
Twelve-day war: Impact of Iran's strikes censored by Israel
The next morning, the people of Tirzah Street emerged to the sight of collapsed buildings and cars crushed into one another – hundreds of metres of destruction. One 74-year-old woman was killed.
Just hours before Iran's strike on Ramat Gan, Israel had launched a surprise attack on Iran, kicking off a new armed conflict between the two nations. In a speech broadcast on June 1 3, 2025, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu justified the attack by citing the 'clear and present danger' that the Iranian nuclear program posed to "Israel's survival'. During the conflict, Israel killed about 30 Iranian senior security officials and 11 Iranian nuclear scientists. The Israeli army attacked more than 900 military sites, and between 800 and 1,000 Iranian missiles were destroyed on the ground.
36 Iranian strikes verified by the Observers team
The strike on Ramat Gan was one of the first to hit Israeli soil. Despite the Israeli strikes on Iran's military bases, Iran was still able to fire more than 500 missiles at Israel during the 12 days of the war, according to The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), an Israeli think tank with links to the University of Tel Aviv. While most of the missiles were intercepted by the Israeli defence system, INSS reported that more than 50 missiles struck the country.
The two parties, however, have had divergent narratives on the impact of the Iranian strikes both during and after the 12 days of the conflict. Iranian authorities bragged about their successes, claiming that they hit 16 strategic sites in Israel, while Israeli authorities minimised the damage caused by the Iranian strikes.
The FRANCE 24 Observers team identified and geolocated 36 different Iranian strikes in Israel using open source data and by cross-referencing both amateur and professional images. The images that we verified show large swaths of destruction in several residential areas, as well as evidence that strikes hit strategic and military sites. Even though Israel incurred less damage than Iran, our investigation reveals that major strikes did take place but were kept under wraps by Israeli censorship. During the hostilities, the Israeli army ordered Israeli and international media outlets to refrain from publishing images of strikes on or near military targets.
Silence around strikes on military sites
Thanks to amateur images leaked online, our team was able to identify four Iranian missiles that landed on or near Israeli military zones.
On June 17, an Iranian missile hit Camp Moshe Dayan, just a few hundred metres from the headquarters of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad. The camp, located in Ramat HaSharon to the north of Tel Aviv, is home to both Mossad and Unit 8200, which specialises in intercepting communications. An amateur video shows the impact of the missile on the camp, and photos taken on the ground that were published on Telegram enabled us to confirm that at least one building – a hangar – was damaged, though we don't know what the hangar was being used for before it came under fire. Three other missiles visible in the video hit civilian targets near the camp.
Despite the site's strategic importance, neither the authorities nor Israeli or international media outlets reported this strike.
It was the same story for a strike that hit the Kirya, a neighbourhood in Tel Aviv, on June 13. The Kirya is home to both the headquarters of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Israeli Ministry of Defence. While reporting live, Trey Yingst, a journalist with the US news channel Fox News, had just said that a building in the complex had been hit by an Iranian missile when he was interrupted by a man who told him, in English, to 'go back'.
The journalist asks his cameraman to turn towards another building. However, he is interrupted again, and the cameraman is forced to turn his camera towards the ground. The video isn't visible on the social media channels of Fox News, but it was copied and then shared online.
By examining photos and videos of the strike, our team was able to determine that the strike hit the Da Vinci complex, a 32-floor residential building, which is located right next to the military complex.
The way that information about this attack was reported in other Israeli and international media outlets also makes it look like censorship was at play. Israeli newspaper Haaretz waited until June 29 to mention this strike in an article – a full two weeks after the attack took place, even though the images of it had already circulated online.
We were also able to verify two other strikes that hit military targets thanks to data from the University of Oregon. One strike hit the airbase in Tel Nof, to the south of Rehovot. Another hit Camp Zipporit, located to the north of Nazareth.
Our team asked the IDF on August 1 if they could confirm that Iranian missiles had hit Israeli military sites during the conflict.
The army had not responded by the publication of this article. If the army does send a statement, we will update this article.
