logo
Mexico says 26 capos extradited to US were requested by Trump administration

Mexico says 26 capos extradited to US were requested by Trump administration

Independent16 hours ago
Mexico sent 26 alleged cartel figures to face justice in the United States because the Trump administration requested them and Mexico did not want them to continue running their illicit businesses from Mexican prisons, officials said Wednesday.
The mass transfer was not, however, part of wider negotiations as Mexico seeks to avoid higher tariffs threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump, they said.
'These transfers are not only a strategic measure to ensure public safety, but also reflect a firm determination to prevent these criminals from continuing to operate from within prisons and to break up their networks of influence,' Mexican Security Minister Omar García Harfuch said in a news conference on Wednesday.
The 26 prisoners handed over to American authorities on Tuesday included figures aligned with the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel among others. They were wanted by American authorities for their roles in drug trafficking and other crimes. It comes months after 29 other cartel leaders were sent to the U.S. in February.
In the exchange, the U.S. Justice Department promised it would not seek the death penalty against any of the 55 people included in the two transfers, which experts say may help avoid any violent outburst by the cartels in response. Authorities said the operation involved nearly a thousand law enforcement officers, 90 vehicles and a dozen military aircraft.
Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said earlier Wednesday that the transfers were 'sovereign decisions,' but the move comes as the Mexican leader faces mounting pressure by the Trump administration to crack down on cartels and fentanyl production.
García Harfuch also confirmed Wednesday that a U.S. government drone — non-military — was flying over central Mexico, but at the request of Mexican authorities as part of an ongoing investigation.
So far, Sheinbaum has tried to show the Trump administration a greater willingness to pursue the cartels than her predecessor — a change that has been acknowledged by U.S. officials — and continued to slow migration to the U.S. border, in an effort to avoid the worst of Trump's tariff threats. Two weeks ago, the two leaders spoke and agreed to give their teams another 90 days to negotiate to avoid threatened 30% tariffs on imports from Mexico.
'Little by little, Mexico is following through with this demand by the Americans to deliver drug capos," said Mexican security analyst David Saucedo. "It's buying (the Mexican government) time."
Saucedo said the Mexican government has been able to avoid a burst of violence by cartels – a reaction often seen when capos are captured – in part, because Ovidio Guzmán, a son of infamous capo Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, showed it's possible to negotiate with U.S. prosecutors. Ovidio Guzmán pleaded guilty last month to drug trafficking and other charges and hopes for a lighter sentence in exchange for his cooperation.
But Saucedo warned that if such mass prisoner transfers continue, the Latin American country is bound to see another outburst of violence in the future.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer and Zelensky meet for last minute crunch talks just hours before Trump & Putin's high-stakes Alaska summit
Starmer and Zelensky meet for last minute crunch talks just hours before Trump & Putin's high-stakes Alaska summit

The Sun

timea few seconds ago

  • The Sun

Starmer and Zelensky meet for last minute crunch talks just hours before Trump & Putin's high-stakes Alaska summit

SIR Keir Starmer hugged Volodmyr Zelensky in Downing Street today on the eve of the high-stakes Alaska summit. The display of unity came ahead of tomorrow's showdown between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin on the future of Ukraine. 3 3 Hopes of a breakthrough to end the war are rising after the US President threw his weight behind trying to secure a ceasefire. But the British PM today assured the Ukrainian leader he will stand by him for as long as it takes to secure a 'just and lasting peace'. After a long embrace outside No10, the pair held talks over a private breakfast to discuss tomorrow's summit. A Downing Street spokesperson said: 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine. 'They then looked ahead to tomorrow's talks between President Trump and President Putin in Alaska, which present a viable chance to make progress as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious about peace.' President Zelensky later said the meeting was 'productive' to 'coordinate our positions'. It followed a call between European leaders and President Trump yesterday to lay down some red lines for tomorrow's Alaska talks. The 'Coalition of the Willing' countries led by Britain and France last night vowed to ratchet up economic sanctions if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire on Friday. They also demanded a 'lasting and significant cessation of hostilities', no chance to Ukraine's borders by force, and 'robust' security guarantees for Ukraine. Western leaders including the PM have said their troops stand ready to be deployed to Ukraine to keep the peace, and that there are 'no limitations' on their numbers. The Kremlin today confirmed the Trump-Putin meeting will start at 8.30pm UK time and see the two strongmen spend time alone. They will then hold a press conference afterwards where the world will see if progress has been made. Mr Trump has called the summit a 'feel out' meeting where he will see if Putin is serious about ending the fighting. He said a second meeting between Zelensky and Putin would hopefully be more productive. The Ukrainian President is not attending tomorrow's talks due to the gulf in differences between him and the Kremlin despot. He has previously balked at suggestions by the White House that he should be forced to concede territory as a price of a ceasefire. 3

