
Hospital in Hay River, N.W.T., has no doctor on site this week
The N.W.T.'s Hay River Regional Health Centre will be without an on-site doctor for nearly a week.
As of Monday, the emergency and outpatient departments at the hospital will only have two nurse practitioners on site. The Hay River Health and Social Services Authority (HRHSSA) made the announcement last week.
The authority said residents who visit the emergency room from now until Friday, May 2, will be assessed and triaged by nurses. And if they need a doctor, they will be connected to one working remotely or they will be medevaced to Yellowknife or Edmonton if needed.
Beatrice Lepine has lived in Hay River all her life. She said the lack of services in the community is worrisome, especially in the event of a critical incident during severe weather or if multiple people are injured at once.
"I just worry about big accidents or something like that, where you'd need a doctor to help in the ER," she said. "I realize there's shortage of doctors Canada-wide, but we're kind of at the bottom of list."
Lepine said her family has already experienced delays due to administrative gaps in the health-care system. Her brother recently missed a flight to see a specialist in Yellowknife because the clinic's paperwork was not processed in time.
Lepine said she is concerned that staff shortages in health care are becoming normalized.
"It almost seems like nothing's really been said or done about it," she said. "I don't think there's any kind of alarm over it. It seems like we are getting used to lower levels of service."
The Hay River Health Authority said in its statement that it's working to recruit more permanent doctors and offering incentives to attract more nurse practitioners.
However, according to Dr. Courtney Howard, an ER doctor in Yellowknife, the gaps are part of a broader staffing challenge affecting the health-care system across the Northwest Territories, and the current incentives are not enough.
She said there is no longer a financial incentive for physicians to work in the North and that makes it difficult to attract and retain permanent medical staff who are making sacrifices, such as leaving their family support systems behind in the South.
"When I signed on 15 years ago, we were going to make a little bit more in the N.W.T.," she said. "We could sort of justify to ourselves coming up there with all the student debt that we had.
"That no longer really exists."
She said the territory relies heavily on temporary locum doctors who fly in from other provinces. While she's grateful for their help in filling staffing gaps, she said this approach is financially unsustainable.
"They spent an entire day on the plane that we've paid for," she said. "They're going to be working for one or two days … we also provide them with housing as well as often a car.
"It's incredibly inefficient, from a health-care expenditure standpoint."
Howard said improving incentives for physicians and creating more flexible work arrangements could help improve the system. She also mentioned using AI transcription tools to reduce the administrative burden, something that's already being used in other parts of Canada.
"What we're hearing from people is that this is buying them hours back every day," she said. "They get to have lunch, they get to go home from the clinic at a reasonable hour and see their kids."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
RFK Jr.'s firing of U.S. immunization committee worrisome, Canadian scientists say
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his wife Cheryl Hines talk to guests before President Donald Trump speaks during a summer soiree on the South Lawn of the White House, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) TORONTO — Canadian doctors and scientists say Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s firing of an immunization advisory committee south of the border is worrisome. On Monday, the U.S. health and human services secretary — a longtime anti-vaccine advocate — said he will appoint new members to the scientific group that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about vaccination. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan, said Tuesday that the move will foster more false anti-vaccine beliefs, not only in the U.S. but also in Canada. 'It creates a culture in which anti-vaxx beliefs are more accepted and challenged a lot less. And also it creates an environment where there's an alternative to an evidence-based recommendation framework,' she said. Even though Kennedy's new appointments will make vaccine recommendations specific to the United States, any disinformation could also feed vaccine hesitancy among Canadians, Rasmussen said. 'We have a lot of the same anti-vaxx sentiment up here. Certainly this will at the very least empower (that),' she said. Rasmussen said current measles outbreaks in both countries show the consequences of disinformation that leads to parents not immunizing their children against preventable diseases. She said Canada could also experience some fallout if the new committee pulls back vaccination recommendations, because manufacturers may cut back on production and that could lead to shortages. 'There's a lot of potential for really, really damaging vaccine access throughout the U.S. and potentially around the world because the U.S. market has a big impact on what vaccine manufacturers are actually going to make and manufacture,' she said. 'There's so many ways that this can end up really badly for vaccination in general. And it really causes me a lot of concern.' Rasmussen said the firing of the advisory committee members is just the latest in a series of anti-public health actions Kennedy has taken. 'It's a death by a thousand cuts,' said Rasmussen, who is American and moved to Canada during the pandemic to work at the University of Saskatchewan's Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has already cut billions of dollars in research grants at the National Institutes of Health. In May, the administration cancelled a contract with mRNA vaccine manufacturer Moderna to develop a vaccine against potential pandemic influenza viruses, including H5N1 avian flu. 'It just seems that there is a top-down approach that views mRNA vaccines in particular — vaccination in general, but mRNA vaccines in particular — with distrust and is trying to dismantle that particular avenue of medical research,' said Dr. Jesse Papenburg, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist at Montreal Children's Hospital. Papenburg, who is a member of Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization but was not speaking on its behalf, said although the Moderna contract cancellation and the firing of the U.S. vaccine advisory committee members are two separate actions, they're both concerning as Canada tries to prepare for potential human-to-human transmission of H5N1. 'Both are potentially very dangerous when it comes to America's and the world's ability to respond to emerging infectious diseases for which vaccines could be a useful medical countermeasure,' he said. — With files from The Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content. Nicole Ireland, The Canadian Press


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
How close are we to getting a vaccine for Lyme disease?
