
Asylum seekers blocked from hotel after massive protests erupt
A council has won its fight to temporarily stop asylum seekers being placed in a hotel at the centre of angry protests.
Epping Forest District Council has been granted a temporary High Court injunction blocking migrants from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping after tensions flared when a man staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
At a hearing on Friday, council lawyers argued that Somani Hotels, which owns the building, had breached planning rules because the site was no longer being used as a hotel, reports the Mirror.
They said the situation 'could not be much worse' and insisted restrictions had to be put in place before the end of the school summer holidays.
But barristers for the hotel company branded the move "draconian", claiming it would cause "hardship" to those inside and insisting "political views" were not grounds for an injunction.
They told the court that contracts to house asylum seekers had become a 'financial lifeline' for the business, which was running at just 1% occupancy in August 2022 when open to paying guests.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Chris Whitbread, the leader of Epping Forest District Council, said: 'I am delighted. This is great news for our residents. The last few weeks have placed an intolerable strain on our community but today we have some great news."
He added: 'This is not the end of the matter. Having obtained an interim provision the next stage is for the council to return to the court and seek a permanent injunction.
"Home Office policy ignores the issues and concerns of local residents that the council represents. Today we have made a step towards redressing the imbalance and showing that local people do have some say, whatever the Home Office thinks.'
The ruling was handed down by Mr Justice Eyre at 2pm on Tuesday. He had earlier ordered that Somani Hotels could not "accept any new applications" from asylum seekers until a decision was reached.
Piers Riley-Smith, representing the hotel firm, told the court that "disagreement with Government policy" did not justify such a "draconian" injunction and said it would cause "hardship" both to the company and those living there.
Mr Riley-Smith said: "It is clear that recent protests have expanded far beyond the local community and have gone into concerns about wider ideological and political issues from those outside the community.
"Those particular ideological, non-community concerns are not relevant to planning."
The hotel was the focal point of a series of protests after Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl. Kebatu, who was housed at the hotel at the time of the incident, denies the allegations and is due to stand trial later this month.
On Thursday night, violent scenes erupted outside the hotel with eight police officers injured as protesters clashed with cops. Those hurt suffered cuts, grazes and hand injuries.
Footage shared on social media showed a police van driving towards a group of protesters and appearing to hit at least one of them.
Commenting on the footage, a spokesperson from the Metropolitan Police told the Mirror: "Met officers attended Epping, Essex on the evening of Thursday, 17 July, following a request by Essex Police to support with an ongoing protest and counter-protest.
"On arrival, officers were met with significant hostility from protestors, with police vehicles damaged and officers threatened with violence.
During their attendance, officers attempted to leave the immediate area due to safety concerns and were subsequently blocked in by the group of protestors using barriers. During this, a police van made contact with one of the protesters."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers
Chris Whitbread, who also leads the Conservative group at the Essex authority, said that failures to improve the system for processing asylum applications were also causing distress 'up and down the country'. His comments came after the council was granted a temporary injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been at the centre of a series of protests and counter-protests in recent weeks. The interim injunction granted by Mr Justice Eyre means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12, but the company could seek to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the judgment, Mr Whitbread said the injunction marked an 'opportunity for my community to start to return to normal'. A hearing on Friday was told by barristers representing Somani Hotels that the venue previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. Asylum seekers were then placed in the Bell Hotel again from April 2025. When asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Mr Whitbread said: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns. 'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns. 'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.' When asked what message he believed this sent from the Government, he said: 'If I am honest with you, I don't think they have actually got a plan. I think that is my real concern. 'We talk about one in, one out, well, that is a gimmick. If you talk about smashing the gangs, that was a gimmick. 'What we really need to see is a government with a serious plan to deal with this problem, and that obviously comes down to processing, where they stay while they are being processed, and actually speeding up the system. 'We are not seeing that at the moment, and that is causing a lot of distress to people up and down the country.' The hotel became the focal point of a series of protests after an asylum seeker housed at the site was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl. Mr Whitbread said that while later protests had been 'more peaceful, more bearable but still disruptive' to the community, he had 'never seen anything like what we have seen in recent times'. He said: 'I think what we have done as a council and what my brilliant team of council officers have done is actually take forward what the desire of residents is, to see the Bell closed, but do it in a sensible and proper way, and that is what we're doing.' Mr Whitbread also said that there had been 'no conversations' about the next steps for removing those currently housed at the hotel. Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open. 'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'

