles they discovered a large quantity of nautical equipment including satellite phones, GPS devices, radios and control panels and wetsuits. READ MORE The non-jury court heard that the ship the rigid inflatable boat (RIB) was attempting to 'rendezvous' with had passed an area in Denmark in mid-March. Eight-hundred-and-forty kilogrammes of cocaine valued at €58 million to €59 million was later found washed up in the area. Five men have previously pleaded guilty to conspiring with others to import drugs. They are: Mario Angel Del Rio Sanz (45), of no fixed abode but from Spain; Anuar Rahui Chairi (42), of Malaga, Spain; Juan Antonio Gallardo Barroso (56), of no fixed address, Spain; Aleksandar Milic (27) with an address in Belgrade, Serbia; and Kiumaars Ghabiri (52) with an address in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. At the court on Monday two co-accused – Pedro Pablo Ojeda Ortega (36) of Cadiz and Angel Serran Padilla (40) of Malaga, both Spain, pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiring to import drugs. Inspector Joseph Young told the court how on Tuesday, February 27th, 2024, gardaí were conducting a checkpoint at Gully in Bandon, Co Cork, and stopped two men – an Irish national and a foreign national – in a car. Gardaí noted the men were 'nervous' and 'evasive' and decided to carry out a search, which led to the two men being brought to Bandon Garda station. During the search, a notepad was found in the vehicle with co-ordinates for Dromadoon Pier and Rosscarbery Pier as well as details for six Airbnb and rental properties. On March 12th, 2024, gardaí received confidential information about suspicious activity at Tragumna pier. A member of the public observed what he believed to be suspicious activity when he saw an articulated truck reversing down and a camper van and other vehicles including a black Land Rover and a white transit van about 50 metres away. A monitoring operation was put in place. Two days later, shortly after midnight, the campervan was observed leaving an Airbnb rental near Leap and entering the Tragumna area. At around 5am the Land Rover and articulated truck also appeared at the slipway at Tragumna and 10 minutes later a black rigid inflatable boat (RIB) was observed. The people from the RIB and those on the pier who had alighted from the three vehicles interacted and a number of holdall bags were transferred from the RIB to the pier. At 7.20am, five of the defendants – Juan Antonio Gallardo Barroso, Aleksander Milic, Pedro Pablo Ojeda Ortega, Angel Serran Padilla and Anuar Rahui Chairi – and one other man were detained, and the white camper van was seized. A further intervention took place at the pier where the articulated truck and trailer and the black Land Rover were still in place and a number of arrests were made at that location also. Insp Young said the investigation team's belief was that a 'rendezvous' or what is known as a 'sea drop off' would occur. The sentencing hearing continues on Tuesday. Earlier on Monday, counsel for three other co-accused – Ali Ghasemi Mazidi (50), with an address in the Netherlands; Sean Curran (37), with an address at Carrickyheenan, Aughnacloy, Enniskillen, Co Fermanagh; and Raul Tabares Garcia (48), of Cadiz, Spain – said their clients were seeking trial dates. Ms Justice Karen O'Connor said the court would list the matter for mention on July 28th.

Former hurler 'lost it' and hit boy 'multiple times' with a stick, court hears
Former hurler 'lost it' and hit boy 'multiple times' with a stick, court hears

