
Letters to the Editor, August 15th: On Michael O'Leary, Tony Honohan for president, and shooting dogs
Sir, – Michael McDowell ('
Hostages in Gaza not a priority for Israel's ministers
,' Opinion, August 13th) condemns Israeli annexation of the West Bank because it breaks international law. Yet he praises 'decent Londoners' when they break domestic law by supporting a proscribed organisation. Both groups are doing the same thing; breaking the law when they find the law politically inconvenient. They deserve equal condemnation by anyone who claims to value the rule of law, unless one finds this politically inconvenient also. – Yours, etc,
Dr DAVID WOODS,
Dept of Classics,
University College Cork,
READ MORE
Cork,
Sir, –
Michael McDowell rightly condemns
the mass killing, displacement, and collective punishment currently being inflicted on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Yet, he, like many other western politicians, still feels obliged to endorse the state of Israel, whose very foundations rest on the violent dispossession and exclusion of another people.
Yes, it is a fact that Israel exists, and under international law it is recognised as a sovereign state. But recognition of that reality should not mean that its current form, defined by apartheid structures, permanent military occupation, and ethno-religious privilege, is beyond question. Just as we once accepted the legal existence of apartheid South Africa but challenged its system of governance as morally indefensible, it must be acceptable to question whether the Israeli state, as presently constituted, can ever deliver justice or equality.
The state of Israel was not born as a benign democracy; rather, it was established in 1948 through systematic expulsions, the destruction of villages, and the creation of a refugee crisis that endures to this day. These were not tragic accidents of war, but deliberate policies aimed at creating and maintaining a Jewish-majority state through the removal and subjugation of the indigenous Palestinian population. This was, and remains, an apartheid system under international legal definitions.
Western political leaders often speak of 'shared democratic values' with Israel while overlooking that those values are applied selectively and exclusively. The ongoing settlement project, the blockade of Gaza, and the military occupation of the West Bank are not deviations from an otherwise just order; they are the logical continuation of a state project rooted in ethno-religious separation and sustained by force.
Condemning Binyamin Netanyahu's government while maintaining unconditional support for the state it leads is moral evasion. If we in Ireland truly value human rights, international law, and equality, we must stop treating Israel as a normal democracy with a temporary extremist problem and instead recognise the structural injustice at its core. – Yours, etc,
SÉAMUS WHITE,
Stoneybatter,
Dublin 7,
Sir, – Trish Lavelle (
Letters, August 13th
) asks that statements from Israeli officials be accompanied by disclaimers to the effect that such statements are subject to 'strict military censorship' and that Israel, 'often cited as the only democracy in the Middle East', ranks at 112 on the world Press Freedom Index, just below Haiti.
I'm sure that Ms Lavelle will have noted that Israel is the highest-ranked Middle Eastern country on the index, and that Palestine ranks at 163, wedged between Cambodia and Belarus. Therefore, shouldn't utterances from the various Palestinian authorities – which have comprised the bulk of the statistics published and broadcast relating to the war in Gaza since 2023 – be accompanied by similar caveats? After all, Hamas's commitment to the freedom of the press should be appreciated by the widest audience possible. – Yours, etc,
KILLIAN FOLEY-WALSH
Kilkenny City
Michael O'Leary and being rich
Sir, –
Michael O'Leary
(
Letters, August 13th
) pleads guilty to 'being rich'. RH Tawney, in his classic book Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, quotes the advice of French writer Anatole France: 'The mercy of God is infinite: it will save even a rich man.' – Yours, etc,
LINDSAY ARMSTRONG
Beechwood Avenue,
Ranelagh,
Dublin 6.
Sir, – I would like to invite
Michael O'Leary
to accompany me from my nearest bus stop on Grange Road to the airport on the number 16 bus. The scheduled journey time is 88 minutes but could be longer depending on traffic. We'd have plenty of time to discuss the issues of the day. – Yours, etc,
FIONA McGOLDRICK,
Grange Downs,
Dublin 14.
Sir, – You gave Michael O'Leary ample space to defend his criticism of MetroLink in
his letter of August 13th.
However, O'Leary is not right when he says that 'the cost-benefit of this insanity has never been published, because it cannot be justified'.
Obviously, he has not looked at the websites of
MetroLink
and the
National Transport Authority
. If he had, he would have seen at least two cost-benefit analyses (CBAs). First, there was the CBA published in 2018. In 2022, a second CBA was published.
