logo
Daniel Pearl's father blasts Pakistan Army for attending funeral of terrorists linked to son's murder

Daniel Pearl's father blasts Pakistan Army for attending funeral of terrorists linked to son's murder

Hindustan Times10-05-2025

The Indian Armed Forces carried out a precision military operation on Tuesday targeting nine terrorist installations across Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK). The strikes included hits on the headquarters of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in Bahawalpur and a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) base in Muridke, Pakistan.
Following the strikes, a photo surfaced on social media showing uniformed Pakistan Army personnel attending the funeral of three terrorists killed in the strikes. Standing alongside them was Hafiz Abdul Rauf, a US-designated global terrorist.
The photo drew criticism from Judea Pearl, father of slain American journalist Daniel Pearl, who was kidnapped and murdered in Pakistan in 2002.
Pearl expressed his outrage on X, writing, 'I wish these dignitaries could tell us: What exactly are you mourning? What role models you wish your children to revere? What have you learned from this man?'
Abdul Rauf Azhar, the brother of JeM chief Masood Azhar, was reportedly among those killed in the missile strike on Bahawalpur. He died along with nine members of his family.
Rauf Azhar's death has rekindled international focus on the Daniel Pearl case. Pearl, a journalist with The Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped and later beheaded in Karachi in 2002 by al-Qaeda operative Omar Saeed Sheikh.
Judea Pearl reacted to Rauf Azhar's killing, writing on X, 'Azhar was a Pakistani extremist and leader of the terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammed. While his group was not directly involved in the plot to abduct Danny, it was indirectly responsible. Azhar orchestrated the hijacking that led to the release of Omar Sheikh—the man who lured Danny into captivity. Sheikh was later sentenced to death but ultimately released from prison and kept in a 'Government Safe House.''
Also Read: G7 condemns Pahalgam attack, reacts to India-Pakistan conflict: 'Express our support for…'
At a press briefing, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri addressed the strikes and their connection to the Pearl case.
'Bahawalpur is the headquarters of the Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist group that is proscribed by the UN. Its leader Masood Azhar is a proscribed individual,' Misri said. 'The JeM was in some way directly or indirectly responsible for the death of Daniel Pearl.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Defence may be the wrong word': Shashi Tharoor points at ‘China factor' in Pakistan conflict
‘Defence may be the wrong word': Shashi Tharoor points at ‘China factor' in Pakistan conflict

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Defence may be the wrong word': Shashi Tharoor points at ‘China factor' in Pakistan conflict

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said on Thursday that 81 percent of Pakistan's defence equipment comes from China, making the country an 'impossible factor' to ignore in the conflict with Islamabad. Tharoor, who is leading a parliamentary delegation to the US to expose Islamabad's nexus with terror after India's Operation Sindoor, said that New Delhi-Beijing relations were making good progress till last month's conflict with Pakistan. 'I'm not going to mince my words, but we are aware that China has immense stakes in Pakistan," PTI quoted Tharoor as telling the representatives of think tanks at the Indian Embassy in Washington DC. Tharoor pointed out that the largest single project under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and that 81 percent of Pakistani defence equipment is from China. 'Defence may be the wrong word here. Offence in many ways……China is an absolutely impossible factor to ignore in what has been our confrontation with Pakistan,' Tharoor said. Shashi Tharoor told the gathering that India had seen good progress in its relationship with China after tensions since the 2020 Galwan Valley clashes. The Thiruvananthapuram MP added that during Operation Sindoor and the conflict with Pakistan, New Delhi saw a very different China in terms of its support for Islamabad, even on the UN Security Council. 'We have no illusions about what the challenges are in our neighbourhood, but I want to remind you all that India has consistently chosen a path of keeping open channels of communication, even with our adversaries. We have tried as much as possible to focus on development, on growth, on trade. Our trade with China is still at record levels. It's not that we are adopting a posture of hostility, but we would be naive not to be aware of these other currents around,' he said. The UN Security Council, on April 25, issued a press statement on the 'terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir' after the April 22 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The statement had condemned the attack in "the strongest terms' but did not mention The Resistance Front as Pakistan, which is a non-permanent member of the council, got it removed with China's help. 'The members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice,' the press statement had said. Shashi Tharoor was asked about the Chinese military equipment that Pakistan used in the conflict during an earlier interaction at the Council on Foreign Relations. The delegation head said that when India saw what the Pakistanis were attempting to do using Chinese technology, for instance, the 'kill chain' that the Chinese specialise in, where the radar, GPS, planes and missiles are all linked together and they react instantly, 'we simply did things in a different way. Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to hit' 11 Pakistani airfields, and "we wouldn't have been able to breach the Chinese-supplied air defences. 'So it's clear that assessments were taking place while the fighting was happening, and we were recalibrating our strategies in order to end as effectively as we were able to end,' Tharoor said.

