Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead.
This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also Housing Secretary (Peter Byrne/PA)
In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out.
The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided.
It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9.
Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email.
It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application.
Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal.
However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application.
Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule.
The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary.
Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant.
'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country.
'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's war on the middle classes has just taken a vicious turn
A government in severe distress always falls back into its comfort zone of issues it wants to talk about, rather than tackle the most important issues before it. And so, as the dog returneth to its vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly, and the Labour Party return to the comforting familiarity of fomenting class war. Another day when, instead of focusing on economic catastrophe, social meltdown and ever-more boat crossings, Labour are tinkering with their already-disastrous Equality Act to introduce a requirement for schools to consider the 'socio-economic' background of pupils when selecting children. This consideration is even likely to trump how far away a student lives from a school, whether they have siblings already there, and perhaps even whether they have disabilities. What these factors are is obviously not properly defined yet, as doing the hard work is too much for the brainboxes behind this scheme. Perhaps it will be based on the same policy surrounding civil service internships announced last week, where you can only apply if you are an ethnic minority or if your dad did a certain list of jobs when you were fourteen. Because being judged on who your father was is now, in this topsy-turvy world, something that the Left-wing progressives do, rather than the toffs. We already know the enormous, wonderful, inspiring, sacrificial steps that parents will take to get their children into the best schools. They take second jobs to pay for private school (much harder since Labour's ruinous and useless VAT increase); they will move house to be in better areas; they will even change religion to get into, for example, Catholic schools. So when yet another ladder of opportunity is removed and broken up for firewood, what will parents do next? Will they quit their jobs, sell investments, adopt a Cockney accent, all in a bid to contort themselves into Labour's increasingly narrow criteria of 'working class'? What then will happen to the economy? This will hurt children, it will hurt parents, it will hurt Britain. The same happened after the disgraceful attacks on the grammar school system. But Labour don't care. Theirs is a pathological hatred of middle England, the wellspring from which so many of them come, but bitterly resent. It is no more someone's fault to be born to loving middle-class parents than to be born to loving working-class ones, or unloving families or no family. As Alex Burghart, the Conservative shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said so well in these pages: 'Rather than dragging people down through social engineering, we should instead focus on improving equality of opportunity, so hard-working people can get on, irrespective of their class, colour or creed.' More broadly, this sorry little diminution of Britain is just the latest in a long list of examples proving that the Left, broadly defined, just does not understand human nature. The Rev Fergus Butler-Gallie put this perfectly recently: 'Liberalism believes that human nature can be bribed or oppressed or educated into goodness' and that this world view 'has been a catastrophe for the last 50 years of policy making'. Governments must work with the grain of human nature, understanding that parents will do everything they can for their children, and harnessing that rather than trying to deny it, or worse, decry it as evil and selfish. Some children will always be brighter than others, too. Again, a return of the grammar school system would allow those kids to thrive, regardless of their 'socio-economic' background. Capitalism works by harnessing human nature – socialism fails by denying it. No amount of moronic Labour policies will ever change that.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The Rushanara Ali scandal exposes Starmer's double standards on sleaze
One of the reasons Keir Starmer won a landslide at the last election was voters' repulsion at the endless sleaze and hypocrisy of the last Tory government. Starmer tore into Boris Johnson time and again over his abuse of power as prime minister and refusal to deal firmly with misconduct by his own ministers. That would all end when Starmer entered No 10, we were told. And we believed him. Starmer may be dull, he may have no great vision and precious few clear policies, we thought. But he was an honest and decent man who would drain the swamp that Westminster had become under the Tories. Addressing Parliament in 2021 at the height of the so-called 'Wallpapergate' affair, when Johnson was caught taking secret loans to refurbish his Downing St flat, Starmer called the prime minister 'Major Sleaze.' Labour MPs cheered as Starmer seized the moral high ground, accusing the Conservatives of being 'mired in sleaze, cronyism and scandal.' If he won power, he would have no truck with such corrupt antics, he said. Barely a year into Starmer's administration, it is depressingly clear that little has changed. We have already had the scandal of his wife taking thousands of pounds worth of free clothes from Labour donor Lord Waheed Alli, while Starmer himself accepted free football tickets, clothes and even spectacles. We have even had a Labour MP forced to resign after being caught punching a constituent outside a pub. But it has reached a new low with the resignation of homelessness minister, Rushanara Ali. The gross double standards that led to her exit from the government – forcing out tenants from a property she owned before whacking up the rent by £700 a month and seeking new tenants when new legislation she is responsible for would outlaw such action – is bad enough. The arrogant manner of her departure – and Starmer's refusal to condemn her in clear terms – is worse. She blithely declares she had 'at all times' followed 'all legal requirements' and had taken her responsibilities 'seriously.' She was resigning to avoid 'being a distraction from the ambitious work of the government.' No mention of an apology. Judging from his ringing denunciation of Johnson you might imagine Starmer would send Ms Ali packing with a stern rebuke. You would be wrong. From a cursory look at his formal reply to her you might think Ali was being promoted not punished. Starmer thanks her for her 'diligent work' at her department, saying it will have 'lasting impact.' How mistaken he is. The only impact Ms Ali's departure from Starmer's government will have is as a reminder to the electorate that when it comes to sleaze, Labour's approach appears little different to their Conservative predecessors. As the saying goes: 'Do as we say, not as we do.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Pakistan suspends mobile data service in restive province
QUETTA, Pakistan, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Pakistan has suspended cell phone data services for three weeks in the restive southwestern province of Balochistan in a bid to block communications among separatist insurgents behind a surge in recent attacks, an official and the government said. Separatist militants demanding a bigger share of profits from the resources of the mineral-rich province have stepped up attacks in recent months, particularly on Pakistan's military, which has launched an intelligence-based offensive against them. In an order on Wednesday seen by Reuters, the government said the services would be suspended until the end of the month because of the law and order situation in the province, home to key Chinese Belt and Road projects. "The service has been suspended because they (militants) use it for coordination and sharing information," Shahid Rind, a spokesperson for the provincial government, said on Friday. Officials said there are 8.5 million cell phone subscribers in Balochistan, Pakistan's largest province by size, which borders Afghanistan and Iran. But it is thinly populated, with just 15 million from a national population of 240 million. The news follows Pakistan's ban on road travel to Iran late last month, citing security threats. The insurgency by the separatists, who accuse Pakistan's government of depriving them of their share in regional resources, has roiled the province for decades. They primarily attack Pakistani military or Chinese nationals and their interests, but have recently started targeting senior army officers. The military said an officer and two soldiers were killed in a roadside blast set off by the militants on Tuesday. The attack targeting a vehicle was claimed by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the strongest of the area's insurgent groups, which has also claimed responsibility for several attacks on senior officers in recent weeks. The region is home to the Gwadar Port, built by Beijing as part of a $65-billion investment in Pakistan in the Belt and Road programme designed to expand China's global reach. Islamabad accuses arch-rival India of funding and backing the insurgents in a bid to stoke instability, as Pakistan seeks international investments in the region, a charge New Delhi denies. In March, the BLA blew up a railway track and took hostage more than 400 train passengers in an attack that killed 31, including 23 soldiers.