An oil refinery that has halted operations for several months
Additional Iranian strikes have hit strategic infrastructure for the Israeli economy. We identified that three Iranian attacks damaged energy infrastructure. Two hit and damaged an oil refinery in the port city of Haifa on the night of June 14. We were able to geolocate one of the impacts using images published by the press and those we found on social media. We were able to geolocate the other using satellite images.
If you compare an aerial view of one building located in the western part of the oil refinery on June 21 – a few days after the strike – with another image from December 2024, you can see that it looks like the roof has caved in, leaving the building's skeleton exposed.
After the wave of attacks on the night of June 14, Bazan Group – which runs the oil refinery – halted its activities for nearly two weeks. The company informed the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange that it wouldn't be back to full operations until October. It further reported that damage to the refinery caused by the Iranian missiles is estimated at between 150 and 200 million dollars. Three employees died in a fire caused by the attack.
Several million dollars of damage caused to a research institute
Another one of the so-called "strategic' Iranian missile strikes hit the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, south of Tel Aviv, on the night of June 14. The institute is ranked among the best in the world (outside the United States). It also has strong links to the Israeli defence industry.
The AP, quoting the Institute, reported that the missile hit two buildings. One housed a biology lab. The other, which was still under construction, was to be used for chemistry research. More than 45 labs were damaged, according to the Times of Israel. Researchers at the institute estimated the damage at hundreds of millions of dollars. According to several images verified by our team, one of the buildings hit by the strike was completely destroyed.
Residential areas in ruin
Out of the 36 strikes that our team geolocated on Israeli soil, 28 hit civilian sites. Some hit fields, beaches, and parking lots, but others caused extensive damage across the country.
The town of Rehovot, located about 20 kilometres south of Tel Aviv, was one of the cities most impacted by Iranian missiles. One strike on the night of June 14 landed downtown, damaging or destroying a number of neighbouring buildings. Drone images filmed a few hours after the impact by local media outlet News Rehovot give a sense of the scale of the damage.
Videos available on TikTok show the extent of the damage, including shops with blown-out windows and crumbled facades more than 250 metres from the point of impact.
Iranian strikes hit a number of residential areas in Israel throughout the month of June. A missile hit a parking lot in the southwest of Tel Aviv on June 16, tearing apart most of the surrounding buildings. speech broadcast on June 1 0, our team shows how we located damage nearly 300 metres from the point of impact.
3,500 people injured, 41,000 requests for compensation filed
Farzin Nadimi, a researcher at the Washington Institute who specialises in Iranian security and defence, says that civilian areas were among the targets of the Islamic republic.
'At some point, during or from the very beginning of the campaign, they actually intended to strike residential areas,' Nadimi told our team. 'You shouldn't forget that they consider all Israelis as enemies, enemy combatants.'
Nadimi says that these strikes may have been part of an Iranian strategy to negotiate an end to the conflict.
'They knew that by pressuring the Israeli civilians and by destroying the residential areas, they would pressure the Israeli government and the military to probably agree to a ceasefire,' he said.
The destruction caused by Iranian missiles to Israel had a direct impact on the lives of many Israelis. Nearly 3,500 Israelis were injured during the conflict with Iran, according to INSS, and about 30 people died. More than 41,000 applications were submitted to the Compensation Fund at the Israel Tax Authority. In Israel, these funds cover some of the damage to buildings and materials caused by war.
However, this damage remains minor compared to what Iran experienced. Around 935 Iranians were killed and more than 4,700 people were injured by Israeli and American bombs, according to INSS.
Blind missiles
Outside of the missiles that caused damage, our team also identified strikes that hit roads, parking lots, and even uninhabited zones.
For example, we identified one strike that took place on June 14 in the northern Israeli city of Tirat Carmel. A video of the missile falling shows that it hit a beach, located a few dozen metres from a road and 200 metres from the closest homes. It was a full two kilometres from the Tirat Carmel military base.