The latter shows that the estimated transport-user benefits of the MetroLink scheme are forecast to exceed the estimated outline scheme costs. It is important that a new CBA now be completed, and published, based on the most up-to-date project details available. It is in the public interest that people should be made aware of the costs and benefits of large-scale projects being funded from the public purse. – Yours, etc,
TOM FERRIS,
Blackrock,
Co Dublin.
Length of school holidays
Sir, – I was compelled to write after reading your recent opinion piece on school holidays being too long for working parents ('
Are school holidays in this country too long
?' Opinion, August 12th). While I agree that the long break can be challenging, I wondered whether employers could offer a practical solution.
Instead of the impossible option of taking the full seven-and-a-half or nine weeks off, employers might consider allowing staff to work part-time during the summer. For example, working half days when children are at summer camps would reduce the need for afternoon childcare.
The maths is simple. Assuming a 40-hour week, nine weeks at part-time means 180 hours to make up. Spread over the remaining 43 working weeks of the year, this is about 4.2 extra hours a week so roughly an extra half-day. I'm fairly sure that many committed employees are already doing this.
Such a system could be open to all employees, not just parents, with accrued hours taken at any time of year. Employers would need to plan for potential staffing issues, perhaps by adopting a job-share model during the summer months. Employees would need to be flexible as the employer will need to ensure that the business functions at any time when leave is taken. This approach could give parents a little breathing space in July and August, while maintaining productivity year-round. – Yours, etc,
GILLIAN MCCARTHY,
Knocklyon,
Dublin 16.
Farmers and food prices
Sir, – John McManus blames farmers, ie food producers, for the rise in food prices ('
Rising grocery prices down to farmers increasing margins
,' Business, August 13th).
A visit to any livestock mart in the country will show that there is major competition for animals heading for the food chain. China, India and a couple of European countries (Italy and Spain) cannot get enough beef and lamb so prices rise.
Why are houses so dear? Because they are scarce. Why are meat and their products so dear? Because they are scarce. Don't blame the producers. – Yours, etc,
RICHARD ALLEN,
Cummeen,
Co Sligo.
Attacks on Indian people
Sir, – President Michael D Higgins has condemned recent attacks on Indian people living in Ireland as a 'stark contradiction' to the values the Irish public hold dear ('
Higgins condemns 'despicable attacks' on Indian people
,' Home News, August 13th)
Unfortunately it seems that those traditional values of welcome and openness to the stranger have been diminishing and even disappearing to the point that they are being replaced by open hostility and violence against anyone perceived as the 'other' in our society.
It can be argued that our traditional welcome of 'cead mile fáilte' is more of a myth and make-believe to attract tourism rather than ever been embedded in our culture. Hostility against the Traveller community was and remains endemic among the settled society.
It is heartbreaking to have to listen to international protection applicants as they describe how they are taunted with racist slurs on our streets and how they fear going out alone in our public areas for fear of being assaulted.
Our streets have become a hostile environment not alone for our Indian community and asylum seekers but also for the LGBTQ+ and other marginalised groups.
This hostility bordering on hatred against the stranger is not confined just to our cities but it has taken root throughout our country, judging from the burning down of accommodation intended for international protection applicants.
Putting a few extra gardaí might contain the violence for a while but a more radical approach to this pandemic of hostility to the 'other' is needed. – Yours, etc,
BRENDAN BUTLER,
Home Farm Road,
Dublin 9.
Holohan for president
Sir, – I for one am enthused by the groundbreaking potential of Tony Holohan joining the race for the presidency ('
Honohan ponders run for Áras after 'encouraging' poll,
' August 13th). He might be the first person to go from being the unelected head of government to an elected head of state in any western democracy. – Yours, etc,
FIONA MEEHAM,
Donnybrook,
Dublin 4.
Sir, – Any political party or nominating group that wants to win the presidential election only has to nominate Prof
Tony Holohan
as its candidate to repeat a Mary Robinson or Mary McAleese result. Despite personal adversity, Mr Holohan was there for the people of this country showing the leadership necessary when it was most needed. He is responsible for saving innumerable lives. – Yours, etc,
SHEAMUS SMITH,
Rathgar,
Dublin 6.
Planning delays as an art form
Sir, – The 'Living Next Door To ...' series has been a joy – though the recent piece on the Dublin Spire ('
My first memory was when Nelson's Pillar was blown up and out windows shattered
', News, August 14th) brought with it a bout of despair for me.
It mentioned, almost in passing, that a plan for a boutique hotel on O'Connell Street had been felled – not by public outrage or financial ruin, but by that most Irish of assassins: the planning process.
