Watch Bord Na Mona to Meet Roscommon Farmers Over Rewetting Concerns
Bord na Móna is tasked with rewetting 40,000ha of peatland under European Union Nature Restoration Law commitments.
It had scheduled work at Mount Dillon, Erenagh, and 15 further sites to begin today (Thursday, July 24).
Independent Ireland MEP Ciaran Mullooly said that landowners were only notified of the start date a few days ago. However, the works did not begin today as planned.
MEP Mullooly and Deputy Michael Fitzmaurice have been engaging with the community on the issue and today visited local sites where flooding is expected if assessments and mitigating works are not carried out.
Following a public meeting last Tuesday in Ballyleague, Co. Roscommon, MEP Mullooly issued a letter directly to Bord na Móna's CEO, Tom Donnellan.
He requested the company to suspend all rewetting activities in Co. Roscommon and elsewhere until certain procedures are followed.
'Farmers are particularly concerned that perimeter drains, many of which are reportedly clogged with silt and overgrown, have not been cleaned out in advance of the rewetting," the MEP said.
"Failure to clear these drains could result in widespread flooding of adjacent farmland this winter, making remediation efforts significantly harder or even impossible in the winter.
'Farmers are not opposed to the principle of bog rewetting, but they rightly expect existing protocols to be honoured and vital drainage infrastructure to be addressed to protect their own land.
"Many of these drains are almost entirely blocked, and without action, the flooding of valuable farmland is inevitable.'
It's understood that personnel from Bord na Móna will meet the affected landowners next week to assess the land and the impact of the planned works on their properties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland fined €1.54m by ECJ for delay in writing Work-Life Balance directive into Irish law
The European Union's highest court has fined Ireland €1.54 million for delays in fully transposing the EU's 2019 directive on Work-Life Balance for Parents and Carers. The directive was due to have been fully transposed by the middle of 2022 but the legislation required to complete the process was not enacted until last year. The fine imposed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) is the fourth imposed on Ireland since 2020 for failing to transpose a directive in the anticipated timeframe following similar issues with regard to recent directives on anti-money laundering measures, audio visual services and electronic communications. The total fines imposed during the period now comes to just over €13 million. READ MORE The Work-Life Balance directive was intended to extend a number of entitlements to carers and parents with regard to time off work to allow them meet caring or support obligations, mainly to family members. Laura Bambrick, head of social policy and employment at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, said part of the problem in this instance was that the government sought to go beyond what was required of it in its legislation and this, combined with complications associated with the pandemic, helped to prolong the process. 'The directive had a number of elements to it,' she says. 'It introduced paternity leave, paid parents' leave, it gave all workers the right of five days unpaid care leave for serious medical reasons, if a close relative or friend fell ill. It also allowed parents and carers to request flexible working and it was those last two that were late being transposed. 'Ireland has tended to be bad at transposing,' she continued. 'Being late, blocking, diluting the transposition. In this case, though, the period for transposition largely coincided with Covid and Ireland was one of the dozen countries given warnings about late transposition. 'What was specific to Ireland was that our Work Life Balance Bill became a miscellaneous piece of legislation, a lot of other bits including improvements to breastfeeding breaks, the introduction of domestic violence leave and the right to request remote working for all workers were all added.' In a statement, the Department for Children, Disability and Equality said it takes its responsibilities seriously regarding transposition of EU directives but that 'there were particular circumstances which delayed transposition of this directive, leading ultimately to today's penalty' It said many of the provisions required by the directive had been introduced before this deadline. Among other factors, it pointed to the pandemic as having contributed to delays and said the decision to attempt to deal with the issue of remote working had added to the time required to pass the required legislation. 'Ireland has made progress on reducing delays in transposing EU directives and is currently ranked second best overall in the EU, alongside Finland, in terms of timely transposition of EU Single Market Directives,' it said.
