Investors, Including Indians, Lose Millions As Dubai Firm Vanishes Overnight
A UAE-based brokerage firm vanished overnight, taking millions of dirhams from investor funds. Until last month, Gulf First Commercial Brokers had two office spaces in Capital Golden Tower in Dubai's Business Bay, from where its around 40 employees relentlessly cold-called investors with forex offers, according to a report by The Khaleej Times.
Now, both office spaces have been abandoned, with floors covered in dust, phone wires ripped, and millions in investor funds gone without explanation.
"They (firm management) returned the keys, cleared everything out, and left like they were in a hurry," a security guard at Capital Golden Tower told the publication.
"Now we have people coming daily asking about them," he added.
Indian Among Defrauded
Among the scores of investors who were left in limbo are Kerala expats Mohammad and Fayaz Poyyl, who invested $75,000 between them with Gulf First Commercial Bankers.
"I came here looking for answers, but there's nothing, no one. Just empty offices. We called every number, but no one responded. It's like they never existed," said Poyyl, who went to the firm's office in Capital Golden Tower.
Another Indian investor, Sanjiv, said that Gulf First Commercial Brokers aggressively pushed clients toward Sigma-One Capital -- an unregulated online platform. He said the brokerage firm guaranteed safe returns and repeatedly assured innocent investors to convince them to invest their life savings.
Mohammad, who had invested $50,000 with the firm, said that the company staff used the names Gulf First and Sigma-One interchangeably, claiming they were the same operation.
Most of the investors said they were convinced to put their money into the firm purely through phone conversations. "My relationship manager convinced me to make an initial deposit of $1,000. Over time, I was pressured into adding more funds, lured by the illusion of smooth trading and early profits," Poyyl recalled.
Police Complaint Filed
Police have filed a complaint against both firms--Gulf First and Sigma-One. Investigations into them revealed that Sigma-One Capital operates without authorisation from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) or the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA).
The company claimed it had a registration in St. Lucia in the Caribbean and had a Bur Dubai office in Musalla Tower, but no such office exists. In fact, the probe found that there are no records of the company ever operating there.
Familiar Playbook
The scam follows a familiar pattern seen in earlier fraud cases in the UAE, where residents lost millions to dubious platforms like DuttFx and EVM Prime. The common factor in all these frauds was that all were promoted through cold calls, promising "secure trading environments".
Victims would max out credit cards or take loans, only to discover the companies' Dubai offices were fictional.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit
Reuters A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?'The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's say minors can access gun content on InstagramMeta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.''They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022.'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.'Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. "The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all," Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.'Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post.'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. ... They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.'The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus adds Rajnikanth fan to script India AI-commerce play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India
Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
Seafood exporters seek Centre's help
Bhimavaram: The Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI) has appealed to the Central government for financial assistance, stating that the industry is facing a severe crisis due to a recent 25% tariff imposed by the United States. A delegation led by Union Minister of State for Steel and Heavy Industries Bhupatiraju Srinivasa Varma met Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman at Parliament on Tuesday to submit a memorandum. The delegation included SEAI President Pavan Kumar, CEO Dr Raghavan, National Committee members I Gangaram and Poojitha, along with MPs Sana Satish Babu and Beeda Masthan Rao. According to Pavan Kumar, the new 25% tariff, combined with existing countervailing duty (CVD) and anti-dumping duties, has burdened Indian exporters with an additional cost of nearly 35%. This has led to a drastic decline in exports to the US and threatens the livelihoods of an estimated 2.8 crore people, including fishermen, farmers, and processing unit workers. India is the world's second-largest seafood exporter, with exports reaching $8 billion in the fiscal year 2023-24. The US market alone accounts for 25% of this total. The SEAI expressed concern that the new tariffs would severely impact exports to the US, affecting not only exporters but also millions of aqua farmers, processing