Big miners accuse union of ‘bully tactics' as Pilbara wage fight continues
The Minerals Council of Australia has lodged a formal complaint with the Fair Work Ombudsman, accusing the Electrical Trades Union of making 'clearly false', and potentially unlawful, representations to workers as it tries to gain a foothold in the Pilbara.
Unions won a test case against BHP in the Fair Work Commission two weeks ago to enforce 'same job, same pay' laws on a coal mine in Queensland's Bowen Basin, adding $66 million to the mining giant's wages bill.
But though no applications have been successful in WA, the ETU was threatening legal action against sub-contractors in the State as far back as April.
In one email sent to multiple labour hire companies obtained by The West Australian, north-west organiser Kevin O'Donnell warned a company it was 'in breach' of the new legislation.
The controversial laws — which received fierce opposition from the resources sector — aim to ensure that labour hire workers receive the same pay and conditions as directly employed staff if the Fair Work Commission rules that they're performing equivalent work.
'The ETU will vigorously defend members pay and conditions and use the full force of our legal team to do so if need be,' the ETU email said.
The Minerals Council of Australia has now made a formal complaint, arguing those emails breach Section 345 of the Fair Work Act that prohibits 'knowingly or recklessly' making a 'false or misleading' representation about workplace rights.
Minerals Council chief executive Tania Constable said the union was attempting to pressure companies into submission.
'This is further evidence of some unions misusing the vast new powers within the legislation to bully their way into the Pilbara,' she said.
'This has nothing to do with workers or wages, it is solely about expanding union power.
'The actions of the ETA in blatantly misrepresenting the law shows the lengths that certain unions will go to in order to abuse such powers.'
ETU state secretary Adam Woodage was yet to receive a copy of the complaint on Sunday but said the union won't back down.
'It's extremely disappointing that the MCA has made no effort to contact the ETU or myself directly,' he said.
'It speaks volumes of their attitude towards workers and their unions that represent them.
'The MCA needs to learn we aren't going away and will continue to advocate and defend our members interests.'
The ETU has recently filed applications urging the Fair Work Commission to enforce 'same job, same pay' on Chevron's Barrow Island LNG facility, and accused the American-owned oil company of 'playing contractors off against one another'.
If successful, sub-contractors Ventia could be forced to increase maintenance wages by $80,000 per year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How a century-old ‘zombie subdivision' became Melbourne's ‘worst case of urban blight'
The intergenerational failure to develop Solomon Heights has been blamed on a tangle of planning problems, according to Brimbank council analysis: it's hard to reach, with one road in and out of the precinct; its residential-sized lots are unsuitable for large-scale industry; and its neglected expanses are a refuge for several critically endangered plants and animals, including the striped legless lizard and the golden sun moth, which are protected under federal and state environmental laws. But the century-long campaign to develop Solomon Heights has never stopped. Glen Ora, a company that owns the undeveloped roads in the southern half of the precinct, has launched legal action to try to connect the area to water and kickstart development. The company has gone to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, appealing Greater Western Water's refusal earlier this year to grant water connection permits in the precinct. A statement of contentions seen by The Age says the refusal 'would stifle and prevent the future creation of infrastructure works in the subdivision'. The company has also approached the Department of Transport and Planning about developing Solomon Heights for housing, but it has been told there are no plans to rezone the area from industrial to residential. Glen Ora director Ron Silverstein was reluctant to comment to this masthead about his company's legal bid to force Greater Western to plumb the estate before VCAT has made a decision. 'What I'm prepared to say is there's an enormous amount of green tape involved in a transaction like this … from the Commonwealth, state and council,' he said. 'There's a huge regulatory system, which is complex, very expensive, and you need very deep pockets to do something like this.' The company is fighting to develop the Solomon Heights as it awaits a separate judgment over whether it is liable for rubbish dumping on the land. The Commonwealth-run Australian Rail Track Corporation, which owns land in Solomon Heights, has sued Glen Ora for more than $828,000, plus costs and interest. According to a statement of claim filed in court, subcontractors hired by Glen Ora dumped contaminated construction spoil, including asbestos, copper and lead, on ARTC-owned land. Loading Glen Ora has denied liability for the dumped spoil and a judgment is pending. When The Age visited Solomon Heights last week, it was clear rubbish dumping was a persistent problem. There were piles of old tyres, a rusted car body, mounds of mangled wires and rotting timber. The flat, grassy terrain is also choked with artichoke thistle and prickly pear. But Silverstein was eager to show this masthead something else that grows hidden among the weeds, and which is key to the precinct's future. 