Agriland
4 hours ago
- Agriland
Mullooly warns of 'risk' to Irish producers despite EU deal on Trump's tariffs
Independent Ireland MEP Ciaran Mullooly has today (Friday, August 1) warned that new US tariffs present a risk to Irish producers, particularly whiskey producers, despite a deal agreed with the EU. Mullooly said, as yet, there is "no clarity" on how US tariffs will be applied to EU exports and he believes as a result of this, Irish producers still face the threat of severe financial penalties. "We now see that, with the zero-tariff arrangement ending for spirits and a 15% tariff being introduced, the drinks sector faces an immediate and unprecedented financial hit, estimated at over €31 million based on 2024 export volumes,' the MEP added. Mullooly is now calling for "decisive government support" because of the threat posed to Ireland's pharmaceutical, whiskey, and food export sectors from US tariffs. "In 2024, exports of Irish-manufactured whiskey to the United States exceeded €410 million, according to recent figures presented in the Dáil. "This is a hammer blow to an industry already under immense pressure. "We cannot afford to sit back and wait until the sector disintegrates beyond repair. The time for emergency government support is now," he added. Previously the Irish Whiskey Association (IWA) the all-island trade body for the sector, had highlighted that a 10% baseline tariff rate applied to all US imports since April had caused "real economic pain for Irish whiskey producers". From today the tariff rate in theory moves to 15%. The IWA had also said that a "zero-for-zero tariff trading environment" between the EU and US had served the spirits industry well for nearly 30 years. In response to this Mullooly wants the government to introduce a tariffs-support package that would include "a rates rebate, job retention supports, energy credits, and the establishment of a stakeholder forum to directly address the challenges facing the sector". Separately the Tánaiste Simon Harris held a meeting today of the Government Trade Forum to "map out" Ireland's response to the agreement between the US and EU. The Tánaiste said that while the 15% tariffs rate applied on EU goods to the US provided "much needed clarity" for Irish businesses the government still needed to analyse the full implications of the EU/US deal.
Irish Independent
6 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Government could generate up to €118m in tax revenue by setting targets for remote job creation, advocate says
It comes as AIB last week announced that its workers must return to the office for a minimum of three days per week from January 2026 in a reversal of its Covid-era policy for non-customer-facing staff. According to Tracy Keogh, co-founder of remote working advocacy group Grow Remote, approximately 100,000 remote jobs are made available across the European Union each month. Ms Keogh said the Irish Government could benefit from a substantial increase in tax revenue if it proactively embraced the work-from-home model in its workforce. "People probably won't know that there's 100,000 remote jobs open across the European Union every month,' she told RTÉ's Morning Ireland. 'If we set a target to win five per cent of those, that's 5,000 jobs.' She added that, if we take the average salary of a remote job at €60,000, this would represent a significant amount of tax generated by Revenue. 'That would be 48 million in taxpayer income per year.' She argues that the establishment of a national target by a pro-remote working government will not just benefit the country in terms of collected revenue, but it would also protect isolated areas of the workforce in the event of a company exodus. "If one [foreign direct investor] pulls out of a rural or regional place, we have left that town stranded. If we have remote jobs coming into the market, that's 118 million from the taxpayer.' Ms Keogh pointed to fintech firm Revolut's recent announcement of 200 remote jobs in Europe for which anybody living in Europe can compete for. "We need a national target to land those jobs into Ireland.' The prospect of businesses mandating a return to the office could see an inevitable worker exodus to remote jobs based on the Continent in search of more flexible working conditions. "In terms of AIB and any other company who since Covid, has decided to pull people back in who were working brilliantly remotely [...] have access to those 100,000 jobs that are available on the market. Ms Keogh acknowledges pushback from employers on the issue, particularly in the realm of employee productivity. This doesn't need to be one silver bullet for every person and company across Ireland. However, she is urging them not to see the advent of remote work as a threat to profitability. "If an employer doesn't want to embrace remote, they don't need to embrace remote. "This doesn't need to be one silver bullet for every person and company across Ireland.' Addressing fears that a growth in remote jobs could result in remote employers competing with office-based employers for workers, Ms Keogh says there should be no in-between. "You should have people who are working in companies, or want remote jobs, working in remote companies. "Then for those companies like AIB, where they have branch staff who have to be on site and present, they will have that tension, and that probably was a factor in how they came to the decision to ask people to come back into the office.'
