logo
Trump threatens tariffs in 50 days: What harm will it do to Russia?

Trump threatens tariffs in 50 days: What harm will it do to Russia?

Al Jazeera15-07-2025
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose steep trading restrictions on Russia unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days, as he announced an agreement with NATO allies to send more weapons to Kyiv.
The announcements on Monday marked a shift in US foreign policy as Trump's endorsement of Ukraine comes just weeks after Washington announced it would pause weapons sales to Kyiv.
But Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin and hopes that tariffs and sanctions, as well as new deals for Patriot air defence missiles, will help bring an end to Russia's more than three-year invasion of Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Telegram that he had spoken to Trump and 'thanked him for his readiness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace'.
On Tuesday, Russia's top security official, Dmitry Medvedev, said the Kremlin did not care about the 'theatrical ultimatum' issued by Trump, adding that Putin will comment on the US proposals if he deems it necessary to do so.
What did Trump say?
Sitting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump told reporters he was disappointed in Putin and that billions of dollars of US weapons would go to Ukraine.
In recent days, Russia has launched hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities, angering Trump, who had accused Putin on July 8 of throwing a lot of 'b*******' at the US. Trump has said that his shift was motivated by frustration with the Russian president.
'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant… and then the missiles go off at night,' he followed up on Monday.
'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO,' Trump said, adding that NATO would pay for them.
For his part, Rutte said that Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway want to be part of the weapons deal.
Trump also said that 'we're going to be doing very severe tariffs [on Russia] if we don't have a deal in 50 days'.
Putin has yet to accept a proposal from Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv.
Trump also said US tariffs on Russian exports would be priced 'at about 100 percent' and then threatened 'secondary tariffs [otherwise known as secondary sanctions]'.
Secondary sanctions, which would be far more punishing than US tariffs, would be levied on any country that trades with Moscow, targeting its commodities business in particular.
What is Trump's tariff threat to Russia?
Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Western countries – including the US, the United Kingdom, and European Union nations – have imposed 21,692 sanctions on Russia, most against individuals.
Key sanctions on Moscow include import bans on Russian oil, a price cap on Russian fuel, and the freezing of Russian central bank assets held in European financial institutions.
But the threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions, if carried out, would mark a notable shift.
So far, Group of Seven (G7) member states have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its fossil fuels elsewhere, to key buyers like China and India.
Lawmakers from both US political parties are pushing for a bill – the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 – that would target other countries that buy Russian oil and gas.
The bill would give Trump the authority to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that helps Russia. US senators are reportedly waiting on Trump's OK to move the bill forward.
Trump could also impose secondary tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which lets the president restrict trade in the event of a national emergency.
Elsewhere, EU countries are close to reaching an agreement on a new package of sanctions against Russia, the bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Tuesday.
'We hope to reach a political agreement on the 18th sanctions package,' Kallas said before a meeting with foreign affairs ministers from the 27 EU countries in Brussels.
How dependent is Russia's economy on fossil fuels?
Fossil fuel sales still generate substantial revenue for the Kremlin. Seaborne oil revenues, for instance, dropped modestly in 2024 but stayed at near pre-war levels.
This is due to Russia's 'shadow fleet' – ships with opaque ownership structures and no Western ties in terms of finance or insurance, allowing them to bypass Western sanctions.
So, while G7 sanctions have reduced Moscow's margins and increased export costs, they haven't cut volumes to importing nations.
From 2022 to 2025, China has purchased almost half of Russia's total crude oil exports (roughly 5 million barrels per day), with India following closely behind at nearly 40 percent.
Both countries also import a large amount of Russian coal. Other importing nations include Brazil, Turkiye and Egypt.
The EU, meanwhile, continues to consume large amounts of Russian natural gas, though Brussels has stated it wants to terminate all its contracts by 2027.
As for the US itself, higher tariffs on Russian goods would have little impact – exports to the US totalled just $3bn in 2024, or 0.7 percent of Russia's total exports.
While fossil fuels now contribute less to Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) than pre-invasion, Moscow's dependence on energy products remains high.
Estimates vary, but fossil fuels still make up 55 percent of Russian export revenues and 16 percent of its GDP (roughly $280bn)
That compares with 60 percent and 18 percent, respectively, before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 – a small drop.
How much could Trump's sanctions threat hurt Moscow?
A sharp decline in Russian energy flows from secondary sanctions would almost certainly lead to higher global prices, particularly for natural gas.
'The impact would probably be greater on natural gas prices than oil,' said Kieran Tompkins, senior climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics, in a note.
He pointed out that 'the oil market appears to have sufficient spare capacity to more or less offset a loss of Russian exports', owing to untapped OPEC supplies.
However, he pointed out that 'knocking out half of Russia's crude and petroleum exports [on the back of Trump's threat] could reduce export revenues by $75bn or so.'
In turn, Tompkins said that could induce a 'fiscal crisis' in Russia, leading to 'debt issuance ramping up, bond yields spiking and pressure for widespread fiscal tightening.'
Looking ahead, Trump's 50-day proposal will give Moscow some time to come up with counterproposals and delay the implementation of sanctions.
But Trump will be hoping that the threat of sanctions will influence Putin to put an end to hostilities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's Medvedev issues warning as Moscow says not bound by missile treaty
Russia's Medvedev issues warning as Moscow says not bound by missile treaty