First Thing: Trump says he'll seek ‘long-term' control of DC police
First Thing: Trump says he'll seek ‘long-term' control of DC police

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

First Thing: Trump says he'll seek ‘long-term' control of DC police

Good morning. Donald Trump has said he plans to ask Congress for 'long-term' control of Washington DC's police department and signaled that he expects other US cities to change their laws in response to his deployment of national guard troops and federal agents into the capital. In an unprecedented move, Trump this week invoked a clause that allows a 30-day federal takeover of the police department, but will need Congress's permission to extend it beyond this timeframe. Despite Congress being out of session, the president said he expected to propose the legislation 'very quickly', before alluding to other plans to secure the extension, saying: 'If it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress'. 'We're going to go for statutes in DC and then ultimately for the rest of the country, where that's not going to be allowed,' Trump said, singling out Democrat-led cities such as New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. Why the takeover? The administration argues it's necessary to fight what Trump has called an 'out of control' crime problem – a crisis that the city's leaders say does not exist. More on that below. Vladimir Putin will face 'very severe consequences' unless he agrees to a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine when he meets with Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, the president has said. Trump said that if the summit went well, he would push for a second meeting which would include Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, adding that he 'would like to do it almost immediately' but gave no concrete timeframe. He made the comments after a call with Zelenksyy and other European leaders, in which he reassured them that a truce was his priority and he would not make any territorial concessions without Kyiv's full involvement. What are European leaders calling for? The UK, France and Germany have repeatedly said negotiations can only begin in earnest with a ceasefire in place. They called for Russia to face further sanctions if it does not agree to a truce at the summit. More than 115 scholars have condemned the cancellation of an entire issue of a prestigious academic journal dedicated to Palestine by a Harvard University publisher as 'censorship'. In an open letter published Thursday, they condemned the sudden cancellation of a special issue of the Harvard Educational Review – which was first revealed by the Guardian in July – as an 'attempt to silence the academic examination of the genocide, starvation and dehumanisation of Palestinian people by the state of Israel and its allies'. Why was it canceled? The journal's publisher acknowledged to editors that it was seeking legal reviews out of concern that the publication would trigger antisemitism claims, according to an editor. Donald Trump has signed an executive order that aims to downgrade environmental rules for commercial spaceship companies, in a move that appears to benefit Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. The father of a New Zealand woman who has been detained by US immigration authorities for three weeks with her six-year-old son is hopeful they will be freed this week. Israeli strikes on a Tehran prison in June killed scores of inmates, visitors and staff in what Human Rights Watch (HRW) has labeled an 'apparent war crime'. In order to feed a growing human population, agricultural output will need to rise by 50% in the next 25 years, the journalist Michael Grunwald estimates in his new book, We Are Eating the Earth. Doing this without wiping out biodiversity and ramping up global heating will be a momentous challenge. 'Feeding the world without frying it' looks to be even tougher than ending the age of fossil fuels, Grunwald argues. In 1992, the death of a staffer for Senator Richard Shelby led the senator to introduce legislation to legalize the death penalty. The incident has similar qualities to the events leading up to Donald Trump's decision to take over Washington DC and deploy the national guard, after a Doge staffer was assaulted. But there's a big difference between DC then and now. Violent crime is at a 30-year low: in 1991, it had recorded 482 murders, earning it infamy as the US's murder capital. By contrast, there were 187 homicides in 2024 and the city looks set to record a lower number this year. Fred Frommer examines the period in the district's history. 'No country is safe from climate change', scientists have warned after Nordic countries endured a dangerous heatwave in July. Despite their typically cool climates, Norway, Sweden and Finland were hit with soaring temperatures last month, including a record run of 22 days above 86C in Finland. In 2018, during the region's last major heatwave, 750 people died prematurely in Sweden alone, and scientists expect to see a similar toll once the data is processed. After three bizarre seasons, And Just Like That says it is finally wrapping up. The critically panned Sex and the City's spin-off was characterized by incoherence, with some viewers wondering if it had secretly been written by artificial intelligence. Despite functioning more like 'content' than TV, writer Lara Williams admits she was drawn to its anaesthetizing lull: 'And when it comes back, as I'm almost certain it will, I will feel much the same about it as Donald Trump does about Coca-Cola: I'll still keep drinking that garbage.' First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you're not already signed up, subscribe now. If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@

Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan
Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

Trump cuts to science research threaten his administration's own AI action plan

The Trump administration released 'America's AI Action Plan' last month with the goal of expanding US dominance when it comes to AI in order to maintain a global edge, especially over China. But Donald Trump's cuts to scientific research funding through federal agencies – including the National Intitute Health, the National Science Foundation, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Nasa – will undermine that goal and threaten the research environment that fostered the foundations of AI, experts in the field said. Mark Histed, chief of neural computation and behavior at NIH, said that while the effects of funding cuts on AI might not be obvious in the next year or two, they threaten 'the whole ecosystem that we have built around AI, that has been created by federal support'. 'What I see is an ecosystem, right? I see multiple different disciplines contributing different aspects to this process. I see academia playing a key role and industry playing a key role. And so as we look forward and we think about trying to advance AI, we need to be supporting that entire ecosystem,' Rebecca Willett, a computer science professor at the University of Chicago and faculty director of AI at the Data Science Institute, explained, echoing Histed. Histed and Willett both believe that AI simply would not exist in its current form without federally funded research, and offered a variety of AI technologies and companies that owe their development to federal funding. For example, self-driving cars rely on computer vision technology – federal funding has supported its development since the 1980s. Computer vision is the foundation for the vast majority of face and image recognition technologies. AlphaFold, which uses AI to help discover new medications, and Anthropic, which improves AI safety, including for the US Department of Defense, also exists thanks to federal support. AI research often takes cues from other realms of science, which in turn can help foster AI, so cuts to other disciplines will affect the intelligence's development. Histed points to the overlap between his field of neuroscience and AI. 'We're just at the beginning of understanding how networks of connected neurons create functions like memory and cognition. And if you look at a machine learning network or an AI network, that is also the case,' he said. Histed pointed out that federally funded research that brings these disciplines together has led to Nobel prize-winning work. Geoffrey Hinton and John Hopfield won the 2024 Nobel prize in physics for their work at the intersection of neuroscience and AI, and received support from the NSF. Trump's plan could also pose a threat to AI safety, which is essential to ensuring that AI is not only effective but that it operates within the boundaries of the law. The plan includes provisions to revise guidelines at the National Institute of Standards and Technology 'to eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change'. These are three of the most controversial aspects of AI, which has been demonstrated to show gender and racial bias in a variety of applications, including face recognition technology and popular applications like ChatGPT. A recent study found that ChatGPT advises women to ask for less money than men when prompted for advice about salary expectations. Histed says that the field of AI safety is also closely linked with neuroscience, because understanding how human neural networks create bias can also help us understand how AI networks create bias. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Trump's plan also calls for less red tape when it comes to building AI datacentres that can suck up huge amounts of energy. Willett said it was true that large-scale machine learning systems 'come at an enormous cost. It's a huge amount of energy, a huge amount of cooling.' But, she added, AI companies themselves should still want to reduce those costs regardless of what Trump's plan says. 'Not only do they have environmental impacts, but it's expensive for the companies that are running these systems. And so I think across the AI community, people are invested in trying to make these systems more efficient,' Willett said. Willett and Histed both say that the AI community will be under threat in the coming years if the federal government no longer funds their training at universities. Histed noted that the federally funded 'talent pipeline' is 'incredibly important', adding 'we train lots and lots and lots of people in neuroscience and related fields that are going directly to these tech companies. There's tons of overlap. All the people who are leading the technical side of the AI revolution have had contact with the academic world that trained them and is supported by US federal funding. 'One of the big ways in which tech companies benefit from universities is that we train students, right?' Willett said. 'And so they walk into these companies with cutting-edge skills that these companies need. And so right off the bat, I think universities are playing an essential role that's important to industry.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store