'One of the features of this property is that it's got a critically endangered plant and I don't want you to laugh when you see it. It's extremely valuable,' he said. In an overgrown corner of the estate near the Melbourne-Sydney railway line, eight spiny rice-flower plants grow, although only a trained eye would spot them. Each critically endangered plant is marked by a stake tied with a ribbon. The delicate yellow-flowered plants are protected under environment and biodiversity laws. There are 240 spiny rice-flowers in the estate, according to ecological surveys. 'People look at them and they can't understand why they're so important, and the answer is, I don't know either,' Silverstein said. Brimbank City Council has spent several years in a state of planning paralysis over Solomon Heights. In a 2019 report, it named the existence of protected plants and animals as a key impediment to development, along with the difficulty of getting property owners in the precinct to agree on a way forward. In 2022, it completed a feasibility study into creating a conservation reserve in the northern part of the estate. The Age sought a copy of the study via a freedom-of-information request but was denied, with the council saying the report is confidential. 'The document contains land use planning information, being information that, if prematurely released, is likely to encourage speculation in land values, which can be commercially sensitive,' Brimbank said. Individual lots are currently listed for more than $230,000 each. Loading The council said it has no plans to pursue public acquisition of any part of the estate. Lancashire argues that the southern part of the estate should be developed into an industrial estate that would boost local employment, and the northern section converted into an environmental reserve. 'There is a way forward,' he says. 'To see that this has been going on in my community for 100 years is gut-wrenching … we've done environmental study after environmental study. We need to stop the delays, we need to come back with a report on how to actually do it.' Monash University senior lecturer in urban planning Dr Elizabeth Taylor has studied Solomon Heights and other 'zombie subdivisions' like it, which are 'the living dead of the real estate market', seemingly trapped in time and unable to be developed. In her research, Taylor wrote that many potential solutions have been posed for the estate but 'a default position of inaction has defined it for nearly a century'. This is partly because current planning laws were not written with a 99-year-old riddle like Solomon Heights in mind. But mostly, it comes down to the cost of fixing the problem and the likely gap between what the council would be prepared to spend on compensation versus what the private landowners would demand. 'You can imagine Solomon Heights maybe being a cool park or something like that, but it just gets stuck because nobody wants to pay for it,' Taylor said.
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
How a century-old ‘zombie subdivision' became Melbourne's ‘worst case of urban blight'
The intergenerational failure to develop Solomon Heights has been blamed on a tangle of planning problems, according to Brimbank council analysis: it's hard to reach, with one road in and out of the precinct; its residential-sized lots are unsuitable for large-scale industry; and its neglected expanses are a refuge for several critically endangered plants and animals, including the striped legless lizard and the golden sun moth, which are protected under federal and state environmental laws. But the century-long campaign to develop Solomon Heights has never stopped. Glen Ora, a company that owns the undeveloped roads in the southern half of the precinct, has launched legal action to try to connect the area to water and kickstart development. The company has gone to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, appealing Greater Western Water's refusal earlier this year to grant water connection permits in the precinct. A statement of contentions seen by The Age says the refusal 'would stifle and prevent the future creation of infrastructure works in the subdivision'. The company has also approached the Department of Transport and Planning about developing Solomon Heights for housing, but it has been told there are no plans to rezone the area from industrial to residential. Glen Ora director Ron Silverstein was reluctant to comment to this masthead about his company's legal bid to force Greater Western to plumb the estate before VCAT has made a decision. 'What I'm prepared to say is there's an enormous amount of green tape involved in a transaction like this … from the Commonwealth, state and council,' he said. 