Diana Moser has, to the best of her knowledge, not contracted Lyme disease, a welcome status quo that might be credited to the tick-repellant clothing she wears in the yard of her East LaHave, N.S., home, or to the insect spray she squirts on herself, or to just plain-old luck. Or, it's possible the good fortune is due to what some are hoping is a "game changer" in the fight against the disease, which is caused by tick-borne bacteria and, if left untreated, can lead to severe heart, joint and nervous system symptoms. Moser is one of dozens of people in Nova Scotia, and more than 9,000 in the eastern United States, Eastern Canada and parts of Europe, who are taking part in clinical trials for a vaccine against Lyme infection. "I think it's incredibly important to have," she said of a vaccine, noting she knows at least four people who have contracted Lyme disease, including one who has had it multiple times. "It's such a tricky disease, like when you get Lyme, so many things can happen. It causes joint pain, it causes inflammation. It really affects your system in a deep and abiding way." There were more than 27,000 cases of Lyme disease recorded in Canada between 2009 and 2024, the majority of those in the last four years. Actual infection rates are higher, however, because cases go undetected or unreported, according to the federal government. In the United States, over 89,000 cases were reported in 2023 to the Centers for Disease Control. In one study, researchers used insurance claims data to estimate that nearly half a million people a year may be diagnosed and treated for Lyme disease. The vaccine furthest along the research pipeline is the collaboration between multinational pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and European vaccine company Valneva SE, with Phase 3 clinical trials scheduled to run to the end of December. WATCH | How close are we to getting a vaccine for Lyme disease?: As recorded cases of Lyme disease rise, so do hopes for a vaccine 6 minutes ago Duration 2:37 A Pfizer spokesperson said if trials are successful the company could potentially apply in 2026 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for approvals to market the vaccine. There is no timeline for a similar application to Health Canada. The clinical trials have targeted areas where Lyme disease is endemic. Participants were chosen for their increased risk, including landscapers in tick-infested areas, people who do a lot of hiking or gardening, or who have dogs that routinely come home with ticks attached. Like all participants, Moser doesn't know if she has been injected with a course of the real vaccine and a booster, or simply been given a placebo, although she hopes to learn which it is once the trials end. Some, but not all, blacklegged ticks carry Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacteria that causes Lyme disease. The ticks are tiny, living in woods, shrubs and long grass, attaching themselves to humans or animals that brush past the vegetation and then feeding on their blood. When they bite, some of their stomach contents, including the bacteria, are eventually discharged into the bloodstream. In most cases, the tick must be attached for at least 24 hours before a person is infected. The Pfizer-Valneva vaccine prompts the human body to create antibodies to a protein on Borrelia burgdorferi, according to Dr. Joanne Langley, a pediatrician with the Canadian Center for Vaccinology, a Halifax-based group helping conduct the clinical trials in Nova Scotia. Ideally, if a Borrelia burgdorferi -carrying tick latches on to the skin, the vaccinated immune system will recognize the bacteria and attack and clear it, preventing Lyme disease, Langley said. "It could be really a game changer for how we try to deal with Lyme infection," she said in an interview, adding that half of people who contract the disease don't even remember being bitten by a tick. "It would be really great if we could be a little more carefree in the woods and just walking around our environment." Found widely in the eastern United