We have elevated 'delay' to an art form. In this country, you could apply to plant a window box and retire before the petunias get approval. Our planners – part monk, part molasses – appear to stall everything from housing to wind farms to hotels, often with the serene conviction that they're protecting the common good from the terrible scourge of progress.
I'm not advocating the Trumpian approach of replacing every dissenting official with a cousin who owns a bulldozer, but perhaps we could at least speed things up something faster than the speed of a glacier. Failing that, might we rebrand Ireland as a heritage theme park, where the chief attraction is that nothing changes. – Yours, etc,
GEOFF SCARGILL,
Bray.
Co Wicklow.
Dogs and sheep worrying
Sir – Not content with having the legal authority to shoot over 20 species of wild birds and up to 10 mammal species, Ireland's shooting community are looking for another living target – the domestic dog.
The issue of dogs worrying and killing sheep is a localised issue in parts of Ireland. It is caused by dogs entering a field where sheep and lambs are grazing, and attacking them. This can result in injury and death to livestock.
As an annual animal welfare issue, it garners local and national media headlines, but no humane solution to solving this issue has been devised and implemented.
The Control of Dogs Act, 1986, allows for the shooting of dogs worrying sheep by sheep farmers so long as there were no other reasonable means of ending or preventing the worrying.
Recently, the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Agriculture and Food heard from a National Association for Regional Game Councils (NARGC) spokesperson who said legislation should be changed that would allow the sheep farmer to subcontract the shooting of dogs that were in the act of sheep worrying to a local NARGC gun club member or to a non-gun club licensed firearm holder.
The thinking is that the sheep farmer might not have the capacity to shoot the dogs. We believe the NARGC proposal is a Trojan horse. The offer to shoot dogs worrying sheep is a ruse to obtain access to private land which is becoming more and more difficult as landowners are rejecting shooting and embracing the value of wildlife on their land.
Drawing on the lexicon of the sheep industry: the Irish shooting community can 'flock off' as the domestic dog will never be allowed to be added to the list of species that can be recreationally shot in Ireland. – Yours, etc
JOHN TIERNEY,
Campaigns director,
Association of Hunt Saboteurs,
Dublin 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
How Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 ago sowed the seeds of devastating conflict we see today
Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-prime minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that reverberate today. The emotional images of Jews being ripped from their homes by Israeli soldiers galvanised Israel's far-right and settler movements. The anger helped them organise and increase their political influence, accounting in part for the rise of hard-line politicians like national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. On Thursday, Smotrich boasted of a settlement expansion plan east of Jerusalem that will 'bury' the idea of a future Palestinian state. For Palestinians, even if they welcomed the disengagement, it didn't end Israel's control over their lives. Soon after, Hamas won elections in 2006, then drove out the Palestinian Authority in a violent takeover. Israel and Egypt imposed a closure on the territory, controlling entry and exit of goods and people. Though its intensity varied over the years, the closure helped impoverish the population and entrenched a painful separation from Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. Israel couldn't justify the military or economic cost of maintaining the heavily fortified settlements in Gaza, explained Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Misgav Institute and the Institute for National Security Studies think tanks. There were around 8,000 Israeli settlers and 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza in 2005. 'There was no chance for these settlements to exist or flourish or become meaningful enough to be a strategic anchor,' he said. By contrast, there are more than 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, most living in developed settlement blocs that have generally received more support from Israeli society, Mr Michael said. Most of the world considers the settlements illegal under international law. Because Israel withdrew unilaterally, without any co-ordination with the Palestinian Authority, it enhanced Hamas's stature among Palestinians in Gaza. 'This contributed to Hamas's win in the elections in 2006, because they leveraged it and introduced it as a very significant achievement,' Mr Michael said. 'They saw it as an achievement of the resistance and a justification for the continuation of the armed resistance.' Footage of the violence between Israeli settlers and Israeli soldiers also created an 'open wound' in Israeli society, Mr Michael said. 'I don't think any government will be able to do something like that in the future,' he said. That limits any flexibility over settlements in the West Bank if negotiations over a two-state solution with the Palestinians ever resume. Anita Tucker, now 79, was part of the first nine Jewish families that moved to the Gaza Strip in 1976. She and her husband and their three children lived in an Israeli army outpost near what is today Deir al-Balah, while the settlement of Netzer Hazoni was constructed. Originally from Brooklyn, she started a farm growing vegetables in the harsh, tall sand dunes. At first relations were good with their Palestinian neighbours, she said, and they worked hard to build their home and a 'beautiful community'. She had two more children, and three chose to stay and raise their families in Netzer Hazoni. She can still recall the moment, 20 years ago, when 1,000 Israeli soldiers arrived at the gate to the settlement to remove the approximately 400 residents. Some of her neighbours lit their houses on fire in protest. 