US report criticises India, Pakistan on human rights abuses
The State Department human rights documentation for India and Pakistan was also much shorter and scaled back this year. India has been an important U.S. partner in recent years in Washington's effort to counter China's rise, although relations have been tense over Trump's imposition of a 50% tariff on goods from India. Pakistan is a non-NATO U.S. ally.
About India, the report said: 'The government took minimal credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.'
On Pakistan, it added: 'The government rarely took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.'
Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington had no immediate comment on the report released on Tuesday, which documented instances in 2024.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities. They point to rising hate speeches, a religion-based citizenship law the U.N. calls 'fundamentally discriminatory,' anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority Kashmir's special status, and the demolition of properties owned by Muslims. Modi denies discrimination and says his policies, such as food subsidy programs and electrification drives, benefit everyone. In Pakistan, Amnesty International says government authorities fail to protect minorities, including Christians, and use 'excessive and unnecessary force' against civil society voices and protesters. In particular, rights groups, the U.N., and Western governments raised concerns over the 2024 Pakistani elections. A U.N. working group said last year that former Prime Minister Imran Khan's detention violated international law. Khan remains in jail.
Islamabad says its elections were fair and dismisses allegations of rigging and foul play. Washington and New Delhi have not reached a trade deal, while the United States has reached an agreement in recent weeks with Pakistan. Trump angered India by taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire in May after hostilities between the neighbors following an April attack in India-administered Kashmir. India says New Delhi and Islamabad should resolve their ties directly without outside involvement. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 minutes ago
- The Star
China, India in talks to resume border trade after 5-year pause
FILE PHOTO: A worker rolls up carpets at an export house in Noida, India, on Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2009. For over three decades, India and China had traded locally produced goods - such as spices, carpets, wooden furniture, cattle fodder, pottery, medicinal plants, electric items, and wool - through three designated points along their 3,488-kilometre disputed Himalayan border. - Bloomberg NEW DELHI: India and China are discussing resuming border trade of locally made goods after more than five years, marking the latest step in a slow but steady effort by the Asian neighbours to ease long-standing tensions, according to officials in New Delhi familiar with the matter. Both sides have proposed restarting trade through designated points on the shared border, and the matter is currently under bilateral discussion, the people said, asking not to be identified as the discussions are still private. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Thursday (Aug 14) that Beijing is "willing to step up communication and coordination with India' on the matter. "Border trade between China and India has long played an important role in improving lives of the two countries' border residents,' it said in a response to a query from Bloomberg News. India's Ministry of External Affairs didn't respond to an email seeking further information. For over three decades, India and China had traded locally produced goods - such as spices, carpets, wooden furniture, cattle fodder, pottery, medicinal plants, electric items, and wool - through three designated points along their 3,488-kilometre disputed Himalayan border. The trade value is relatively small, estimated at just US$3.16 million in 2017-18, according to the most recent government data available. The trading points were shut during the Covid-19 pandemic, which coincided with a sharp decline in relations between the two nations after border clashes in the Himalayas killed 20 Indian soldiers and at least four Chinese troops. The planned resumption marks another sign that relations between the two neighbours are gradually improving after both sides took steps last year to end border tensions. China and India are set to resume direct flight connections as soon as next month, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday, while Beijing has eased curbs on some fertilizer shipments to India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to head to China for the first time in seven years in August to attend a summit of the Beijing-led regional security grouping - the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation - and hold a bilateral meeting with President Xi Jinping on the sidelines. The normalising in ties between the two countries come against the backdrop of deteriorating relations between New Delhi and US President Donald Trump, who has imposed a 50 per cent tariff rate on Indian exports to the US, significantly higher than the duties imposed on regional peers. - Bloomberg
New Straits Times
4 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
CK Hutchison's US$22.8 billion ports deal in focus as conglomerate reports results
HONG KONG: Investors will look for comments from CK Hutchison on the status of its US$22.8 billion ports business sale to a consortium led by US investment firm BlackRock when the Hong Kong conglomerate reports its results on Thursday. The ports-to-telecoms group will present its interim results at 5 p.m. (0900 GMT), offering analysts the first opportunity to quiz the management about the plan to sell the ports business since it was announced in March. Departing from its usual practice, CK Hutchison did not brief analysts or media about its 2024 earnings, released in March after it made public its plan to sell the business, which includes two ports along the strategic Panama Canal. Since the plan to sell 43 ports in 23 countries to a group led by BlackRock and Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping firm MSC was announced, CK Hutchison has faced a firestorm of criticism from China. In the latest announcement on July 28, the conglomerate said it was in talks with the consortium pursuing its ports business to add a Chinese "major strategic investor" to the bid, after their exclusive talks ended. It said changes would be necessary to secure regulatory approval in relevant jurisdictions and that it would allow as much time as needed to achieve that. Sources have told Reuters the investor was COSCO - one of the world's dominant, vertically integrated marine transportation firms. They said COSCO was seeking a bigger stake while the other parties in the consortium were keen to keep it a minority. While any stake by COSCO is not yet clear, an inclusion of a Chinese investor would alleviate China's national security concerns and have its blessing, the sources and other experts have said. COSCO did not respond to a request last month for comment. US President Donald Trump had earlier called for the removal of Chinese ownership in the Panama Canal. More than 40 per cent of US container traffic, valued at roughly US$270 billion annually, transits the Panama Canal. Shares of CK Hutchison eased 0.2 per cent on Thursday ahead of the results, versus a 0.1 per cent fall in the Hang Seng Index. UBS forecast last month a 6 per cent rise in underlying profit for the first six months, as ports and retail business growth and a weakening dollar offset the negative impact of oil prices. However, one-off losses, including from the completion of the 3UK merger, could weigh on the conglomerate's net profit. Morgan Stanley rated CK Hutchison "overweight" last month, citing potential strategic transactions, attractive valuation, and a strong balance sheet.
New Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Trump orders deregulation of space launches, paving way for Musk's Mars ambitions
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday easing regulations for the private space industry, including eliminating some environmental reviews, in a move likely to please his erstwhile advisor Elon Musk. The executive order, which said it aimed to "substantially" increase the number of space launches in the United States, was described by an environmental group as "reckless." Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has talked up several space missions including sending humans to the Moon and Mars. The Moon and Mars missions are planned to get a ride on the massive Starship rocket of Musk's private firm SpaceX. However, Starship has had a series of setbacks, with its latest routine test ending in a fiery explosion in June. SpaceX dominates the global launch market, with its various-sized rockets blasting off more than 130 times last year – and that number looks set to rise after Trump's executive order. "It is the policy of the United States to enhance American greatness in space by enabling a competitive launch marketplace and substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence" by 2030, the order read. The change could well benefit Musk, who has long advocated for deregulation of the space industry. The world's richest man was previously a close advisor to Trump before the pair had a dramatic, public falling out in July. The executive order also called on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy – who was at the signing and is currently NASA's administrator – "to eliminate or expedite the Department of Transportation's environmental reviews" for launches. SpaceX has been repeatedly criticised over the environmental impact at the sites where Starship, the largest and most powerful rocket in history, blasts off. The US-based nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity said Trump's new executive order "paves the way for the massive destruction of protected plants and animals." "This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas," the centre's Jared Margolis said in a statement. Musk's dreams of colonising Mars rely on the success of Starship, and SpaceX has been betting that its "fail fast, learn fast" ethos will eventually pay off. The Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in annual Starship rocket launches from five to 25 in early May, stating that the increased frequency would not adversely affect the environment.--AFP
