‘Disgraceful': Workers slam Labor's compensation plan
Workers have rallied outside NSW parliament and in regional centres across the state, warning that the Minns government's proposed changes to workers compensation laws would leave injured employees without adequate support.
The protest, led by Unions NSW on Monday, drew supporters from the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, the Teachers Federation, and a broad coalition of workers furious over what they say is a betrayal by the Labor government.
Protests were also held in Tweed Heads, Wagga Wagga, and Newcastle as part of a co-ordinated campaign against the Exposure Workers Compensation Bill, which unions claim will gut access to compensation for psychological injuries.
Among the proposed changes is a plan to lift the permanent impairment threshold for psychological injury to 31 per cent – a move Unions NSW and the Teachers Federation say would prevent up to 95 per cent of workers from receiving damages.
There is also outrage over a proposal requiring workers alleging psychological injury caused by bullying, racial abuse, or sexual harassment to obtain a court determination before being eligible for compensation.
Sue Walton, an aged care assistant-in-nursing with more than 20 years' experience and a history of workplace injuries, attended the rally, arguing the changes would prevent people like her from accessing workers compensation.
'You'll be sitting at home without any support or any medical help through workers compensation if this Bill goes through,' she said.
'You get penalised when you're on workers comp anyway because you don't get your full wage, but now they want to take that away from every single worker. It's disgraceful.'
Retired union worker Kenneth, who spent 20 years in the manufacturing industry, said the proposed changes would undo hard-fought gains.
'To have governments breaking their pledge is not a good thing and this is a big issue for everybody,' he said.
'You have to assist workers, not cut their rights.'
He said anyone injured at work, either physically or mentally, knew how difficult it could be to access compensation.
'I've had lots of injuries in my time and it's always been a hard battle,' Kenneth said.
'We made some progress over the years and we don't need them to be stripped back; if anything, you need more help.'
Unions NSW secretary Mark Morey said frustration among workers was turning to anger.
'There is a growing anger around why (the NSW government) are doing this,' he said.
Mr Morey acknowledged the Minns government had made progress in other areas but said these proposed reforms were undermining its credibility.
'These sorts of fights detract from them being seen as a positive Labor government to a government that's fighting with all its workforce,' he said.
'I think they're getting a name for themselves of always fighting with their workforce.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
ACT Greens announce bill that would make institutions vicariously liable for sexual abuse by employees
The ACT Greens have unveiled a bill aimed at making institutions such as the Catholic Church, Scouts and sporting groups vicariously liable for the actions of those associated with them who have sexually abused children. This includes priests, Scouts leaders, and sports coaches who may have a relationship with the organisation akin to employment, even though it is not strictly an employment relationship. The move was prompted by a High Court ruling last year that found a priest, accused of child sex offences, was not an employee of the church, so the institution could not be held vicariously liable for his actions because that only applies in employment relationships. "I am deeply concerned that we are now seeing a situation where institutions that have had people abused in their care are now able to avoid responsibility because of this apparent lack of connection where people who were priests, coaches other roles, as part of these institutions, are now not seen to be covered by that organisation," Greens leader Shane Rattenbury said. The High Court case involved a man who was allegedly sexually abused by the family priest in 1971, during pastoral visits to his family home. The man was only five at the time. The priest was Father Bryan Coffey, who was convicted of offences against other children in the 1990s and has since died. The High Court ruling was a bitter blow for the alleged victim, who had won two Victorian court cases, which found the church was vicariously liable for the damage caused to him. In both rulings it was found Father Coffey was not an employee of the church but had a special place within the hierarchy of the church, which gave rise to vicarious liability. The High Court found that simply wasn't the case, and only an employment relationship matters. "My observation of having read the material from the High Court is that they were looking at the broader picture of vicarious liability, and its broad status in the law, as opposed to the specific matters of child sexual abuse," Mr Rattenbury said. "So the High Court was thinking much more about a range of corporate matters and the like rather than the specifics." Mr Rattenbury said his proposed law would target child sex