'There's a huge regulatory system, which is complex, very expensive, and you need very deep pockets to do something like this.' The company is fighting to develop the Solomon Heights as it awaits a separate judgment over whether it is liable for rubbish dumping on the land. The Commonwealth-run Australian Rail Track Corporation, which owns land in Solomon Heights, has sued Glen Ora for more than $828,000, plus costs and interest. According to a statement of claim filed in court, subcontractors hired by Glen Ora dumped contaminated construction spoil, including asbestos, copper and lead, on ARTC-owned land. Loading Glen Ora has denied liability for the dumped spoil and a judgment is pending. When The Age visited Solomon Heights last week, it was clear rubbish dumping was a persistent problem. There were piles of old tyres, a rusted car body, mounds of mangled wires and rotting timber. The flat, grassy terrain is also choked with artichoke thistle and prickly pear. But Silverstein was eager to show this masthead something else that grows hidden among the weeds, and which is key to the precinct's future. 'One of the features of this property is that it's got a critically endangered plant and I don't want you to laugh when you see it. It's extremely valuable,' he said. In an overgrown corner of the estate near the Melbourne-Sydney railway line, eight spiny rice-flower plants grow, although only a trained eye would spot them. Each critically endangered plant is marked by a stake tied with a ribbon. The delicate yellow-flowered plants are protected under environment and biodiversity laws. There are 240 spiny rice-flowers in the estate, according to ecological surveys. 'People look at them and they can't understand why they're so important, and the answer is, I don't know either,' Silverstein said. Brimbank City Council has spent several years in a state of planning paralysis over Solomon Heights. In a 2019 report, it named the existence of protected plants and animals as a key impediment to development, along with the difficulty of getting property owners in the precinct to agree on a way forward. In 2022, it completed a feasibility study into creating a conservation reserve in the northern part of the estate. The Age sought a copy of the study via a freedom-of-information request but was denied, with the council saying the report is confidential. 'The document contains land use planning information, being information that, if prematurely released, is likely to encourage speculation in land values, which can be commercially sensitive,' Brimbank said. Individual lots are currently listed for more than $230,000 each. Loading The council said it has no plans to pursue public acquisition of any part of the estate. Lancashire argues that the southern part of the estate should be developed into an industrial estate that would boost local employment, and the northern section converted into an environmental reserve. 'There is a way forward,' he says. 'To see that this has been going on in my community for 100 years is gut-wrenching … we've done environmental study after environmental study. We need to stop the delays, we need to come back with a report on how to actually do it.' Monash University senior lecturer in urban planning Dr Elizabeth Taylor has studied Solomon Heights and other 'zombie subdivisions' like it, which are 'the living dead of the real estate market', seemingly trapped in time and unable to be developed. In her research, Taylor wrote that many potential solutions have been posed for the estate but 'a default position of inaction has defined it for nearly a century'. This is partly because current planning laws were not written with a 99-year-old riddle like Solomon Heights in mind. But mostly, it comes down to the cost of fixing the problem and the likely gap between what the council would be prepared to spend on compensation versus what the private landowners would demand. 'You can imagine Solomon Heights maybe being a cool park or something like that, but it just gets stuck because nobody wants to pay for it,' Taylor said.
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Petrol power is enjoying a resurgence at General Motors
General Motors was increasingly going down the path of having V8-powered full-size pickups and SUVs, but using electric power for almost everything else. Its Buick and Cadillac brands, for example, had goals of going electric-only by 2030, while myriad combustion-powered models were being phased out. However, GM Authority reports the American giant is now putting new combustion-powered vehicles into development. It's also reportedly evaluating new variants of existing combustion-powered vehicles – something that could see it introduce, for example, performance-focused pickups to take on Ford's Raptor models. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. ABOVE: Chevrolet Silverado ZR2 It's unclear what new combustion-powered models GM may develop, though it currently doesn't have a unibody (car-based) ute to rival the Ford Maverick and no longer has a pony car to rival the Ford Mustang (following the axing of the Chevrolet Camaro). It also doesn't have a body-on-frame off-roader smaller than its Chevrolet Tahoe/GMC Yukon to take on the Toyota 4Runner and LandCruiser 250 Series (sold as the Prado here), apart from the ageing Chevrolet Trailblazer in Latin America. The change in strategy comes as fuel prices remain low in the US, while emissions regulations have been softened under the Trump administration. Of course, GM still has a bevy of electric vehicles (EVs) and is crowing about its Chevrolet brand being the second biggest seller of EVs in the US market. But GM had been more aggressive than many brands in phasing out combustion-powered vehicles in favour of EVs. ABOVE: American Cadillac XT5 and (new) Chinese XT5 For example, the Chevrolet Blazer and Cadillac XT4, XT5 and XT6 crossover SUVs were all being phased out in favour of electric replacements – the Blazer EV, Optiq, Lyriq and Vistiq, respectively. Likewise, the Cadillac CT4 and CT5 sedans were expected to be replaced by one or two electric sedans, while the Chevrolet Malibu sedan has been axed outright. While none of these combustion-powered vehicles top the sales charts in their respective segments, many have been strong sellers at one point or another in their run. However, in June, GM announced it would add production of the combustion-powered Blazer to its Spring Hill, Tennessee plant in 2027 – a somewhat odd move, given the now six-year-old vehicle was set to be phased out. ABOVE: Chevrolet Blazer and Blazer EV Now, GM Authority reports it'll be a next-generation Blazer being manufactured in Spring Hill. Whether this means the new second-generation XT5 sold in China – previously slated to be a Chinese-market exclusive vehicle – will be offered in the US remains to be seen. It's not just the new XT5 that's exclusive to China. GM has developed a handful of new-generation combustion-powered vehicles for China that it hasn't offered in its home market. That includes the Cadillac GT4 and second-generation CT6. However, GM has struggled in China of late as resurgent domestic brands offering increasingly sophisticated products have eaten away both at its market share and that of many other foreign brands. It's now losing money there, despite the Chinese market once being a cash cow. ABOVE: Cadillac Lyriq With GM having reduced its global footprint through the sale of Opel/Vauxhall and a large-scale (if not complete) withdrawal from right-hand drive production that spelled the end of Holden, among other strategic moves, its home market has now become even more important. And despite EV sales continuing to grow in the US, the world's second-largest new-car market, there's still healthy demand for combustion-powered vehicles. GM has been pulling back somewhat from its previous bold EV goals. For example, it confirmed this year its Orion Assembly Plant in Michigan that was earmarked for EV production will now produce combustion-powered vehicles, while it will also introduce plug-in hybrids – technology it was previously planning to skip over. However, it's investing in new battery developments and plans to introduce a new, more affordable EV as a successor to its defunct Chevrolet Bolt, indicating it remains committed to EVs. It now offers multiple EVs across its Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands, with electric Buicks also offered in China. Content originally sourced from: General Motors was increasingly going down the path of having V8-powered full-size pickups and SUVs, but using electric power for almost everything else. Its Buick and Cadillac brands, for example, had goals of going electric-only by 2030, while myriad combustion-powered models were being phased out. However, GM Authority reports the American giant is now putting new combustion-powered vehicles into development. It's also reportedly evaluating new variants of existing combustion-powered vehicles – something that could see it introduce, for example, performance-focused pickups to take on Ford's Raptor models. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. ABOVE: Chevrolet Silverado ZR2 It's unclear what new combustion-powered models GM may develop, though it currently doesn't have a unibody (car-based) ute to rival the Ford Maverick and no longer has a pony car to rival the Ford Mustang (following the axing of the Chevrolet Camaro). It also doesn't have a body-on-frame off-roader smaller than its Chevrolet Tahoe/GMC Yukon to take on the Toyota 4Runner and LandCruiser 250 Series (sold as the Prado here), apart from the ageing Chevrolet Trailblazer in Latin America. The change in strategy comes as fuel prices remain low in the US, while emissions regulations have been softened under the Trump administration. Of course, GM still has a bevy of electric vehicles (EVs) and is crowing about its Chevrolet brand being the second biggest seller of EVs in the US market. But GM had been more aggressive than many brands in phasing out combustion-powered vehicles in favour of EVs. ABOVE: American Cadillac XT5 and (new) Chinese XT5 For example, the Chevrolet Blazer and Cadillac XT4, XT5 and XT6 crossover SUVs were all being phased out in favour of electric replacements – the Blazer EV, Optiq, Lyriq and Vistiq, respectively. Likewise, the Cadillac CT4 and CT5 sedans were expected to be replaced by one or two electric sedans, while the Chevrolet Malibu sedan has been axed outright. While none of these combustion-powered vehicles top the sales charts in their respective segments, many have been strong sellers at one point or another in their run. However, in June, GM announced it would add production of the combustion-powered Blazer to its Spring Hill, Tennessee plant in 2027 – a somewhat odd move, given