Al Jazeera

time2 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Russia's Medvedev issues warning as Moscow says not bound by missile treaty

Russia is no longer bound by a moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said, with former President Dmitry Medvedev blaming NATO's 'anti-Russian policy' and warning that Moscow will take 'further steps' in response. Medvedev, who has engaged in a war of words on social media with United States President Donald Trump, made his latest broadside after the Foreign Ministry's announcement on Monday. 'The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy,' Medvedev posted in English on the X social media platform. 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps,' he said. Medvedev, who serves as the deputy head of Russia's powerful Security Council and has made several hawkish comments on Russia's nuclear capabilities in recent years, did not elaborate on what 'further steps' may entail. Last week, Trump said that he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to be repositioned to 'the appropriate regions' in response to Medvedev's remarks about the risk of war between Washington and Moscow. The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps. — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) August 4, 2025 In its statement, Russia's Foreign Ministry said the developing situation in Europe and the Asia Pacific prompted its reassessment on the deployment of short- and medium-range missiles. 'Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared,' the ministry said. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said last year that Moscow may have to respond to what they described as provocations by the US and NATO by lifting restrictions on missile deployment. Lavrov told Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti in December that Moscow's unilateral moratorium on the deployment of such missiles was 'practically no longer viable and will have to be abandoned'. 'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world,' Lavrov told the news agency. The US withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty in 2019, under the first Trump administration, citing Russian non-compliance, but Moscow had said that it would not deploy such weapons provided that Washington did not do so. The INF treaty, signed in 1987 by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US President Ronald Reagan, had eliminated an entire class of weapons: ground-launched nuclear missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500km (311 to 3,418 miles). In its first public reaction to Trump's comments on the repositioning of US submarines, the Kremlin on Monday played down the remarks and said it was not looking to get into a public spat with the US president. 'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process, that's the first thing,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. 'But in general, of course, we would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to comment on it in any way,' he said. 'Of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric,' he added. The episode comes at a delicate moment, with Trump threatening to impose new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its oil, including India and China, unless President Vladimir Putin agrees by Friday to a ceasefire in Moscow's war on Ukraine. Putin said last week that peace talks had made some positive progress but that Russia had the momentum in its war against Ukraine, signalling no shift in his position despite the looming deadline.