abuse. Lawyer Alessandra Pettit, who was involved in the launch of today's draft law, says the real problem is for the victims. "We spent $370 million on a royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse and whilst a lot of the recommendations have been helpful, it seems to be a bit of a pendulum in this area that it keeps swinging each way," Ms Pettit said. "I am really really concerned about the effect of this on my clients. "You are dealing with a cohort of people who have already been abused as children by someone in a position of power. "To stand up in court is not an easy thing for anyone and then to have technical legal arguments take that away is really really difficult." Mr Rattenbury said the Council of Attorneys General was looking at the issue, but it was something that had to be addressed more locally. "This will not be a national response, it is one that will sit with states and territories," Mr Rattenbury said. "So my view is to move forward. "And the ACT can act as a template and a guide for other jurisdictions." Mr Rattenbury said he was hoping his private members bill would get some traction in the Assembly. "This bill is about ensuring victims have access to justice for the crimes committed against them as children and it's about ensuring institutions make amends for the harm caused by their institutions and the people participated and took significant roles in those institutions," Mr Rattenbury said. The bill will be presented later in the month.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Federal politics: PM leaves door open for further defence spending to boost capability — as it happened
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has outlined his priorities for his second term in office in his first major speech since his emphatic election win. Asked about whether Australia should heed the advice of the US and up defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, he says it's up to Australia to decide how much it spends on defence. The PM says he wants to make sure that every single dollar spent on defence results in "actual assets". Take a look back at the day's coverage.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Cruise passenger stuck in hospital after nightmare trip
What started out as a fun-filled holiday at sea turned into a dangerous nightmare for a man now stranded in a Darwin Hospital unable to get home to Western Australia. Peter Jackson and his wife Amanda set sail from Sydney to Fremantle on the Crown Princess and were having the time of their lives celebrating their 40th wedding anniversary until 63-year-old Mr Jackson fell backwards while re-embarking the vessel after ANZAC celebrations in Darwin. He suffered a bleed on the brain and was rushed to the ship hospital – but when the ship had to set sail, Mr Jackson was taken to Royal Darwin Hospital where he has since undergone two surgeries for brain bleeds. 'He was unconscious for two days and we were told he was in trouble, and to prepare ourselves,' Mr Jackson's daughter Chloe Moloney told 'We were told Dad was too unwell to be transported and he needed to be stable for an airlift. Once he was stable, an airlift was to be done. Dad came around and improved and was moved to a ward.' But for reasons unknown to the anxious family, the medical transport back to WA was cancelled. 'We couldn't understand why. Dad needs to be admitted to a neuro-rehab facility once a bed becomes available back home,' Ms Moloney said. 'Dad's speech has been impacted quite severely, he is quite hard to understand now. He also has issues with his right arm, and his high-level balance. Flying home commercially is not an option for us, with his condition.' Ms Moloney is desperate for answers and a solution. 'On Wednesday last week we were told that neither the WA or NT governments wanted to pay for dad to get home, even though he needed to be admitted to a neuro-rehab facility,' she said. 'They said we needed to pay to get him on a commercial flight. From the research I have done I'm sure this falls under the national health form agreement, where the national government pays or they split the cost. 'The Royal Flying Doctor Service quoted $80,000 to fly Dad home. Mum and Dad have premium Ambulance cover which covers Air Ambulance but the health fund advised mum that St Johns Ambulance in Darwin do the patient transfers,' Ms Moloney said. 'When called, St Johns gave mum a flat no, with no reason why. 'Mum had another quote that will provide a nurse on a commercial flight to sit in business class with dad and that costs $15,000. 'Where is she supposed to get all this money from when she has already spent thousands on accommodation so far to stay with dad? 'It's been a nightmare. We just want to get him home safely and get the ongoing care he needs,' Ms Moloney said. 'My dad is the most beautiful man. When he was of sound mind he would go out of his way to help anyone. Well now he needs help and we just can't get it.' Both the NT and WA Governments and the Federal Government have been contacted for comment. A spokeswoman for St John NT said 'this type of patient transport would need to be arranged by NT Health. If requested by NT Health, St John NT may facilitate the transport but we cannot initiate it.'