and packaging workers, and transport personnel. It is estimated that around 25 lakh people nationwide will be directly or indirectly affected by this crisis. To overcome the crisis, the SEAI has submitted several proposals to the government. They urged the government to provide soft loans at a low interest rate (below 5%) to exporters, similar to the relief provided during the COVID-19 pandemic, extend export-related credit facilities for all seafood exporters for up to 240 days, offer 8% financial assistance on the FOB (Free On Board) value of exports to the US and an additional 2% assistance for exports to other countries, and announce special financial aid for small and medium-sized aqua farmers to protect them from losses. The SEAI is hopeful that implementing these measures will help the industry stabilise and protect the livelihoods of the 2.8 crore people dependent on it. Pavan Kumar stated that the finance minister listened attentively to their concerns and assured them that the government would review the situation and take appropriate action. Pavan Kumar stated that they also met Andhra Pradesh Minister for Human Resources Nara Lokesh, who was currently in Delhi, and submitted a memorandum requesting measures to protect the industry. The meeting, which took place under the leadership of Union Minister Bhupatiraju Srinivas Varma, was also attended by Union Minister for Civil Aviation K Rammohan Naidu and MPs Lavu Srikrishna Devarayalu and Ganti Harish. Since Andhra Pradesh accounts for the largest share of aqua product exports, the representatives appealed to both the central and state governments to take immediate, coordinated action to save the sector. Minister Nara Lokesh assured them that he would bring the issue to the attention of Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu and work towards a suitable solution.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Mangal Electrical IPO day 1: GMP, subscription status to review. Apply or not?
Mangal Electrical IPO day 1: Mangal Electrical Industries Limited's initial public offering (IPO) has hit the Indian primary market today and will remain open until 22 August 2025. The transformer maker company has declared the Mangal Electrical IPO price band at ₹ 533 to ₹ 561 per equity share. The public issue is proposed for listing on the NSE and the BSE. The mainboard IPO aims to raise ₹ 400 crore by issuing fresh shares. Meanwhile, Mangal Electrical shares are available in the grey market. According to market observers, the company's shares are trading at a premium of ₹ 21 in today's grey market. This means Mangal Electrical IPO GMP today is ₹ 21, which signals a listing gain of around 4% against its upper price band. Bidding for the Mangal Electrical IPO will begin today at 10:00 AM on Wednesday. During the Mangal Electrical IPO dates, bidders can apply from 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM. 1] Mangal Electrical IPO GMP today: According to market observers, the company's shares are trading at a premium of ₹ 21 in today's grey market. 2] Mangal Electrical IPO date: The public issue has opened today and will remain open until 22 August 2025. 3] Mangal Electrical IPO price: The transformer maker company has declared a price band of ₹ 533 to ₹ 561 apiece. 4] Mangal Electrical IPO size: The company aims to raise ₹ 400 crore, which will be raised by issuing fresh shares. 5] Mangal Electrical IPO lot size: Bidders can apply in lots, and one lot of the public offer will comprise 26 company shares. 6] Mangal Electrical IPO allotment date: The most likely date for share allotment is 25 August 2025. 7] Mangal Electrical IPO registrar: Bigshare Services Private Limited has appointed this public issue's official registrar. 8] Mangal Electrical IPO Lead Manager: Systematix Corporate Services has been appointed the lead manager of Mangal Electrical IPO. 9] Mangal Electrical IPO listing date: The most likely date for share allotment is 28 August 2025. 10] Mangal Electrical IPO review: Anand Rathi has assigned a 'subscribe' tag to the book build issue, saying, "At the upper price band, the company is valued at a FY25 P/E of 32.8x, with a post-issue market capitalisation of ₹ 15,500 million. In recent years, India's substation capacity has grown significantly, driven by rising electricity demand, creating a favourable environment for transformer manufacturing with consistent demand supporting production planning and operational efficiency. Based on these factors, the IPO appears fully priced, with a 'SUBSCRIBE – LONG TERM' recommendation." Ventura Securities has also assigned a 'buy' tag to the public issue, saying, "While Mangal Electrical's manufacturing units face underutilised capacity in some areas, the company is focused on increasing production efficiency, improving capacity utilisation, and expanding its geographical footprint to reduce its regional dependency. Its strategic focus on quality, technological investments, and strong customer relationships also provides a solid foundation for continued growth, particularly with the increasing demand in the power infrastructure and renewable energy sectors." Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or brokerage companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