The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Epping hotel migrant ban is massive victory for the ordinary mums & dads who stood up to protect their kids
Plan B&B? THE decision to ban migrants from The Bell Hotel in Epping is a massive victory for the ordinary mums and dads who stood up to protect their kids. Their objections were never about race. 2 Instead, it was about safety and the suitability of housing dozens of young men — two of whom have since been charged with sex offences — in the small Essex town. The High Court injunction in the local council's favour — even if only temporary — should leave the Government's asylum hotel policy in tatters. It's a measure of the Home Office's desperation — and its callous disregard for the concerns of locals — that it attempted to hijack the case at the last minute. Ludicrously, Government lawyers tried to argue that closing The Bell would spark violence across the country. Yet the Epping protest has been largely peaceful. It was only Essex Police's abject handling of the initial demonstrations — and the decision to escort far-Left masked Antifa thugs into the melee — that sparked trouble. The Government must now quickly find a viable alternative to the hotels. Dumping large groups of illegal migrants in flats among families is another recipe for disaster. Instead they should be housed in temporary secure detention camps. None of this would be necessary, of course, if Labour ever got close to making good on its promise to smash the people-smuggling gangs. That seems further away than ever. Gloom loop WHEN will this Government start talking about actually SAVING some money instead of constantly coming up with ideas to take it away from us? In desperation to fill a £50billion black hole, the Chancellor is preparing raids on pensions and even modest savings as well as other massive tax rises. Now she is looking at whacking families with property taxes, too. Yet Labour are still bent on ending the two-child benefit cap which will hand an extra £20,000 to workless families for having more children they cannot afford. And there still remains no new plan to cut welfare spending set to hit £100BILLION a year. Worryingly, the markets are now reacting to this never-ending cycle of tax and spend. Liz Truss debacle.

BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Epping ruling creates practical and political pain for Home Office
The High Court judgment granting a temporary court injunction to prevent asylum seekers from being housed at a hotel in Epping will be a political and practical headache for the the Home Office has less than a month to find alternative accommodation for the asylum seekers housed at Epping's Bell hope – though perhaps not the expectation – is that Tuesday's judgement doesn't set a council has to return to court in the autumn and it is possible the temporary ban on housing asylum seekers will not be made the Home Office's lawyers have acknowledged that this is more than a local difficulty on the outskirts of Greater London. They have said that the decision could "substantially impact" the government's ability to house asylum seekers in hotels across the use of hotels has halved from 402 at their peak to 210 now but some contracts are in place until 2029, and pressure will grow on ministers to find alternative accommodation at a greater pace than although the number of asylum seekers in hotels fell by 6,000 in the first three months of the year, 32,000 this practical re-housing headache could escalate into a political migraine. The Home Office lawyers had suggested preventing the use of the Epping hotel "runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests".The Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has praised what he described as the bravery of the local community and expressed his hope that Epping would provide inspiration to others across the certainly is not advocating violent demonstrations but even a profusion of peaceful protests elsewhere would still require an increase in public-order are concerns in government that this, in turn, could draw resources away from other crime fighting Mr Farage's colleague Richard Tice has said Reform-run councils will urgently explore taking legal action similar to EppingThe shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he would welcome other councils following Conservative-controlled Epping's council in Hertfordshire, also Conservative controlled, has said it will be doing just that. There is a wider political cost to the government asylum seekers were housed in Epping's Bell Hotel under the last Conservative government – although moved out in 2024 – the publicity around the legal challenge has enabled opposition politicians to focus on the government's record on immigration and government has pledged to no longer use hotels by the end of this parliament, but questions are now being raised about whether they are proceeding quickly enough, and whether they are doing enough to prevent asylum seekers arriving by irregular routes in the first all this maintains the spotlight on what is a politically toxic topic for ministers.