White House defends firing of jobs data official, critics mount
White House defends firing of jobs data official, critics mount

Qatar Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

White House defends firing of jobs data official, critics mount

Agencies White House economic advisers defended on Sunday the move of President Donald Trump to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), pushing back against criticism that surprise action could undermine confidence in official U.S. economic data. Later on Sunday, Trump again criticized BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, without providing evidence of wrongdoing and said he would name a new BLS commissioner in the next three or four days. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had 'real concerns' about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president 'is right to call for new leadership.' Hassett said on Fox News Sunday that the main concern was Friday's BLS report, which showed net downward revisions indicating that 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation. The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price BLS gave no reason for the revised data but noted 'monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.' McEntarfer responded to her abrupt dismissal on Friday in a post on the Bluesky social media platform, saying it was 'the honor of her life' to serve as BLS commissioner and praising the civil servants who work there. McEntarfer's firing added to growing concerns about the quality of U.S. economic data and came on the heels of a raft of new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, sending global stock markets tumbling as Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy. Investors are also watching the impact of the surprise resignation of Federal Reserve (Fed) Governor Adriana Kugler, which has opened a spot on the central bank's powerful board and could shake up what was already a fractious succession process for Fed leadership amid complex relations with the Trump administration. Trump said on Sunday he would announce a candidate to fill the open Fed position within the next couple of days. Revisions are common In an interview with CBS's 'Face the Nation,' Greer acknowledged there were always revisions of job numbers, 'but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, stated that significant revisions to economic data could erode public confidence and that government officials should develop methods to enhance data quality.

Wall Street rebounds as Fed rate cut bets intensify on weaker payrolls
Wall Street rebounds as Fed rate cut bets intensify on weaker payrolls

Qatar Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Wall Street rebounds as Fed rate cut bets intensify on weaker payrolls

Agencies New York Wall Street's main indexes bounced back on Monday after a sharp pullback in the previous session, buoyed by growing expectations of deeper Federal Reserve interest rate cuts following an unexpectedly weak jobs report. At 11:39 am ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 463.55 points, or 1.06 percent, to 44,052.13, the S&P 500 gained 74.56 points, or 1.2 percent, to 6,312.57 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 325.95 points, or 1.58 percent, to 20,976.08. Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq were on track for their biggest single-day jump in more than two months. This is in contrast to Friday, when a dismal US jobs report hammered the S&P 500 and sent it to its steepest intraday drop since May 27. The bleak data that also accompanied steep downward revisions for May and June forced market participants to amplify their bets for Fed rate cuts this year, noting signs of a weakening labor market. 'When you have a Fed that operates in a lagging sense, you're going to have the market moving around as the data comes, that's what we're seeing with the weaker jobs report,' said Charlie Ripley, senior investment strategist for Allianz Investment Management. Odds for a September rate cut now stand at about 84 percent, according to CME Fedwatch. Market participants see at least two quarter-point cuts by the end of this year. Underscoring uncertainty, Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer the same day, accusing her of faking the jobs numbers. 'The revisions ... it brings a level of skepticism into the data sets,' Allianz Investment Management's Ripley added. Investors also weighed Fed Governor Adriana Kugler's unexpected resignation, which could open the door for President Donald Trump to reshuffle the central bank's leadership to his favour. Trump has repeatedly threatened to fire Chair Jerome Powell, believing that rates should be much lower than they are. Meanwhile, Tesla rose 1.2 percent after granting CEO Elon Musk 96 million shares worth about $29 billion. All S&P 500 sub-sectors were trading in the green, with communication services leading gains with a 2 percent jump. US factory orders tumbled 4.8 percent in June after an upwardly revised 8.3 percent increase in May, owing to a sharp drop in commercial aircraft orders. Meanwhile, Trump threatened to substantially raise tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil. Last week, Trump slapped a 25 percent tariff on goods imported from the country. After a big week for Big Tech earnings, companies from various sectors, including Palantir, Eli Lilly and Disney, will report this week. Among notable movers, Joby Aviation rose 20.7 percent after Bloomberg News reported that the company was exploring the acquisition of helicopter ride-share operator Blade Air Mobility. Blade Air's shares surged 26.6 percent. IDEXX Laboratories soared 26.8 percent after the animal diagnostics maker raised its full-year profit and revenue forecasts and reported better-than-expected second-quarter results. Spotify jumped 6.8 percent as the music streaming platform announced plans to raise the monthly price of its premium individual subscription in select markets from September. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 4.76-to-1 ratio on the NYSE and by a 2.8-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 25 new 52-week highs and seven new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 52 new highs and 72 new lows.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store