Tees Valley to scrap public questions at meetings
A regional authority has been accused of "removing citizen's rights" with a change to prevent the public from submitting questions ahead of meetings.The current system of sending questions to the Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) and having them answered by officers is set to be scrapped at a meeting later.A cabinet report said the TVCA's plan to introduce a Question Time with the Mayor, Lord Ben Houchen, in May will allow the "public participation protocol" to be removed from its constitution.The report states where there is "legitimate question to answer, it is important that TVCA does so", but claims the current protocol is an ineffective use of resources.
The Conservative mayor plans to host in-person Question Time events twice a year and participate in a monthly local radio phone-in.But Ray Casey, a member of the Teesside Resistance group which opposes Houchen, said it "appears to be an attempt to reduce public scrutiny of the TVCA".He claimed that, under the new proposed system, people would not be guaranteed to have access to Houchen in order to ask questions, some could be vetted to "avoid difficult ones" and it was also "highly unlikely" the mayor would be able to answer detailed questions.
'Public money'
At a meeting last year, TVCA's chief legal officer Emma Simson said officers had worked through the night in advance of a meeting in an attempt to answer submitted questions.A cabinet report, to be considered by TVCA cabinet members, said: "Where there is a legitimate question to answer, it is important that TVCA does so, but currently hours of officer time are being used pointing to readily available resources, reducing capacity. "TVCA believes this is not an effective use of public money and resources."According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the report goes on to say removing the public participation protocol is "both proportionate and reflects the approach taken by other combined authorities that already have in place a mayor's Question Time".Mr Casey said that, rather than "removing our rights as citizens", the TVCA could have sought to increase the capacity available to deal "quickly and effectively" with any questions coming in.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Winter Fuel Payments details of who is eligible confirmed
The payment, worth up to £300, will return for millions this winter, the Chancellor has announced. To be eligible for the winter fuel allowance, a person will need to have reached state pension age by the week starting September 15 this year. Devolved authorities in Scotland and Northern Ireland will each receive a funding uplift so they too can meet the new threshold. Payments will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically Those with an income above this threshold will also receive the payment, but it will then be reclaimed from them in tax. Pensioners who do not want to receive the payment will be able to opt out, according to the Treasury. The decision to limit the winter fuel payment to only those who claimed pension credit was one of Labour's first acts in Government, aimed at balancing what was described as a £22 billion 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. But Sir Keir Starmer announced there would be a partial U-turn on the policy in May, after it was thought to have contributed to Labour's drubbing in the local elections. The Treasury claims the new arrangement will cost £1.25 billion in England and Wales, while means-testing winter fuel will save the taxpayer £450 million. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. 'It is also right that we continue to means test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the winter fuel payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. NEWS. Winter Fuel Payment to be reinstated for all State Pensioners this winter, but then clawed back via tax system for all who earn over £35,000 (roughly average earnings). This is a big improvement. Full instant analysis video coming with all the details in a minute.… — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 9, 2025 'This will mean over three-quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' Some two million pensioners who earn more than £35,000 will see their winter fuel payments clawed back via the taxman, the Treasury estimates. Kemi Badenoch, Leader of the Opposition, claimed the Prime Minister had 'scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making'. The Conservative leader added: 'I repeatedly challenged him to reverse his callous decision to withdraw winter fuel payments, and every time Starmer arrogantly dismissed my criticisms. hr /> Recommended reading: What is the energy price cap and does it need a smart meter? 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The Prime Minister should now apologise for his terrible judgment.' Liberal Democrat Leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Finally the Chancellor has listened to the Liberal Democrats and the tireless campaigners in realising how disastrous this policy was, but the misery it has caused cannot be overstated. 'Countless pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating all whilst the Government buried its head in the sand for months on end, ignoring those who were really suffering. 'We will now study the detail of this proposal closely to make sure those who need support actually get that support. The pain they went through this winter cannot be for nothing.'
ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
Government pledges £14bn towards Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk ahead of Spending Review
The government has confirmed a £14.2bn investment to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant - but still cannot confirm the project is fully funded. Ministers claim the reactor - the third to be built on the Suffolk coast - will create 10,000 jobs, 1,500 apprenticeships, and generate enough "clean" energy to power millions of homes. It will be part of a "golden age of clean energy abundance" which will pave the way for household bills and help tackle the climate crisis, according to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. But the government has had to stop short of issuing a "Final Investment Decision", which can only be given once full investment has been secured. Opponents insist the government "will come to regret" this latest backing for Sizewell C, claiming the project "will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent", comparing it to Hinkley Point C, the nuclear plant under construction in Somerset. Sizewell, which sits just a few miles south of celebrity hotspot Southwold and borders the former Springwatch base at RSPB Minsmere, was first identified as a potential site for a new plant back in 2009. The project was granted development consent by the then-Conservative government in July 2022 and Sir Keir Starmer made a further £5.5bn available to the project last August. Preparatory work has already been started by French energy firm EDF and contracts worth around £330m have already been signed with local companies. The government said Tuesday's announcement would end "years of delay and uncertainty". "We will not accept the status quo of failing to invest in the future and energy insecurity for our country," said Mr Miliband. "We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. "This is the government's clean energy mission in action - investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security." The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.'But with an estimated cost of at least £20bn - and some experts predicting it could exceed £40bn - EDF continues to seek investors in the project. The government said it expected to issue a Final Investment Decision in the summer. Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, said: "There still appears to be no Final Investment Decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2bn in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. "Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? "Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark two." No new nuclear plant has opened in the UK since 1995, with all of the existing fleet - except Sizewell B - likely to be phased out by the early 2030s. The reactor at Hinkley Point in Somerset is thought to be five years behind its original target - with an estimated end date of 2031 - and many billions of pounds over budget.
South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Councillor parked illegally in Chepstow to have manicure
It was claimed in January drivers have been parking 'where and when they want' in Chepstow while Monmouthshire County Council admitted it has struggled to enforce a parking restriction on the High Street. Councillor Lisa Dymock has now been criticised for parking on St Mary Street which only vehicles making deliveries are entitled to enter. The councillor said she had parked on St Mary Street to have a nail repaired at a local salon and thought she had only slightly overstayed a time restriction. Business owner Lisset Burrett said she was angered to discover a four by four parked against the window of her ice cream shop, Colin's, on St Mary Street on Saturday, June 7 belonged to a local councillor. Cllr Lisa Dymock's car parked on St Mary's Street. Photo supplied The ice cream shop boss claimed the councillor had shown a disregard for parking restrictions and businesses on the high street and said: 'We must pay for our parking while county councillors with scant regard for the businesses trying to survive here are above the law.' MS welcomes continuation of free parking in Monmouthshire Controversial lorry ban on Severn Bridge 'unenforceable' without ANPR cameras Cllr Dymock, who represents Portskewett on the outskirts of Chepstow, acknowledged she had parked on St Mary Street. She said: 'I stayed over a little bit longer than I anticipated, that's all. I was 10 minutes over.' She said she understood parking is permitted during set times and said: 'That street is always packed with cars.' The Conservative councillor said she had only thought she would be in the nail salon for some 10 or 15 minutes and added: 'Lots of people park on St Mary Street, at all different hours.' She said she had also apologised, at the ice cream parlour, after being asked to move her car at around 10.45am on Saturday, and also said she supports local businesses. Cllr Lisa Dymock Vehicles are only allowed on St Mary Street for loading and that is restricted to between 7am and 10.30am, and for two and a half hours in the evening, from 4.30pm to 7pm. A sign at the entrance to St Mary Street states it is a pedestrian zone and no vehicles are allowed from 10.30am to 4.30pm and from 7pm to 7am. Loading allows domestic and commercial drivers to load and unload goods or waste but doesn't permit drivers to park to go shopping or for extended periods. Ms Burrett has also written to Monmouthshire County Council to ask why bollards previously installed to prevent access aren't in use. She said: 'I decided to rent a building on this street because it is pedestrianised; I have opened up an ice cream parlour and naturally children are frequent visitors. 'I chose this location due to its safe nature for the children who visit. However cars constantly drive along St Mary Street throughout the day. Cars daily park outside my premises, blocking the view of the shop and at times the entrance.' Cabinet member, and Chepstow Labour councillor, Paul Griffiths has told Ms Burrett he has raised the issue of how the restriction on vehicles could be enforced but said, in an email, the previous 'volunteer based movement of bollards proved unsustainable'. In January Cllr Griffiths compared parking in Chepstow to the 'wild west' and said: 'Chepstow residents tell me they feel they are living in the sort of lawless conditions you would have found in the American wild west. 'Motorists appear to be parking where they want, how they want without apparent restriction.'