A missile landed in a parking lot in the town of Beersheba on June 20, damaging several nearby buildings and setting fire to a number of cars. A new military base, which houses the southern command of the army and a division specialised in cyber defence and communication technology, is just 300 metres from the point of impact. The parking lot is also close to Beersheba's so-called "cyber campus" where American companies Microsoft, IBM and Dell all have offices.
The Iranian authorities have not clearly communicated what they were targeting, so it is hard to determine their intentions. Nadimi thinks that the missiles that fell a few hundred metres from military and strategic targets lacked precision. 'While they were quite 'successful' at hitting residential blocks in central Tel Aviv, for example, they still lack precision to specifically strike a certain building in a military, security, or intelligence complex.'
When reporting on a strike that hit Soroka Hospital on June 19, Israeli newspaper Haaretz suggested that Iran might be following a strategy of 'ballistic terror.' This would explain the three Iranian strikes using cluster missiles. These weapons, used to hit a number of targets at once, hit buildings housing a school and nursery in southern Israel on June 20. There were no victims.
Strong censorship from the authorities
All of the strikes that we reported in this article were either partially or fully kept under wraps by Israeli military censorship. A Chief Censor in the Israeli military is tasked with limiting the sensitive information disseminated by both Israeli and international media outlets. Guidelines updated in May specify that information about 'the impact and results of enemy actions and attacks… carried out against the state of Israel' must be submitted to the Censor before publication.
Authorities doubled down on these policies after the conflict with Iran began. In a communiqué dated June 16 and addressed to all Israeli and international newsrooms present in Israel, the Chief Censor said that 'the use of drones or fixed-position cameras to capture wide-area footage around the impact site is strictly prohibited'.
On June 17, Israeli police arrested journalists from the Turkish Arabic-language channel TRT and the Egyptian channel Al Ghad TV who were filming the port in Haifa. Police also seized some of their material.
And while Israel has been trying to limit the spread of information about all missile impacts on its territory, information about strikes that damaged military sites is even more tightly controlled. In the same communiqué, the Chief Censor banned 'filming damage at or near military sites' and broadcasting 'the exact address of the impact location' in 'civilian areas near security facilities'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
Gaza: Stopping Benjamin Netanyahu's tragic escalation
By announcing on Thursday, August 7, his decision to deploy the Israeli army to occupy the entirety of the Gaza Strip, Benjamin Netanyahu set Israel on a path with incalculable and potentially tragic consequences. Not only for the one million residents of Gaza City, who could face forced evacuation to an unknown destination within an already devastated territory, but also for the Israeli hostages, now exposed to the worst possible risks, and for the Israeli soldiers drawn into a guerilla war fueled by the occupation. Not only for Israel, whose indefensible action would further deepen its diplomatic isolation, but also for the already faint hopes for a regional political settlement, which would be wiped out. The Israeli prime minister's announcement was not intended to pressure Hamas in ongoing negotiations. He has refused that route for months, fearing it would shatter his governing alliance. It must be stated clearly: Netanyahu's plan for a take over – imposed in spite of opposition from military leaders – is the occupation of a foreign territory and appears neither legal, nor legitimate, nor coherent. "Driving out Hamas" to guarantee Israel's security nearly two years after the terrorist attack of October 7, 2023, as the prime minister claimed? The rise and dominance of the Islamist militia in Gaza were themselves a consequence of the previous Israeli occupation; it is hard to see how another takeover by Israel would eliminate them. To occupy the Gaza Strip without wanting to "keep" or "govern" it, with the aim of "hand[ing] it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly"? By reoccupying Gaza, however, Israel would inherit all the responsibilities of an occupying power – responsibilities it currently refuses to assume in areas under its control, at the cost of a terrible humanitarian disaster. As for the "Arab forces" cited by the prime minister, they exist only in his imagination: which Arab country would willingly throw itself into such a quagmire to serve as a proxy for Israel? Dissuading Netanyahu The strategic relevance of an occupation is equally questionable. In a country – Israel – where the army forms the backbone of the state and where major decisions are traditionally made jointly by military and political leaders, Netanyahu's decision to override the formal opposition of the top military hierarchy – who warned him about the dire consequences of an occupation both for the hostages and over questions of responsibility, military losses and the exhaustion of reservists – marks a deep rupture. While opinion polls show that Israelis prioritized freeing the hostages and rejected further military escalation, nations concerned both for the fate of Palestinians and for Israel's security must do everything in their power to dissuade Netanyahu from carrying out his plan. France "firmly condemned" the Israeli government's plan for Gaza, and Germany, traditionally very discreet, announced the suspension of its arms exports that Israel could use in Gaza. But only truly coordinated political sanctions targeting the ruling coalition in Jerusalem could halt Netanyahu's march toward the abyss.