the now six-year-old vehicle was set to be phased out. ABOVE: Chevrolet Blazer and Blazer EV Now, GM Authority reports it'll be a next-generation Blazer being manufactured in Spring Hill. Whether this means the new second-generation XT5 sold in China – previously slated to be a Chinese-market exclusive vehicle – will be offered in the US remains to be seen. It's not just the new XT5 that's exclusive to China. GM has developed a handful of new-generation combustion-powered vehicles for China that it hasn't offered in its home market. That includes the Cadillac GT4 and second-generation CT6. However, GM has struggled in China of late as resurgent domestic brands offering increasingly sophisticated products have eaten away both at its market share and that of many other foreign brands. It's now losing money there, despite the Chinese market once being a cash cow. ABOVE: Cadillac Lyriq With GM having reduced its global footprint through the sale of Opel/Vauxhall and a large-scale (if not complete) withdrawal from right-hand drive production that spelled the end of Holden, among other strategic moves, its home market has now become even more important. And despite EV sales continuing to grow in the US, the world's second-largest new-car market, there's still healthy demand for combustion-powered vehicles. GM has been pulling back somewhat from its previous bold EV goals. For example, it confirmed this year its Orion Assembly Plant in Michigan that was earmarked for EV production will now produce combustion-powered vehicles, while it will also introduce plug-in hybrids – technology it was previously planning to skip over. However, it's investing in new battery developments and plans to introduce a new, more affordable EV as a successor to its defunct Chevrolet Bolt, indicating it remains committed to EVs. It now offers multiple EVs across its Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands, with electric Buicks also offered in China. Content originally sourced from: General Motors was increasingly going down the path of having V8-powered full-size pickups and SUVs, but using electric power for almost everything else. Its Buick and Cadillac brands, for example, had goals of going electric-only by 2030, while myriad combustion-powered models were being phased out. However, GM Authority reports the American giant is now putting new combustion-powered vehicles into development. It's also reportedly evaluating new variants of existing combustion-powered vehicles – something that could see it introduce, for example, performance-focused pickups to take on Ford's Raptor models. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. ABOVE: Chevrolet Silverado ZR2 It's unclear what new combustion-powered models GM may develop, though it currently doesn't have a unibody (car-based) ute to rival the Ford Maverick and no longer has a pony car to rival the Ford Mustang (following the axing of the Chevrolet Camaro). It also doesn't have a body-on-frame off-roader smaller than its Chevrolet Tahoe/GMC Yukon to take on the Toyota 4Runner and LandCruiser 250 Series (sold as the Prado here), apart from the ageing Chevrolet Trailblazer in Latin America. The change in strategy comes as fuel prices remain low in the US, while emissions regulations have been softened under the Trump administration. Of course, GM still has a bevy of electric vehicles (EVs) and is crowing about its Chevrolet brand being the second biggest seller of EVs in the US market. But GM had been more aggressive than many brands in phasing out combustion-powered vehicles in favour of EVs. ABOVE: American Cadillac XT5 and (new) Chinese XT5 For example, the Chevrolet Blazer and Cadillac XT4, XT5 and XT6 crossover SUVs were all being phased out in favour of electric replacements – the Blazer EV, Optiq, Lyriq and Vistiq, respectively. Likewise, the Cadillac CT4 and CT5 sedans were expected to be replaced by one or two electric sedans, while the Chevrolet Malibu sedan has been axed outright. While none of these combustion-powered vehicles top the sales charts in their respective segments, many have been strong sellers at one point or another in their run. However, in June, GM announced it would add production of the combustion-powered Blazer to its Spring Hill, Tennessee plant in 2027 – a somewhat odd move, given the now six-year-old vehicle was set to be phased out. ABOVE: Chevrolet Blazer and Blazer EV Now, GM Authority reports it'll be a next-generation Blazer being manufactured in Spring Hill. Whether this means the new second-generation XT5 sold in China – previously slated to be a Chinese-market exclusive vehicle – will be offered in the US remains to be seen. It's not just the new XT5 that's exclusive to China. GM has developed a handful of new-generation combustion-powered vehicles for China that it hasn't offered in its home market. That includes the Cadillac GT4 and second-generation CT6. However, GM has struggled in China of late as resurgent domestic brands offering increasingly sophisticated products have eaten away both at its market share and that of many other foreign brands. It's now losing money there, despite the Chinese market once being a cash cow. ABOVE: Cadillac Lyriq With GM having reduced its global footprint through the sale of Opel/Vauxhall and a large-scale (if not