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud was predicted by Barron Trump? Viral video clip that claims it all In a whirlwind saga that has captured the internet's attention, the long-simmering relationship between former US President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk has finally imploded—and the timing couldn't have been more theatrical. While political commentators, Musk fans, and MAGA loyalists pick sides, an old resurfaced clip from Trump's 2017 inauguration has become the unlikely centerpiece of the drama. The viral footage shows a teenage Barron Trump standing beside a visibly animated Elon Musk, and internet users are now convinced: Barron knew all along that this bromance was doomed. As the online world spirals into memes, speculation, and mockery, the underlying story has serious political and economic dimensions. From Trump's new tax proposal that threatens Tesla's bottom line to Musk's public fallout with the former president, the Musk-Trump divorce goes far beyond a simple social media spat. Here's a detailed breakdown of what led to the breakup, how Barron's now-iconic reaction became a meme-worthy prediction, and what this all means for the future of the tech-political alliance. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's breakup shocked the internet, but the warning signs were clear Elon Musk and Donald Trump were once considered unlikely allies. During Trump's presidency, Musk served on White House advisory councils and even appeared at several official events. While their ideologies often clashed—Musk being a vocal supporter of sustainable energy and Trump known for climate skepticism—the mutual benefits of their relationship were clear. Trump got to flaunt a high-profile tech billionaire's approval, while Musk hoped to influence infrastructure and space policy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Despite moments of public camaraderie, friction was always bubbling beneath the surface. Musk resigned from Trump's advisory council in 2017 over the US withdrawal from the Paris climate accord. Still, their interactions remained largely civil—until now. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud explodes over brutal tax bill The conflict erupted in earnest when Trump, eyeing a 2024 comeback and eager to boost traditional US industries, introduced a tax overhaul that would cut federal subsidies benefiting electric vehicle makers like Tesla. Musk didn't take it lightly. Calling the legislation a "disgusting abomination" in a series of X (formerly Twitter) posts, Musk accused Trump of sabotaging America's clean energy future. 'This bill is a disaster for innovation. Subsidies cut, investment threatened. The real loser is America,' Musk posted on X. Trump, never one to back down, fired back at a campaign rally in Ohio: 'Elon Musk, great guy when he needed the government's help. Now he cries when the help stops. Sad!' And with that, the bromance publicly combusted. Barron Trump's old clip goes viral In the midst of this drama, a 2017 clip of Barron Trump and Elon Musk at the US Capitol surfaced and quickly went viral. While Musk can be seen excitedly clapping and reacting with animated enthusiasm—especially after Trump vowed to plant the American flag on Mars—Barron stood beside him, calm, unimpressed, and possibly even irritated. The moment passed unnoticed at the time. But in hindsight, internet detectives are convinced that Barron's demeanor foreshadowed the eventual falling out. Barron Trump and Elon Musk Social media reacts: 'Barron Knew!' The reactions on X were instant and hilarious. Users began to speculate whether Barron was always aware of the inevitable rift between his father and Musk. 'Barron knew this was coming. He saw through Musk from day one,' one user wrote. Another joked, 'It's giving 'Attack on Titan' energy. Barron saw it all from the beginning like Eren Yeager.' Someone posted alongside a clip, 'Elon is the over-excited class clown. Barron is the quiet kid who's already judging everyone's future.' Some users went further, suggesting the contrast between Musk's chaotic energy and Barron's composed demeanor was symbolic of the changing tides in Republican politics—young conservatives showing less enthusiasm for tech billionaires. Political implications of the Musk-Trump split Trump's proposed tax cuts are part of a broader economic agenda that appears to favor fossil fuels and heavy industry—policies directly at odds with Musk's clean energy empire. With tax breaks for EVs on the chopping block, Tesla could see a sharp decline in demand in the US market. Adding fuel to the fire, right-wing voices aligned with Trump have begun to question Musk's immigration status. Musk, originally from South Africa, has US citizenship but critics have now raised alarms over his past visas and green card process, accusing him of benefiting from 'elite favoritism.' 'We're looking into all foreign influences. No one gets a pass. Not even Elon,' one Trump ally said on Fox News. This prompted more outrage from Musk's side, with allies claiming that Trump is targeting him because he no longer 'bends the knee.' What did Barron Trump know It's hard to tell whether Barron Trump was merely tired or genuinely unimpressed with Musk. But that hasn't stopped netizens from turning him into a prophetic icon. 'Barron looked like he was already writing the breakup tweet in his head,' one X user quipped. Others interpreted his serious expression as a sign of maturity and a deeper understanding of the political theater unfolding around him. Also read | Elon Musk is an illegal alien...': Donald Trump is urged by former White House official to deport Musk immediately AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more
How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more

New Indian Express

time32 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more

VATICAN CITY: The world's smallest country has a big budget problem. The Vatican doesn't tax its residents or issue bonds. It primarily finances the Catholic Church's central government through donations that have been plunging, ticket sales for the Vatican Museums, as well as income from investments and an underperforming real estate portfolio. The last year the Holy See published a consolidated budget, in 2022, it projected 770 million euros ($878 million), with the bulk paying for embassies around the world and Vatican media operations. In recent years, it hasn't been able to cover costs. That leaves Pope Leo XIV facing challenges to drum up the funds needed to pull his city-state out of the red. Withering donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion 'according to the resources of their dioceses.' US bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store