'Obviously it was a mistake to leave. The lives of the Arabs became much worse, and the lives of the Jews became much, much worse, with rockets and October 7,' she said, referring to the decades of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel and the date in 2023 of the Hamas attack that launched the ongoing war. Despite the passage of time, her family still is 'yearning and longing for their home', she said. Several of her 10 grandchildren, including some who spent their early childhood in the Gaza settlements, have served in the current war and were near her old house. 'It's hard to believe, because of all the terrible things that happened that we predicted, but we're willing to build there again,' said Ms Tucker. After Israel's withdrawal 20 years ago, many Palestinians described Gaza as an 'open-air prison'. They had control on the inside – under a Hamas government that some supported but some saw as heavy-handed and brutal. But ultimately, Israel had a grip around the territory. Many Palestinians believe Sharon carried out the withdrawal so Israel could focus on cementing its control in the West Bank through settlement building. Now some believe more direct Israeli occupation is returning to Gaza. After 22 months of war, Israeli troops control more than 75pc of Gaza, and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of maintaining security control long term after the war. Amjad Shawa, the director of the Palestinian NGO Network, said he doesn't believe Netanyahu will repeat Sharon's full withdrawal. Instead, he expects the military to continue controlling large swathes of Gaza through 'buffer zones'. The aim, he said, is to keep Gaza 'unlivable, to change the demographics', referring to Netanyahu's plans to encourage Palestinians to leave the territory. Israeli former Major General Dan Harel, who was head of the country's Southern Command during the disengagement, remembers the toll of protecting a few thousand settlers. There were an average of 10 attacks per day against Israeli settlers and soldiers, including rockets, roadside bombs big enough to destroy a tank, tunnels to attack Israeli soldiers and military positions, and frequent gunfire. 'Bringing a school bus of kids from one place to another required a military escort,' said Mr Harel. 'There wasn't a future. People paint it as how wonderful it was there, but it wasn't wonderful.' Mr Harel says the decision to evacuate Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip was the right one, but that Israel missed crucial opportunities. Most egregious, he said, was a unilateral withdrawal without obtaining any concessions from the Palestinians in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority. He also sharply criticised Israel's policy of containment toward Hamas after disengagement. There were short but destructive conflicts over the years between the two sides, but otherwise the policy gave Hamas 'an opportunity to do whatever they wanted'. 'We had such a blind spot with Hamas, we didn't see them morph from a terror organisation into an organised military, with battalions and commanders and infrastructure,' he said. The October 7 attack, Israel's largest military intelligence failure to date, was not a result of the disengagement, said Mr Harel. 'The main issue is what we did in the 18 years in between.'


Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Journalists protest over press death toll in Gaza amid accusations of Israeli ‘media blackout' strategy
Journalists across the world have been holding vigils and protests in solidarity with colleagues killed covering the Israel-Gaza war amid calls for an investigation into the deliberate targeting of reporters by the Israeli military . The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) estimates that at least 190 journalists and media workers have been killed since the Israel-Gaza war began in October 2023. Other groups put the death toll higher still, with UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric saying on Monday that 242 journalists have been killed. ' Israel 's media blackout strategy, designed to conceal the crimes committed by its army ... in the besieged and starving Palestinian enclave, must be stopped immediately,' said Thibaut Bruttin, the director general of Reporters Without Borders (RSF), which defends journalists and press freedom worldwide. READ MORE RSF has filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court and called for the European Union to suspend its trade agreement with Israel. Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif (28) was among six journalists killed in a targeted Israeli air strike last Sunday. The CPJ warned in advance that his life was in danger. Israel's military claimed Mr al-Sharif was the head of a Hamas military cell, though it did not provide convincing evidence to support the allegation which was previously rejected by the journalist before his death. A journalist holds a picture of Palestinian journalist and Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif who was killed by Israel's military in what it described as a targeted strike. Photograph: EPA On July 20th, Mr al-Sharif broke down in tears when a woman collapsed from hunger as he reported on widespread starvation in Gaza City. Israel, which says it controls about 75 per cent of the Gaza Strip , is aiming to take full control of Gaza City, relocating its one million residents further south. CPJ regional director Sara Qudah said Shaif's reporting of significant developments made his journalism particularly vital. 