France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Kyiv won't give up land, says Zelensky as US-Russia summit confirmed
Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the far-north US state of Alaska, near Russia, on August 15, to try to resolve the three-year conflict, despite multiple warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of the negotiations. Announcing the summit on Friday, Trump said that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Ukraine and Russia, without providing further details. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," Zelensky said on social media hours later. "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace. They will achieve nothing," he said, adding that the war "cannot be ended without us, without Ukraine". Three rounds of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit, and it remains unclear whether a summit would bring peace any closer. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes. Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire. Zelensky said Kyiv was "ready for real decisions that can bring peace" but said it should be a "dignified peace", without giving details. The former KGB officer in power in Russia for over 25 years has also ruled out holding talks with Zelensky at this stage. Ukraine's leader has been pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. Far away from war The summit in Alaska, which Russia sold to the United States in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. This was just nine months before Moscow sent troops to Ukraine. Zelensky said of the location that it is "very far away from this war, which is raging on our land, against our people". The Kremlin said the choice was "logical" because the state close to the Arctic is on the border between the two countries, and this is where their "economic interests intersect". Moscow has also invited Trump to pay a reciprocal visit to Russia later. Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January. On Friday, Putin held a round of calls with allies, including China and India, in a diplomatic flurry ahead of the summit with Trump, who has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace in Ukraine without making a breakthrough. The US president has earlier imposed an additional tariff on India for buying Russia's oil in a bid to nudge Moscow into talks. He also threatened to impose a similar tax on China, but so far has refrained from doing so. Away from the talks, across the more than 1,000-kilometre (600-mile) frontline, Russia and Ukraine continued pouring dozens of drones on each other in an overnight exchange of attacks on Saturday.


Euronews
10 hours ago
- Euronews
European leaders criticise Israel's Gaza City takeover decision
European and world leaders have criticised Israel's decision to seize control of Gaza City, warning the move risks exacerbating the already catastrophic humanitarian crisis in the Strip, and culminating in Germany's decision to suspend its exports of weapons that could be used in Gaza. The Israeli security cabinet approved the controversial plan early Friday, marking a new escalation in the country's nearly two-year-long war against Hamas. The announcement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office came after hours of debate among senior security officials. The decision to move into Gaza City was made in light of Netanyahu's earlier suggestions that the military would "take control of all Gaza," but also his claim that Israel had no intention of occupying the Strip permanently. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's decision not to authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza "until further notice" marked a break from the Staatsräson, a cornerstone of German foreign policy, which sees Israel's security as intrinsically linked to Germany's national interest. "The new military push agreed by the Israeli security cabinet makes it increasingly unclear how these goals are to be achieved,' Merz posted on X. 'The German government will, until further notice, authorise no military equipment exports that can be used in the Gaza Strip.' Merz added that with Netanyahu's planned offensive, 'the Israeli government bears even more responsibility than before for ensuring that civilians can be provided with the supplies they need,' and should 'refrain from taking any further steps towards an annexation of the West Bank.' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the Israeli security cabinet's decision in strong terms, stating: 'Israel's decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong and we urge it to reconsider immediately.' 'This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed,' Starmer said in a statement. 'What we need is a ceasefire, a surge in humanitarian aid, the release of all hostages by Hamas and a negotiated solution.' Starmer added that Hamas 'can play no part in the future of Gaza and must leave as well as disarm.' The UK, he said, is working with allies on a long-term strategy to establish peace in the region 'as part of a two-state solution.' Israel asked to 'reconsider' The comments were echoed with even more intensity by other European politicians who made clear that the takeover of Gaza would further aggravate the current humanitarian disaster in the strip and that a ceasefire would be the only way to end the ongoing war with Hamas. Spain's foreign affairs minister, socialist José Manuel Albares, strongly condemned the decision to take over Gaza, which would "only provoke more destruction and suffering', he said. His Dutch counterpart Caspar Veldkamp, a member of the centre-right New Social Contract, called Netanyahu's plan to take over Gaza a "wrong move'. 'The humanitarian situation is catastrophic and demands immediate improvement,' Veldkamp posted on X. "This decision in no way contributes to this and will also not help to get the hostages home.' Slovenia's Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon "strongly' condemned the Israeli plans and urged Israel "to halt any intention or attempt to militarily occupy Gaza'. "Any such attempts would further aggravate the already untenable humanitarian conditions. An immediate and permanent ceasefire is needed," she said. Finland's Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen echoed those concerns, stating she was 'extremely worried' about the worsening humanitarian conditions in Gaza. 'We hope for an immediate Gaza ceasefire and the immediate release of Israeli hostages,' she said. A more measured reaction came from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who called on the Israeli government to "reconsider' its decision to expand its military operation in Gaza. Von der Leyen made clear that the priority was the "release of all hostages, who are being held in inhumane conditions', give "immediate and unhindered' humanitarian aid to Gaza, and establish a ceasefire. In turn, European Council President António Costa reacted strongly to Netanyahu's takeover plan, urging the 27-member bloc to take action. According to Costa, Israel's decision alongside 'the illegal expansion of settlements in the West Bank, the massive destruction in Gaza, the blockade of humanitarian aid, and the spread of famine,' is contrary to international law and 'violates' the agreement reached by the EU last month to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. "Such a decision must have consequences for EU-Israel relations, to be assessed by the Council," Costa concluded. US President Donald Trump commented earlier this week that the decision was 'really up to Israel' and blamed Hamas for stalling negotiations. "They didn't really want to make a deal," he said. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk slammed the move, saying: 'The Israeli government's plan for a complete military takeover of the occupied Gaza Strip must be immediately halted.' 'It runs contrary to the ruling of the International Court of Justice that Israel must bring its occupation to an end as soon as possible, to the realisation of the agreed two-state solution and to the right of Palestinians to self-determination,' he added. 'Declaration of a war crime' Reactions within Israel were divided. Opposition leader Yair Lapid denounced the government's plan, saying it went against the advice of military leadership. "The plan is completely contrary to the position of the military and the defence establishment, without taking into consideration the burnout and the exhaustion of the combat troops," he said. Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir warned earlier on Thursday that the plan would endanger the lives of the hostages and further stretch the military. Zamir has repeatedly clashed with the security cabinet in recent days, notably over the Gaza proposal. Prior to the security cabinet session on Thursday, Netanyahu denied Israel had any intentions of permanently controlling Gaza in its entirety. "We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter," the Israeli leader told Fox News. "We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body." He said that Israel intends to hand over the Strip to a coalition of Arab forces that would govern it. The announcement comes as humanitarian organisations continue to warn of severe conditions in Gaza, where widespread hunger and displacement are mounting daily. The ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza has displaced nearly the entire population of Gaza, destroyed over 60% of the enclave's buildings and infrastructure, and brought most of its 2 million residents to the brink of famine. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking 251 hostage. Fifty hostages are still being held, although fewer than half of them are believed to be alive. Israel's subsequent offensive resulted in the deaths of over 60,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry, whose figures do not distinguish between fighters and civilians. The Israeli military says nearly 900 of its soldiers have died since the start of the war.