complete) withdrawal from right-hand drive production that spelled the end of Holden, among other strategic moves, its home market has now become even more important. And despite EV sales continuing to grow in the US, the world's second-largest new-car market, there's still healthy demand for combustion-powered vehicles. GM has been pulling back somewhat from its previous bold EV goals. For example, it confirmed this year its Orion Assembly Plant in Michigan that was earmarked for EV production will now produce combustion-powered vehicles, while it will also introduce plug-in hybrids – technology it was previously planning to skip over. However, it's investing in new battery developments and plans to introduce a new, more affordable EV as a successor to its defunct Chevrolet Bolt, indicating it remains committed to EVs. It now offers multiple EVs across its Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands, with electric Buicks also offered in China. Content originally sourced from: General Motors was increasingly going down the path of having V8-powered full-size pickups and SUVs, but using electric power for almost everything else. Its Buick and Cadillac brands, for example, had goals of going electric-only by 2030, while myriad combustion-powered models were being phased out. However, GM Authority reports the American giant is now putting new combustion-powered vehicles into development. It's also reportedly evaluating new variants of existing combustion-powered vehicles – something that could see it introduce, for example, performance-focused pickups to take on Ford's Raptor models. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. ABOVE: Chevrolet Silverado ZR2 It's unclear what new combustion-powered models GM may develop, though it currently doesn't have a unibody (car-based) ute to rival the Ford Maverick and no longer has a pony car to rival the Ford Mustang (following the axing of the Chevrolet Camaro). It also doesn't have a body-on-frame off-roader smaller than its Chevrolet Tahoe/GMC Yukon to take on the Toyota 4Runner and LandCruiser 250 Series (sold as the Prado here), apart from the ageing Chevrolet Trailblazer in Latin America. The change in strategy comes as fuel prices remain low in the US, while emissions regulations have been softened under the Trump administration. Of course, GM still has a bevy of electric vehicles (EVs) and is crowing about its Chevrolet brand being the second biggest seller of EVs in the US market. But GM had been more aggressive than many brands in phasing out combustion-powered vehicles in favour of EVs. ABOVE: American Cadillac XT5 and (new) Chinese XT5 For example, the Chevrolet Blazer and Cadillac XT4, XT5 and XT6 crossover SUVs were all being phased out in favour of electric replacements – the Blazer EV, Optiq, Lyriq and Vistiq, respectively. Likewise, the Cadillac CT4 and CT5 sedans were expected to be replaced by one or two electric sedans, while the Chevrolet Malibu sedan has been axed outright. While none of these combustion-powered vehicles top the sales charts in their respective segments, many have been strong sellers at one point or another in their run. However, in June, GM announced it would add production of the combustion-powered Blazer to its Spring Hill, Tennessee plant in 2027 – a somewhat odd move, given the now six-year-old vehicle was set to be phased out. ABOVE: Chevrolet Blazer and Blazer EV Now, GM Authority reports it'll be a next-generation Blazer being manufactured in Spring Hill. Whether this means the new second-generation XT5 sold in China – previously slated to be a Chinese-market exclusive vehicle – will be offered in the US remains to be seen. It's not just the new XT5 that's exclusive to China. GM has developed a handful of new-generation combustion-powered vehicles for China that it hasn't offered in its home market. That includes the Cadillac GT4 and second-generation CT6. However, GM has struggled in China of late as resurgent domestic brands offering increasingly sophisticated products have eaten away both at its market share and that of many other foreign brands. It's now losing money there, despite the Chinese market once being a cash cow. ABOVE: Cadillac Lyriq With GM having reduced its global footprint through the sale of Opel/Vauxhall and a large-scale (if not complete) withdrawal from right-hand drive production that spelled the end of Holden, among other strategic moves, its home market has now become even more important. And despite EV sales continuing to grow in the US, the world's second-largest new-car market, there's still healthy demand for combustion-powered vehicles. GM has been pulling back somewhat from its previous bold EV goals. For example, it confirmed this year its Orion Assembly Plant in Michigan that was earmarked for EV production will now produce combustion-powered vehicles, while it will also introduce plug-in hybrids – technology it was previously planning to skip over. However, it's investing in new battery developments and plans to introduce a new, more affordable EV as a successor to its defunct Chevrolet Bolt, indicating it remains committed to EVs. It now offers multiple EVs across its Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands, with electric Buicks also offered in China. Content originally sourced from:
