Politicians condemn attack on Belfast Islamic Centre while people prayed
Belfast
that was carried out while people were praying on Friday evening.
A local MLA said a device was thrown into the building during evening prayer, forcing it to be evacuated.
Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn said he was 'deeply concerned by the shameful attack'.
'Hatred of this sort has no place in Northern Ireland. If anyone has any information about this, please contact the PSNI,' he said.
READ MORE
Police said they attended a security alert on University Road in south Belfast on Friday night.
A number of cordons were put in place and members of the public were asked to avoid the area.
A 34-year-old man was arrested and taken into police custody.
Alliance MLA for South Belfast Paula Bradshaw condemned the attack, which she said did 'not reflect the diversity of south Belfast in 2025'.
'This attack was again designed to cause fear among people inside the centre, who were at prayer at the time.
'Nevertheless, I am thankful for the intervention of a nearby passer-by and for the work of the police. Those were much more reflective of the true spirit of Belfast, where most people rejoice in diversity.
'I would like to express my solidarity with all those who were evacuated and my thanks to all those who worked to ensure their safety.'
Sinn Féin MLA Deirdre Hargey said 'no one should ever feel unsafe in their place of worship'.
'Acts like these, fuelled by hate, spread fear and division, and target people who have come to our communities to build a life and call this place home.
'It's vital that all political leaders speak out and stand united against this disgusting behaviour.'
Green Party councillor Aine Groogan condemned the attack as a 'cowardly and vicious act'.
'I am horrified to hear about the attack on the Islamic Centre during evening prayers,' she said.
'I want to pay tribute to the courageous passer-by who intervened and prevented what could have been a far more tragic outcome.
'It is terrifying to consider what might have happened and I sincerely hope that all those present are recovering from this traumatic ordeal.'
She added: 'This attack is yet another reminder of the very real danger faced by our Islamic community. The recent rise in racist hate and violence on our streets is a shameful stain on our society.
'We must all take responsibility for actively challenging racism, misinformation and bigotry wherever it appears before someone is seriously hurt.
'I urge those politicians who continue to hide behind the notion of so-called 'legitimate concerns' around migration to reflect on the consequences of their words.
'Such narratives are as disingenuous as they are dangerous. They help foster a culture in which hate can thrive. Frankly, they should know better.' - PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Chance to end the scourge of paramilitaries in Northern Ireland cannot be lost again
More than seven years ago, the first collective statement from loyalist paramilitaries since the 1994 ceasefire was read out on their behalf by the former Church of Ireland Archbishop Alan Harper in the Linen Hall Library in Belfast. Dubbed a Loyalist Declaration of Transformation, it received widespread media coverage and was welcomed by the then taoiseach Leo Varadkar as 'a commitment to ensure loyalist communities are at the centre of Northern Ireland's peace and political transformation'. No such support was offered by the British prime minister or the secretary of state for Northern Ireland of the day. Indeed, the British government did nothing then, or since, to build on the declaration's contents or see any value in what it might mean. Perhaps little remembered now, the declaration had come following months of close engagement with a small team of interlocutors and the paramilitary leaderships of the loyalist paramilitary groups – the UDA , the UVF and the Red Hand Commando. READ MORE Finalised and agreed over a day of intense discussion, it offered a basis for change and its intention was to make clear a new direction away from paramilitarism towards communal and social development. Ignored by the British government after it was released, to my knowledge, no British representative ever sought afterwards to meet the interlocutors about what they had done, how they had done it and where it might lead. That was, and remains, a lost opportunity. Those opportunities briefly offered by the declaration were lost in the serious tensions over Brexit and the Northern Ireland protocol and were then compounded by the havoc of the Covid pandemic , while the loyalist leaderships became distracted by internal problems. Momentum was lost. Now that an expert is to be appointed to report on the dismantling of Northern Ireland's paramilitary groups, it would be a mistake not to revisit the 2018 declaration and to talk to those who brought it about. Clearly the leaderships trusted those interlocutors. Paramilitary leaders do not make collective public statements of intent too often. They took the declaration very, very seriously, even if others did not. A large chunk of the declaration addressed ongoing criminality. However, it is understandable that many would dismiss such comments as a cynical ploy to deflect attention from behaviour that had continued unabated, or grown, since 1998. The Loyalist Declaration of Transformation was welcomed by Leo Varadkar, taoiseach at the time it was issued. Photograph:Unfortunately, the scale of criminality today and since, involving loyalist paramilitaries – everything from drugs, to controlling prostitution, to the extortion that too often happens in their own communities – gives only further credence to those doubts. Nevertheless, the best way to isolate, expose and deal with criminals is through changes that isolate them in their own communities, backed and supported by the Police Service of Northern Ireland , from its highest levels to its lowest. Certainly, the absence of such an agreement serves criminals better than if one were in play, where structures and mechanisms could help identify and charge those who wantonly impose coercion and misery on their communities. If a new declaration is to be agreed now, loyalist paramilitary leaders must work hand-in-hand with the police. However, more than that is needed. New measures to improve education within loyalist communities are urgently required, as is more investment. In addition, loyalist communities must be represented politically by their own – an outcome sadly lacking since the Belfast Agreement , even if it began with hope under David Ervine and Gary McMichael . But it is not just about loyalist leaders. Unionist political leaders of all colours, many of whom have long ignored loyalist communities, must work to make such areas more confident, to offer hope of better days. This abdication of social and political responsibility by London – even if the blame has to be shared with unionist political leaders – has contributed significantly to the deprivation, the sense of loss and the growing anxieties and expressions of anger in loyalist areas. This must change. Equally, loyalist paramilitaries, too, must begin the path of honest self-examination about their role in past bloodshed. Such a process must run in parallel to a similar course within republican communities. For both, there is still a long journey to travel. The Civic Forum that was legislated for and ran during the first couple of years after the Belfast Agreement should be reborn, but the idea of bringing communities together in such ways should not be confined to Northern Ireland. Two more should be created, one to bring communities from all parts of the island of Ireland together, and the second to look at an even more neglected relationship, the one between the island of Ireland and Britain. The three-stranded structure of the Belfast Agreement should not just be one for politicians, it should be one for the people they serve, too. In ways that can build ties, share experiences and increase understanding of the other. And it must involve loyalist communities at every turn. Everything must be conditional on paramilitary groups finally disappearing nearly 30 years after the conflict they were involved in was said to have ended. That work will not be easy. The leaderships will require support to achieve it. The difficulties should be underestimated by no one, even if most have long since lost patience with endless debate surrounding the matter. New paramilitary groups will have to be crushed decisively and swiftly. Equally, every funding pledge made by London, or, if that happens, Dublin, must be linked finally with proven changes on the ground, not just promises. There can be no repeat of the endless government grants of the past. When it comes, the report from the soon-to-be appointed expert must be hard-hitting and extensive. Tens of millions will be needed, if not more, over the years to finally eradicate the scourge of paramilitarism. The human cost and all the implications of that, in places long ignored by those in power, will be much greater if, yet again, an opportunity for change is missed and little is achieved. The chance cannot be thrown away again. Graham Spencer is Emeritus Professor of Social and Political Conflict at the University of Portsmouth.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Northern Ireland ‘crucial' as British chancellor looks to ‘all parts' of UK for growth
Northern Ireland is 'absolutely crucial' for the United Kingdom and will contribute to the chances of growth in the country as a whole, the British chancellor has said during a visit to Belfast. Rachel Reeves , the Labour finance minister, made her first trip to the North as chancellor and was asked whether she considers Northern Ireland to be an 'economic basket case'. As part of her trip, Ms Reeves visited the filmmaking facilities at Studio Ulster and also paid tribute to Northern Ireland's defence sector. Studio Ulster, which sits on the shores of Belfast Lough, was officially opened in June in what have been termed the world's most advanced virtual production facilities spanning 75,000 square feet. READ MORE Speaking at the studios, Ms Reeves said: 'Northern Ireland is absolutely crucial for the United Kingdom, including for our growth prospects. 'We've got here, at Studio Ulster, not just the best facilities in the UK, but the best facilities in the world, for a part of our economy that is globally growing at such a fast rate. 'This is the best place in the world to make those investments, to start a business, to grow a business, whether that's in video games, or TV, or film. 'That's really exciting and we benefit hugely from the thriving creative industry sector in Northern Ireland.' She continued: 'As we step up that defence spending to 3 per cent, and then 3.5 per cent, of GDP in due course, that will mean more good jobs, paying decent wages in Northern Ireland. 'My economic belief, my strong belief, is that all parts of the country should be able to contribute to economic growth and prosperity, and all parts of the country should benefit from economic growth and opportunities. 'That has not been the case for far too long in the UK.' Ms Reeves was due to meet deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly and Finance Minister John O'Dowd later on Tuesday. The chancellor also said that farmers with agricultural property worth more than £3 million (€3.47m) 'should make a contribution' in tax, following protests earlier this year against a change in policy. Asked whether she had 'sympathy for farmers who are now facing an inheritance tax bill', Ms Reeves told reporters her government had not increased taxes on 'ordinary working people', but went on: 'If you've got agricultural property worth less than £3 million and you own it jointly with a partner, you'll pay no inheritance tax when you pass that farm on. 'But I do believe that if you do have agricultural property worth more than £3 million, you should make a contribution... the inheritance tax on that is half the rate that anybody else pays, just 20%, and it's payable over 10 years interest-free.'–PA
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Former Premier League referee David Coote given eight-week ban over Jürgen Klopp comments
Former Premier League referee David Coote has been given an eight-week suspension and told to attend an education programme over abusive words he used about ex- Liverpool head coach Jürgen Klopp . Coote was charged by the English Football Association in June after the comments about Klopp came to light in a video circulated on social media last November. The FA said he had subsequently admitted the charge. Coote's misconduct was defined as an aggravated breach under the FA's rules because there was a reference to Klopp's nationality. Coote was sacked by Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) last December, a month after the video filmed in July 2020 came to light. READ MORE PGMOL said in confirming Coote's dismissal last December that his position had become 'untenable'. In it, Coote is heard saying it had been 's**t' to be fourth official at a Liverpool match in the summer of 2020, describing Klopp as a 'German c**t'. He also said Klopp was 'f*****g arrogant'. When the FA charged him over the Klopp comments in June, the governing body said Coote would face no further action in regard to separate allegations of gambling misconduct, which he had strenuously denied. The FA said those allegations had been fully investigated. Coote was banned by European football's governing body Uefa in February until June 30th, 2026 after a different video emerged of him snorting a white powder through a bank note while in Germany for last summer's Euros. In January, Coote came out as gay in an interview with the Sun and said that a lifelong struggle to hide his sexuality had contributed to the rant about Klopp, and to his drug use. 'My sexuality isn't the only reason that led me to be in that position. But I'm not telling an authentic story if I don't say that I'm gay and that I've had real struggles with hiding that,' he said. 'I hid my emotions as a young ref and I hid my sexuality as well – a good quality as a referee but a terrible quality as a human being. And that's led me to a whole course of behaviours.' Coote's formal response to the FA charge was detailed in the regulatory commission's written reasons which were published alongside the confirmation of the sanctions imposed. He accepted his words about Klopp were 'crass, inappropriate and unworthy of the role that he held within the game' and asked the commission to accept that his decision not to attend the hearing was not made out of avoidance, but due to his mental state. Coote said the words did not respect his true view of Klopp, for whom he had always had a deep professional respect. The panel wrote: 'DC [Coote] stated that he felt an immense sense of shame. He had lost a career that formed the very core of his identity. He had lost all his income and the media attention had deepened his sense of humiliation and despair. 'He was trying to piece his life back together, from a place of near total collapse.'