The Journal

time11 hours ago

  • The Journal

Former hurler 'lost it' and hit boy 'multiple times' with a stick, court hears

FORMER ALL-STAR and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler, Niall Gilligan 'lost it' when he hit a then 12 year old child 'multiple times' with a stick. That is according to counsel for the State, Sarah Jane Comerford BL who told a jury at Ennis Circuit Court on Monday that Mr Gilligan 'lost control' on 5 October, 2023 when he punished the boy for the damage being caused at the time to his Jamaica Inn hostel property in Sixmilebridge. Ms Comerford was making her closing speech in the case where Mr Gilligan (48) of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge, denies the assault causing harm with a stick. In his own closing speech, counsel for Mr Gilligan, Patrick Whyms BL said in no way is Mr Gilligan trying to suggest that he was entitled to punish the boy as was suggested and said that the injuries sustained by the boy 'are clearly regrettable'. Mr Whyms said that on the evening at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Mr Gilligan 'didn't know that he was dealing with a child and did not create this situation'. Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan 'was at the end of his tether' by the vandalism being done to a vacant property he was trying to sell. Putting forward the defence of reasonable force against the charge of assault causing harm, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan was at the Jamaica Inn hostel on the night of October 5th 'in the dark and believed that he was under siege'. He said: 'Believing himself under threat and needing to protect himself and his property, Niall Gilligan needs to make an instant decision and so we are here.' Mr Whyms (instructed by solicitor, Daragh Hassett) said: 'And Mr Gilligan, a family man who has young children and no previous convictions gives a clear story which has't changed and an entirely credible, fulsome account of what happened.' Mr Whyms said to the jury: 'Did Niall Gilligan use such force as was reasonable in the circumstances as he believed them to be and if he did then no offence was committed.' In his prepared statement at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 on the alleged assault, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan 'has given a perfectly plausible account in an otherwise impeccably accurate description of what occurred which placed the boys inside the building when he met them'. On the medical evidence, Mr Whyms said: 'Nobody wants to see a child being injured and it would be much better if that didn't happen and the boy was injured in this case.' He said: 'There doesn't seem to be much room for argument that he was injured from the actions of Niall Gilligan.' Mr Whyms said that a displaced fracture of a finger on the boy's left hand 'is the only fracture in this case'. He said 'There was mention of dislocated shoulders, broken tibias and broken wrists all over the evidence but none of those things happened.' 'There is an un-displaced fracture of a finger – that is not a good thing to happen but that it is what happened' He said: 'There were injuries and there were sustained in the incident but by and large, most were cleared up in the week and the last one was pretty well cleared up in two weeks.' Mr Whyms said that the injuries 'don't look nice on the photographs – there is no getting away from that and injuries that are photographed immediately after don't look nice'. Earlier in her closing speech Ms Comerford (instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey) told the jury: 'This is a story of a man who lost his cool.' She said: 'Instead of picking up the boy after he slipped and bringing him out to his car and driving him home and telling his parents, he hit him and lost it and he was angry and frustrated.' Ms Comerford said that the alleged assault in broad daylight 'is the action of a man who took out his anger and frustration on a child. There is no evidence that his injuries were caused by anything other than his interactions with Niall Gilligan.' Advertisement Ms Comerford said that Niall Gilligan 'lost control and punished the boy for the damage and inconvenience caused to his property on a morning when he had to clean up human faeces and urine from his property'. Ms Comerford said that the evidence of the then 12 year old boy and his friend 'is credible and can be relied upon to the high standard beyond reasonable doubt'. Ms Comerford said that the then 12 year old 'of course he knew that it not okay to explore a building without permission, to let off fire extinguishers, to remove keys so he would have access to the building again, but he was a 12 year old child and he was exploring and knew that others had been there before'. Ms Comerford said that the boy 'thought Niall Gilligan would threaten him with a stick. He didn't think he was actually going to hit him, but he did and he kept hitting him'. She told the jury: 'I would suggest to you that the boy was shocked and in disbelief that this could happen – that a grown man would hit a child and not once and not a clip around the ear and a kick up the backside followed by a drive home to tell his parents to say what the child had been up to'. Ms Comerford said that the boy knew that Mr Gilligan 'was a big strong man who he never thought would viciously assault him'. She said: 'You will recall him saying 'he was so big and I was so little' and Mr Gilligan was so big and the boy was so little.' Highlighting the medical evidence, Ms Comerford said that the first medical report stated 'Head injury, loss of consciousness, bowel incontinence, right shoulder injury query, right posterior elbow wound? left hand and wrist injury, left tibia wound exposure and maybe fracture'. She said: 'In the later reports, there is a reference to an X-ray to his tibia and fibula which was suggestive of a non-displaced fracture and ultimately it doesn't appear that this was a fracture.' Ms Comerford said that 'it is understandable when you look at the photos why there may have been a query on fractures when you look at the level of bruising sustained by the body of the boy' She said that the boy slipped outside the Jamaica Inn and was lying on his stomach 'and you can see clearly the marks on both buttocks, the wrist injury, the shoulder bruising, the arm injury and the bruising around the ribs and the gash to his shin bone when he was hit over and over again'. She said: 'He lost consciousness for a while. He must have been hit multiple times in order to have sustained as many injuries as he did in the various locations you can see in the photos taken on the night and following day.' She said: 'The only evidence you have on how those injuries were caused is the boy's video statement who said that he was hit with a stick a number of times before he was knocked out. 'The reason why he knew he was knocked out is that he didn't remember that he was dragged and also had incontinence… He can be forgiven for thinking that he disclosed his shoulder when you see the extensive bruising all around his shoulder.' Ms Comerford described Ms Gilligan's prepared statement given to Gardai at Shannon Garda Station in February 2024 as 'a self-serving fabricated story to justify an encounter with a 12 year old child'. Ms Comerford said that the account 'is purposefully vague' and 'I don't think you can believe anything that Niall Gilligan says about how he came to assault the young boy'. Ms Comerford said in his statement Mr Gilligan says he got 'entangled in the dark and they fell on top of each other'. Ms Comerford said: 'Mr Gilligan didn't fall and get entangled with the boy. He beat him there and he knew it. He lost control, he was angry and frustrated and he needed to cover all angles and that is why he said that to the Gardai.' Ms Comerford told the jury that they should give greater weight to the evidence of the 12 year old boy and his friend who allowed themselves to be subject to cross examination from Mr Whyms on their evidence and 'withstood the cross examination'. Ms Comerford said that due to the level of force used by Mr Gilligan in the assault, the defence of self-defence should not be available to him. At the conclusion of the closing speeches Judge Francis Comerford commenced his charge to the jury. Judge Comerford said that he will continue his charge to the jury on Tuesday. When Judge Comerford completes his charge, the jury will then commence their deliberations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store