'It is no coincidence that the smears against al-Sharif – who has reported night and day for Al Jazeera since the start of the war – surfaced every time he reported on a big development,' said CPJ regional director Sara Qudah. 'Israel is murdering the messengers.' In addition to Gaza, Israeli forces have been accused of targeted and killing journalists in neighbouring Lebanon. International lawyers say deliberately targeting journalists is a war crime, regardless of any affiliation, unless the individual is directly participating in hostilities. Members of the media gathered on O'Connell Street, Dublin, to express outrage at Israel's ongoing targeting and killing of journalists. Photograph: Chris Maddaloni On Monday, Irish journalists held an emergency protest by the Spire in Dublin. On Wednesday, UK-based journalists held a vigil at Downing Street, while others were organised in cities including Istanbul, Barcelona, Damascus and Tel Aviv. 'They are burying journalists to bury the truth,' read one sign in Tel Aviv. 'You only target journalists when the truth is your enemy,' read another. The Israeli military said it 'takes all operationally feasible measures to mitigate harm to civilians, including journalists. The IDF has never, and will never, deliberately target journalists as such ... The IDF directs its strikes only towards military targets and military operatives.' It claimed that 'terrorists' have disguised themselves as journalists. Israel bars foreign reporters from Gaza, apart from rare and controlled trips with the Israeli military. A recent petition , organised by the Freedom to Report group and signed by hundreds of international journalists, said it is vital to 'acknowledge the extraordinary work of Palestinian journalists inside Gaza'. 'Despite unimaginable danger, loss, and now starvation, they continue to document the war with extraordinary courage and professionalism,' the petition states. It said that not allowing international journalists into Gaza 'is the very playbook of authoritarianism: control the narrative, silence independent voices and sever the link between reality and public understanding.'


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Far-right Israeli minister taunts jailed Palestinian leader during prison visit
The Palestinian Authority has reacted angrily after footage was released of Israel 's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, appearing to threaten prominent Palestinian Marwan Barghouti during a visit to his prison cell. 'You will not defeat us, whoever messes with the people of Israel, whoever murders our children and women – we will wipe him out,' Mr Ben-Gvir appears to tell Mr Barghouti. 'You need to know this, it's been like this throughout history.' Mr Barghouti (66) has been incarcerated since 2002 when he was sentenced by Israel to five life sentences plus 40 years after a court convicted him of planning attacks in the occupied West Bank that led to the deaths of five civilians during the second Palestinian Intifada, or uprising. The Palestinian Authority said the comments amounted to 'state terrorism.' READ MORE 'We condemn the raid by extremist minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on the cell of commander Marwan Barghouti, directly threatening him. This is an unprecedented provocation and organised state terrorism,' a statement by the Palestinian foreign ministry read. Israeli media reported that Ben Gvir was visiting Tel Aviv's Gannot prison with Prisons Service Commissioner Kobi Yaakobi "to closely monitor the worsening of the imprisoned terrorists' conditions" — Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) Palestine Liberation Organisation executive committee deputy chair Hussein al-Sheikh also criticised Mr Ben-Gvir's remarks. 'Ben-Gvir's threat against leader Marwan Barghouti in his cell is the peak of the psychological, moral and physical terror used against prisoners, and a grave violation of international and humanitarian treaties and conventions,' he wrote on X. But Mr Ben-Gvir, who has imposed numerous restrictions on Palestinian prisoners since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th, 2023, rejected the Palestinian condemnation, saying he would repeat his statements 'again and again without apologising'. He referred to Mr Barghouti as an 'arch-terrorist' and called for his name to be erased, citing a Hebrew curse used for enemies of the Jews. The short video clip marked the first image of Mr Barghouti seen in public in over a decade. He was placed in solitary confinement at the start of the Gaza war . Relatives of Mr Barghouti said they were 'shocked by the changes in Marwan's facial features, from the fatigue and hunger he is in'. His wife, Fadwa, said she didn't recognise him. At the time of his arrest Mr Barghouti was the leader of the Tanzim militia, linked to the Fatah party led by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. Despite his imprisonment, Mr Barghouti has consistently topped opinion polls asking Palestinians who they would vote for in a presidential election, ahead of current Mr Abbas and leaders of Hamas. Although he is a senior member of Fatah, his support cuts across party lines. Palestinians have long sought his release, including through hostage deals, but Israel has so far rejected this. Hamas wants him set free as part of a ceasefire deal with Israel to end the Gaza war.