States, the first colony of blacklegged ticks in Canada was discovered in the 1970s in an Ontario provincial park on Lake Erie. It has since become established in six provinces. In Nova Scotia, which has some of the highest tick numbers, populations are growing both in rural and urban areas, according to the provincial government. What has perplexed some people who ritually pick ticks off their pets or who have been infected with Lyme is why it has taken so long to develop a vaccine, especially given Lyme vaccines for dogs have been available for years. A Lyme vaccine for humans did hit the market in 1998, but was pulled in 2002 by the company that developed it, citing poor sales. Its reputation had been damaged by reports of adverse reactions, even though the FDA didn't find any evidence it was causing harm. Thomas Hart, a microbiologist who studies Lyme disease at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said the controversy "just chilled the whole field." "That's part of why we're only now seeing momentum again and bringing the Lyme disease vaccine actually through clinical trials in to market," he said. Hart has not been involved with the Pfizer-Valneva work, but said it's a "real promising vaccine" and it will be a "big deal" if approved. But it's not the only vaccine research. For instance, Hart said, scientists are examining vaccines aimed at deterring ticks from simply feeding on humans, protecting people not just against Lyme disease, but from other tick-borne infections. Another strain of research attacks the problem from an imaginative angle — small food-like pellets coated in vaccine to inoculate, of all things, mice. It's an idea conceived by Dr. Maria Gomes-Solecki, a veterinarian and microbiologist at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. Mice and ticks, she said, infect each other with Borrelia burgdorferi. Vaccinating mice attempts to break the cycle. That brings down the prevalence in an area of ticks that have the bacteria, which in turn cuts the risk of humans getting Lyme disease. "One strategy alone is not enough to control this disease," she said in an interview. The company US Biologic has been marketing the product for about a year and a half, according to president Chris Przybyszewski. Pellets can tossed using a scoop — at intervals at the sides of trails, for instance — or deployed near homes in small circular "stations." The product is aimed at homeowners, golf courses, summer camps, outdoor athletic facilities and pest-management outfits. The company is also working with governments to deploy it on public lands, he said. The pellets, shaped like acorns, don't provide any nutritional value and don't attract other animals, Przybyszewski said. But the mice will eat them, he said, and research shows they can cut the rate of infected ticks in an area by 75 per cent. There are plans to eventually bring the product to Canada, he said, with US Biologic likely to begin seeking approval this year or next. "I think it's just incredibly important that we pay more attention to this kind of concept, really focusing on products and programs that can make a difference and really create a new way of stopping infectious diseases," he said. For Colin Chase, a participant in the Pfizer-Valneva vaccine clinical trials, ticks are a fact of life, both as someone with a deep love of the woods, and as a volunteer search and rescuer who routinely clambers through dense Nova Scotia forests. Searchers take the full range of precautions, he said, examining each other for the tiny creatures, stripping down before they go inside their homes and throwing their clothes in the dryer and then the washer. Many have a favoured anti-tick spray they swear by. But even with those efforts, ticks can still sneak in and become embedded on the skin. If a vaccine is safe and effective, Chase said, why wouldn't someone take advantage? "Because otherwise the alternative is, 'Oh, I'm not going to go in the woods. I'm going to disconnect myself from the natural environment.' And there's so much beauty in the woods," he said.

Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, June 11: ‘The obsession with NATO's 2-per-cent defence spending target ignores another global responsibility'
Re ''Nation-building' projects should also reflect Canadian values' (June 10): As a registered nurse who has practiced in both the United States and Canada, I would never trade our imperfect but equitable universal health care for the ragged patchwork quilt of American health care that leaves many with no coverage whatsoever. We should act to strengthen the health care system that sustains us all. As a health care worker with a deep concern for planetary health, I also echo the concern that nation-building must be undertaken by investing in programs that make people healthier. Building more pipelines would add to our carbon emissions and worsen climate change, darkening our chances for overall well-being and a healthy future. Agnes Black RN; New Westminster, B.C. Canada accounts for less than 2 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions. While we should do our part to reduce emissions, I do not believe halting pipeline projects will prevent wildfires or significantly change global outcomes, especially while countries such as China and India continue expanding coal use. Pipelines are the safest and most efficient way to transport the oil and gas our society still depends on. Until a reliable, affordable, large-scale alternative to fossil fuels exists – and we are nowhere close – oil and gas will remain essential. Cutting off pipeline infrastructure wouldn't stop demand, just shift transportation to rail or truck, which are riskier and more carbon-intensive. Wildfires are caused by a combination of factors: lightning, human carelessness, forest mismanagement and climate trends. Suggesting that pipelines 'bring fires' seems to ignore the complexity of the issue and undermines serious conversations about adaptation, fire prevention and energy transition. Kevin Kobes Lloydminster, Alta. Columnist André Picard advocates selection of nation-building projects to strengthen medicare and extinguish HIV-AIDS, in accordance with the Canadian values described in Mark Carney's 2021 book Value(s). I agree, but first we should have major projects that contribute to national prosperity and economic resiliency, while respecting Indigenous reconciliation and climate change. Bottom line: There is a price attached to solidarity, fairness, responsibility, resilience, sustainability, dynamism, humility and even compassion. Virtue-signalling is morally vacuous and valueless until we enable ourselves to put our money where our mouth is. As Mr. Carney also says, we can't redistribute what we don't have. Ellen Anderson Summerside, PEI Re 'Carney lays out defence boost, says era of U.S. dominance over' (June 10): The obsession with NATO's 2-per-cent defence spending target ignores another global responsibility: foreign aid as a share of national income. If we want to build a safer, more stable world, we should prioritize lifting people out of poverty, not just boosting defence budgets. Countries such as Sweden, Luxembourg and Norway routinely exceed the United Nations' target of 0.7 per cent of gross national income for aid. Canada, though still falling short at between 0.34 and 0.38 per cent, gives a much higher share than the United States, which contributes less than 0.24 per cent, and that number is set to fall even further under the Trump administration. If NATO members matched defence rhetoric with real investment in global development, they would be far more effective in addressing and reducing the root causes of conflict and creating lasting security. I thought that was the end goal anyway. Am I wrong? Timothy Kwiatkowski London, Ont. Re 'Carney should know it's way too soon to invite Modi to Canada' (June 7): I thought Mark Carney was a Blue Liberal in the tradition of Paul Martin, but he is doing what Stephen Harper recommended recently regarding India. Narendra Modi's attitude toward Sikhs is part of his vision of Hindu chauvinism, which targets minorities. His repression in Muslim-majority Kashmir flows from the same vision. Mr. Modi must be mighty pleased that Canada seems to be disregarding not just his interference in Canada, but also his repressive policies and actions, including toward the press. Masud Sheikh Oakville, Ont. Canada's G7 invitation to Narendra Modi has understandably generated debate, given the allegations linking Indian agents to violence on Canadian soil. These accusations must be taken seriously, but it is important to remember the facts have yet to be determined in court. As host, Canada faces the challenge of balancing bilateral concerns with India and broader international responsibilities. The G7 is a forum for the world's largest economies and leading democracies to address global issues. India, as the world's largest democracy and fifth-largest economy, is an important partner in this context. By inviting Mr. Modi, I believe Canada is not ignoring unresolved bilateral issues, but rather recognizing they should not overshadow the G7's multilateral purpose. Canada is a strong supporter of multilateral dialogue and a rules-based international order. Engaging India at the G7 is consistent with these values and ensures the summit remains relevant and effective in today's interconnected world. Stewart Beck Former Canadian high commissioner to India; North Vancouver Re 'Industry Minister Joly signals action on steel dumping into Canada coming' (Report on Business, June 7): Please forgive my failing memory, but aren't these now foreign-owned steel companies – presently criticizing the government over the lack of tariffs on steel dumping to support the floor on domestic prices – the same group that, a few decades ago, admonished the government of the day for interfering with the global market by restricting foreign ownership of critical infrastructure industries? Stephen Halman Toronto Re 'Some university professors say AI is here to stay, so students should learn how to use it'(June 4): I thought the point of going to school and receiving an education was so students would be able to understand complex language, by looking up the meaning of words so they can converse in the terminology of their chosen discipline of study. In the future, are people going to walk around asking artificial intelligence to translate everything for them, because they are too lazy to learn the meaning of words, concepts and issues? Kim Patrick O'Leary Vancouver Re 'For Trump, the L.A. protests are an opportunity to wield power and spread fear' (June 10): It was 55 years ago when the Ohio National Guard was called to Kent State University where, on a U.S. campus peacefully protesting the war in Vietnam, four young people were shot dead by guardsmen. Soon after, Neil Young wrote: 'Tin soldiers and Nixon coming / We're finally on our own / This summer I hear the drumming; Four dead in Ohio.' Will the lyrics need to be altered? 'Tin soldiers and Trump coming / How many dead in greater L.A.?' Heather MacAndrew Victoria Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@